Kloss, Jean

Abstract IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant primary adult brain tumor, with a five-year survival rate below 5%. Despite maximal treatment, including surgical resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide (TMZ), recurrence is universal, driven by profound intratumoral heterogeneity, diffuse invasion, and therapy resistance. A hallmark of IDH-wildtype GBM is frequent alteration of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), including amplification (50%), the EGFRvIII deletion variant (25%), and extracellular missense mutations such as G598V and A289V (10–15%). These missense mutations increase ligand affinity and receptor activity, yet their downstream signaling consequences and role in shaping the tumor phenotypes remain poorly defined. Recent pathway-based subclassifications identified four subtypes in IDH-wildtype GBM. Notably, neuronal (NEU) and glycolytic/plurimetabolic (GPM) subtypes predominate the invasive tumor margins. NEU programs are enriched in synaptic and neurodifferentiation signals, while GPM programs are associated with metabolic adaptation, angiogenesis, and immune evasion. Here, we show EGFR-G598V and EGFR-A289V mutations differentially regulate these invasive subtypes identities. Transcriptional analysis reveals EGFR G598V upregulates metabolic and inflammatory pathways consistent with the GPM phenotype, while EGFR A289V activates genes involved in neuronal differentiation and synaptic function, aligning with the NEU subtype. Phosphoproteomics and kinase-substrate analysis further uncovered distinct kinases to be functionally activated/inhibited in EGFR A289V-expressing cells and G598V cells. Mechanistic studies revealed EGFR A289V induces sustained EGFR phosphorylation at Y992, activating PLCγ2 via the SRC-family kinase LCK. This cascade drives calcium release, CAMK1 activation, and STAT5 phosphorylation, defining a novel EGFR A289V–LCK/PLCγ2/CAMK1/STAT5 axis. In addition, Y1068 phosphorylation is also constitutively active in EGFR A289V, resulting in increased BRAF activation. In contrast, EGFR G598V activates MAPK6 and CAMK2 inducing AKT2 activation, reinforcing GPM-associated signaling. These findings uncover mutation-specific signaling networks that drive subtype fate in invasive GBM and highlight unique pathway(s) as tractable targets for subtype-directed therapy in EGFR-mutant GBM.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors contain a subpopulation of glioma stem cells (GSC) which can escape therapeutic effects through self-renewal and invasion. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common alteration in GBM (50%). One example includes extracellular domain missense mutations like G598V, A289V, and R108K (10-15%). These extracellular domain missense mutations increase ligand binding affinity, inducing a highly active receptor. Earlier reports have shown these EGFR missense mutations exhibit therapeutic resistance; however, the molecular mechanism of these missense mutations in GBM remains unknown. In this study, we show high oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) expression in GSCs with EGFR-G598V and EGFR-A289V missense mutations. OLIG2 is universally expressed in glioma and essential for reprogramming GBM cells into stem-like tumor cells. Here, we report GSCs with these point mutations display increased self-renewal, growth, invasion, and therapeutic resistance. In addition, EGFR-G598V and EGFR-A289V trigger distinct downstream signaling pathways in GSCs to regulate OLIG2 function. These missense mutation(s) also represent different pathway-based GBM subclassifications, where A289V induces a Neuronal subtype and G598V induces a Glycolytic/Plurimetabolic subtype. We hypothesize that GBM tumors harboring EGFR missense mutations (G598V, A289V) influence stem cell properties via multiple pathways to evade therapeutic effects and inhibiting these different signaling pathways will decrease therapeutic resistance in GBM. Understanding the mechanism of these EGFR mutations may lead to improved therapeutic strategies for GBM patients. Citation Format: Sidney Weaver, Aunay Miller, Mylan Blomquist, James McNamara, Keely Orndorff, Chris Sereduk, Jean Kloss, Joseph Loftus, Shwetal Mehta, Nhan L. Tran. EGFR missense mutation(s) induce OLIG2 expression to regulate glioma stem cells maintenance and therapeutic resistance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5444.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors contain a subpopulation of glioma stem cells (GSC) which can escape therapeutic effects through self-renewal and invasion. