Berens, Michael E.

Abstract While genomic profiling and therapeutic selection support individualized GBM treatment, such therapeutic decision-making is usually made with reference to tumor obtained from the enhancing core region. GBM is known to be heterogeneous and exhibits a high resistance to standard therapies. To address whether non-enhancing tumor (representing the majority of tumor left behind after surgery) shows distinct genomic characteristics and therapeutic targets compared to the enhancing tumor core, we performed genome-wide exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing for 12 patients with matched enhancing region and at least one non-enhancing region. Non-enhancing biopsies show a surprisingly high level of tumor content, with a median of 28% tumor cells and 6 of the 22 samples having greater than 50% tumor cells. Cognate non-enhancing and enhancing specimens demonstrated overall concordance in therapeutically actionable alterations (single nucleotide variants) and copy number alterations. However, non-enhancing regions were not genetically identical and did reveal additional and distinct variants compared to enhancing cores. For example, the non-enhancing region of patient 1 showed two nonsense NF1 mutations (R1534X; R2517X) while the enhancing region showed an NF1 frameshift mutation (F1247fs). Clonality analysis by LumosVar also indicated that 7 out of 12 patients harbored dissimilar cellular prevalence patterns between enhancing and non-enhancing regions. In addition, comparison of alternative polyadenylation between enhancing and non-enhancing regions uncovered distinct 3' UTR usage: e.g. SGMS2 and TOB1 tended to have longer 3' UTR in enhancing regions whereas longer 3' UTR of SYNPO and NOS1AP were prevalent in non-enhancing regions. We posit that the enhancing component of glioblastoma probably underrepresents the genomic alterations in patients' tumors. Given non-enhancing tumor is left behind after surgical debulking, genomic profiling of this region would potentially reveal more accurate tumor vulnerabilities and lead to more effective therapy. Supported by a grant from the Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation. Citation Format: Sen Peng, Rebecca Halperin, Harshil Dhruv, Sara Byron, Christophe Legendre, Joanna Phillips, Michael Prados, Michael Berens, Nhan Tran. Probing the non-enhancing component of glioblastoma: Targeting what is left behind [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 289.

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma is an aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous cancer with few effective treatment options. We hypothesized that next-generation sequencing can be used to guide treatment recommendations within a clinically acceptable time frame following surgery for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective genomics-informed feasibility trial in adults with recurrent and progressive glioblastoma. Following surgical resection, genome-wide tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing were performed to identify molecular targets for potential matched therapy. A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board issued treatment recommendations based on the genomic results, blood–brain barrier penetration of the indicated therapies, drug–drug interactions, and drug safety profiles. Feasibility of generating genomics-informed treatment recommendations within 35 days of surgery was assessed. Results: Of the 20 patients enrolled in the study, 16 patients had sufficient tumor tissue for analysis. Exome sequencing was completed for all patients, and RNA sequencing was completed for 14 patients. Treatment recommendations were provided within the study's feasibility time frame for 15 of 16 (94%) patients. Seven patients received treatment based on the tumor board recommendations. Two patients reached 12-month progression-free survival, both adhering to treatments based on the molecular profiling results. One patient remained on treatment and progression free 21 months after surgery, 3 times longer than the patient's previous time to progression. Analysis of matched nonenhancing tissue from 12 patients revealed overlapping as well as novel putatively actionable genomic alterations. Conclusions: Use of genome-wide molecular profiling is feasible and can be informative for guiding real-time, central nervous system–penetrant, genomics-informed treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 295–305. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Wick and Kessler, p. 256

