Citations

Showing 10 of 108060 citations.

A Prospective, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate for Knee Osteoarthritis
Kazmerchak, Shari E. , O'Connor, Mary I, Shapiro, Shane A. , Heckman, Michael G. , Zubair, Abba C. , O’Connor, Mary I.

Mayo Clinic

The American Journal of Sports Medicine | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 82-90

10.1177/0363546516662455 | PMID 27566242 Get It

Background: Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) is increasingly used as a regenerative therapy for musculoskeletal pathological conditions despite limited evidence-based support. Hypothesis: BMAC will prove feasible, safe, and efficacious for the treatment of pain due to mild to moderate degenerative joint disease of the knee. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: In this prospective, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 25 patients with bilateral knee pain from bilateral osteoarthritis were randomized to receive BMAC into one knee and saline placebo into the other. Fifty-two milliliters of bone marrow was aspirated from the iliac crests and concentrated in an automated centrifuge. The resulting BMAC was combined with platelet-poor plasma for an injection into the arthritic knee and was compared with a saline injection into the contralateral knee, thereby utilizing each patient as his or her own control. Safety outcomes, pain relief, and function as measured by Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) measures and the visual analog scale (VAS) score were tracked initially at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure. Results: There were no serious adverse events from the BMAC procedure. OARSI Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain and VAS pain scores in both knees decreased significantly from baseline at 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months ( P ≤ .019 for all). Pain relief, although dramatic, did not differ significantly between treated knees ( P > .09 for all). Conclusion: Early results show that BMAC is safe to use and is a reliable and viable cellular product. Study patients experienced a similar relief of pain in both BMAC- and saline-treated arthritic knees. Further study is required to determine the mechanisms of action, duration of efficacy, optimal frequency of treatments, and regenerative potential. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov record 12-004459.
Clinical Spectrum of Medium‐Sized Vessel Vasculitis
Alıbaz-Öner, Fatma , Crowson, Cynthia S. , Makol, Ashima , Ytterberg, Steven R. , Matteson, Eric L. , Warrington, Kenneth J. , Koster, Matthew J. , Salvarani, Carlo , Warrington, Kenneth J , Makol, Ashima

Mayo Clinic

Arthritis Care & Research | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 69 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 884-891

10.1002/acr.23007 | PMID 27564269 Get It

ObjectivePolyarteritis nodosa (PAN) is a systemic necrotizing vasculitis of medium‐sized visceral vessels. However, cutaneous arteritis (CA) and gastrointestinal (GI) vasculitis are forms of single‐organ vasculitis having indistinguishable histopathologic findings from PAN. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients with systemic PAN, CA, and GI vasculitis.MethodsRetrospective cohorts were assembled, consisting of patients with PAN, CA, and GI vasculitis between 1980 and 2014. The demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients were abstracted from medical records.ResultsWe included 48 patients with PAN, 41 patients with CA, and 19 patients with GI vasculitis. The disease of 1 patient evolved from CA to systemic PAN during the disease course. At diagnosis, 94% of patients with PAN, 93% of patients with CA, and 67% of patients with GI vasculitis were treated with glucocorticoids. Additional immunosuppressive agents were used in 67% of PAN, 37% of GI vasculitis, and 32% of CA cases. The 5‐year cumulative relapse rate was 45.2% in CA, and only 9.6% in PAN during a followup of approximately 6 years. No deaths were observed in the CA group. The survival rate at 10 years was 66% in the PAN group and 61% in the GI vasculitis group.ConclusionSystemic PAN, CA, and GI vasculitis take different clinical courses and therefore may be different diseases, rather than existing on a spectrum of the same disease. Progression of CA to systemic PAN is very rare. Relapse risk is low during followup in PAN. Patients with CA have a higher relapse rate than those with systemic PAN, possibly due to less use of immunosuppressive therapy in CA.
What Next After GAS and PANDA?
Ing, Caleb , Rauh, Virginia , Sun, Lena S. , Warner, David O.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 381-383