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are the most common alteration in GBM. EGFRvIII (deletion of exons 2-7) is observed in GBM (20-25%) resulting in a constitutively activated EGFR receptor. In addition, extracellular domain missense point mutations, (e.g. G598V, A289V, R108K) are observed in GBM (14.4%). These missense mutations in the EGFR extracellular domain also induces a highly active receptor by enhancing ligand binding. Earlier reports have shown that these EGFR missense point mutations have exhibited therapeutic resistance; however, the molecular mechanism of these missense point mutations in GBM remains unknown. Previous studies in our lab showed that EGFRvIII promotes GSC maintenance and therapeutic resistance via oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) signaling. OLIG2 is universally expressed in glioma and essential for reprogramming GBM cells into stem-like tumor cells. Increased OLIG2 expression promotes invasion, growth, proliferation, and survival. Here we report an increase in OLIG2 protein expression in GSCs harboring EGFR-G598V or EGFR-A289V mutations, suggesting these mutations may support stemness properties in GBM tumors. GSC expressing these point mutations display increased self-renewal, growth, and survival. In addition, EGFR-G598V and EGFR-A289V trigger distinct downstream signaling pathways in GSCs to regulate OLIG2 function. Hence, we hypothesize that GBM tumors harboring EGFR missense mutations (G598V, A289V) influence stem cell properties via multiple pathways to evade therapeutic effects and inhibiting these different signaling pathways will decrease therapeutic resistance in GBM. Understanding the mechanism of these EGFR mutations may lead to improved therapeutic strategies for GBM patients.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM), the most common primary brain tumor in adults, comprises all WHO Grade IV gliomas of astrocytic origin. Despite extensive characterization of the molecular and genetic features of GBM, there remains a paucity of viable treatment options, and this disease confers a dismal 5% 5-year survival rate. Genomic amplification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) occurs in 40-60% of primary GBM. Half of all EGFR-amplified cases of GBM also harbor EGFRvIII, a constitutively active, truncated variant of EGFR. EGFR and EGFRvIII transduce oncogenic signals via cytoplasmic mediators, including the JAK/STAT signal transduction pathway. The oncogenic role of STAT3 has been well-studied in CNS malignancies; STAT3 has been found to induce the expression of target genes involved in the proliferative and invasive phenotypes of GBM. However, little is known about the mechanism and role of STAT5 activation in GBM progression. Microenvironmental cues and EGFRvIII signaling, lost in adherent cell culture, are required for STAT5 activation, making STAT5 difficult to study by conventional cell culture methods. Our recent data from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) cultures demonstrates that activation of STAT5 is important in GBM cell invasion and survival. Further, STAT5 activation is present predominantly at the invasive periphery of the tumor. In this study, we seek to characterize the mechanism and role of STAT5 activation downstream of EGFRvIII in GBM. RNA sequencing of PDX tumors expressing stable shRNA knockdown of STAT3 or STAT5 indicate both redundant and distinct transcriptional changes induced by STAT3 and STAT5 in GBM. We also find that while STAT3 activation is dependent upon JAK1/2, STAT5 activation is JAK-independent downstream of EGFRvIII in GBM. Depletion of JAK1/2 expression by siRNA oligonucleotides and pharmacologic inhibition of JAK1/2 suppressed STAT3 activation but not STAT5. In fact, targeting JAK2 with kinase inhibitor WP1066 suppressed STAT3 activation, but increased activation of STAT5 in GBM cells expressing EGFR/EGFRvIII. Inhibition of Src family kinases (SFK), a family of upstream signaling effectors of the JAK/STAT pathway, attenuates both STAT3 and STAT5 activation. These results suggest that activation of STAT5 may provide a therapeutic escape mechanism to JAK-STAT3 inhibition in GBM, necessitating dual STAT3 and STAT5 inhibition to successfully inhibit the distinct oncogenic signals transmitted by STAT3 and STAT5 to promote GBM cell survival and resistance. Citation Format: Mylan Blomquist, Serdar Tuncali, Christopher Sereduk, Jean Kloss, Joseph Loftus, Nhan Tran. JAK-independent STAT5 signaling as a node of therapeutic vulnerability in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 101.