Citations

ABSTRACT Venetoclax (Ven) plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) is standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed AML (ND‐AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy and is also considered in younger, fit patients. However, consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is often required to secure durable remission. The current study examines posttransplant outcomes in patients with ND‐AML treated with frontline Ven‐HMA who subsequently underwent ASCT. A total of 111 ND‐AML patients (58% male, 60% secondary/therapy‐related, median age 70 years [range, 37–80]) received a median of 3 cycles of Ven‐HMA. Mutations at the time of diagnosis included RUNX1 (18%), SRSF2 (17%), TP53 (16%), ASXL1 , IDH2 , K/NRAS , TET2 (14% each), STAG2 (11%), DNMT3A (8%). All patients were in CR/CRi at the time of transplant including 88% after Ven‐HMA. Measurable residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry was detectable in 18/76 (24%) patients. Donors were mostly HLA‐matched unrelated (75%); 51% receiving fludarabine/melphalan conditioning and 67% posttransplant cyclophosphamide. At a median follow‐up of 15 months, 42 (38%) of patients have died and 18 (16%) experienced posttransplant relapse. Median posttransplant survival was not reached (NR), with 1‐, 2‐, 3‐year survival rates of 69%/60%/57%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, STAG2 mutation ( STAG2 MUT ) , and DNMT3A MUT were associated with superior posttransplant survival. Patients were stratified into low‐ (0–1 point), intermediate‐ (2 points), and high‐risk (3 points); age < 65 years, STAG2 wild type, and DNMT3A wild type, with 3‐year survival rates of 89%, 59%, and 19%, respectively ( p < 0.01). Taken together, age, STAG2 MUT and DNMT3A MUT stratified posttransplant survival in Ven‐HMA treated patients with ND‐AML.

ABSTRACT The recently published BLAST clinical risk model for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and its molecular version (BLAST‐Mol) differentiate low, intermediate, and high‐risk groups. The objective of the current retrospective study was to examine the survival impact of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in a consecutive series of Mayo Clinic patients ( n = 775; 68% males, median age 71 years) with CMML, overall and adjusted for baseline BLAST/BLAST‐Mol risk categories. At a median follow‐up of 77 months, 151 (20%) patients underwent ASCT. Overall survival (OS) was longer in the ASCT compared to the non‐ASCT cohorts (median 77 vs. 28 months; p < 0.01). The significant difference in OS between the ASCT and non‐ASCT cohorts was retained after adjusting for BLAST clinical risk groups: high‐risk (median 50 vs. 14 months; p < 0.01), intermediate‐risk (81 vs. 28 months; p < 0.01), and low‐risk (111 vs. 65 months; p = 0.04), respectively. The same was mostly the case when OS comparison was adjusted for BLAST‐Mol with respective p values of < 0.01, < 0.01, and 0.08, respectively. Time‐dependent cox models confirmed the favorable survival impact of ASCT in the BLAST/BLAST‐Mol high‐ and intermediate‐risk groups. The current study highlights the benefit of ASCT for BLAST/BLAST‐Mol high‐ and intermediate‐risk groups in CMML and its potential to overcome the adverse impact of some high risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. These observations support the early use of ASCT in CMML, ideally before BT and regardless of genetic characteristics.

