Citations

Abstract Objective To measure the relative levels of signal and noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy. Methods Twenty multinational epileptologists independently reviewed 50 vignettes of adult and pediatric patients presenting with suspected seizure(s) on two separate occasions with a ≥30‐day washout period. Experts provided a diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on clinical information and, if requested, routine EEG and neuroimaging data. Cases had an established clinical diagnosis of epilepsy or non‐epilepsy based on capture of habitual paroxysmal events on video‐EEG or long‐term clinical follow‐up. Experts' judgments were analyzed to decompose variability into different sources: signal (objective differences between cases), level noise (experts' bias toward over/under‐diagnosis), pattern noise (experts' idiosyncratic reactions to specific case features), and occasion noise (inconsistency across occasions). Results The probability of an expert making a different diagnosis for a given case on two different occasions was 16%. The probability of two different experts making a different diagnosis for the same case was 26%. Signal (case “difficulty”) accounted for 66–69% of total variation, with 31–34% attributable to noise. Level noise was the largest contributor in the absence of EEG/neuroimaging results (23%), while pattern noise dominated when test results were available (24%). Occasion noise contributed relatively little (1%) but was still sufficient to cause diagnostic reversals in 16–22% between occasions. Significance The degree of noise in expert diagnosis of epilepsy is substantial, stemming primarily from physicians' idiosyncratic interpretations of case features and variable dispositions toward over‐ or under‐diagnosis. Strategies to improve reliability are needed, including standardized data collection protocols and structured decision algorithms. For “difficult cases,” where expert reliability and accuracy are lowest, our findings support current clinical practice which favors early referral for video‐EEG monitoring over reliance on diagnostic anchoring. This diagnostic pathway may become more accessible with advances in EEG technology (e.g., wearable devices) and artificial intelligence.

Sharing research code in an open access version-controlled repository offers significant benefits for both science as a whole and for individual researchers. In this article, we focus on this practice, which is fully aligned with the NIH’s Gold Standard Science (GSS) program as well as FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable) and TRUST (transparency, responsibility, user focus, sustainability, technology) principles. Gold Standard Science supports open science by emphasizing transparency, reproducibility, and the use of best practices that enable others to verify and extend research. Pairing a research article’s cited data snapshot with a versioned, environment-specific code release, deposited in a companion code repository, ensures that, upon submission to a medical journal, readers and reviewers can directly verify results. An executable and updatable companion code repository complements, rather than replaces, established research data repositories. When code underlying medical research results is made openly available, then other scientists can inspect, run, and validate analyses. These activities enhance reproducibility, which is a core aim of GSS. Shared code also facilitates collaborative innovation by allowing researchers to extend the utility of the code to new datasets and applications. For researchers, code sharing can increase visibility, credibility, and citation impact. Demonstrating transparency through shared executable and updatable code builds trust with journal readers, peer reviewers, funders, and peers. Shared code in an open access repository signals adherence to high standards of scientific integrity and attracts opportunities for collaboration. A researcher who shares code receives recognition as a leader in reproducible, trustworthy research consistent with NIH’s GSS principles.

ABSTRACT Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common, heritable disorder with diverse clinical presentations and etiologies. We conducted a genome-wide association meta-analysis of 492,107 individuals, including 46,028 OSA cases, identifying 14 genome-wide significant loci, eight of which are novel. Analyses adjusting for body mass index (BMI) revealed three loci independent of obesity, implicating alternative biological pathways contributing to disease. Integrative functional analyses, including chromatin interaction mapping, fine-mapping, and eQTL colocalization, prioritized candidate effector genes. Notably, implicated genes in chondrocytes were associated with craniofacial morphology in both mouse and human multivariate genotype-phenotype mapping, supporting a role for craniofacial structure in OSA risk. These findings highlight key genetic pathways (obesity-related, neurological, and craniofacial) underlying the development of OSA, offering new insights into its complex etiology.