Abstract Glioblastoma (GB) is the highest grade and most common form of primary adult brain tumors. Despite surgical removal followed by concomitant radiation and chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide, GB tumors develop treatment resistance and ultimately recur. Impaired response to treatment occurs rapidly, conferring a median survival of just fifteen months. Thus, it is necessary to identify the genetic and signaling mechanisms that promote tumor resistance to develop targeted therapies to combat this refractory disease. Previous observations indicated that SGEF (ARHGEF26), a RhoG-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), is overexpressed in GB tumors and plays a role in promoting TWEAK-Fn14–mediated glioma invasion. Here, further investigation revealed an important role for SGEF in glioma cell survival. SGEF expression is upregulated by TWEAK-Fn14 signaling via NF-κB activity while shRNA-mediated reduction of SGEF expression sensitizes glioma cells to temozolomide-induced apoptosis and suppresses colony formation following temozolomide treatment. Nuclear SGEF is activated following temozolomide exposure and complexes with the DNA damage repair (DDR) protein BRCA1. Moreover, BRCA1 phosphorylation in response to temozolomide treatment is hindered by SGEF knockdown. The role of SGEF in promoting chemotherapeutic resistance highlights a heretofore unappreciated driver, and suggests its candidacy for development of novel targeted therapeutics for temozolomide-refractory, invasive GB cells. Implication: SGEF, as a dual process modulator of cell survival and invasion, represents a novel target for treatment refractory glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Res; 14(3); 302–12. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The Mayo Clinic has developed a large panel of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) from patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Here we report initial molecular profiling of the Mayo PDX panel and a comparison of patient and PDX molecular profile and response to therapy. METHODS & MATERIALS Clinical data was retrieved by retrospective chart review. Animal data from all PDX investigations conducted between 2004-2014 were retrieved from experimental logs and subsequently consolidated into a database for analysis. RESULTS From 1999 to 2014, 182 patient tumor samples of varying histological grades were attempted for xenograft with 73 resulting viable PDX lines. Viable xenografts were only produced from WHO grade IV tumor specimens, yielding an overall success rate of 49% for these tumors. GBM patients that produced viable xenografts compared to those that did not exhibited a trend for decreased overall survival (P = 0.18). There was no significant association between successful xenografting and whether tissue was from newly diagnosed (45/93%) or recurrent (20/40; 50%) tumors. Patient age > 45 at diagnosis was correlated with increased PDX viability in GBMs (p = 0.05). Of the viable PDX models analyzed, EGFR mutation was identified in 17 lines, TERT mutation was found in 13 lines, IDH mutation in 1 line, and MGMT hypermethylation in 25 lines. RNAseq was performed on orthotopic tumor samples from 53 PDX models. After excluding contaminating murine sequence reads, expression analysis demonstrated 32 models with a mesenchymal phenotype. Array comparative genomic hybridization was performed on 9 patient samples and derivative early, mid and late passage PDX tumors. Using unbiased hierarchical clustering, there was a high concordance between patient and xenograft models. Within the PDX panel, fractionated radiation (RT) alone and RT combined with temozolomide (TMZ) was tested in orthotopic tumors in 38 lines. The overall median survival benefit (ratio of median survival for treated vs. placebo) in PDX lines treated with RT only was 1.6 (range: 0.9-2.5) and with RT/TMZ was 2.5 (range: 1.1 - 8.9). There was a positive association between observed patient survival and the corresponding survival benefit in the PDX for subjects treated with RT/TMZ (r = 0.2; n = 17). Response to adjuvant TMZ was evaluated in 42 tumor lines, and response to bevacizumab was tested in 33 tumor lines, and correlations with clinical treatment response are being evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: The Mayo GBM PDX panel is widely used in the neuro-oncology community. The initial molecular analysis suggests a good correlation between patient and PDX at the level of genotypic characteristics and therapeutic sensitivity. Citation Format: Dioval A. Remonde, Brett L. Carlson, Mark A. Schroeder, Brock Armstrong, Sen Peng, Lisa Evers, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette Eckel Passow, Michael E. Berens, Nhan L. Tran, Robert B. Jenkins, Jann N. Sarkaria. Characterization of patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models to evaluate clinical and therapeutic responses of glioblastoma multiforme. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1468. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1468

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary tumor of the CNS and carries a dismal prognosis. The aggressive invasion of GBM cells into the surrounding normal brain makes complete resection impossible, significantly increases resistance to the standard therapy regimen, and virtually assures tumor recurrence. Median survival for newly diagnosed GBM is 14.6 months and declines to 8 months for patients with recurrent GBM. New therapeutic strategies that target the molecular drivers of invasion are required for improved clinical outcome. We have demonstrated that TROY (TNFRSF19), a member of the TNFR super-family, plays an important role in GBM invasion and resistance. TROY expression increases with glial tumor grade and inversely correlates with patient survival. TROY stimulates GBM cell invasion and increases resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation treatment. Conversely, knockdown of TROY expression inhibits GBM cell invasion, increases sensitivity to temozolomide, and prolongs survival in an intracranial xenograft model. Propentofylline (PPF), an atypical synthetic methylxanthine compound, has been extensively studied in Phase II and Phase III clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia where it has demonstrated blood-brain permeability and minimal adverse side effects. In this study, we demonstrated that PPF decreases TROY protein expression in glioma cells, and subsequently suppress activation downstream signaling effectors including AKT, NF-κB, and Rac1. PPF treatment of glioma cells also suppressed glioma cell migration and invasion, demonstrated by transwell migration assay and reduced membrane ruffling. Finally, PPF treatment increased vulnerability of glioma cells to Temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation. In summary, this study demonstrates that PPF provides a pharmacologic approach to target TROY to inhibit glioma cell invasion and reduce therapeutic resistance to TMZ and radiation. Citation Format: Harshil D. Dhruv, Serdar Tuncali, Alison Roos, Patrick Tomboc, Nathan Jameson, Ashley Chavez, Joseph Loftus, Michael E. Berens, Nhan L. Tran. Propentofylline inhibits TROY/TNFRSF19 signaling to enhance therapeutic efficacy in invasive glioblastoma cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 5366. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-5366