ABSTRACT We examined the prognostic value of routine NGS data in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive (7 + 3 backbone) induction, specified by AML subtype. A contemporary (2015–2025) series of 545 Mayo Clinic patients (median age 56 years, females 44%) was considered. Median follow‐up was 49 months with 341 (63%) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (AHSCT) recorded. AML subtypes included core‐binding factor (CBF; N = 72; 13%), primary non‐CBF ( N = 403; 74%), post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or post‐myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN; N = 28; 5%), post‐MPN ( N = 15; 3%), and therapy‐related (t‐AML; N = 27; 5%). Corresponding complete remission rates, with/without count recovery (CR/CRi), were 89%, 76%, 64%, 27%, and 78% ( p < 0.01) and 5‐year transplant‐censored survival rates 68%, 57%, 21%, 0%, and 55% ( p < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic value of specific mutations was mostly limited to primary non‐CBF AML where adverse karyotype (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) predicted inferior and FLT3 ‐ITD (OR 0.4; p < 0.01) or NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (OR 0.1; p < 0.01) superior CR/CRi while KRAS MUT (HR 8.8; p < 0.01), TP53 MUT (HR 5.4; p < 0.01), and TET2 MUT (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) predicted inferior and NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (HR 0.3; p = 0.01) superior survival. Prognostication in intensively‐treated AML should start with subtype specification and recognition of the limited value of NGS in non‐primary AML. Post‐MPN AML is particularly associated with dismal outcomes and should be prognostically distinguished from post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN AML. In primary non‐CBF AML, in addition to previously established risk factors, the favorable impact of FLT3 ‐ITD on achieving CR/CRi and the unfavorable impact of KRAS MUT and TET2 MUT on transplant‐censored survival were noted and require confirmation from additional studies.

6530 Background: Venetoclax (Ven) plus hypomethylating agents (HMA) is standard frontline therapy for newly diagnosed AML (ND-AML) patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy and is also being considered in younger and fit patients (Fathi, Blood 2025). However, consolidation with allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) is often required to secure durable remission. The current study examines predictors of post-transplant survival (PTS) in the particular scenario. Methods: ND-AML patients who received upfront Ven+HMA and underwent ASCT were retrospectively studied. PTS, relapse rate, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were evaluated. Results: 111 ND-AML patients (58% male, 60% secondary/therapy-related, median age 70 [37-80 years]) received median 3 cycles of Ven-HMA. 22% had complex karyotype. Mutations at diagnosis included RUNX1 (18%), SRSF2 (17%), TP53 (16%), ASXL1 , IDH2 , K/NRAS and TET2 (14% each), STAG2 (11%), DNMT3A (8%) and at time of ASCT (N=78 evaluable); RUNX1 (8%), NPM1 (6%), TP53 and ASXL1 (5% each), and SRSF2 and TET2 (4% each). At ASCT, all patients were in CR/CRi; 88% after Ven-HMA and 12% after additional bridging therapy. MRD by flow cytometry was detected in 18 (24%) of 76 evaluable patients and complex karyotype in 8 (9%) of 94. Donors were mostly HLA-matched unrelated (75%), with 51% receiving fludarabine/melphalan conditioning and 67% post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy). At a median follow-up of 30 months, 42 patients (38%) have died including 18 (40%) from relapse. Median PTS was not reached (NR) with 1-2-3-year survival of 69%/60%57%. On multivariate analysis, age ≥65 years (median NR vs 10 months p<0.01), STAG2 (NR vs 44 months; p=0.04), and DNMT3A mutations (NR vs.NR p=0.05) were associated with superior PTS. In analysis limited to variables at time of ASCT, age ≥65 years remained significant (p<0.01) while TP53 mutations, donor type, and MRD status were not (p>0.1). Patients <65 years more often received bridging therapy compared to ≥65 years (23% vs 7%; p<0.05); excluding salvage-treated patients did not change survival results. 18 patients (16%) experienced post-ASCT relapse with median RFS of 7 months. Relapse rates at 1/2/3 years were 22%, 30% and 31% and NRM 13%, 24%, 46%, respectively. Patients <65 years had a higher 1 yr relapse incidence than those ≥65 years (36% vs 18%; p=0.01), with similar NRM (p=0.58). PTCy was not associated with relapse (p=0.66) but showed a borderline association with higher NRM (1-/2-/3-year 17%/31%/58% vs 4%/7%/16% in non-PTCy recipients; p=0.06). GVHD rate was 44% (50% ≥grade 2) with no association with relapse (p=0.43) or NRM (p=0.99). Conclusions: In the current study, older age (>65 years), including >75 years, was independently associated with superior PTS in ND-AML patients receiving Ven-HMA. By contrast, PTS was not affected by genetic profile at the time of ASCT, donor type, conditioning regimen, or GVHD prophylaxis.

