Citations

147 Background: The Institute of Medicine recommends development of cancer survivorship care models that are patient centered. We designed a cross-sectional survey to determine the medical and psychosocial needs and preferences of breast cancer survivors. Methods: We identified a random sample, stratified by age and chemotherapy usage, of 600 women from MN, WI, and IA, ages 18-99, within 1-5 years of diagnosis of stage 0-3 breast cancer and seen at our institution. Results: We received 329 surveys (response rate 55%). Respondents were a mean age of 58 years (range 26-89) and a mean of 3.3 years from cancer diagnosis (range 1.2-5.4). 96% were white and stage distribution was: 15% stage 0, 35% stage 1, 32% stage 2, 15% stage 3, and 3% missing. Treatment included mastectomy (60%), lumpectomy (40%), radiation (61%), chemotherapy (55%) and hormonal therapy (50%). Most common treatment-related sequelae were neuropathy (38%), chest wall or arm pain (27%), and lymphedema (26%). Over half (52%) report worry and 45% report fatigue as a problem in the past week. 74% stated that their medical needs were met, whereas 49% said their psychological and spiritual needs were met (p<0.01). 68% understood the follow-up plan after treatment was complete. Perceived barriers to follow up care were anxiety (30%) and lack of coordination (10%). When queried about post-treatment care, the following aspects were considered important (% of patients ranking ≥7 on scale 0-10: 0=not important, 10=very important): breast/chest wall exam (88%); screening for osteoporosis (71%), colorectal cancer (69%), and heart disease (65%); educational materials (64%); mammography (63%); physical therapy (61%); diet and exercise counseling (60%); and complementary/alternative medicine information (53%). Less important were psychology (44%), gynecology (43%), chaplain services (35%), support groups (32%), social work (20%), and infertility experts (4%). 60% expressed interest in attending a survivorship clinic. Conclusions: This survey provides unique data on breast cancer survivors, and efforts should be made to optimize medical and psychosocial care in line with their needs and preferences. These results will be imperative in designing a wellness and survivorship clinic.

144 Background: Many patients require hospitalization after mastectomy, predominantly for pain management and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). In order to improve a woman's perioperative experience after mastectomy and facilitate mastectomy on an outpatient basis, we initiated a clinical pathway for perioperative management of unilateral mastectomy patients at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Methods: The clinical pathway consists of preoperative oral medications (celecoxib and gabapentin), preoperative ultrasound guided paravertebral block using bupivacaine, intraoperative anesthesia management with total intravenous anesthetic, and minimal use of long-acting opioids and postoperative acetaminophen and oxycodone. All patients are evaluated by the surgical team on the afternoon after surgery and if patients are recovering well are discharged on the day of surgery. The following morning, the surgical team telephones the patient to follow up on management of pain, nausea or vomiting, and drain output. Results: Eighteen patients have been treated on this clinical pathway. Mean age of patients was 66 (range 51-81). Majority of patients (n=16, 89%) underwent unilateral mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy, with 1 patient undergoing bilateral mastectomy and 1 patient undergoing mastectomy and axillary dissection. All patients are evaluated by the surgical team on the afternoon of surgery. Fourteen patients (78%) were without evidence of hematoma or PONV, pain was well-controlled on oral medications and they were discharged on the day of surgery. On morning after telephone calls, pain scale ratings ranged from 1 to 3 and no patients verbalized complaints of nausea. Four patients (22%) treated on this clinical pathway required overnight observation in the hospital, one for urinary retention, two for pain control, and one for high sanguineous drain output. Conclusions: The clinical pathway presented provides preemptive analgesia and regional anesthesia for patients undergoing mastectomy, enabling the majority of patients to be discharged on the day of surgery. The clinical pathway is a safe and effective way to improve the perioperative experience of breast surgery patients and decrease hospital admission.