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal CNS malignancy in adults with a median survival of about 15 months. Effective therapeutic control of GBM is thwarted by the invasive nature of the tumor, which prevents complete surgical removal and results in tumor recurrence. Thus, there is a dire need to develop innovative approaches to target the invasive tumor cells for improved treatment of this disease. Expression of TROY, a member of the TNFR family, increases with glial tumor grade and inversely correlates with patient survival. Increased expression of TROY stimulates glioblastoma cell invasion and increases resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation treatment. We have demonstrated that TROY forms a novel complex with EGFR and modulates EGFR survival signaling. IHC analysis of GBM specimens showed that tumors with elevated TROY expression had a statistically positive correlation with increased EGFR expression. TROY expression enhanced EGFR phosphorylation, stabilized EGFR surface expression in the presence of ligand, and significantly increased EGF-stimulated GBM cell invasion. Consistent with invasion, co-expression of TROY with EGFR increased cell survival to TMZ. Moreover, we have shown that in cells treated with EGF, the TROY and ErbB4 receptor are recruited to the EGFR complex. Although the role of ErbB4 in GBM is not well defined, inhibition of ErbB4 expression suppressed tumor growth and invasion in multiple tumor subtypes, decreased EGFR surface retention, and limited EGF-induced cell migration. These data suggest that the TROY-EGFR-ErbB4 complex may represent an unappreciated therapeutic target to inhibit glioma invasion and decrease therapeutic resistance. Citation Format: Alison Roos, Zachary Mayo, Jean Kloss, Serdar Tuncali, Harshil Dhruv, Michael E. Berens, Joseph C. Loftus, Nhan L. Tran. TROY-EGFR signaling complex mediates glioblastoma cells invasion and survival. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 506. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-506

Abstract Deregulation of the TWEAK-Fn14 signaling pathway is observed in many diseases including inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and cancer, notably glioblastoma. Activation of Fn14 signaling by TWEAK binding triggers glioma cell invasion and survival and therefore represents an attractive pathway for therapeutic intervention. Based on structural studies of the TWEAK-binding cysteine rich domain of Fn14, several homology models of TWEAK were built to investigate plausible modes of TWEAK-Fn14 interaction. Two promising models, centered on different anchoring residues of TWEAK [Tyrosine 176 (Y176) and Tryptophan 231 (W231)], were prioritized using a data-driven strategy. Site-directed mutagenesis of TWEAK at Y176, but not W231, resulted in the loss of TWEAK binding to Fn14 substantiating Y176 as the anchoring residue. Importantly, mutation of TWEAK at Y176 did not disrupt TWEAK trimerization, but failed to induce Fn14 mediated nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) signaling. The validated structural models were utilized in a virtual screen to design a targeted library of small molecules predicted to disrupt the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction. 129 small molecules were screened iteratively, with identification of molecules producing up to 37% inhibition of TWEAK-Fn14 binding. One specific compound, L524-0366 binds specifically to the Fn14 receptor and disrupt TWEAK-Fn14 interaction. Treatment of L524-0366 suppresses TWEAK-induced cell migration and survival in glioblastoma cells. In summary, we present a data-driven in silico study revealing key structural elements of the TWEAK-Fn14 interaction, followed by experimental validation, serving as a guide for the design of small molecule inhibitors of the TWEAK-Fn14 ligand-receptor interaction. Our results provide the foundation for further exploration utilizing L524-0366 as a small molecule inhibitor to the TWEAK-Fn14 signaling axis. Citation Format: Harshil D. Dhruv, Joseph C. Loftus, Pooja Narang, Joachim L. Petit, Donald Chow, Holly Yin, Michael Berens, Nathalie Meurice, Nhan L. Tran. Identification and characterization of L524-0366 as a small molecule inhibitor that disrupt TWEAK-Fn14 signaling in glioblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 1780. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-1780