Figueroa-Parra, Gabriel

Objective To assess the impact of renal replacement therapy in people with lupus nephritis (LN)–associated end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) and support the development of the 2024 American College of Rheumatology LN treatment guidelines. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis to address three Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions related to renal replacement therapy for ESKD due to LN, including comparisons of kidney transplant versus dialysis, hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis, and preemptive kidney transplant versus no preemptive kidney transplant. Outcomes of interest included mortality, cardiovascular (CV) events, infections, lupus flares, disease‐related damage, graft failure, and quality of life. We conducted a meta‐analysis and analyzed hazard ratios for time‐to‐event analyses and risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes, as well as absolute risk estimates. Results Sixteen comparative observational studies addressed at least one of the three PICO questions. Kidney transplant was found to reduce the risks of all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, infection‐related mortality, and CV events compared with dialysis (high certainty). Dialysis modality (peritoneal vs hemodialysis) was not associated with mortality (high certainty) or with other outcomes of infection, CV complications, and systemic lupus erythematosus flares (low certainty). Preemptive kidney transplant was associated with lower risks of graft failure and mortality (low certainty). Conclusion This systematic review identified improved outcomes with kidney transplant versus dialysis for people with LN‐associated ESKD and potential benefits of preemptive kidney transplant. This evidence supports the use of kidney transplant as a preferred renal replacement therapy for people with LN‐ESKD.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

Objective To provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the treatment and management of non‐renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); treatment and management of lupus nephritis are addressed in a separate guideline. Methods Clinical questions for treatment and management of SLE were developed in the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were developed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess evidence quality and formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus of ≥70% agreement on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present recommendations and ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the treatment and management of SLE that are applicable to pediatric and adult patients. Recommendations emphasize uniform treatment with hydroxychloroquine, limiting duration of glucocorticoid use, and early introduction of conventional and/or biologic immunosuppressive therapies to achieve and maintain control of SLE inflammation (remission or a low level of disease activity), reduce SLE‐related morbidity and mortality, and minimize medication‐related toxicities. Conclusion This guideline presents direction regarding treatment and management of SLE and provides a foundation for well‐informed, shared clinician–patient decision‐making. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each person with SLE.

BACKGROUND: Whereas antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is best known for increasing the risk of macrovascular thrombosis, APS vasculopathy is characterized by the abnormal proliferation of endothelial and smooth muscle cells, leading to occlusion of small blood vessels in the skin, kidneys, and heart, among other organs. The underlying mechanisms remain unclear, and targeted treatment options for patients with APS are lacking. METHODS: To identify and analyze APS microvascular endothelial cells (MVECs), skin biopsies of patients with APS complicated by livedo racemosa were characterized using single-cell RNA sequencing. CCN1 (cellular communication network factor 1) and CCN2 were identified in skin and kidney biopsies by immunofluorescence microscopy and in plasma by ELISA. Healthy dermal MVECs were cultured with APS patient–derived serum or immunoglobulin G (IgG), and relevant signaling pathways were characterized using quantitative PCR, immunoblotting, and immunofluorescence microscopy. The proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells were determined after exposure to conditioned medium from APS IgG–stimulated MVECs. A mouse model of APS IgG–accelerated neointima formation was developed. Anti-CCN2 monoclonal antibodies were tested in vascular smooth muscle cell functional assays and the mouse model. RESULTS: Increased endothelial cell expression of CCN1 and CCN2 was identified by single-cell RNA sequencing and further confirmed in APS skin by microscopy as well as in APS plasma by ELISA. Exposure of healthy MVECs to patient IgG triggered the upregulation of CCN1 and CCN2 via Toll-like receptor 4– and YAP1 (yes-associated protein 1)–mediated signaling. CCN2, originating from APS IgG–stimulated MVECs led to the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells, phenotypes that were inhibited by an anti-CCN2 antibody or depletion of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor). We further observed increased expression of CCN2, along with evidence of YAP1 nuclear translocation, in kidney vessels of APS nephropathy biopsies. Finally, CCN2 inhibition with an anti-CCN2 monoclonal antibody significantly reduced neointima thickening and cell proliferation in a mouse model of APS IgG–accelerated neointima formation. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed activation of YAP1-mediated signaling in APS dermal microvessels and demonstrated that the YAP1 target CCN2 plays a role in facilitating pro-proliferative communication between MVECs and vascular smooth muscle cells. These findings offer insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying APS vasculopathy, providing potential therapeutic targets for patients.

ObjectiveThe objective is to provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis.MethodsThe Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation.ResultsWe present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3–5 years for those achieving complete renal response.ConclusionThis guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

Objective The objective is to provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis. Methods The Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation. Results We present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3–5 years for those achieving complete renal response. Conclusion This guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.