Abstract The comparative value of liposomal cytarabine/daunorubicin (CPX-351) versus venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) in the frontline treatment of older adults with primary ( de novo ) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. In the current study, we retrospectively examined outcomes of 600 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with CPX-351 (N = 112) or Ven-HMA (N = 488). AML subtypes included de novo (46%), post-myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (19%), post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (12%), post-MDS/MPN (6%), therapy-related (17%) and AML with myelodysplasia-related genetic abnormalities (AML-MR; 46%). Patients receiving CPX-351 were younger (median 65 vs. 73 years; p < 0.01), predominantly female (50% vs. 38%; p = 0.02), more likely to have secondary AML (68% vs. 51%; p < 0.01), and less likely to harbor NPM1 MUT (5% vs. 12%; p = 0.02). Rates of complete response with or without count recovery (CR/CRi) were comparable between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA (55% vs. 60%; p = 0.30), including in AML-MR (60% vs. 63%; p = 0.70). Ven-HMA use was associated with fewer infectious complications (62% vs. 83%; p < 0.01) and yielded higher CR/CRi rates in males (60% vs. 45%; p = 0.04), de novo AML (68% vs. 50%; p = 0.03), and in the presence of STAG2 MUT (86% vs. 44%; p = 0.02), or CEBPA MUT (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.03). Overall survival censored for transplant, was similar (median 10 vs. 13 months; p = 0.90), with Ven-HMA being superior in post-MDS AML (median 12 vs. 7 months; p = 0.02) and CPX-351 in the presence of SF3B1 MUT (not reached vs. 14 months; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that Ven-HMA is as effective and less toxic than CPX-351 in newly diagnosed AML, including AML-MR, despite selection of younger, fitter patients for CPX-351.

Abstract Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is widely used as frontline treatment in older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX-351) is FDA-approved for the treatment of secondary AML, including therapy-related (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MR). The current study aimed to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two treatment strategies to better inform clinical decisions. Methods The current retrospective analysis was performed under an institutional review board approved minimal risk protocol at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL). AML-MR gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities were categorized according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022;140:1200). Treatment response was assessed according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (Dohner et al. Blood 2022;140:1345). Overall survival (OS) analysis was censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 18.0.0). Results A total of 600 patients with newly diagnosed AML (ND-AML) treated with CPX-351 (N-112, 19%), or Ven-HMA (N=488, 81%) were included. AML subtypes included de novo (N=277, 46%), post-myelodysplastic syndrome (post-MDS, N=114,19%), post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (post-MPN, N=70, 12%), post-MDS/MPN (N=36, 6%), t-AML (N=103, 17%) and AML-MR (N=274, 46%). Compared with those treated with Ven-HMA, patients receiving CPX-351 were younger (median age 65 vs 73 years; p&lt;0.01), more likely to be female (50% vs 38%; p=0.02), more frequently diagnosed withsecondaryAML (68% vs 51%; p&lt;0.01), and less likely to have NPM1MUT (5% vs 12%; p=0.02) whereas ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk distribution was similar between the two (adverse risk; 43% vs 40%; p=0.5). Comparison of treatment response and survival Complete response rates with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery were similar between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA overall (55% vs 60%) as well as specifically in patients with AML-MR (60% vs 63%), adverse karyotype (44% vs 44%), NPM1MUT (100% vs 89%), TP53MUT(32% vs 45%), IDH1MUT (60% vs 76%), IDH2MUT (63% vs 77%), SF3B1MUT(71% vs 45%), and CBLMUT (33% vs 69%) [p&gt;0.05 in all instances]. Compared to those with CPX-351, CR/CRi rates with Ven-HMA were superior in males (60% vs. 