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and deadly malignancy of the central nervous system in adults with a median survival of about 15 months after diagnosis. Its aggressive and highly infiltrative nature renders the current standard treatment of maximal surgical resection, radiation, and chemotherapy relatively ineffective. Identifying the molecular events that regulate GBM migration/invasion is required to develop more effective therapeutic regimens to treat GBM. Expression of TROY, an orphan receptor of the TNFR superfamily, increases with increasing glial tumor grade, inversely correlates with patient survival, stimulates GBM cell invasion in vitro and in vivo, and increases resistance to temozolomide and radiation therapy. Conversely, silencing TROY expression inhibits GBM cell invasion, increases sensitivity to temozolomide, and prolongs survival in a preclinical intracranial xenograft model. Thus, the TROY signaling pathway represents an attractive therapeutic target. We previously reported that increased TROY expression strongly activates NF-kB. We have identified for the first time that TROY forms a unique signaling complex with JAK1. Interaction with TROY stimulates phosphorylation of JAK1 and significantly increases the activation of STAT3. TROY specifically associates with JAK1 as it does not associate with other JAK family members. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis demonstrated that TROY interacts with JAK1 through its cytoplasmic domain as a TROY variant without its extracellular domain associates with JAK1 while a TROY variant without a cytoplasmic domain fails to bind JAK1. Luciferase reporter assay confirmed that full length TROY or a variant lacking the extracellular domain are able to induce STAT3 activation, but not a TROY variant lacking the cytoplasmic domain. Pharmacological inhibition of JAK1 by the FDA approved inhibitor ruxolitinib or knockdown of JAK1 by siRNAs significantly inhibited TROY-induced STAT3 activation and GBM cell migration. Together, our data indicate that the TROY-JAK1 complex represents an unappreciated therapeutic target to inhibit glioma invasion and decrease therapeutic resistance.

Abstract Glioblastoma is the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults and a highly lethal malignancy with a median survival of about 15 months. The aggressive invasion of the surrounding normal brain makes complete surgical resection impossible, increases the resistance to radiation and chemotherapy, and assures tumor recurrence. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop innovative therapeutics to target the invasive tumor cells for improved treatment outcomes of this disease. Expression of TROY (TNFRSF19), a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family, increases with increasing glial tumor grade and inversely correlates with patient survival. Increased expression of TROY stimulates glioblastoma cell invasion in vitro and in vivo and increases resistance to temozolomide and radiation therapy. Conversely, silencing TROY expression inhibits glioblastoma cell invasion, increases temozolomide sensitivity, and prolongs survival in an intracranial xenograft model. Here, a novel complex is identified between TROY and EGFR, which is mediated predominantly by the cysteine-rich CRD3 domain of TROY. Glioblastoma tumors with elevated TROY expression have a statistically positive correlation with increased EGFR expression. TROY expression significantly increases the capacity of EGF to stimulate glioblastoma cell invasion, whereas depletion of TROY expression blocks EGF stimulation of glioblastoma cell invasion. Mechanistically, TROY expression modulates EGFR signaling by facilitating EGFR activation and delaying EGFR receptor internalization. Moreover, the association of EGFR with TROY increases TROY-induced NF-κB activation. These findings substantiate a critical role for the TROY–EGFR complex in regulation of glioblastoma cell invasion. Implications: The TROY–EGFR signaling complex emerges as a potential therapeutic target to inhibit glioblastoma cell invasion. Mol Cancer Res; 16(2); 322–32. