Gosain, Arun K.

Background: There remains significant uncertainty about the fistula rate following palate repair with the Furlow double opposing Z-plasty (Furlow DOZ) technique compared with a straight-line/mucosal incision with intravelar veloplasty (IVVP) technique. Moreover, the relative impact of technique and surgical skill on fistula incidence remains unclear. Methods: A prospective, observational study of cleft palate repair was conducted. Enrollment occurred at 18 U.S.-based cleft centers, including 64 cleft surgeons. The primary outcome was postoperative fistula. Results: Overall, 1219 participants underwent cleft palate repair, 1178 of whom presented for follow-up. Of these, 581 (49.3%) underwent palate repair with the Furlow DOZ technique, 483 (41.0%) with the straight-line/IVVP technique, and 114 (9.7%) with an alternative technique. The overall fistula incidence was 5.3% (62 of 1162 analyzed for fistula occurrence). The fistula incidence was significantly lower in the Furlow DOZ group (2.4% [14 of 564]) than in the straight-line/IVVP group (7.8% [37 of 427]), with a propensity score–weighted risk difference of 5.7% (95% CI, 1.6% to 9.9%; P = 0.007). The fistula incidence varied substantially among surgeons: the top quartile’s fistula rate was 0% (0 fistulas among 417 repairs), whereas the bottom quartile’s fistula rate was 18.9% (31 fistulas among 164 repairs). Conclusions: Fistula incidence following cleft palate repair was significantly lower when using the Furlow DOZ technique, compared with the straight-line/IVVP technique. The effect of surgical technique was smaller, however, than the variation observed between the top and bottom quartiles of surgeons. These findings suggest that changing surgical technique may lead to small changes in fistula incidence, but greater opportunities exist to improve outcomes by improving surgical skill.

Background: The American Board of Plastic Surgery has been collecting practice data on operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations since 2006, as part of its Continuous Certification program. Methods: Data on operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations from 2006 to 2014 were reviewed and compared with those from 2015 to 2020. National practice trends observed in these data were evaluated and reviewed alongside published literature and evidence-based medicine. Results: In total, 780 patients with flexor tendon laceration injuries were included. Mean patient age was 38 years; mean time between tendon injury and first evaluation was 4 days, and the mean time from injury to operative repair was 12 days. Four-strand sutures remain the most common technique of tendon repair (57%). In the recent cohort, there were significant decreases in tourniquet use (94% versus 89%), general anesthesia (88% versus 74%), and monofilament sutures (44% versus 35%), with a significant increase reported in preserving the A1 pulley (20% versus 29%). Postoperative movement was described as “almost full range of motion” or “good” in 70% of cases, and 74% of patients were satisfied with their results. Postoperative adverse events were reported in 26% of cases, with the most common complications being tendon adhesions (14%) and rupture (3%). Conclusions: Review of The American Board of Plastic Surgery tracer data for operative repair of flexor tendon lacerations establishes a framework by which surgeons can evaluate how their current practice aligns with that of their peers, and whether their practice patterns remain current relative to recommendations from evidence-based medicine.

Objective The present study was performed to identify factors that lead to a favorable outcome of postpalatoplasty velopharyngeal incompetence using the double-opposing Z-palatoplasty. Design A retrospective analysis was performed on 23 consecutive nonsyndromic patients who underwent secondary surgical management of velopharyngeal incompetence using a double-opposing Z-palatoplasty technique following primary, non-Furlow palatoplasty for overt cleft palate. Main Outcome Measures All subjects were evaluated preoperatively using a perceptual speech assessment scale, nasendoscopy, and videofluoroscopy. Inclusion criteria consisted of a velopharyngeal gap of 9 mm or less on phonation. Patients were followed with perceptual speech assessment for at least 1 year following secondary surgery. Results The perceptual speech assessment score for all patients decreased from 6.48 ± 2.26 (mean ± standard deviation; range, 3 to 11) to 1.90 ± 1.51 (range, 0 to 6) at 6 months or more postoperatively ( P < .0001). Of the 21 patients with follow-up data 1 year or more post–op, 16 (76%) achieved velopharyngeal competence and five (24%) had borderline competence. Preoperative assessment factors associated with compromised outcome included a large velopharyngeal gap of 7 to 9 mm, poor lateral wall motion of 40% or less, and an elevated perceptual speech assessment score. Conclusion Double-opposing Z-palatoplasty is a surgical technique that can be used successfully to correct velopharyngeal incompetence in selected secondary palatoplasty patients. This technique permits correction of velopharyngeal incompetence and restoration of the velopharyngeal mechanism irrespective of prior intravelar veloplasty and without accompanying loss in the nasal airway. Preoperative assessment can better identify those patients who are less likely to achieve velopharyngeal competence following double-opposing Z-palatoplasty alone.