9 Background: We examined patient-reported fatigue scores and overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer (EC) enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus Registry (EABE). Methods: 1,481 patients enrolled in the EABE between September 2001 and January 2009 returned a baseline quality of life questionnaire including a Linear Analog Self Assessment (LASA) fatigue score which was scored on a 0-10 scale, with 0 as the most extreme fatigue. Patients were categorized as having clinically deficient fatigue (DF) if they reported a score of ≤ 5 and clinically non-deficient fatigue (nDF) if they reported a score of > 5. Kaplan-Meier methodology and Cox models explored OS in relation to fatigue scores in patients with EC. Results: A total of 667 patients with EC were included in the EABE, of which 659 returned a registry questionnaire with a valid LASA fatigue score recorded. Median age at the time of registry entry was 65 years (range 23-92). A total of 392 (59%) and 267 patients (41%) reported DF and nDF, respectively. On univariate analysis, patients with nDF had improved 5-year survival compared to patients with DF. In patients having esophagectomy prior to LASA, those reporting nDF had improved survival compared to patients with DF. Similarly, in patients having no esophagectomy prior to LASA, those with nDF had improved survival compared to those with DF. Among the 368 patients with locally advanced EC (LAEC), those reporting nDF had improved 5-year overall survival compared to patients with DF (28% vs 17%, HR = 0.67, p = 0.003). This remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR = 0.71, p = 0.015). Conclusions: Patient-reported fatigue is associated with overall survival in patients with LAEC. As a result, fatigue scores should be considered as a stratification factor in future clinical trial design. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

480 Background: COs associated with varying Tx patterns in mCRC pts are poorly understood because patterns diverge from the randomized trials (RCT). The RCTs of BV (Avastin) plus chemotherapy (CT) in mCRC pts continued BV until progressive disease (PD), even if CT was stopped/changed. Some RCTs of BV+CT in mCRC show ∼50% of pts stopping Tx early for reasons other than PD with possible lessening of benefit. It is unclear if this is due to use of a particular CT regimen or other practice pattern. While the beneficial effect of post-PD BV Tx has been shown in ARIES (HR 0.52 BBP vs No BBP) [A Cohn, ASCO 2010], the effect of stopping BV or CT before PD is unclear. ARIES, a community based observational study with a large cohort of 1st line BV-treated mCRC pts, will assess the COs associated with different 1st line Tx patterns (BV and CT) based on real world practice. Methods: ARIES enrolled mCRC pts receiving first- or second-line CT+BV. No Tx regimens or assessments are protocol specified. Data are collected prospectively at baseline (BL) and quarterly. Analyses included first-line pts with PD. Tx patterns of pts initially treated with FOLFOX/BV or FOLFIRI/BV are described and preliminary COs (PFS and OS) are estimated from K-M curves. Tx duration is calculated from enrollment date. Results: As of 2/5/10, 1,548 first-line mCRC pts enrolled (median follow up = 21 m); 1,133 pts had PD. Of 1,133 pts with PD, most had FOLFOX/BV (63%) or FOLFIRI/BV (16%) as first CT. BL characteristics were similar, but the FOLFOX/BV group had more stage 4 pts (74%). Main reasons for stopping BV include AE, max benefit achieved and CT holiday. Tx patterns and COs are in the table. Conclusions: ARIES first-line mCRC pts treated with FOLFOX/BV or FOLFIRI/BV had similar Tx patterns and COs despite the common opinion that they may differ in tolerability and possibly effectiveness. Additional analyses will assess the impact of stopping BV and/or CT before PD. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

437 Background: Optimizing post-operative clinical management for early-stage (I/II) colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts) is a significant unmet medical need. We hypothesized that a molecular prognostic test using primary CRC tissue would better predict the chances of tumor R within 36 months (mo) than current NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (NCCN). Methods: Pts had tumor R by 36 mo (n=46) or confirmed non-recurrence (NR) for ≥36 mo (n=69) after surgery; none had received neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy. Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary adenocarcinoma tissues (median storage 7 years; range 4-15) obtained at initial surgical resection with curative intent were retrieved for 86 stage I/II (pT1-4 pN0 M0) colon cancer and 29 stage I (pT1-2, pN0 M0) rectal cancer pts from 2 US and 2 European sites that were different from those previously used to generate the molecular test. Tumor gene expression was assessed by qRT-PCR with custom 384- well TaqMan Low Density Arrays (Applied Biosystems) using RNA that had satisfied a set of rigorous quality control parameters. Results: For stages I/II CRC (n=115), the dichotomous rule correctly classified 32/46 R and 38/69 NR pts: sensitivity (S) 0.70, specificity (SP) 0.55. High-risk pts had a significantly higher probability of R by 36 mo than low-risk pts: PPV 0.51, NPV 0.73; hazard ratio (HR) 2.06 (95% CI: 1.10 to 3.86; p=0.020). NCCN (V.1.2011) was not able to differentiate 36-mo R vs NR in this population: S 0.72, SP 0.42, PPV 0.45, NPV 0.69; HR 1.38 (95% CI: 0.73 to 2.63; p=0.315). The SP of the molecular test was significantly greater than that for NCCN (p=0.05). For stage I pts (n=29; 13R, 16NR), the prognostic accuracy of the test (0.79; 23/29) surpassed that for NCCN (0.55; 16/29). Conclusions: External validation of a 5-gene prognostic rule confirmed its ability to differentiate early stage CRC pts at high risk vs low risk for R within 36 mo after surgery better than current NCCN Guidelines, especially for stage I. The improved specificity and high sensitivity of the molecular test confirm its potential utility for optimizing post-op clinical management of early stage CRC. [Table: see text]