10.1097/ana.0000000000000350 | PMID 27564560 Get It

On April 16 and 17, 2016, the Fifth biennial Pediatric Anesthesia & Neurodevelopment Assessment (PANDA) symposium was convened at the Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital of New York at Columbia University Medical Center. During the symposium, experts in the fields of anesthesiology, neuropsychology, and epidemiology were convened in a small group session to determine the level of confidence in the current clinical evidence and the next steps in anesthetic neurotoxicity clinical research. Among the participants in the discussion, there remained a lack of consensus on whether anesthetic exposure causes long-term neurodevelopmental deficits in children based on the current evidence. This causal relationship between anesthesia exposure and neurodevelopmental deficit is difficult to establish using observational data, and current and future clinical trials are critical for answering this question. It was, however, recognized that the continuum of data that is seen in studies of other toxic environmental exposures, such as lead poisoning, has not been established in the anesthetic neurotoxicity literature, specifically regarding the timing of the exposure, the dose effects, contributing perioperative conditions, or vulnerable populations. As a result, these questions may need to be addressed in observational studies to guide future clinical trials.
Systematic review with meta‐analysis: prevalent vs. incident oesophageal adenocarcinoma and high‐grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus
Visrodia, Kavel , Singh, Siddharth , Krishnamoorthi, Rajesh , Ahlquist, David A. , Wang, K. K., Iyer, Prasad G. , Katzka, David A.

Mayo Clinic

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 775-784

10.1111/apt.13783 | PMID 27562355 Get It

SummaryBackgroundThe proportion of oesophageal adenocarcinoma that is detected concurrently with initial Barrett's oesophagus diagnosis is not well studied.AimTo compare the proportion of prevalent adenocarcinoma vs. incident adenocarcinoma found during surveillance of Barrett's.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science (from their inception to 31 May 2015) for cohort studies in adults with Barrett's (nondysplastic Barrett's ± Barrett's with low‐grade dysplasia) with minimum average follow‐up of 3 years, and providing numbers of prevalent adenocarcinoma detected (concurrently with Barrett's diagnosis and up to 1 year afterwards) vs. incident adenocarcinoma detected (greater than 1 year after Barrett's diagnosis). Pooled weighted proportions of prevalent and incident adenocarcinoma were calculated, using a random effects model.ResultsOn meta‐analysis of 13 studies reporting on 603 adenocarcinomas in 9657 Barrett's patients, 85.1% of adenocarcinomas were classified as prevalent [95% confidence interval (CI), 78.1–90.2%) and 14.9% as incident (95% CI, 9.8–21.9%), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 66%). Among nine studies reporting on 787 high‐grade dysplasia and oesophageal adenocarcinomas in 8098 Barrett's patients, the proportion of prevalent high‐grade dysplasia‐oesophageal adenocarcinoma was similar at 80.5% (95% CI, 68.1–88.8%, I2 = 87%). These results remained stable across multiple subgroup analyses including study quality, setting, duration of follow‐up and presence of baseline dysplasia.ConclusionsIn our meta‐analysis, four of five patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma or high‐grade dysplasia at index endoscopy or within 1 year of Barrett's follow‐up were considered to be prevalent cases. Continued efforts are needed to identify patients with Barrett's before the development of adenocarcinoma.
Dissemination and Implementation of Shared Decision Making Into Clinical Practice: A Research Agenda
Kanzaria, Hemal K., Booker‐Vaughns, Juanita , Itakura, K, Yadav, Kabir , Kane, Bryan G , Gayer, Christopher, Lin, Grace A. , Gibson, Robert W. , Williams, Pluscedia, Carpenter, Christopher R. , LeBlanc, Annie , Chen, Esther H. , Carpenter, Christopher R

Mayo Clinic

Academic Emergency Medicine | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1368-1379

