Citations

OBJECTIVE Core outcome sets (COSs) are needed to promote data consistency across studies as well as data synthesis and comparability. The goal of the current study was to utilize a modified Delphi process to develop a COS–sciatic injury and neuropathy evaluation (COS-SINE). METHODS A five-stage approach was utilized to develop the COS-SINE: stage 1, consortium development; stage 2, literature review to identify potential outcome measures; stage 3, Delphi survey to develop consensus on outcomes for inclusion; stage 4, Delphi survey to develop definitions; and stage 5, consensus meeting to finalize the COS and definitions. The study followed the Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Development recommendations. RESULTS The Core Outcomes in Nerve Surgery (COINS) Consortium comprised 23 participants, all neurological surgeons, representing 13 countries. Three participants were excluded on the basis of agreed upon participation rules. The final COS-SINE consisted of 36 data points/outcomes covering the domains of demographics, diagnostics, patient-reported outcomes, motor and sensory outcomes, and complications. Appropriate instruments, methods of testing, and definitions were set. The consensus minimum duration of follow-up was 24 months, with consensus optimal time points for assessment identified as preoperatively and 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS The COINS Consortium developed a consensus COS and provided definitions, methods of implementation, and time points for assessment. The COS-SINE should serve as a minimum set of data that should be collected in all future neurosurgical studies on sciatic nerve injury and neuropathy. Incorporation of this COS should help improve consistency in reporting and data synthesis and comparability and should minimize outcome-reporting bias.

Abstract Excessively restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials are one of many barriers to clinical trial enrollment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). Many organizations are developing efforts to increase clinical trial eligibility; yet, several recent publications focused on patients with MDS suggest that many patients with this disease may be excluded from clinical trials unnecessarily. Clinical trial eligibility should reflect the phase of the study and risks of the agent being studied. Phase 3 trials should be less restrictive than early-phase trials to represent the real-world population as closely as possible. We hypothesize that many clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, have unnecessarily restrictive eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the most common eligibility criteria according to phase of trial and to determine whether criteria correspond with drug safety signals. We identified MDS clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2023 and analyzed the eligibility criteria of 191 therapeutic MDS trials. We found that categorical inclusion and exclusion criteria are remarkably similar in representation across trial phases. Additionally, only 13% of trials are concordant with drug safety signals, suggesting that the eligibility criteria are often arbitrary. On behalf of the icMDS (International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes), an association of international MDS experts, we provide a position statement on restrictive eligibility criteria for MDS clinical trials that should be avoided with the aim of removing barriers to clinical trial enrollment.

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with cervical artery dissection (CAD) are at risk for subsequent ischemic events. We aimed to identify characteristics that are associated with increased risk of ischemic stroke after initial presentation of CAD and to evaluate the differential impact of anticoagulant versus antiplatelet therapy in these high-risk individuals. METHODS: This was a preplanned secondary analysis of the STOP-CAD study (Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection), a multicenter international retrospective observational study (63 sites from 16 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Africa) that included patients with CAD predominantly between January 2015 and June 2022. The primary outcome was subsequent ischemic stroke by day 180 after diagnosis. Clinical and imaging variables were compared between those with versus without subsequent ischemic stroke. Significant factors associated with subsequent stroke risk were identified using stepwise Cox regression. Associations between subsequent ischemic stroke risk and antithrombotic therapy type (anticoagulation versus antiplatelets) among patients with identified risk factors were explored using adjusted Cox regression. RESULTS: In all, 4023 patients (mean age was 47.4 years; 44.5% were women) were included. By day 180, subsequent ischemic stroke occurred in 5.3% of the cohort. In adjusted Cox regression, factors associated with increased risk of subsequent ischemic stroke were prior history of ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 7.31 [95% CI, 1.61–33.13]; P =0.010), presentation within 7 days from first symptoms (aHR, 3.04 [95% CI, 1.04–8.91]; P =0.043), infarct on baseline imaging (aHR, 9.85 [95% CI, 3.65–26.58]; P <0.001), and occlusive dissection (aHR, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.03–5.34]; P =0.043). Only patients with occlusive dissection demonstrated a reduced risk of subsequent ischemic stroke when treated with anticoagulation versus antiplatelets (aHR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.16–0.80]; P =0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this post hoc analysis of the STOP-CAD study, several factors associated with subsequent ischemic stroke were identified among patients with CAD. Furthermore, we identified a potential benefit of anticoagulation in patients with CAD with occlusive dissection. These findings require validation by meta-analyses of prior studies to formulate optimal treatment strategies for specific high-risk CAD subgroups.

