Citations

498 Background: Prior study, demonstrating differential immunohistochemical EGFR expression between the primary colon cancer and the liver metastasis, suggested possible molecular differences between the two tumor sites. This questions the relevance of obtaining genomic information from the primary tumor to guide adjuvant treatment. In this study we examine whether there are genomic differences specific to metastatic nodes versus the paired colon primary samples. Methods: Using 30 primary and lymph node metastasis pairs (dissected for >80% tumor from paraffin embedded tissue), we obtained a dataset of copy number derived from the Affymetrix Oncoscan Molecular Inversion Probe platform. Using the Nexus Copy Number software for processing, we used the default automatic segmentation of the copy number data with a threshold for calling copy number gains/losses of 2.3/1.7. Subsequently we applied the Wilcoxon signed-rank test in order to find regions showing copy number imbalance that differ between the paired nodes and tumors correcting for multiple comparisons by performing permutation-based estimation of the false discovery rate permuting the samples 100 times. Results: Using 40 ng of total DNA from paraffin embedded tumor from primary and tumor in positive nodes, we obtained high quality, genome wide copy number data. Using FDR < 0.1, we identified four chromosomal segments that showed statistically significant increased likelihood of copy number gains in the primary tumor compared to the tumor-containing node. Thirty five percent of tumor-bearing lymph nodes were copy number normal at the EGFR locus whereas the corresponding primary tumor showed amplification at 7p11.2 (includes the EGFR gene). A similar pattern was observed for 8q24, 14q11.2, and 20q12-q13; regions associated with aggressive tumor behavior. Conclusions: Our results demonstrate four significant differences between the primary tumor and lymph node metastasis and in all cases the metastasis were copy number normal compared to the copy number gain observed in the primary tumor. These results support the importance to examine differences at the genome level between the metastatic tumor site and the primary.

460 Background: The immune response has emerged as a strong prognostic factor in colon cancer. Whereas CD8+ T cells mediate antitumor response, regulatory T cells expressing FoxP3+ can antagonize this effect, though prognostic data conflict. These markers have yet to be analyzed with MMR status, which is important since dMMR tumors show enhanced immune response. Methods: CD8+ and FoxP3+ density were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in resected stage II and III colon carcinomas (N = 216) from participants in phase III adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based trials. High vs low immune density was dichotomized at the median. MMR status, determined by IHC or analysis of microsatellite instability, was categorized as dMMR (12%) or proficient MMR (pMMR). Cox models, stratified by study, were adjusted for age, stage, grade and, where noted, MMR. Results: The association of FoxP3+ density with overall survival (OS) differed by CD8+ density (P for interaction = .040). By multivariable analysis, FoxP3+high was significantly associated with improved OS in CD8+low tumors (hazard ratio 0.43 [95% confidence interval 0.19 – 0.95]; P = .030], but not in CD8+high tumors (P = .91). Results were consistent after MMR adjustment. We then determined their prognostic impact in the larger pMMR subset (N = 119). Tumors with high FoxP3+ were associated with improved OS in cases with low, but not high, CD8+ density ( Table ). These patients (FoxP3+high, CD8+low) had similar 5-year OS rates as 107 dMMR cases from parent studies (89% vs 80%; P = .74), despite having distinct clinicopathologic features. Conclusions: The prognostic impact of FoxP3+ T cells depends on CD8+, indicating the importance of analyzing both in combination. High FoxP3+ exerts a paradoxically favorable survival impact, but only when CD8+ is low. Survival in pMMR tumors with high FoxP3+ and low CD8+ was similar to that of dMMR tumors, indicating that a favorable pMMR subset can be identified. [Table: see text]

446 Background: MutKRAS and mutBRAF are important predictive and prognostic markers, respectively, in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, little is known about why some tumors harbor these mutations. N0147 is a phase III adjuvant trial for stage III CRC patients (N=3397) in which patients completed questionnaires and tumor variables and KRAS/BRAF mutation status was assessed. Methods: 2,323/3,397 patients who were enrolled prior to a 2008 amendment requiring KRAS testing completed a Patient Questionnaire. Primary tumors were assessed for mutKRAS and mutBRAF using standard methods; MMR status was determined using IHC. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of mutation status. Results: 60% and 86% of mutKRAS and mutBRAF tumors were right-sided, respectively. MutKRAS was less likely if there was a family history of CRC and in ever-smokers, and was nearly mutually exclusive with mutBRAF. MutBRAF was associated with deficient MMR (dMMR), high grade histology, and 4+ positive lymph nodes at surgery. MutBRAF was more likely in patients age > 70, retired persons, ever-smokers, but was less likely in non-whites and men. Conclusions: Smoking, family history of CRC, and dMMR status are associated with lower frequency of mutKRAS , but higher mutBRAF. Both mutations tend to be right sided, and mutBRAF is more common in the elderly, females, and non-Hispanic whites. [Table: see text]

