Citations

Abstract Background Recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) is not uncommon. However, real-world long-term data on clinical outcomes of rhythm control strategies in patients with recurrent AF after CA remain limited. Methods Using the TriNetX database, we identified adult patients (≥18 years) with recurrent AF after index CA. A 3-month blanking period was applied, during which no rhythm-control therapy was received. Patients were classified into two groups: repeat CA or initiation of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure (HF) exacerbation, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding over 5 years. Results Among 4,056 patients with recurrent AF post-CA, 17.2% underwent repeat CA. After PSM, 697 patients in the repeat CA group (mean age 68.9 ± 9.6 years; 35.7% female) and 697 in the AAD group (mean age 68.4 ± 10.0 years; 37.6% female) were analyzed. Repeat CA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (3.3% vs 8.2%; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27–0.72; P < 0.01), all-cause hospitalization (42.8% vs 56.4%; HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; P < 0.01) and HF exacerbation (12.5% vs 24.8%; HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39–0.64; P < 0.01). No differences were observed in ischemic stroke (5.3% vs 4.7%; HR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77–1.96; P = 0.40) or major bleeding (4.6% vs 6.2%; HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52–1.29; P = 0.39). Conclusions Repeat CA was associated with lower mortality, hospitalization, and HF exacerbation over 5 years.

Abstract Background Emerging evidence suggests that premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) may influence atrial electrophysiology and remodeling, potentially leading to higher rates of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. However, existing data is limited to small-scale studies. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the potential association between PVCs and AF ablation outcomes, which may suggest the need for more aggressive management of ventricular ectopy in this population. Objective This study aims to assess the 5-year outcomes of catheter ablation for AF in patients with and without a diagnosis of PVCs. Methods Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent AF catheter between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2020. Patients were further categorized into two groups based on the presence of a diagnosis of PVCs. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed using patient demographics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), cardiac comorbidities, and medications. Study outcomes included all-cause mortality & hospitalization, acute heart failure (HF), and rhythm control interventions during a 5-year follow-up. Results A total of 15,987 patients with PVCs and 40,605 patients without PVCs were identified. After PSM, 15,152 patients from each group were included for further analysis. Compared to control group, patients with PVCs had significantly higher odds of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.138; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.034–1.253), all-cause hospitalization (OR, 1.300; 95% CI, 1.243–1.360), acute heart failure (HF) (OR, 1.223; 95% CI, 1.162–1.287), and cardiogenic shock (OR, 2.059; 95% CI, 1.751–2.420) following catheter ablation for AF at 5-year follow-up. Additionally, higher odds of AF requiring cardioversion (OR, 1.135; 95% CI, 1.074–1.199) or repeated ablation (OR, 1.164; 95% CI, 1.085–1.249) were observed in the PVCs group. Conclusion Premature ventricular contractions were associated with poorer clinical outcomes and a higher odds of requiring additional rhythm control intervention following catheter ablation for AF. These findings suggest that PVCs may be a marker for worse outcomes after AF ablation.

Abstract Background The incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus among young adults has been increasing over the past few decades. There are limited data on contemporary national cardiovascular mortality rates in young adults with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods We queried the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide‐Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database for patients aged 15 to 44 years from 1999 to 2019 in the primary analysis. A secondary analysis included data from 2020 to 2022 to examine the effect of the COVID‐19 pandemic. We analysed patients in whom cardiovascular diseases (CVD) were listed as the main cause of death and DM as a contributing cause of death. In calculating age‐adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100 000 individuals, we used CVD mortality in young adults with comorbid diabetes as the numerator and the overall population as the denominator. We determined temporal trends by estimating the average annual percent change (AAPC) using the Joinpoint regression program. Results Among 3 309 079 individuals aged 15–44 years who died, 30 978 deaths were due to CVD with comorbid DM listed as a contributing cause. The overall AAMR increased from 1.08 per 100 000 individuals in 1999 to 1.23 per 100 000 individuals in 2019, with an average APC of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.31–1.20). Compared with 1999, the percentage increase in CVD deaths in 2019 among young adults with comorbid DM was +6.2%, whereas a decrease of 19.9% was observed among those without comorbid DM. Males had a higher AAMR than females (1.60 vs. 0.97). Non‐Hispanic Black individuals and non‐Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native individuals had the highest AAMRs of 2.99 and 2.89, respectively. The AAMR was higher in rural regions compared to urban areas (1.63 vs. 1.23). The overall AAMR increased markedly from 1.23 in 2019 to 1.60 in 2022, with a similar pattern observed across demographic subgroups. Conclusion Our study reveals a rising trend in CVD mortality in young adults with DM as a contributing cause. Males, non‐Hispanic Black individuals, and individuals from rural regions had higher AAMR than their counterparts. This warrants the development of specific healthcare policies aimed at these at‐risk populations. Lay summary Our study shows that cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths are increasing in young adults with diabetes mellitus listed as a contributing cause.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

