List, Alan F.

Abstract Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically diverse disorders, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment approaches. The International Working Group for Prognostication of MDS (IWG_PM) recently introduced a molecular classification, referred to as the MDS taxonomy, that categorizes patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at TP53 and TET2 loci. This study sought to validate and enhance the clinical relevance of the MDS taxonomy by analyzing a large retrospective cohort ( n = 5136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort ( n = 477). The taxonomy successfully identified subgroups with distinct clinical characteristics and disease progression patterns. However, incorporating gene interactions from taxonomy subgroups did not improve the prognostic performance of the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS‐M). We further assessed whether the taxonomy could guide management in patients receiving disease‐modifying therapies. Except for the “ TP53 ‐complex” subgroup, taxonomy classifications were not predictive of hypomethylating agent response or transplant outcomes. Nonetheless, they correlated with overall survival, suggesting that while both IPSS‐M and the taxonomy capture disease biology, other non‐genetic factors may influence treatment response. RNA sequencing confirmed the biological distinctiveness of the taxonomy groups. Transcriptomic profiling of CD34+ bone marrow cells revealed unique, homogeneous gene expression patterns, particularly within the AML‐like, bi TET2 , SF3B1 , and TP53 ‐complex subgroups. Further integration of multi‐omics data may refine MDS classification, improving clinical decision‐making and guiding the development of targeted therapies.

Abstract Introduction: Standardized reporting of clinical trials results for MDS is essential to improve clinical interpretation and cross-study comparison. However, reporting of patient characteristics, response criteria, and endpoints in publications is often inconsistent; there is no systemic analysis of MDS trial reporting available. We conducted a systematic review of published MDS trial manuscripts on behalf of the international consortium for MDS (icMDS) to assess variability in reporting practices. Methods We searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all clinical trials registered for adults (≥18 years) with MDS that reported results between 2015-2024. Clinical trials that included acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) were included if they enrolled ≥5 MDS patients. We excluded trials without an MDS cohort; non-therapeutic trials; trials focused on transplant interventions; or those which enrolled solid malignancies or other hematologic malignancies (chronic myeloid leukemia or lymphoid diseases). Finally, trials were required to have a manuscript available on Larvol, PubMed, or Google Scholar. Trials were categorized by disease risk (lower-risk [LR] vs. higher-risk [HR]) and trial phase (early phase [EP] vs. late phase [LP]). Results We identified 502 MDS trials on ClinicalTrials.gov, of which 351 did not meet inclusion criteria and 79 lacked a manuscript. A total of 72 trials (32 EP, 40 LP) with 80 publications (34 EP, 46 LP) were analyzed. Frequently reported baseline characteristics included age (100% EP, 100% LP), disease risk (74% EP, 74% LP), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (85% EP, 72% LP), prior treatments (71% EP, 67% LP), and RBC transfusion dependency (32% EP, 70% LP). Less frequently reported characteristics included blood counts (hemoglobin [Hb; 38% EP, 54% LP], platelet count [38% EP, 54% LP], neutrophil count [24% EP and LP]) and bone marrow blasts (29% EP, 43% LP). Although disease risk was widely reported, definitions varied: IPSS and IPSS-R were each reported in 54% of manuscripts, while IPSS-M appeared in only 3%. Cytogenetic risk was separately reported in 39% of manuscripts (38% EP, 39% LP), and mutational data in 45% (47% EP, 43% LP). Responses per IWG 2006 criteria were reported in 84% of manuscripts. The primary endpoint involved safety/tolerability in 85% of EP manuscripts, though definitions were variable; recommended phase 2 dose was the most common (26% of EP manuscripts). In LP trials, primary endpoints were risk-specific: transfusion independence (TI) in 77% of LR, overall response rate (ORR) in 28% of HR, and complete remission (CR) or overall survival (OS) in 22% of HR. In HR manuscripts, CR was reported in 100%, ORR in 73%, hematologic improvement (HI) in 48%, RBC-TI in 23%, and OS in 80%. However, seven different definitions were used for ORR: CR + marrow CR + partial remission + HI per IWG 2006 was most common (35%). Event-free survival was reported in 25%; progression-free survival and relapse-free survival in 13%; and leukemia-free survival in 5%. Early mortality rate was reported in 35% (18% EP, 56% LP) and transplant rate in 58% (50% EP, 67% LP). Only 47% of HR and 90% of LR manuscripts identified HI-eligible patients. In LR-MDS, RBC-TI was reported in 72% of manuscripts but used six definitions. The most common were RBC-TI ≥8 weeks at any time during treatment (24%), ≥8 weeks within 28 weeks of treatment (13%), ≥8 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.0 (4%), ≥12 weeks with Hb increase ≥1.5 (4%), and ≥16 weeks within 24 weeks of treatment (12%). The remainder did not report RBC-TI, did not define it, or used a custom definition not used in another trial. HI was reported in 80% of LR papers with most of those reporting HI using IWG 2006 criteria (90%). Conclusion Reporting of baseline characteristics, response criteria, and outcomes is inconsistent in MDS clinical trials, with wide variability in response definitions, including ORR and TI. This heterogeneity limits interpretability, hampers historical comparisons and may obscure efficacy signals. Our findings highlight the need for standardized reporting guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency in MDS trial publications. As a next phase of this effort, we will conduct a formal Delphi process among icMDS experts to establish consensus recommendations for minimal and optimal MDS clinical trial reporting in manuscripts by disease risk (LR/HR) and trial phase (EP/LP).