443 Background: Identification of a sensitive and specific prognostic marker would aid in the management of patients (pts) with standard histopathology node negative colon cancer (CC). We conducted a pooled individual pt data analysis to confirm the prognostic value of GCC for disease recurrence in untreated stage II CC. Methods: GCC mRNA was quantified by RT-qPCR using formalin-fixed LN from 310 stage II pts diagnosed from 1991-2006 enrolled in two studies (Sargent 2011 [study1] and Haince 2009 [study2]). Patients were classified by GCC LN ratio (LNR) (high risk: LNR ≥ 0.1; low risk: LNR < 0.1), with LNR defined as number of GCC positive LN divided by number of informative LNs. Clinical outcomes included time to recurrence (TTR), overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Stratified log-rank tests and multivariate Cox models assessed the association between clinical outcomes and GCC LN status. Results: The 5-year recurrence rate in study 1 (n=241) was 15.8%, 24.9% in study 2 (n=69). GCC LNR high risk pts had significantly higher risk of TTR, OS, DSS and DFS, which remained after adjusting for age, T stage, grade, number of LNs examined, and presence of lymphovascular invasion ( Table ). In a secondary analysis of low risk stage II pts (T3, ≥12 LNs examined, and negative surgical margins, n=241), a strong relationship between GCC LNR and each endpoint remained (TTR HR=4.34, 95% CI=2.07 – 9.13, p<0.001). Conclusions: Pts with GCC LNR high risk status have significantly poorer outcomes compared to pts with low risk status, particularly among those traditionally considered to be low risk. [Table: see text]

327 Background: The use of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This study reviews our experience using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery with intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) tumors. Methods: A retrospective review identified 48 patients (pts) with primary BR/UR pancreas adenocarcinoma treated with preop CRT with intent to proceed to curative surgery with IOERT. Seventeen patients did not undergo attempted resection and are excluded (disease progression, 12; medically inoperable, 3; declined surgery, 2). Thirty-one patients proceeded to resection attempt and are the subject of this analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using log rank test for significance. Median follow up was 19 months (mo). Results: Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 11 pts, R1 in 5, and R2 or not resected (IOERT alone) in 15 patients. Twenty-six pts died (23 of disease, 2 unrelated causes, 1 uncertain). Median overall survival (OS) was 19 mo for all pts. Local progression was detected in only 5 patients (16%) while distant disease developed in 24 (77%). Resection status significantly correlated with OS; R0/R1 patients had a median survival of 23 mo vs. 10 mo for R2/unresected tumors (p = 0.002). Three-year OS was 35% vs. 0%, respectively. Survival was not influenced by tumor location, CA19-9 baseline or response, tumor size, or initial judgment of resectability (BR vs. UR). BR tumors were resectable after neoadjuvant therapy in 9 of 11 patients (R0, 8; R1, 1) while 8 of 20 initially UR tumors underwent resection (R0, 3; R1, 4; R2, 1). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy combined with IOERT has the possibility to improve patient selection for surgical resection and to optimize local therapy. Although the prognosis for locally advanced pancreatic cancer remains poor, survival was superior among patients for whom R0 or R1 resection was achieved. Distant metastasis remained the dominant pattern of failure, and novel systemic agents are needed. Prospective evaluation of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CRT, and IOERT is warranted.