419 Background: Deficient DNA mismatch repair (MMR) results in microsatellite instability (MSI) that is detected in ∼15% of sporadic colon cancers. MMR status has been shown to provide prognostic and predictive information. We developed a model to predict MMR deficiency using clinically available data, and thereby facilitate the selection of patient tumors for MMR testing. Methods: Data were utilized from stage II and III colon carcinoma patients (n = 2016) who participated in 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant studies (NCCTG, FFCD, NCIC, GIVIO, NSABP) and an Italian cohort. MMR status in tumors had been determined by MSI testing or by immunohistochemistry for hMLH1 and hMSH2 proteins. Logistic regression and a recursive partitioning and amalgamation analysis was used to identify factors (histologic grade, gender, tumor site, stage, age, lymph node status, T-stage) predictive of MMR status. Results: Of the cancers, 357 (17.7%) showed deficient MMR. Tumor site was the most important predictor of MMR status followed by histologic grade, then stage (II vs. III) and then gender. Distal tumors had a low likelihood of deficient MMR (5% rate overall), whereas proximal tumors had a greater likelihood of deficient MMR (30%). For patients with proximal tumors, the addition of histologic grade and stage increased the prediction of deficient MMR (Table). Using tumor site, histologic grade, and stage, the logistic regression model showed excellent discrimination (c-statistic = 0.80). Conclusions: Routine clinicopathological data can facilitate the identification of MMR deficient cases. Tumor site and histologic grade were the strongest predictors of MMR deficiency. Within proximal, poorly differentiated tumors, stage was highly predictive. These findings suggest that our model can assist in selecting sporadic colon cancers for MMR testing for use in clinical decision-making, especially for stage II patients. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

397 Background: Carcinomas of the appendix are exceedingly rare tumors and have an annual age-adjusted incidence of around 0.4 cases per 100,000. Appendiceal adenocarcinoma accounts for <0.5% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms and, of these, mucinous adenocarcinomas account for the majority. Published accounts of familial instances of primary appendiceal tumors are strikingly rare. Methods: We report two siblings who both developed primary mucinous adenocarcinomas. A genetics evaluation was conducted to determine if there was a recognizable underlying single gene disorder: no DNA mismatch repair defect was evident and no other diagnosis was apparent. A review of appendiceal cancers seen at Mayo Clinic from l997 to the present was conducted to search for additional familial cases. Results: Among 316 cases of primary appendiceal cancer of any histologic type, this sib pair was the only family reporting a second affected family member. Conclusions: The occurrence of appendiceal cancer in siblings may represent a random occurrence. Adenocarcinomas of the most common type of appendiceal cancer and occur at older ages than other histologic subtypes. A strikingly rare predisposition syndrome cannot be ruled out. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

369 Background: A multi-center prospectively specified retrospective study Validating Indicators to Associate Recurrence (VITAR) is assessing the relationship between guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) gene expression in formalin fixed LNs and recurrence risk in stage II CC pts not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Here we report the preplanned initial analysis performed with 241 pts. Methods: GCC mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using FFPE LNs tissues from untreated stage II CC pts diagnosed from 1999-2006 with at least 10 LN examined blinded to clinical outcomes. Cox regression models examined the relationship between GCC nodal status and the prespecified primary endpoint of recurrence risk. Results: Twenty-ninepts (12%) had a disease recurrence or cancer death, median follow-up was 60 months and median LNs examined was 15. The ratio of the number of GCC+ LNs over the total number of informative LNs (LNR) significantly predicted higher recurrence risk for 84 pts classified as high risk (HR, 2.38; p=0.02). The estimated 5-yr recurrence rates were 10% and 27% for the low and high risk group, respectively. After adjusting for age, T stage, number of LNs assessed, and MMR status, the significant association remained (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.17-5.83; p=0.02). In a subset of 181 pts with negative margin, T3 tumor only and ≥12 LN examined, the GCC LNR had a HR for recurrence of 5.06 (95% CI 1.61-15.91, p=0.003), translating into 5-yr recurrence rates of 4% among low risk pts and 27% for the high-risk group. Conclusions: Our results suggest that GCC expression in LNs is a significant determinant of recurrence in appropriately staged CC pts not treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The validation component of the study is ongoing. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