Lay Summary This multicenter study evaluated clinical outcomes in pregnancy for women with ulcerative colitis and an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Close monitoring is needed with a multidisciplinary team for management of inflammatory complications of the pouch such as pouchitis in pregnancy and postpartum.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) can cause radiation-induced changes (RIC), but its interactions with AVM embolization are not well established. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of previous embolization on RIC in SRS-treated AVM patients. METHODS: Data of AVM patients treated with single-session SRS from 1987 to 2018 were retrieved from the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation. Univariable and stepwise backward logistic regression models were used to identify RIC predictors. Patients were stratified into those who received pre-SRS embolization (E + SRS) vs those who did not (SRS-only). Radiologic RIC (rRIC) was the primary end point. Secondary outcomes included symptomatic RIC (sRIC) and permanent symptomatic RIC (pRIC). RESULTS: Among 1187 AVM patients, the mean age was 36.4 years (SD 16.8), with 50.4% female patients. AVMs had a mean untreated AVM volume of 5.2 cm 3 . A total of 130 patients (11%) underwent neoadjuvant embolization (E + SRS). The overall rRIC and sRIC rates were 32.8% and 12.1%, respectively, with time to rRIC and sRIC being significantly longer in the E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (103.6 ± 339.4 vs 11.3 ± 12.5 and 60.4 ± 262.9 vs 9.5 ± 9.0 months, respectively). Seizures at presentation and ≥3-cm untreated AVM volume significantly correlated with a higher likelihood of rRIC (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.32 [1.25-4.30] and aOR 2.77 [1.24-6.16], respectively). Age and pre-SRS embolization were associated with a significantly lower risk of rRIC (aOR 0.97 [0.96-0.99] and aOR 0.32 [0.13-0.74], respectively). The E + SRS cohort had significantly reduced odds of rRIC (aOR = 0.37 [0.15-0.89]) and pRIC (aOR = 0.04 [0.00-0.30]) after adjusting for significant covariates. CONCLUSION: Seizures at presentation and larger untreated AVM volume were independently associated with an increased risk of rRIC, whereas older age and pre-SRS embolization were protective. Notably, patients who underwent embolization before SRS had lower odds of rRIC and pRIC, with delayed onset of complications compared with SRS-only.

Abstract Introduction Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) have changed the treatment algorithm for patients with high-risk relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Efficacy was demonstrated for zanubrutinib and ibrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL patients in the ALPINE (NCT03734016) trial, for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in the ELEVATE-RR (NCT02477696) trial, and for acalabrutinib in the ASCEND (NCT00135226) trial. While there is limited head-to-head comparative trial data of all covalent BTKis in the treatment of high-risk R/R CLL, a previously published network meta-analysis (NMA) used data from the ALPINE, ELEVATE-RR, and ASCEND trials, and reported that zanubrutinib demonstrated significantly improved relative efficacy compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL (Shadman 2025). Within this NMA, high-risk R/R CLL populations were defined based on the prespecified definitions within each trial, including patients with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations in the ALPINE and ASCEND trials, and del(17p)/del(11q) in the ELEVATE-RR trial. This study aimed to compare zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib and acalabrutinib in high-risk R/R CLL by calculating the number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one progression or death. Methods A model was developed to evaluate the NNT among high-risk R/R CLL patients to avoid a progression or death. Progression free survival (PFS) data for zanubrutinib in high-risk patients were extracted from the ALPINE trial. PFS values for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were derived from the previously published NMA study. PFS for ibrutinib and acalabrutinib were calculated by applying PFS hazard ratio from the NMA results to the zanubrutinib PFS value for the high-risk population in the ALPINE trial. 24-month PFS (72.6% for zanubrutinib, 52.0% for ibrutinib, and 55.9% for acalabrutinib) were used for the base case analysis of the model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the impact of alternative PFS inputs for ibrutinib, derived directly from the high-risk populations in ALPINE trial (unadjusted). Results The base case results from the NNT model indicate that for the treatment of patients with high-risk R/R CLL over 24-months, every five patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of ibrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death and every six patients treated with zanubrutinib instead of acalabrutinib results in the avoidance of one disease progression or death. Applying the model result to a hypothetical scenario of 100 patients with high-risk R/R CLL treated with zanubrutinib versus ibrutinib for two years finds approximately 20 patients will avoid disease progression events or deaths. Treating the same population with zanubrutinib versus acalabrutinib for two years will result in the avoidance of 17 disease progression events or death. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent NNT results.Conclusions The NNT analysis suggests that among high-risk R/R CLL patients, zanubrutinib is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes compared to ibrutinib and acalabrutinib. Over 24 months, zanubrutinib demonstrated a NNT of five to prevent one disease progression or death compared to ibrutinib, and an NNT of six compared to acalabrutinib, in high-risk R/R CLL patients. Study findings should be interpreted based on modeling assumptions and potential patient population differences across trials.