Abstract Excessively restrictive inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials are one of many barriers to clinical trial enrollment for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDSs). Many organizations are developing efforts to increase clinical trial eligibility; yet, several recent publications focused on patients with MDS suggest that many patients with this disease may be excluded from clinical trials unnecessarily. Clinical trial eligibility should reflect the phase of the study and risks of the agent being studied. Phase 3 trials should be less restrictive than early-phase trials to represent the real-world population as closely as possible. We hypothesize that many clinical trials, particularly phase 3 trials, have unnecessarily restrictive eligibility criteria. This study aims to evaluate the most common eligibility criteria according to phase of trial and to determine whether criteria correspond with drug safety signals. We identified MDS clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1 January 2000 to 1 September 2023 and analyzed the eligibility criteria of 191 therapeutic MDS trials. We found that categorical inclusion and exclusion criteria are remarkably similar in representation across trial phases. Additionally, only 13% of trials are concordant with drug safety signals, suggesting that the eligibility criteria are often arbitrary. On behalf of the icMDS (International Consortium for Myelodysplastic Syndromes), an association of international MDS experts, we provide a position statement on restrictive eligibility criteria for MDS clinical trials that should be avoided with the aim of removing barriers to clinical trial enrollment.

Background. The inclusion of gene mutations and chromosomal abnormalities in the 2022 WHO and ICC Classifications of MDS has enhanced diagnostic precision and is expected to improve clinical decision-making process. Although these two systems share similarities, clinically relevant discrepancies still exist and potentially cause inconsistency in their adoption in a clinical setting. In this study on behalf of the International Consortium for MDS (icMDS), we adopted a data-driven approach to provide a harmonization roadmap between the 2022 WHO and ICC classification for MDS. A modified Delphi Process consensus approach is currently ongoing among icMDS experts to finalize a harmonized MDS classification scheme. Methods. We analyzed retrospective international cohorts of patients with a diagnosis of MDS (n=7017) and AML (n=1002) according to WHO 2016 criteria. Hierarchical Dirichlet Processes were applied to define clusters capturing broad dependencies among all gene mutations and cytogenetic abnormalities. To investigate the features of importance and their impact on the clustering process, we employed the SHapley Additive exPlanations approach (SHAP). This allowed to define harmonized labels for each clinical entity. The clinical relevance of the unsupervised clustering was assessed through the analysis of phenotypic features and outcomes among each group. ( Blood 2022;140: 9828-9830) Results. Patients' characteristics are summarized in Table 1. We identified 9 clusters, defined by specific genomic features. The cluster of highest hierarchical importance was characterized by biallelic inactivation of TP53 (biTP53). According to SHAP analysis, bi TP53 was defined as 2 or more TP53 mutations, or 1 mutation with copy number loss or cnLOH. Most patients assigned to bi TP53 cluster had TP53 VAF>10% (77.9%) and complex karyotype (70.1%). Assignment to bi TP53 cluster was irrespective of blast count. Patients with monoallelic TP53 mutation segregated into other clusters. Hierarchically, the second cluster included patients with del(5q). SHAP analysis highlighted 5q deletion alone, or with one other chromosomal abnormality other than -7, and absence of bi TP53, as the most relevant features. Most of these