Hefazi, Mehrdad T.

Abstract The comparative value of liposomal cytarabine/daunorubicin (CPX-351) versus venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) in the frontline treatment of older adults with primary ( de novo ) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. In the current study, we retrospectively examined outcomes of 600 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with CPX-351 (N = 112) or Ven-HMA (N = 488). AML subtypes included de novo (46%), post-myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (19%), post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (12%), post-MDS/MPN (6%), therapy-related (17%) and AML with myelodysplasia-related genetic abnormalities (AML-MR; 46%). Patients receiving CPX-351 were younger (median 65 vs. 73 years; p < 0.01), predominantly female (50% vs. 38%; p = 0.02), more likely to have secondary AML (68% vs. 51%; p < 0.01), and less likely to harbor NPM1 MUT (5% vs. 12%; p = 0.02). Rates of complete response with or without count recovery (CR/CRi) were comparable between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA (55% vs. 60%; p = 0.30), including in AML-MR (60% vs. 63%; p = 0.70). Ven-HMA use was associated with fewer infectious complications (62% vs. 83%; p < 0.01) and yielded higher CR/CRi rates in males (60% vs. 45%; p = 0.04), de novo AML (68% vs. 50%; p = 0.03), and in the presence of STAG2 MUT (86% vs. 44%; p = 0.02), or CEBPA MUT (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.03). Overall survival censored for transplant, was similar (median 10 vs. 13 months; p = 0.90), with Ven-HMA being superior in post-MDS AML (median 12 vs. 7 months; p = 0.02) and CPX-351 in the presence of SF3B1 MUT (not reached vs. 14 months; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that Ven-HMA is as effective and less toxic than CPX-351 in newly diagnosed AML, including AML-MR, despite selection of younger, fitter patients for CPX-351.

Abstract Introduction: Despite the remarkable activity of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART19), durable remissions remain low, especially in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Ibrutinib is an oral irreversible inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase and is a first line therapy for CLL. Preclinical and early clinical data indicate that ibrutinib plus CART19 may be synergistic through inhibition of IL2-inducible T cell kinase. To systematically study the effects of prior ibrutinib treatment on subsequent CART functions, we utilized blood samples from the pivotal clinical trial E1912 (NCT02048813). E1912 was a phase 3 randomized trial comparing treatment with ibrutinib/rituximab (IR) to fludarabine/cyclophosphamide/rituximab (FCR) in previously untreated patients with CLL, which led to the FDA approval of ibrutinib as a first-line therapy in CLL. Methods: We evaluated the ex vivo expansion and effector functions of T cells and CART19 generated from patients (n=12) with CLL progression following treatment with IR or FCR. We generated CART19 from longitudinal samples obtained at baseline (pretreatment), 6 months post-treatment, 12 months post-treatment, and disease progression. Isolated T cells were lentivirally transduced to express CD28- or 41BB-costimulated CAR19. To assess antigen specific killing and proliferation, untransduced T cells or CART19 were co-cultured at a 1:1 ratio with the CD19+ cell line, JeKo-1, as a surrogate for CLL cells. Results: Ex vivo T cell expansion increased from an average of 1.5-fold at baseline to 6.7-fold at 6 months, 11.6-fold at 12 months, and 16.9-fold at progression, following ibrutinib-based therapy (p = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.04, respectively). Improved T cell expansion was independent of disease burden (p = 0.89, 0.73, and 0.54 for expansion vs B cell count at 6 months, 12 months, and progression). T cell expansion significantly worsened following treatment with FCR-based therapy compared to ibrutinib-based therapy (0.6- vs 11.6-fold at 12 months and 0.9- vs 16.9-fold at progression; p = 0.031 and 0.039, respectively). Starting at 6 months post-IR, CART19 demonstrated improved antitumor activity and antigen-specific proliferation against JeKo-1. There was no significant difference in the expansion of 41BB- vs CD28-costimulated CART19 following ibrutinib treatment. However, 41BB-CART19 showed enhanced antigen-specific proliferation upon stimulation with JeKo-1 (p = 0.008, 0.02, and 0.02 at 6 months, 12 months, and progression). Conclusion: Our results indicate significant improvement in T cell expansion and CART19 cell functions in patients with CLL following frontline ibrutinib-based therapy, and worsening T cell functions after FCR treatment. Improvement in T cell functions is independent of malignant B cell eradication and is more significant in 41BB-costimulated CART19. Citation Format: Truc Ngoc Huynh, Victoria Wang, Tait Shanafelt, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Carli M. Stewart, Kun Yun, Long K. Mai, Olivia Sirpilla, James H. Girsch, Claudia Manriquez-Roman, Jennifer M. Feigin, Makena Rodriguez, Brooke L. Kimball, Hong Xia, Reona L. Sakemura, Ismail Can, Omar L. Gutierrez-Ruiz, Ekene J. Ogbodo, Erin E. Tapper, Lionel A. Fonkoua, Mehrdad T. Hefazi, Michael W. Ruff, Sameer Parikh, Neil E. Kay, Saad J. Kenderian. Frontline ibrutinib-based therapy enhances CART cell functions in patients with CLL: Analysis of the phase 3 randomized clinical trial ECOG-ACRIN E1912 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 3849.