Background Flow-diverter stents (FDS) have become the standard of care for a wide range of intracranial aneurysms, but their efficacy/safety in the context of recurrent/recanalized aneurysms following stent-assisted coiling (SAC) is not well established. We evaluate the outcomes of FDS retreatment in a large multicenter cohort. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 118 patients across 22 institutions who underwent FDS retreatment for recurrent/persistent aneurysms after SAC (2008–22). The primary outcome was angiographic occlusion status at last follow-up, categorized as complete (100%), near-complete (90–99%), or incomplete (<90%) occlusion. Secondary outcomes included procedural complications and clinical outcomes measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Results A total of 118 patients (median age 57, 74.6% female) with median follow-up of 15.3 months were identified. Complete occlusion was achieved in 62.5% and near-complete occlusion in 25%. FDS deployment within the pre-existing stent was successful in 98.3% of cases. Major complications occurred in 3.4% of cases, including postoperative aneurysmal rupture with resultant mortality (1.6%) and thromboembolic events with long-term disability (1.6%). Favorable clinical outcomes (mRS 0–2) were observed in 95.1% of patients. Wider aneurysm neck diameter was a significant predictor of incomplete occlusion (adjusted OR (aOR) 1.23 per mm, P=0.044), with male sex trending towards association with non-occlusion (aOR 3.2, P=0.07), while baseline hypertension was associated with complete occlusion (aOR 0.32, P=0.048). Conclusions FDS treatment for recurrent/residual aneurysms after SAC represents a viable treatment option for these challenging cases with acceptable safety and reasonable occlusion rates, although lower than de novo FDS occlusion rates.

Abstract Purpose: Embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes (ETMR) is a rare pediatric CNS embryonal tumor with poor survival. The Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) was queried for outcomes data from prospectively consenting pediatric patients with ETMR treated with proton radiation therapy (RT). Methods: 20 patients (2013-2021) at 9 institutions had ETMR; 2 with prior RT were excluded from statistical analyses (PPCR ETMR, N=18). Overall Survival (OS) and Event Free Survival (EFS) analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank values. Median follow-up was calculated using the reverse Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Median age at RT was 3.0 years (1.7-12.2); median follow-up was 55.5 months (2.6-119.4). 8 patients (44%) expired and 6 patients (33%) are surviving ≥55 months. 11 (61%) patients received systemic therapy with stem cell support. The majority (89%) had focal RT, while 2 patients received craniospinal irradiation (CSI). 4-year OS and EFS were 59.6% and 54.2%, respectively. Local control (LC) at 4 years was 81%. No differences in OS or EFS were observed for receipt of systemic therapy with stem cell support (p=0.361, p=0.57), progression prior to RT (p=0.127, p=0.18), or surgery to RT ≥200 days (p=0.35, p=0.254). Symptomatic radionecrosis was not reported. Conclusion: Focal proton RT provided effective local control as part of multimodality therapy for ETMR, with encouraging survival for this rare and often infant age tumor. Outcomes for CSI were limited to 2 patients treated upfront, and 1 patient receiving salvage CSI for disseminated relapse after focal RT who is surviving >1 year. Trial: DFCI protocol 12-103, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01696721, date of registration 9/27/2012

Objective The objective is to provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Methods The Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3–5 years for those achieving complete renal response. Conclusion This guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

Objectives/Goals: Community-based practices have limited research opportunities for providers. As a rural community-based health system, Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sought to create intramural funding mechanisms to help early-stage researchers conduct pilot research so they are more competitive to compete for more robust extramural funding opportunities. Methods/Study Population: We created a Research Seed Grant Program infrastructure across our four MCHS regions (Southwest and Southeast Minnesota, Northwest and Southwest Wisconsin). This model program featured an initial research funding announcement call based on 6 prioritized programs (AI Validation & Stewardship, Cancer, Health Equity, Population Health, Rural Health, Learning Healthcare System [LHS]), with submissions uploaded to a central electronic repository. Proposal review and ranking was organized on a regional basis, with ranking of all proposals by at least 2 clinical scientist reviewers according to the NIH domain-specific framework (i.e., 1.0 best > 9.0 worst). Awards were competitively selected by conformity to prioritized research areas and through ranking of most competitive overall application scores. Results/Anticipated Results: For our inaugural RFA, we received 55 grant application submissions across the MCHS regions. Fifteen of the most highly ranked applications were selected for awards on a per region basis, providing direct funding as well as protected investigator research time of 10% for up to six months. The selected projects address several research priorities including improving access, reducing health disparities, improving behavioral health in our communities, increasing cancer screening and prevention, and community-based pragmatic trials and interventions. Outcomes from these now completed pilot projects remain pending at this time. Funding for this seed grant program was supported by philanthropy, Mayo Clinic Research Administration, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, and the Mayo Clinic CCaTS Rural Core. Discussion/Significance of Impact: We present this framework for a LHS-focused Seed Grant program model for consideration of adoption by other national/international LHS. Future plans include tracking of outcome metrics (e.g., published peer review articles, extramural grant applications) of this initial cycle and future expansion of this program to support the goals of our LHS.