Abstract Background Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) is a rare, typically acquired disorder due to an immune-mediated deficiency of ADAMTS13, a metalloprotease responsible for cleaving large multimers of von Willebrand Factor (vWF). In the absence of ADAMTS13 activity, ultra-large vWF multimers accumulate, promoting widespread platelet aggregation and microvascular thrombosis. This consumptive cascade leads to thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, fever, neurological symptoms, and rarely renal dysfunction. Although therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has long been the cornerstone of TTP treatment, the FDA approved Caplacizumab as a first-line treatment for TTP in 2019. This drug is a bivalent single-domain antibody that binds to the A1 domain of vWF and prevents its interaction with platelets, thus effectively interrupting the pathogenic cascade, which is associated with a risk of bleeding. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising data from 152 healthcare organizations. Adults (≥18 years) with a diagnosis of TTP who received Caplacizumab plus TPE were compared to patients with TTP who received TPE alone. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance characteristics between cohorts. The primary outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality and major bleeding events over a period of 1 month. Results A total of 4084 patients with TTP were identified, of whom 356 received caplacizumab with TPE and 3728 received TPE. After PSM, 2 balanced cohorts were created: C+P (Caplacizumab + TPE), P only (TPE), each comprising 356 patients. The average age in C+P and P only, after PSM, was 50.4 +/- 16.2 and 50.8 +/- 16.2 years, respectively. Females formed 65.7% of both C+P and P only, and males accounted for 28.4% and 28.7% of C+P and P only, respectively. 2.8% patients in C+P and 7.06% patients in P only had all-cause mortality at the end of 1 month. One-month all-cause mortality was significantly lower in C+P (2.8%) compared to P only (7.06%), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.385 (95% CI 0.182 to 0.814, p=0.010). Upon assessment of bleeding outcomes, no statistically significant risk difference was noted between the 2 groups, with the odds ratio being 0.974 (95% CI 0.399 to 2.379, p=0.954). Conclusion Our large database study suggests that the addition of caplacizumab to standard TPE therapy is associated with a reduction in one-month all-cause mortality in patients with TTP, without a corresponding increase in major bleeding. However, given the lack of granular clinical data, such as contraindications to caplacizumab use, it is possible that patients who received TPE alone were inherently at a higher risk. As such, while these findings support the potential benefit of early caplacizumab use, they should be interpreted with caution and warrant prospective validation to confirm causality and assess long-term outcomes.

Abstract Background: Recent approvals and clinical trials have established covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKis), including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib, as effective agents for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Multiple BTKi-based regimens are recommended by experts and clinical guidelines in both the first-line and later-line settings. Additional approvals of the noncovalent BTKi pirtobrutinib and multiple CAR T-cell therapies have also advanced the management of patients who have progressed on covalent BTKi therapy. In light of these developments in treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), this study compares trends in treatment choice among experts and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in an online treatment decision support tool. Methods: An online decision support tool, developed with 5 US-based experts in MCL, was launched in April 2023 and updated in April 2025. The tool provided treatment recommendations for various clinical scenarios involving newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, incorporating factors such as age, fitness, previous therapies, and response duration. HCPs entered specific patient characteristics along with their intended treatment choice. The tool then displayed expert recommendations for that scenario, and HCPs were asked whether these recommendations influenced their treatment decision. HCP-entered data and expert recommendations were analyzed to identify common trends and divergence in current BTKi therapy use. Results: The 2023 online tool was used by 119 HCPs who entered 148 patient scenarios, and the 2025 online tool was used by 69 HCPs who entered 96 patient scenarios. In 2023, for patients with ND MCL who had later-stage disease or were not eligible for radiation therapy (n = 75), 64% of expert-recommended treatments included BTKis, with the ECHO and TRIANGLE regimens representing 12% and 17% of recommendations, respectively. In 2025, 81% of expert recommendations were BTKi-based regimens, with ≥3 experts recommending a BTKi regimen in 66 of 67 unique ND case scenarios. The ECHO and TRIANGLE regimen each represented 28% to 29% of expert recommendations. In addition, 51% of recommendations for patients with 17p deletions or TP53 mutations consisted of the BOVen regimen. The percentage of HCPs who indicated that they were considering a BTKi-based regimen in the setting of ND MCL was 17% (13 of 75 ND cases) in 2023 and 66% (44 of 67 ND cases) in 2025. The use of both the ECHO and TRIANGLE regimens by HCPs increased from 5% and 4%, respectively, in 2023 to 19% for each in 2025. In 2025, 6% of HCPs considered the BOVen regimen for patients with TP53 mutation (n = 17). In 2023 and 2025, approximately 50% of the HCP-entered patient cases for previously treated MCL had not received a BTKi (n = 48 and n = 18, respectively). For these scenarios, 94% and 98% of expert recommendations consisted of covalent BTKis in 2023 and 2025, respectively. HCPs selected covalent BTKis for 68% of cases in 2023 and 89% of cases in 2025. For patients with R/R MCL previously treated with a BTKi, CAR T-cell therapy represented 36% of expert recommendations in 2023 (23 scenarios) and 60% in 2025 (18 scenarios). By contrast, 4% and 11% of HCPs considered CAR T-cell therapy for these patients in 2023 and 2025, respectively. For HCPs reporting on the tool's clinical impact (n = 96), 35% indicated expert recommendations changed their intended therapy, 41% stated their treatment plan matched the recommendations, 10% cited barriers to implementing recommendations, and 14% remained undecided on optimal treatment. Conclusions:This analysis highlights the ongoing adoption of expert-recommended treatments into real-world clinical practice. Our data suggest that expert and HCP use of BTKi therapy in the ND MCL setting has increased in recent years. In R/R MCL, CAR T-cell therapy appears to be considered infrequently by HCPs. Barriers to implementation of expert recommendations warrant further investigation. Enhanced decision support tools and targeted educational initiatives could help increase the use of expert treatment recommendations and potentially improve patient outcomes.