45%; p=0.04) and in patients with de novo AML (68% vs. 50%; p=0.03), STAG2MUT (86% vs. 44%; p=0.02), or CEBPAMUT (88% vs. 50%; p=0.03); infectious complications were significantly more frequent with CPX-351 (83% vs 62%, p&lt;0.01). At a median follow-up of 12 months (range; 1-88), 416 (69%) deaths, 179 relapses (44% in CPX-351 and 52% in Ven-HMA responders) and 149 ASCTs (53% in CPX-351 and 18% in Ven-HMA) were documented. OS rates were similar between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA, in general (median 10 vs 13 months), as well as in patients with adverse karyotype, TP53MUT, IDH1MUT, and IDH2MUT (p&gt;0.05 in all instances). By contrast, OS was superior in Ven-HMA-treated patients with post-MDS AML (median 12 vs. 7 months; age-adjusted p=0.02) and in CPX-351-treated patients harboring SF3B1MUT(median not reached vs 14 months; age-adjusted p&lt;0.01). In addition, a borderline-significant OS advantage for CPX-351 was apparent in patients with PTPN11MUT (13.5 vs 8 months; p=0.08). Comparison in ICC defined AML-myelodysplasia-related CR/CRi and OS rates were comparable between patients treated with CPX-351 (N=57) or Ven-HMA (N=217), with response rates of 60% vs 63% (p=0.68) and median OS of 10 vs 14 months (p=0.61), respectively. However, OS was superior with Ven-HMA in patients with post-MDS AML (15 vs 8 months; age-adjusted p=0.02) and with CPX-351 in those with SF3B1MUT (NR vs 14 months; age-adjusted p=0.02). Conclusions: The current study suggests that Ven-HMA was as effective and possibly less toxic than CPX-351 for the treatment of ND-AML, including AML-MR, despite the bias for younger and fitter patients treated with the latter regimen. Observed differences involving patients with SF3B1MUT or post-MDS AML require validation in prospective studies and provide parameters for developing treatment-specific predictive models that will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia (KMT2Ar AML) is characterized by chromosomal translocation involving KMT2A gene at 11q23, resulting in fusion with variety of partner genes. It is usually associated with poor outcomes, high risk of relapses and suboptimal responses to conventional therapies. While NPM1-mutated (mt) AML is considered favorable risk, they are equally dismal in relapse refractory (RR) setting. Menin inhibitors have emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy, particularly in RR AML patients (pts) with KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt genotypes. While revumenib, a menin inhibitor approved for managing RR KMT2Ar acute leukemia, no menin inhibitor is currently approved for NPM1-mt AML. In this study, we evaluated clinical outcomes of adults with KMT2Ar AML and performed a comparative analysis of pts with RR KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt AML using data from the Mayo Clinic. Methods: After screening 102 AML pts with reported KMT2A abnormalities, we identified 33 adults with confirmed KMT2Ar diagnosed between 2012 and 2024 for retrospective analysis. Clinical and molecular/cytogenetics data, induction type (intensive chemotherapy [IC] vs non-intensive chemotherapy [NIC]), response, transplant use, and survival outcomes were reviewed. A separate analysis was performed comparing 20 RR KMT2Ar AML pts with 20 propensity score matched RR NPM1-mt AML pts from a pool of 125 NPM1-mt RR pts. Results: The median age was 50 years (yrs) (range [R], 19.0-75.0), and 60.6% were &lt; 60 yrs. Most cases were de novo AML (64%), and the most frequent translocation was t(6;11)(q27;q23)/MLLT4 (27%), followed by t(10;11)(p12;q23)/MLLT10 (21%), t(9;11)(p21.3;q23.3)/MLLT3 (15%), and t(11;19)(q23;p13.1)/ELL (12%). Other KMT2A fusion partners were rare and collectively accounted for the remaining cases. The median follow-up was 57 months (mo) (R, 7.0-109.0). The overall response rate (ORR) was 91%, and composite complete remission (CRc, , including CR, CRi, and CRh) was 73%. The CRc rates were comparable between IC and NIC (80% vs 62%, p=0.24). CRc were not significantly different by disease type (de novo [71.4%] vs secondary [sAML] [75%], p= 0.82) or KMT2A fusion partner gene (60% for t[9;11]/MLLT3 vs. 57.1% for t[10;11]/MLLT10 vs 55.6% for t[6;11]/MLLT4, p=0.069). Seventeen (52%) pts received an allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT). The