patients had blast counts <5% (88.1%). The third distinct cluster included patients with SF3B1 mutations (in the absence of concurrent del(7q), abn3q26.2, complex karyotype or RUNX1 mutation). Most patients with MDS and SF3B1 mutation had <5% blasts (94.2%). Common co-mutated variants in the SF3B1 cluster included mutant DNMT3A (25.2%) and TET2 (38.3%). Morphologically defined MDS cases (i.e., not meeting criteria for bi TP53, del(5q) or SF3B1) were preferentially assigned to the following additional clusters: SF3B1 and concurrent higher-risk mutations (e.g., RUNX1 and ASXL1); SRSF2 and concomitant TET2 mutations; U2AF1 mutations with del(20q), del(7q) or -7; SRSF2 with TET2 mutations and co-mutational patterns including RUNX1 and ASXL1; and AML-like genomic signatures. Our analyses suggest that morphologically defined MDS is characterized by a large heterogeneity in terms of mutation profiles, not entirely captured by the presence of unilineage versus multilineage dysplasia, percentage of bone marrow blasts, and presence of hypocellularity and fibrosis. To better investigate the continuum between high risk MDS (i.e., patients with ≥10% blasts) and AML, an exploratory comparison was made using a cohort of AML (defined according to WHO 2016) patients analyzed using the same statistical methods. Only a partial overlap in genetic signatures was observed between MDS with ≥10% blasts and AML. However, similarities were observed between the AML-like MDS clusters (characterized by mutant NPM1, bZIP CEBPA, and Core Binding Factor abnormalities) and AML clusters defined by the same genetic signature, thus supporting the classification of these entities as AML, irrespective of blast count. Conclusion. Our study demonstrated the utility of a data-driven approach based on advanced statistical methods to generate a harmonized classification for MDS. Table 2 shows a provisional, hierarchical classification algorithm. Further refinement of entity labels and classification criteria is the subject of the ongoing modified Delphi Process consensus approach among icMDS experts.

PURPOSE Impaired response to erythropoietin underlies ineffective erythropoiesis and anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). We investigated whether treatment with lenalidomide (LEN), which augments erythropoietin receptor signaling in vitro, can restore and improve hemoglobin response to epoetin (EPO) alfa in patients with lower-risk, non-del(5q) MDS who have anemia that is refractory to or have low probability of benefit from treatment with recombinant erythropoietin. METHODS In a phase III, US intergroup trial, we randomly assigned patients to receive either LEN and EPO alfa or LEN alone following stratification by serum erythropoietin concentration and prior erythropoietin treatment. RESULTS A total of 195 evaluable patients were randomly assigned: 99 patients to the LEN-EPO alfa cohort and 96 to LEN alone. After four cycles of treatment, the primary end point of major erythroid response (MER) was significantly higher (28.3%) with the combination compared with LEN alone (11.5%) ( P = .004). Among 136 patients who completed 16 weeks of study treatment, 38.9% and 15.6% achieved MER, respectively ( P = .004). Additionally, minor erythroid response was achieved in 18.2% and 20.8% of patients, for an overall erythroid response rate of 46.5% versus 32.3%. Among LEN nonresponders, 38 crossed over to the addition of EPO alfa with 10 patients (26.3%) achieving a MER. Responses to the combined treatment were highly durable with a median MER duration of 23.8 months compared with 13 months with LEN alone. CONCLUSION LEN restores sensitivity to recombinant erythropoietin in growth factor–insensitive, lower-risk, non-del(5q) MDS, to yield a significantly higher rate and duration of MER compared with LEN alone (funded by the National Cancer Institute; E2905 ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02048813 ).