368 Background: 5-Fluorouracil (5FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) chemoradiation for anal cancer is associated with high rates of acute morbidity. We have previously shown that dose-painted IMRT (DP-IMRT) significantly reduces grade 3+ GI and dermatologic acute toxicity, as compared to the RTOG 9811 5FU/MMC arm, which used non-conformal radiation techniques. We now report on the two-year outcomes of this DP-IMRT approach. Methods: T2-4N0-3M0 anal canal cancers received 5FU (1,000 mg/m2/day 96 hour infusion) and MMC (10 mg/m2 bolus) days 1 and 29 of DP-IMRT prescribed as follows - T2N0: 42 Gy elective nodal and 50.4 Gy anal tumor planning target volumes (PTVs), 28 fractions; T3-4N0-3: 45 Gy elective nodal, 50.4 Gy ≤ 3 cm and 54 Gy > 3 cm metastatic nodal and 54 Gy anal tumor PTVs, 30 fractions. The following two-year outcomes were assessed: local-regional (LRF) and colostomy failures (CF) using the cumulative incidence method, and disease-free (DFS), overall (OS) and colostomy-free survivals (CFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Of 63 accrued patients, 52 were analyzable. Median age was 58 years; 81% female; 54% stage II; 25% IIIA; 21% IIIB. Median follow-up was 23.2 months (0.2-33). Two-year LRF, CF, DFS and 95% confidence intervals are 20% (9%, 31%), 8% (0.4%, 15%) and 77% (62%, 86%), respectively. The causes of death for the 7 patients that died are: anal cancer in 5, morbidity in one and second primary outside the radiation field in one. Two-year comparison data from the RTOG 9811 5FU/MMC arm are shown in the table below. Conclusions: DP-IMRT with 5FU/MMC for the treatment of anal canal cancer yields similar two-year outcomes as the RTOG 9811 conventional radiation, 5FU/MMC arm. Because of the associated acute toxicity sparing, DP-IMRT will be used as the platform, and may allow for radiation dose escalation, in future RTOG anal canal trials. Supported by RTOG U10 CA21661, CCOP U10 CA3742 and ATC U24 CA 81647 NCI grants. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

367 Background: On initial publication of GI Intergroup RTOG 98-11, concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU+mitomycin (MMC) decreased colostomy failure (CF) vs induction plus concurrent 5FU+cisplatin (CDDP), but did not significantly impact disease free or overall survival (DFS, OS). The intent of the current analysis is to determine the long-term impact of treatment on survival (DFS, OS, colostomy-free [CFS]), CF and relapse (local-regional [LRF], distant [DM]) in this patient group. Methods: Stratification factors included gender, clinical node status, and primary size. DFS/OS were estimated univariately by Kaplan-Meier method and treatment arms compared by log-rank test. Time to relapse/CF were estimated by cumulative incidence method and treatment arms compared by Gray's test. Multivariate analyses were done with Cox proportional hazard models to test for treatment differences, adjusting for stratification factors. Results: Of 682 patients accrued, 649 were analyzable for outcomes. As seen in the table, 5-yr DFS and OS were statistically better for RT+5FU/MMC vs RT+5FU/CDDP (67.7 v 57.6%, p=.0.0045; 78.2 v 70.5%, p=0.021) with trends toward statistical significance for CFS, LRF, and CF (71.8 v 64.9%, p=0.053; 20 v 26.5%, 11.9 v 17.3%, p=0.092 and 0.075). Similar results were seen in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Concurrent chemoradiation with 5FU-MMC has a statistically significant impact on DFS and OS vs induction + concurrent 5FU-CDDP and borderline significance for CFS, CF and LRF. Therefore, RT+5FU/MMC remains the preferred standard of care. Potential strategies to improve outcomes include treatment intensification and individualized molecular-based treatment. Supported by RTOG grant U10 CA21661 and CCOP grant U10 CA37422 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.