314 Background: Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SB-ACA) is rare, having little prospective data guiding management. A prior phase I study evaluated UGT1A1 genotype specific dosing of oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine. Our prospective, multicenter clinical trial assessing tumor response in pts having metastatic SB-ACA, used a similar dosing strategy. Methods: Genotypes were determined via central lab. Previously untreated pts were dosed by UGT1A1*28 genotypes 6/6, 6/7, and 7/7 receiving 100/85/85 mg/m2 oxaliplatin d1, 150/150/75 mg/m2 irinotecan d1, and 1600/400/200 mg/m2 capecitabine (BID) d2-15 of 21 days. The study design was such that 1 confirmed response in 16 pts expanded enrollment to 33 pts, with 7 required for demonstrating efficacy. Results: 28 pts (13-6/6, 10-6/7, 5-7/7) have been enrolled [75% male, mean age 62.5 (range 41-77)]. Location of primary included: duodenum (63%), jejunum (26%), and ileum (7%), with pts having >1 metastatic site (abdominal-41%, bone-7%, liver-56%, lung-30%, nodal-52%, subcutaneous-4%, other-19%). Gr 3+ treatment related toxicity was not significantly different by genotype (50%-6/6, 44%-6/7, 20%-7/7, p=0.48) and included (pts): diarrhea(5), vomiting(5), leukopenia(5), neutropenia(7), and nausea(6). 57% (13 of 23) pts achieved responses during therapy, with a confirmed response rate of 39% (95% CI 0-58%). 18 have died, with a median follow-up of 8.3 mos (range 0-43). Conclusions: UGT1A1 genotype directed dosing with oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and capecitabine appears to result in prolonged response in this population. Larger studies are needed to determine comparability to CapeOx alone or if response/toxicity differs among genotypes. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text]

271 Background: Epidermal growth factor inhibitors show some benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. A trial to evaluate the incorporation of Pmab into a conventional multimodality regimen and continuation as maintenance therapy was conducted in pts with LA disease. Methods: Pts with ECOG PS 0-1, preserved organ function and tumor encompassed within standard radiation fields were eligible. Pmab 6 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29 and continuous infusion 5-FU 225 mg/m2/d or capecitabine 825 mg/m2 were given with RT. Pts then received weekly gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and Pmab on days 1, 15 for three 4-week cycles. Maintenance Pmab was then continued for additional 6 months. RT consisted of 45 Gy to the tumor and regional nodes with a 5.4 Gy boost using conformal techniques. Primary endpoint of one-year survival (OS) with secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed tumor response, and adverse events (at least possibly related) are reported. Results: 51 pts (23 M: 28 F) were enrolled with a median age of 65 (range: 43-84). Twenty-two pts (43%) received at least 1 cycle of post-chemo-RT, while 29 patients only received chemo-RT. All 51 pts have ended treatment with pts going off study because of: progression (39%), adverse events (27%), refusal (25%), and other reasons (8%). Frequently occurring maximum grade 3/4 AEs across the entire treatment course (chemo-RT + post-chemo-RT chemo) are shown below. With a median follow-up of 12.3 months, survival at 12 months is 50.2% (95% CI: 37.9-66.5%), median survival 12.1 mos (95% CI: 6.8-15.9) and median PFS 7.4 mos (95% CI: 3.7-8.6). Confirmed response rate was 5.9% (1-CR, 2-PR). Conclusions: The addition of Pmab to a conventional chemo-RT regimen provides benefit in terms of median survival. This is similar to reports of other EGFR inhibitors in LA disease. Adverse events, especially during the chemo-RT portion, were considerable and affected administration of subsequent systemic maintenance therapy. [Table: see text]

260 Background: Recent placebo-controlled phase III trials of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and the VEGF/ PDGF receptor inhibitor sunitinib in PNET noted improved progression-free survival (PFS). However, objective response rates (RR) with these agents are <10%. Preclinical studies suggest enhanced anti-tumor effects with combined mTOR and VEGF targeted therapy. Methods: We conducted a phase II trial of the mTOR inhibitor TEM (25 mg IV q week) and the VEGF-A monoclonal antibody BEV (10 mg/kg IV q 2 weeks) in patients (pts) with well or moderately differentiated PNET and progressive disease by RECIST within 7 months of study entry. Co-primary endpoints were RR and 6-month PFS. Planned enrollment is 50 patients, with interim analysis after the first 25 evaluable pts. Pts had no prior mTOR or VEGF targeted agents, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematologic and organ function. Continued octreotide was allowed, but not required. Prior interferon, embolization, and ≤ 2 chemotherapy regimens were allowed. Results: Confirmed PR was documented in 11 of the first 25 (44%) evaluable patients. 20 of 25 (80%) patients were progression-free at 6 months. Both endpoints exceeded pre-defined criteria to continue enrollment. For 35 evaluable patients, the most common grade 3-4 adverse events attributed to therapy were leukopenia (12%), hypertension (12%), hyperglycemia (12%), mucositis (9%), and fatigue (9%). Conclusions: The combination of TEM/BEV has substantial activity in a multi-center phase II trial with RR of 44%, well in excess of single targeted agents in PNET. 6-month PFS was a notable 80% in a population of patients with RECIST criteria progression within 7 months of study entry. Accrual is ongoing. Supported by NCI N01 Contracts: 662205, 62203, 62208, 62209, 62206, 62204, 62207, 62201.