ABSTRACT This review provides an in-depth analysis of glucocorticoid therapy for lupus nephritis (LN), a severe manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus that affects up to 51.7% of patients. LN significantly increases the risk of mortality and progression to end-stage kidney disease. Glucocorticoids have been central to LN treatment for decades due to their anti-inflammatory properties, but optimal dosing strategies remain uncertain. The review discusses the historical evolution of glucocorticoid use, highlighting the shift from high-dose regimens to combined approaches with immunosuppressants and lower glucocorticoid doses to minimize adverse effects. Mechanistically, glucocorticoids exert effects through genomic and non-genomic pathways, modulating immune responses and metabolism. Long-term use is associated with risks such as infection, osteoporosis, hyperglycemia and cardiovascular disease. The review examines different dosing strategies, including intravenous pulse therapy and oral regimens, and presents evidence of their efficacy and safety. It also explores alternative approaches, such as low-dose and glucocorticoid-free regimens, which show promise but require further study. The review concludes by emphasizing the need for future research to optimize glucocorticoid regimens, refine tapering protocols and identify safer therapeutic combinations, as glucocorticoids remain a cornerstone in LN management despite their challenges.

Objective To characterise the changing trends in the pharmacological management of SLE in the USA between 2007 and 2023 as new treatment options emerged. Methods In a retrospective cohort study using data from OptumLabs Data Warehouse, we characterised the annual prevalent (ie, all) and incident (ie, new) use of antimalarials, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive medications among patients with SLE from 2007 to 2023 and assessed for changing trends over time. Results We identified 19 122 adults with SLE; they were 51.2 (SD 16.1) years of age, 89% were female, 61.3% were White, 18.5% were Black and 13.1% were Hispanic. The proportion of prevalent users of antimalarials has decreased from 79.4% in 2007 to 77.2% in 2023 (p=0.0055), while the proportion of incident users fluctuated between a lowest 5.8% in 2021 and a highest 8.1% in 2008 (p=0.008). The proportion of prevalent users of glucocorticoids increased from 64.6% in 2007 to 66.7% in 2023 (p=0.0132), as did the proportion of incident users (12.4% in 2007 to 21.7% in 2023; p<0.0001). The use of cyclophosphamide (2.0% in 2007 to 0.4% in 2023, p<0.0001) has decreased; the use of mycophenolate mofetil (7.7% in 2007 to 10.3% in 2023, p<0.0001), rituximab (1.4% in 2007 to 2.1% in 2023, p<0.0001) and belimumab (0.8% in 2011 to 6.1% in 2023, p=0.0001) has increased. Conclusions Despite increasing availability of alternative treatment options, patients with SLE in the USA increasingly rely on glucocorticoid-based therapy. Efforts to improve the use of antimalarials and steroid-sparing immunosuppressants are needed.

Objective The 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria score (≥20 points) has been associated with poor outcomes. We aimed to evaluate its utility as a predictor for mortality and hospitalisation and to derive and validate an ominosity score based on the SLE classification criteria set. Methods Incident patients with SLE in a population-based cohort were included. The association between the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE score and mortality and hospitalisation was assessed using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex and calendar year. An ominosity score for mortality was developed based on the SLE criteria set. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method was used to estimate model coefficients. Concordance and calibration were assessed by cross-validation and by plotting the observed event rates against the deciles of predicted probabilities. Results Among 374 patients with incident SLE, a EULAR/ACR score ≥20 points was not associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.03) or first hospitalisation (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.64) compared with a score ≤19 points. The derived ominosity score for mortality included age, sex, thrombocytopaenia, neuropsychiatric manifestations, subacute cutaneous or discoid lupus, non-scarring alopecia, inflammatory arthritis, renal involvement, antiphospholipid antibodies and hypocomplementaemia. This model demonstrated a concordance=0.76 with adequate calibration. Age and sex were the main predictors, as seen in the model including just age, sex and year (concordance=0.77). Conclusion The 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE criteria score was not associated with mortality and hospitalisation. The derived ominosity score for mortality presented good prediction for mortality but was not better than age and sex alone.

Abstract Objective To assess the association of aPL and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) in patients with SLE by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Multiple databases were systematically searched from inception to February 2024. Studies were eligible if they included patients with SLE (population), reported aPL status (exposure), and DAH (outcome). We pooled the estimates as odds ratio (OR) using fixed-effect models. We examined the association between aPL and DAH, as well as associations based on aPL subtypes or concomitant APS. Results Out of 454 screened studies, nine were included in meta-analysis, encompassing 7746 patients with SLE, of whom 2016 (26.0%) were aPL-positive and 163 (2.1%) had DAH. Patients with SLE and positive aPL (any) were more likely to develop DAH than aPL-negative patients (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.24–2.49; I2 = 0%). Patients with SLE and positive LA (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.06–2.93, I2 = 35%) or positive anticardiolipin IgG (OR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.13–2.34, I2 = 0%) had a higher likelihood of developing DAH compared with patients that were negative for these aPL. An APS diagnosis was associated with a 2.5-fold increased likelihood of DAH compared with subjects without APS (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.23–4.92, I2 = 0%). Positivity of anti-β2 glycoprotein I IgG was not significantly associated with DAH among patients with SLE (OR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.45–1.36, I2 = 0%). Conclusion In patients with SLE, aPL positivity increases the risk of DAH compared with aPL-negative patients, particularly in those positive for LA and anticardiolipin IgG.