Background: Effective risk factor modification, including management of obesity and diabetes mellitus (DM), is essential to mitigating cardiovascular complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Given the growing use of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), large-scale studies are needed to assess their cardiovascular impact in patients undergoing HSCT. Methods: Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients who underwent HSCT and had DM or obesity. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: those who received GLP-1 RAs and those who did not. Outcomes, including all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), atrial fibrillation (AF), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), and heart failure (HF) exacerbation, were assessed at 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years follow-up. Cohorts were propensity score-matched based on medical comorbidities, transplant diagnoses, and conditioning regimens. Results: Of the initial 17,475 patients with HSCT and DM/obesity, 876 (5.0%, 46.0% females, mean age 58.4 +/- 11.3 years old) received GLP-1 RA and 16,599 (95.0%, 40.8% females, mean age 55.6 +/- 14.3 years old) did not. After propensity score matching, 873 patients were divided equally into each cohort (Table). GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality (1-year: odds ratio [OR]: 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.76; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.52; CI: 0.40–0.69; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.44; CI: 0.33–0.58; p<0.01), all-cause hospitalization (1-year: OR: 0.74; CI: 0.61–0.89; p<0.01; 3-year: OR: 0.66; CI: 0.55–0.79; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.72; CI: 0.59–0.87; p<0.01), and HF exacerbation (1-year: OR: 0.65; CI: 0.44–0.96; p=0.03; 3-year: OR: 0.59; CI: 0.43–0.81; p<0.01; 5-year: OR: 0.53; CI: 0.38–0.74; p<0.01), compared to the non–GLP-1 RA group. At 5-year follow-up, GLP-1 RA use was also associated with lower odds of AF (OR: 0.71; CI: 0.53–0.94; p=0.02). No significant differences were noted in AMI or CVA at 1-, 3-, and 5-years of follow-up. Conclusion: After propensity score-matching in this retrospective cohort study, GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly lower odds of all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, and heart failure exacerbation at 1-, 3-, and 5-year of follow-up in patients with DM/obesity who underwent HSCT. At 5 years, use of GLP-1 RA was associated with lower odds of AF.

e19515 Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is significantly higher in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to the general population. DM has been associated with worse outcomes in MM, including reduced overall survival and increased mortality. The impact of diabetes in patients with MM is further compounded by cardiotoxicity from proteasome inhibitors and the increased thromboembolic risk linked to immunomodulatory agents. Given the potential benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, we hypothesized that their use in MM patients with DM could improve clinical outcomes and mitigate adverse events in this population. Methods: We utilized the TriNetX network to identify patients (≥18 years old) with MM and DM between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2019. We categorized the patients into SGLT2 inhibitors users and SGLT2 inhibitors users. Inclusion in the SGLT2 inhibitors group required exposure to SGLT2 inhibitors for at least 1 year. 1:1 Propensity score matching was performed to match these two groups based on comorbidities, medications, baseline hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein, and left ventricular ejection fraction to produce two comparable cohorts. The study outcomes include all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), acute heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest over the 5-year follow-up duration. Results: A total of 43,078 patients were identified, including 3,640 SGLT2 inhibitors users and 39,438 non-SGLT-2 inhibitors users. After 1:1 propensity-score matching, there were 3,379 SGLT-2 inhibitor users (68.9 ± 10.3 years of age, 38.0% female, 23.9% African American [AA]) and 3,379 non-SGLT-2 inhibitor users (68.9 ± 11.0 years of age, 35.9% female, 22.2% AA). SGLT-2 inhibitors users were associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.30-0.39) and all-cause hospitalization (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.47-0.58). Lower odds of acute VTE (OR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.49-0.70), acute HF (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81-0.98), acute MI (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.95), cardiac arrhythmia (OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97), and cardiac arrest (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.44-0.74) were reported among SGLT-2 inhibitors users compared to non-SGLT2 inhibitor users. Conclusions: Our study revealed that only 8.4% of patients with DM and MM were prescribed an SGLT-2 inhibitor. Our study also demonstrated that SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with lower odds of all-cause mortality and hospitalization, reduced risk of VTE, and favorable cardiovascular outcomes in this patient population.