259 Background: Belinostat is a novel histone deactylase inhibitor which demonstrates preclinical activity in HCC. We report the results of a phase I/II study on belinostat in patients (pts) with unresectable HCC. Methods: Major eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed HCC not amenable to curative treatment; PS ≤ 2; adequate organ function; prior systemic therapy was allowed. In the phase I portion, belinostat was given i.v. on D1-5 every 3 weeks with dose levels of 600, 900, 1200 and 1400 mg/m2/day. In the phase II portion, belinostat was tested at the MTD. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints were RR according to RECIST and OS. CT assessment was done every 8 weeks. Results: Phase I portion: a total of 18 pts were accrued; no DLTs were observed at 1400mg/m2/day for 5 days, and this dose was selected for phase II development. Phase II portion: 42 pts were accrued; Median age = 57.5 years; 41 had Child’s A function, and 24 pt had ECOG 0. Sixteen (38%) had previous systemic therapy, and 21 (50%) had previous transarterial therapy. Median follow-up was 20.0 months. The PR and SD rate was 2.4% (1/42) and 45.2% (19/42). Median PFS was 2.64 months (95%C.I. 1.55-3.17) and OS was 6.60 months (95%C.I. 4.53-11.60). Grade 3 or higher toxicities (>5% rate) were abdominal pain (9.5%), (9.5%) hyperbilirubinemia (9.5%), raised ALT (9.5%); anemia (7.1%) and vomiting (7.1%). Conclusions: Belinostat demonstrates disease stabilization in a predominantly pretreated population of pts with unresectable HCC with an acceptable safety profile. Further randomized studies are warranted.Supported in part by N01-CM-62205.

249 Background: HA, a glycosaminoglycan in the tumor matrix, accumulates in 20-30% of solid tumors and ≥28%, ≥42% and ≥87% of colon, gastric and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) tumors, respectively. Tumors that accumulate HA can develop high interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) and are resistant to chemotherapy. HA in human PDA is associated with disease progression and poor prognosis. In animal models, PEGPH20 reduced tumor-associated HA, tumor IFP and tumor growth, and increased efficacy of chemotherapy. Pharmacodynamic (PD) activity of PEGPH20 is being evaluated in Phase 1 (Ph1) trials. Methods: Two Ph1 studies in pts with advanced solid tumors refractory to prior therapy examined the safety, tolerability, PK, PD and MTD of single-agent IV PEGPH20. Dosing in Study 1 was 2x/wk and then reduced to q21d and in Study 2 is 1-2x/wk x 4wks and 1x/wk thereafter with dexamethasone pre-medication regimen. Biomarkers evaluated: Histochemistry to detect depletion of tumor HA, serum HA catabolites, Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI and FDG-PET. Results: In Study 1, the first 3 pts demonstrated musculoskeletal events (MSE; 2 pts dosed with 50 µg/kg 2x/wk, severe; 1 pt dosed with 0.5µg/kg 2x/wk, moderate) not predicted from GLP safety studies. The frequency of drug administration was reduced to q21d and the next 10 pts tolerated ≤1.5 µg/kg. In Study 2, dexamethasone pre-medication regimen was evaluated while dosing at 1-2x/wk. Nine pts were dosed ≤5.0 µg/kg. Doses ≤3.0 µg/kg administered 2x/wk were tolerated with intermittent Grade 1-2 MSE. Activity of PEGPH20 was reflected by increased HA serum catabolites. Pre- and post-dose biopsies from 2 colon pts demonstrated a 23-60% reduction in tumor HA after 4 wks of PEGPH20 dosing. DCE-MRI of PDA and FDG-PET of lung metastases increased tumor perfusion (Ktrans) and decreased metabolic activity 8 and 24hrs post-PEGPH20 dose and was still apparent after 4 wks of treatment with PEGPH20. Conclusions: Ongoing Ph1 studies have shown in vivo activity of PEGPH20 through HA plasma catabolites, tumor HA depletion, DCE-MRI and FDG-PET.