median overall survival (mOS ) for the entire cohort was 16 mo (R, 11.0-34.0). In subset analysis, IC compared to NIC was associated with significantly longer mOS (30 vs 11 mo, p=0.014). The mOS was also superior in pts &lt;60 vs ≥60 yrs (32 vs 8 mo, p=0.005). Similarly, de novo cases had better mOS than sAML (22.0 vs 9.5 mo, p=0.052). Among KMT2Ar subtypes, t(6;11)/MLLT4 showed the longest mOS (54 mo [R, 30.0-not reached (NR)]), while t(9;11)/MLLT3 had the shortest (11.0 mo, [R 9-NR]), but differences were not statistically significant (p=0.32). The mOS was significantly longer among allo-HCT pts (30 vs 11 mo, p=0.005). Among 29 pts who experienced RR disease, the median relapse free survival (RFS) was 3 mo (R, 2.0-10.0). First salvage therapy yielded a CRc of 43.8% in 16 evaluable pts. When compared to a propensity matched cohort of 20 RR NPM1-mt AML pts, the CRc rates was 57.9% vs 50% in RR NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar AML (p= 0.68). The mRFS was not significantly different between RR KMT2Ar and NPM1-mt AML, (3 vs 4 mo, p=0.9). However, KMT2Ar pts had inferior mOS compared to NPM-mt AML (12 vs 65 mo, p=0.004). We further compared survival between NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar pts stratified by allo-HCT status. Among those who underwent allo-HCT, NPM1-mt pts had longer mOS (NR vs 22 mo, p=0.037). Among non-allo-HCT pts, mOS was numerically higher in NPM1-mt vs KMT2Ar (19 vs 8 mo, p=0.11). Conclusions: This single institusion cohort of adult AML with KMT2Ar underscores the biological and clinical heterogeneity of this high-risk group. IC was associated with a survival benefit, particularly among younger and fit patients. However, the outcomes following relapse remained poor, highlighting the urgent need for improved post-remission and salvage therapies. Comparative analysis with matched RR NPM1-mt AML pts revealed similarly dismal survival outcomes. Emerging data from single-arm studies of menin inhibitors in both frontline and RR settings among pts with NPM1-mt and KMT2Ar AML are encouraging and may represent a paradigm shift in treatment.

Abstract Background In patients with myelofibrosis (MF) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis has traditionally included a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) plus methotrexate (MTX). We conducted a retrospective study comparing the safety and efficacy of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based GVHD prophylaxis to CNI-based regimens. Methods This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic IRB. Patients with myelofibrosis who underwent allo-HCT after 2016 at Mayo Clinic in Arizona and Florida were included. Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Overall survival (OS) was defined from transplant to death, and progression-free survival (PFS) from transplant to relapse or death. OS and PFS were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; univariate differences were assessed with log-rank tests. The cumulative incidence of acute and chronic GVHD and time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment were analyzed using competing risk models, with death as a competing event; differences were tested using Gray's test. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs). Results A total of 110 patients were included. 53 patients received PTCy-based prophylaxis (43 PTCy/Tac/MMF, 1 PTCy/CSA/MMF, 9 PTCy/Siro/MMF), while 57 received non-PTCy regimens (54 Tac/MTX +/- 39 T-cell depletion, 2 CSA/MMF, 1 Tac/MMF). Median age at transplant was 63 (range: PTCy 40-76; others 38-74) years in both groups; 59 were male (58.5% PTCy vs 49.1% others). Median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and HCT–Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) in patients receiving PTCy vs non-PTCy were 90 vs 80 and 1 vs 3, respectively. Conditioning intensity was similar: 22.6% myeloablative vs 21.7%, and 77.4% reduced-intensity vs 76.7% in PTCy and non-PTCy, respectively (p=1.000). Stem cell source was peripheral blood in all patients except one in the non-PTCy group who received bone marrow. 