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is the most common tumor of the CNS with a median survival of approximately 15 months. The highly aggressive invasion of malignant cells into the surrounding normal brain tissue renders complete surgical resection impossible, increases therapeutic resistance, and virtually assures tumor recurrence. We have previously demonstrated that TROY (TNFRSF19) has an important role in GBM invasion and resistance. TROY expression is correlated with glial tumor grade and inversely correlated with patient survival. Increased TROY expression stimulated cell migration/invasion in vitro and in vivo and confers resistance to both ionizing radiation- and temozolomide-induced apoptosis via activation of Akt and NF-κB. These data indicate that TROY stimulated migration/invasion is associated with signaling pathways that also increase survival and therapeutic resistance, however, the mechanistic basis of this signaling remains unclear. To investigate the mechanism by which TROY induces GBM cell invasion, we performed immunoprecipitation of the TROY receptor coupled with MALDI-TOF and MS/MS analysis and identified PDZ-RhoGEF as a binding partner for TROY. We validated the interaction of TROY with PDZ-RhoGEF by immunoprecipitation and western blotting, and demonstrated that PDZ-RhoGEF can exchange for both RhoA and RhoC in glioma cells and is implicated in GBM cell invasion, proliferation, and survival. In order to assess the specific role of PDZ-RhoGEF in TROY signaling, we examined the effects of PDZ-RhoGEF on TROY-mediated activation of NF-κB. While overexpression of TROY alone strongly stimulated NF-κB transcriptional activity in serum-free conditions, increased expression of PDZ-RhoGEF alone had no effect on NF-κB activity. Co-transfection of PDZ-RhoGEF with TROY synergistically promoted NF-κB activation. Mutation of the TRAF binding domain (TBD) in the cytoplasmic domain of TROY abolished its capacity to activate NF-κB, even in the presence of PDZ-RhoGEF, suggesting that the TBD is important for TROY induced NF-κB activation. Furthermore, knockdown of PDZ-RhoGEF by shRNA attenuated NF-κB activation in TROY expressing cells, blocked TROY mediated invasion of primary GBM xenograft cells and increased sensitivity to temozolomide. Collectively, these data indicate that PDZ-RhoGEF plays an important role in TROY signaling and provides insights into a potential node of vulnerability to limit GBM cell invasion and decrease therapeutic resistance. Citation Format: Zonghui Ding, Alison Roos, Jean Kloss, Harshil Dhruv, Marc Symons, Nhan L. Tran, Joseph C. Loftus. PDZ-RhoGEF functions as a critical signaling effector for TROY [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1878. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-1878

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal CNS malignancy in adults with a median survival of about 15 months. Effective therapeutic control of GBM is thwarted by the invasive nature of the tumor, which prevents complete surgical removal and results in tumor recurrence. Thus, there is a dire need to develop innovative approaches to target the invasive tumor cells for improved treatment of this disease. Expression of TROY, a member of the TNFR family, increases with glial tumor grade and inversely correlates with patient survival. Increased expression of TROY stimulates glioblastoma cell invasion and increases resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation treatment. We have demonstrated that TROY forms a novel complex with EGFR and modulates EGFR survival signaling. IHC analysis of GBM specimens showed that tumors with elevated TROY expression had a statistically positive correlation with increased EGFR expression. TROY expression enhanced EGFR phosphorylation, stabilized EGFR surface expression in the presence of ligand, and significantly increased EGF-stimulated GBM cell invasion. Consistent with invasion, co-expression of TROY with EGFR increased cell survival to TMZ. Moreover, we have shown that in cells treated with EGF, the TROY and ErbB4 receptor are recruited to the EGFR complex. Although the role of ErbB4 in GBM is not well defined, inhibition of ErbB4 expression suppressed tumor growth and invasion in multiple tumor subtypes, decreased EGFR surface retention, and limited EGF-induced cell migration. These data suggest that the TROY-EGFR-ErbB4 complex may represent an unappreciated therapeutic target to inhibit glioma invasion and decrease therapeutic resistance. Citation Format: Alison Roos, Zachary Mayo, Jean Kloss, Serdar Tuncali, Harshil Dhruv, Michael E. Berens, Joseph C. Loftus, Nhan L. Tran. TROY-EGFR signaling complex mediates glioblastoma cells invasion and survival. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 506. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-506