10.1111/acem.13075 | PMID 27561951 Get It

AbstractShared decision making (SDM) is essential to advancing patient‐centered care in emergency medicine. Despite many documented benefits of SDM, prior research has demonstrated persistently low levels of patient engagement by clinicians across many disciplines, including emergency medicine. An effective dissemination and implementation (D&I) framework could be used to alter the process of delivering care and to facilitate SDM in routine clinical emergency medicine practice. Here we outline a research and policy agenda to support the D&I strategy needed to integrate SDM into emergency care.
Acute leukemia in pregnancy: a single institution experience with 23 patients
Farhadfar, Nosha , Cerquozzi, Sonia , Hessenauer, M.R., Litzow, Mark R. , Letendre, Louis, Patnaik, Mrinal M. , Tefferi, Ayalew , Gangat, Naseema , Hessenauer, Michael R, Hogan, William J.

Mayo Clinic

Leukemia & Lymphoma | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 58 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1052-1060

10.1080/10428194.2016.1222379 | PMID 27562538 Get It

Dementia, gait disturbance, and urinary incontinence in a patient with pulmonary sarcoidosis
Labarca, Gonzalo , Ramirez, R. Najera, Monsalve, Ximena, Mira‐Avendano, Isabel , Labarca, Gonzalo

Mayo Clinic

Respirology Case Reports | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/rcr2.182 | PMID 28127435 Get It

Hydrocephalus is an uncommon presentation of neurosarcoidosis. We discuss the case of a 67‐year‐old woman with a prior diagnosis of hypothyroidism, systemic hypertension, and lung sarcoidosis who presented with a 1‐month history of progressive impairment of consciousness leading to prostration and loss of sphincter control. At admission, patient was febrile with altered speech and without focalization. Laboratory results showed leucocytosis and mild anaemia. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis was characterized by mild elevated protein level, increased cell count, normal glucose and adenosine deaminase (ADA), negative cytology, and no bacterial isolations. Electroencephalogram showed toxic‐metabolic encephalopathy. Computed tomography (CT) of the brain revealed hydrocephalus without structural damage, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain demonstrated non‐specific diffuse meningeal enhancement and periventricular changes supporting normal pressure hydrocephalus. Chest X‐ray showed mediastinal adenopathy and parenchymatous lesions, consistent with stage II lung sarcoidosis. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was installed, and the patient experienced rapid improvement in her symptoms.
Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Other Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Chronic Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Directions
Tan, Cher Heng , Venkatesh, Sudhakar K. , Venkatesh, Sudhakar Kundapur, Venkatesh, Sudhakar K

Mayo Clinic

Gut and Liver | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 672-686

10.5009/gnl15492 | PMID 27563019 Get It

Risk Factors for Readmission in Patients With Cancer Comanaged by Hospitalists
Shapiro, Joshua S., Humeniuk, Michael, Siddiqui, Mustaqeem , Bonthu, Neelima, Schroeder, Darrell R. , Kashiwagi, Deanne T. , Siddiqui, Mustaqeem A, Siddiqui, Mustaqeem A , Schroeder, Darrell

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Medical Quality | August 26, 2016 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 526-531

10.1177/1062860616665904 | PMID 27561695 Get It

Little is known about which variables put patients with cancer at risk for 30-day hospital readmission. Comanagement of this often complex patient population by specialists and hospitalists has become increasingly common. This retrospective study examined inpatients with cancer comanaged by hospitalists, hematologists, and oncologists to determine the rate of readmission and factors associated with readmission. Patients in this cohort had a readmission rate of 23%. Patients who were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (odds ratio [OR] = 0.34) or hospice (OR = 0.11) were less likely to have 30-day readmissions, whereas patients who had surgery (OR = 3.16) during their index admission were more likely. Other factors, including patient demographics, cancer types, and hospitalization interventions and events, did not differ between patients who were readmitted and those who were not. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature identifying risk factors for readmission in medical oncology and hematology patients.