Tamirisa, Kamala P.

Abstract Background Recurrence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation (CA) is not uncommon. However, real-world long-term data on clinical outcomes of rhythm control strategies in patients with recurrent AF after CA remain limited. Methods Using the TriNetX database, we identified adult patients (≥18 years) with recurrent AF after index CA. A 3-month blanking period was applied, during which no rhythm-control therapy was received. Patients were classified into two groups: repeat CA or initiation of antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, all-cause hospitalization, heart failure (HF) exacerbation, ischemic stroke, and major bleeding over 5 years. Results Among 4,056 patients with recurrent AF post-CA, 17.2% underwent repeat CA. After PSM, 697 patients in the repeat CA group (mean age 68.9 ± 9.6 years; 35.7% female) and 697 in the AAD group (mean age 68.4 ± 10.0 years; 37.6% female) were analyzed. Repeat CA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (3.3% vs 8.2%; HR 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27–0.72; P < 0.01), all-cause hospitalization (42.8% vs 56.4%; HR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.61–0.82; P < 0.01) and HF exacerbation (12.5% vs 24.8%; HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.39–0.64; P < 0.01). No differences were observed in ischemic stroke (5.3% vs 4.7%; HR 1.22; 95% CI, 0.77–1.96; P = 0.40) or major bleeding (4.6% vs 6.2%; HR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.52–1.29; P = 0.39). Conclusions Repeat CA was associated with lower mortality, hospitalization, and HF exacerbation over 5 years.

Background: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) is the standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections. Data regarding the optimal timing of CIED reimplantation after TLE are not well established. Objective: This study aims to assess the 5-year outcomes of early (≤7 days) versus non-early (>7 days) CIED reimplantation following TLE for CIED infection using a multi-national database. Methods: Using the TriNetX Analytics Research Network, we included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent TLE for CIED infection between 1/1/2014 and 1/1/2020. Patients were further categorized into two groups: early CIED reimplantation (≤7 days from TLE) and non-early CIED reimplantation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed by including patient demographics, LVEF, cardiac comorbidities and medications. The study outcomes included all-cause mortality and cardiac adverse events during a 5-year study period. Results: A total of 1668 patients in the early CIED reimplantation group and 1550 in the non-early group were identified. After PSM, 1327 patients in each group were analyzed. Compared to non-early group, early CIED reimplantation group was associated with significantly higher odds of all-cause hospitalization (odds ratio [OR]: 1.837, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.532-2.203) and repeated device infection (OR: 1.569, 95% CI: 1.314-1.873) at 5-year follow-up. However, no significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (OR: 0.927, 95% CI: 0.778-1.104), HF exacerbation (OR: 1.021, 95% CI: 0.855-1.218), cardiac arrest (OR:0.924, 95% CI: 0.739-1.157), stroke (OR: 1.169, 95% CI: 0.915-1.494), cardiac thrombus (OR: 1.163, 95% CI: 0.749-1.808), major bleeding (OR: 1.079, 95% CI: 0.857-1.358) and venous thromboembolism (OR: 0.923, 95% CI: 0.759-1.123) between the two groups. Conclusion: Early reimplantation of CIED following TLE of infected devices was associated with worse outcomes in all-cause hospitalization and repeated device infection. Further large prospective studies are needed to define the optimal timing of device reimplantation.

AbstractBackgroundThe leadless Micra transcatheter‐pacing system (Micra‐TPS) is implanted via a femoral approach using a 27‐French introducer sheath. The Micra Transcutaneous Pacing Study excluded patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility and safety of Micra‐TPS implantation through an IVC filter.MethodsThis multicenter retrospective study included patients with an IVC filter who underwent a Micra‐TPS implantation. Data for clinical and IVC filter characteristics, preprocedure imaging, and procedural interventions were collected. The primary outcome was a successful leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation via a femoral approach in the presence of an IVC filter. Periprocedural and delayed clinical complications were also evaluated.ResultsOf the 1528 Micra‐TPS implants attempted, 23 patients (1.5%) had IVC filters. The majority (69.6%) of IVC filters were permanent. Six (26.1%) patients underwent preprocedural imaging to assess for filter patency. One patient's filter was retrieved before LP implantation. The primary outcome was achieved in 21 of 22 patients (95.5%) with an existing IVC filter. An occluded IVC precluded LP implantation in one patient. Difficulty advancing the stiff guidewire or the 27‐Fr sheath was encountered in five patients. These cases required repositioning of the wire (n = 2), gradual sheath upsizing (n = 2), or balloon dilation of the filter (n = 1). Postprocedure fluoroscopy revealed intact filters in all cases. During a median 6‐month follow‐up, there were no clinical complications related to the filter or the Micra‐TPS.ConclusionThis multicenter experience demonstrates the feasibility and safety of Micra‐TPS implantation via an IVC filter without acute procedural or delayed clinical complications.