Back to Authors

Mariotti, Estefania Gauto

0000-0001-5710-4714

Mayo Clinic

Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Citations 4

Chromosome 1q Gain Defines a Plasma Cell–Dominant Adverse‐Risk Subtype in AL Amyloidosis With Inferior Long‐Term Survival

American Journal of Hematology | August 25, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.70484 | PMID 42638274

ABSTRACT The prognostic relevance of multiple myeloma (MM)‐defined high‐risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities in AL amyloidosis is incompletely defined. We retrospectively evaluated 517 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients seen at Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2021 who had baseline plasma cell FISH. HR cytogenetics were defined as t (4;14), t (14;16), t (14;20), del(17p), or 1q gain/amplification (+1q). HR abnormalities were identified in 151 patients (29%); +1q accounted for most HR cases (122/151, 81%). Compared with standard‐risk (SR), patients harboring +1q demonstrated a greater clonal disease burden, including higher dFLC and bone marrow plasma cells, greater intact immunoglobulin secretion, higher plasma cell proliferative index, and enrichment for modified SLiM‐CRAB features. Hematologic and organ response patterns of +1q patients were generally comparable to SR patients, whereas non‐1q HR patients had a higher proportion of early hematologic responses. Patients harboring +1q demonstrated significantly inferior overall survival (OS) compared with both non‐1q HR patients and SR patients (median OS 57 months vs. not reached vs. 120 months, p = 0.02). In multivariable piecewise Cox analysis, the adverse prognostic impact of +1q was most evident beyond 24 months from diagnosis (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.64–5.09, p < 0.001), whereas non‐1q HR lesions were not independently prognostic. These findings suggest that +1q identifies a biologically distinct AL amyloidosis subset characterized by plasma cell–dominant features and inferior long‐term disease control. In contrast, other MM‐defined HR cytogenetic abnormalities appear to have limited prognostic relevance in AL amyloidosis.
Risk‐Adjusted Comparison of Survival in Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia With and Without Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant: Mayo Clinic Experience in 775 Consecutive Patients

American Journal of Hematology | July 25, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajh.70453 | PMID 42499183

ABSTRACT The recently published BLAST clinical risk model for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and its molecular version (BLAST‐Mol) differentiate low, intermediate, and high‐risk groups. The objective of the current retrospective study was to examine the survival impact of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) in a consecutive series of Mayo Clinic patients ( n = 775; 68% males, median age 71 years) with CMML, overall and adjusted for baseline BLAST/BLAST‐Mol risk categories. At a median follow‐up of 77 months, 151 (20%) patients underwent ASCT. Overall survival (OS) was longer in the ASCT compared to the non‐ASCT cohorts (median 77 vs. 28 months; p < 0.01). The significant difference in OS between the ASCT and non‐ASCT cohorts was retained after adjusting for BLAST clinical risk groups: high‐risk (median 50 vs. 14 months; p < 0.01), intermediate‐risk (81 vs. 28 months; p < 0.01), and low‐risk (111 vs. 65 months; p = 0.04), respectively. The same was mostly the case when OS comparison was adjusted for BLAST‐Mol with respective p values of < 0.01, < 0.01, and 0.08, respectively. Time‐dependent cox models confirmed the favorable survival impact of ASCT in the BLAST/BLAST‐Mol high‐ and intermediate‐risk groups. The current study highlights the benefit of ASCT for BLAST/BLAST‐Mol high‐ and intermediate‐risk groups in CMML and its potential to overcome the adverse impact of some high risk cytogenetic or molecular abnormalities. These observations support the early use of ASCT in CMML, ideally before BT and regardless of genetic characteristics.
Cytogenetics-based Clinical Trajectories in Patients with MRD Negativity Post Autologous Transplant for Multiple Myeloma

No container title available | January 20, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-8586124/v1

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment has become central to risk-adapted treatment strategies in multiple myeloma, yet the prognostic value of MRD negativity following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) across individual high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) remains unclear. We analyzed 351 newly diagnosed patients who achieved MRD negativity (sensitivity 2.4×10 − 6 ) at Day 100 following ASCT and had baseline cytogenetic data available. Median follow-up was 50.4 months. Standard-risk cytogenetics were present in 46% (n = 162), while 34% (n = 118) had one HRCA and 20% (n = 71) had ≥ 2 HRCAs. Despite uniform MRD negativity, several HRCAs continued to confer inferior progression-free survival (PFS). Compared with the standard-risk group (4-year PFS 84%), patients with del(17p), 1q21+, t(4;14), or MAF translocations [t(14;16)/t(14;20)] had significantly lower 4-year PFS rates: 56% (HR 2.89; p = 0.0001), 60% (HR 2.46; p = 0.0001), 43% (HR 3.50; p = 0.0001), and 58% (HR 2.51; p = 0.01), respectively. Isolated del(17p) and 1q21 + also conferred inferior PFS. The 4-year PFS was 65% for patients with one HRCA (HR 2.31; p = 0.0004) and 55% for those with ≥ 2 HRCAs (HR 2.75; p = 0.0001). In this large MRD-negative post-ASCT cohort, several HRCAs, including isolated HRCAs, remained clinically meaningful drivers of inferior PFS, highlighting that early MRD negativity does not uniformly mitigate the impact of high-risk biology.
Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: analysis of post-transplant survival and risk factors in 138 Mayo Clinic patients

No container title available | June 9, 2025 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-6753879/v1

Abstract Allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains the only curative option in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). We retrospectively analyzed 138 CMML patients who underwent ASCT at the Mayo Clinic. Patients who transitioned to ASCT while in chronic phase (Group A) displayed superior post-transplant survival (PTS), compared to those in whom ASCT was performed after blast transformation (BT; Group B) (median 95 vs. 16 months; p=0.01). In Group A, PTS was superior in patients with <5% bone marrow (BM) blasts at time of ASCT (median 164 vs. 13.5 months; p=0.01). Other predictors of superior PTS included day-100 BM blast <5% or normal cytogenetics (median 164 vs 18 months; p=0.01) or presence of chronic graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD; median 164 vs. 26 months; p=0.01). Pre-ASCT hypomethylating agent exposure (HR=2.03; p=0.03), and receiving more than one line of pre-ASCT chemotherapy (p=0.01) predicted inferior PTS. In multivariable analysis, predictors of superior GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) included the use myeloablative conditioning and the absence of morphologically or cytogenetically apparent disease at day-100. The use of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) was associated with higher cumulative incidence of relapse (p=0.02) and numerically inferior PTS (p=0.1). Group B patients also appeared to benefit from achieving BM blast <5% at time of ASCT (p=0.4) as well as at day-100 (p=0.01), in terms of PTS, while full chimerism and normal cytogenetics at day-100 were associated with superior GRFS. These observations support the value of ASCT in CMML, especially if performed prior to BT and in the presence of <5% BM blasts at time of ASCT. Additionally, the observed detrimental impact of PTCy requires additional studies to confirm and investigate the underlying mechanisms.