Abstract Introduction: Recent reviews indicate that transfusional hemosiderosis may be associated with an increased risk of mortality in lower-risk pts with MDS. This trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and long-term safety of deferasirox (Exjade®, ICL670) in MDS. Deferasirox is an oral iron chelator approved for use in pts with transfusional iron overload. Methods: This is a Phase II, open-label, 3-yr clinical trial in 55 US centers, enrolling 150 pts (aged ≥18 years) with Low- or Int-1-risk MDS (by IPSS criteria) and transfusional iron overload (serum ferritin ≥1000 ng/mL and >20 units RBC transfusions). Deferasirox dosing is 20–30 mg/kg/day. Serum ferritin, iron, transferrin and transferrin saturation are being assessed at screening and monthly in yr 1, then quarterly in yrs 2 and 3, while labile plasma iron (LPI) is assessed quarterly in yr 1. In addition, creatinine, calculated creatinine clearance, echocardiograms and endocrine and hematological status are being assessed. This report describes baseline data in these pts. Results: As of June 2006, 84 pts have enrolled. Demographic data are available from 79 pts: median age 71 years (range 47–87); sex (52 male, 27 female); ethnicity (74 Caucasian, 2 Black, 2 Hispanic, 1 Oriental); and IPSS Risk Group (Low: 22 pts; Int-1: 56 pts). Iron status is summarized in the table: Parameter n Mean ± SD Median Range Normal range n/a, not applicable Serum ferritin,μg/L 84 3779 ± 4070 2951 1160–36280 12–370 Serum iron, μg/dL 84 205 ± 64 201 48–409 37–180 Transferrin, mg/dL 82 153 ± 31 152 83–244 190–375 Transferrin saturation, % 83 85 ± 15 91 20–94 15–50 LPI, μmol/L 38 0.52 ± 0.63 0.25 0–2.9 0 Total transfusions, n 78 63.3 ± 66.3 41.5 14–435 n/a Years of transfusion 75 3.4 ± 1.9 3 1–12 n/a Baseline concurrent therapies: 5-azacytidine (Vidaza): 5 pts; lenalidomide (Revlimid): 1 pt. Calculated creatinine clearance: normal (>80 mL/min): 37 pts; mildly abnormal (51–80 mL/min): 30 pts; moderately abnormal (30–50 mL/min): 9 pts. Hematological parameters: Anemia was present in all pts; other cytopenias included: neutropenia (<1800/μL): 13 pts, thrombocytopenia (<100,000/μL): 15 pts; neutropenia and thrombocytopenia: 12 pts. A total of 53 pts had received chelation prior to enrolling: 51 deferoxamine (Desferal®); and 2 deferasirox. Conclusions: Despite the prior availability of deferoxamine, these baseline data demonstrate significant levels of iron overload among transfused pts with myelodysplasia. Serum iron, ferritin and LPI are all well above the clinically significant thresholds associated with increased complications. Since recent data has suggested that iron overload may be a poor prognostic indicator in MDS, increased attention to maintaining appropriate iron balance is warranted. The recent availability of an oral iron chelator may be more acceptable to MDS pts and their physicians. This ongoing trial is designed to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and clinical benefits of deferasirox in pts with MDS.

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients (pts) with MDS require red blood cell transfusions, which can result in iron overload and its clinical sequelae. The US03 trial is designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of the once-daily, oral iron chelator, deferasirox (DFX), in pts with lower-risk MDS. In this ongoing study 93/176 pts have now completed 12 months of treatment. METHODS: US03 is a Phase II, open-label, 3-year trial in pts with Low- or Int-1 IPSS-risk MDS and transfusional iron overload (serum ferritin [SF] 1000 μg/L and >20 units RBC transfusions), with serum creatinine (SCr) 2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN). Initial DFX dose was 20 mg/kg/day and could be increased to 40 mg/kg/day based on tolerability and response. SF was monitored monthly; labile plasma iron (LPI), the reactive species of non-transferrin-bound iron, was assessed quarterly. BASELINE FEATURES: 176 pts were enrolled at 45 centers. Mean age: 70 years (range 21–90); 105 men and 71 women; IPSS Low risk (n=47; 27%); Int-1 (n=126; 72%); other (n=3; 2%). Mean baseline iron status was: SF, 3397 μg/L (863–36,280); LPI, 0.4 μmol/L (0.0–3.6). Forty-one percent of pts had elevated LPI at baseline (≥0.5 μmol/L). Mean number of lifetime prior transfusions: 63; mean duration of transfusions: 3.5 years (0–34). MDS therapy at study entry included azacitidine, hydroxyurea, lenalidomide, thalidomide or decitabine in 25 pts, and growth factors in 48 pts. Calculated creatinine clearance was normal (>80 mL/min) in 77 pts and abnormal (abn) in 99: mildly abn (51– 80 mL/min) in 71; moderately abn (30–50 mL/min) in 25; severely abn (<30 mL/min) in 3. RESULTS: Over 12 months, the mean dose of DFX was 21 mg/kg/day, and the mean transfusion rate was 3.4 units/month. Mean SF±SEM (μg/L) values at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months were 3397±233 (n=176), 3057±144 (n=143), 2802±128 (n=126), 2635±148 (n=109) and 2501±139 (n=93), respectively. In pts with elevated baseline LPI, sustained suppression of mean LPI to the normal range was achieved after 3 months of treatment. The figures show reductions (±SEM) in SF, and in LPI in pts with baseline LPI ≥0.5 μmol/L. Hematological improvement by IWG 2000 criteria was achieved in 8 pts (5%): erythroid response in 5 (major 3; minor 2); platelet in 1 (major); neutrophil in 1 (major); and combined platelet and neutrophil in 1. SAFETY: Of 173 pts, 18 (10%) discontinued DFX because of suspected adverse events (AEs), and an additional 5 (3%) because of serious AEs (SAEs). The most common AEs were diarrhea (n=9), rash (n=3) and nausea (n=2), while the most common SAEs were rash (n=2) and diarrhea (n=1). Of 147 pts with normal baseline SCr, 26 (18%) increased >ULN on at least two occasions (3.0 mg/dL max SCr). There were 9/172 (5%) and 22/168 (13%) new onset cases of grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, respectively, none suspected to be related to DFX; 7 and 11 of these pts, respectively, were receiving other MDS treatment therapies, including lenalidomide, decitabine, hydroxyurea and azacitidine. There were 17 deaths (10%), due to sepsis/infection (n=8), disease progression (n=4), intracranial bleed (n=2), cardio-respiratory arrest (n=2) and renal failure (n=1), all thought to be unrelated to DFX. CONCLUSIONS: In these heavily iron-overloaded pts, DFX was generally well tolerated. New onset cytopenias were consistent with the underlying disease. A 2-year extension phase of this study will assess the long-term safety and efficacy of DFX as well as the clinical impact on cardiac, hepatic and endocrine function. Figure Figure

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The majority of patients (pts) with MDS become red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent with escalating risk for transfusional hemosiderosis and its adverse effect on morbidity and mortality. The US03 trial is designed to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of the oral iron chelator, deferasirox (DFX), in pts with lower risk MDS. In this ongoing study 53 pts have completed 12 months’ (mos) treatment. METHODS: US03 is a Phase II, open-label, 3-year trial in pts with Low- or Int-1 IPSS risk MDS and transfusional iron overload (SF ≥1000 μg/L and >20 units RBC transfusions [tx]), with serum creatinine (SCr) ≤2-fold the upper limit of normal (ULN). Initial DFX dose was 20 mg/kg/day and could be increased to 40 mg/kg/day based on tolerability and response. SF was monitored monthly; LPI, the reactive species of non-transferrin-bound iron, was assessed quarterly. BASELINE FEATURES: 176 pts were enrolled at 45 centers. Mean age was 70 years (range, 21−90), including 102 men, 71 women; and IPSS risk groups of Low 46 pts (27%), Int-1 123 (71%), other 4 (2%). Mean baseline iron status: SF 3398 μg/L (range, 863−36,280); LPI 0.4 μmol/L (0.0−3.6); mean lifetime txs prior to study, 63; years of prior tx 3.5 (0−34). MDS therapy at study entry included chemotherapy, 22 pts; growth factors, 46. Estimated creatinine clearance: normal (>80 mL/min), 77 pts; mild (51−80 mL/min), 68; moderate, (30–50 mL/min) 25; severe (<30 mL/min) 2. Over 12 mos the mean dose was 21 mg/kg/day, and the mean tx rate was 4.1 units/mo. Forty percent of pts had elevated LPI at baseline (≥0.5 μmol/L). RESULTS: Mean SF±SD (μg/L) values: baseline 3398±3088; 3 mos 3065±1743; 6 mos 2775±1355; 9 mos 2759±1562; 12 mos 2603±1336. Sustained suppression of mean LPI to the normal range was achieved after 3 mos of treatment. (Figure shows changes in SF and LPI). Hematologic improvement by IWG criteria: 5 pts (6%); erythroid response: 3 (major 1; minor 2); platelet 2 (major); neutrophil 1 (major). SAFETY: Of 165 pts, only 10 (6%) discontinued secondary to suspected adverse events (AEs), and 7 (4%) serious AEs. There were 11 deaths (7%), all unrelated to DFX. Of 140 pts with normal baseline SCr, 35 (25%) increased >ULN (2.2 mg/dL max SCr). SCr increased >33% above baseline in 11 pts (8%) abnormal at baseline. New onset of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were 52/165 (32%) and 22/165 (13%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DFX therapy decreased mean SF over 1 year in this heavily iron-replete MDS population. Trough LPI normalized in 100% of pts over 12 mos, indicating 24-hour sustained suppression. DFX had a manageable safety profile in this population; new cytopenias were consistent with hematologic progression of MDS. Recent reviews show a 30% increase in hazard ratio for every 500 ng/mL increase in SF >1000 ng/mL; NCCN guidelines recommend consideration of iron chelation in iron-overloaded MDS pts. Ongoing assessments evaluating cardiac, hepatic and endocrine function will evaluate the impact of iron reduction on morbidity and mortality in MDS. Figure Figure