58 patients had primary MF (54.7% PTCy vs 50.9% others), and 52 had secondary MF (45.3% PTCy vs 49.1% others), including essential thrombocythemia (28.3% PTCy vs 31.6% others), polycythemia vera (17.0% vs 15.8%), and MPN-NOS (0% vs 1.8%). Median follow-up was 26.2 months (95% CI: 20.7-52.7) in the PTCy and 60.6 months (95% CI: 53.1-70.6) in the non-PTCy cohort. CD3 and CD33 donor chimerism ≥95% at day +100 was 66.7% and 86.7% in PTCy vs 63.6% and 92.7% in others, respectively (p=0.50); day +100 driver molecular mutations were present in 32.1% of PTCy and 32.0% of others (p&gt;0.99). Rates of acute GVHD grades ≥2 and ≥3 were not statistically significant, in the PTCy group (37.7% vs 49.1% p=0.229 and 17.0% vs 22.8% p=0.445, respectively). Chronic GVHD (any grade) occurred in 42.3% of PTCy vs 38.2% of others (p=0.664), while moderate-to-severe cGVHD was lower with PTCy (21.2% vs 27.3% p=0.461). Platelet engraftment was significantly delayed in the PTCy group (median 33 vs 21 days, p=0.030). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was also delayed in the PTCy group (20 vs 17 days, adjusted p=0.025). Age-adjusted HR for time to platelet engraftment was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.41–0.90; p=0.014), and for neutrophil engraftment 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44–0.95; p=0.025), indicating significantly delayed hematopoietic recovery with PTCy. Graft failure occurred in 9.4% vs 5.3% (p = 0.48); primary 7.5% vs 3.5%, secondary 1.9% vs 1.8% in PTCy vs non-PTCy groups, respectively. Relapse or progression occurred in 11.3% of PTCy vs 17.5% of others (p=0.355); four patients in the non-PTCy group progressed to AML post-transplant, versus none in the PTCy group (p=0.119). 1-year TRM was 22.6% in the PTCy group and 14.0% in the non-PTCy group, p = 0.324. Median OS was 72.8 months in the PTCy group (95% CI: 49.9 months, upper limit not estimable [NE]) and 93.4 months in the non-PTCy group (95% CI: 48.5 months, upper limit NE), although the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.739). After adjusting for age and HCT-CI, there were no significant differences in PFS (adjusted HR 1.37; 95% CI: 0.73–2.56; p=0.331) or OS (adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI: 0.64–2.51; p=0.498). Conclusions In myelofibrosis patients undergoing allo-HCT, PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis showed similar rates of grade ≥2 acute and moderate-severe chronic GVHD compared to non-PTCy regimens. Engraftment was significantly delayed, while OS and PFS were comparable. PTCy appears to be a safe and viable alternative to CNI-based prophylaxis.

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only curative option in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). We retrospectively analyzed 138 CMML patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic. Patients who transitioned to ASCT while in chronic phase (Group A) displayed superior post-transplant survival (PTS), compared to those in whom ASCT was performed after blast transformation (BT; Group B) (median 95 vs. 16 months; p=0.01). In Group A, PTS was superior in patients with <5% bone marrow (BM) blasts at time of ASCT (median 164 vs. 13.5 months; p=0.01). Other predictors of superior PTS included day-100 BM blast <5% or normal cytogenetics (median 164 vs 18 months; p=0.01) or presence of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD; median 164 vs. 26 months; p=0.01). Pre-ASCT hypomethylating agent exposure (HR=2.03; p=0.03), and receiving more than one line of pre-ASCT chemotherapy (p=0.01) predicted inferior PTS. In multivariable analysis, predictors of superior GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) included the use myeloablative conditioning and the absence of morphologically or cytogenetically apparent disease at day-100. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was associated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p=0.02) and numerically inferior PTS (p=0.1). Group B patients also appeared to benefit from achieving BM blast <5% at time of ASCT (p=0.4) as well as at day-100 (p=0.01), in terms of PTS, while full chimerism and normal cytogenetics at day-100 were associated with superior GRFS. These observations support the value of ASCT in CMML, especially if performed prior to BT and in the presence of <5% BM blasts at time of ASCT. Additionally, the observed detrimental impact of PTCy requires additional studies to confirm and investigate the underlying mechanisms.