Citations

363 Background: Irinotecan (CPT-11) has demonstrated antitumor activity against metastatic colorectal cancer used alone or with 5-fluorouracil (5FU)/leucovorin (LV). Two arms with CPT-11, 5FU, and LV (FOLFIRI) +/- cetuximab (Cmab) were originally included in N0147. However, after CALGB 89803 (J Clin Oncol. 25:3456, 2007), PETACC-3 (J Clin Oncol. 27:3117, 2009), and Accord02 (Ann Oncol. 20:674, 2009) showed no benefit to the three-drug combination in adjuvant therapy, the CPT-11 arms of N0147 were discontinued. We report the outcomes for patients given FOLFIRI +/- Cmab. Methods: Following a signed informed consent patients with resected stage III colon cancer were randomized to one of 6 arms including 12 biweekly cycles of CPT-11 180 mg/m2 d1 with LV 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus IV, then 46-hr IV 5FU 2,400 mg/m2 on d1-2 without (Arm B, FOLFIRI) or with Cmab (Arm E) 400 mg/m2 d1 cycle 1 then Cmab at 250 mg/m2 d1 and 8. Primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: 156 patients (Arm B-111, Arm E-45) were enrolled; median follow-up on 81 patients in Arm B was 60.3 months and 58.2 months in Arm E for 41 patients. wtKRAS (vs mt) status was associated with improved DFS (HR=0.6 [95% CI 0.4-1.1], p = 0.09) and OS (HR 0.7 [95% CI 0.4-1.5], p = 0.38). The addition of Cmab improved DFS and OS in the overall group and within wtKRAS pts. Grade greater than III non-hematologic adverse effects were significantly increased in the Cmab arm (46% vs. 64%, p = 0.05). Conclusions: In this randomized phase III trial adjuvant FOLFIRI resulted in a 3-year DFS lower than that expected for FOLFOX. Trends for improved DFS and OS with the addition of Cmab were observed in patients with resected stage III colon cancer patients, regardless of KRAS status. Supported by NIH Grant CA25224, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

333 Background: Primary pancreatic small cell carcinoma (SCC) is rare, with just over 30 cases reported in the literature. Only 7 of these patients underwent surgical resection with a median survival of 6 months. Prognosis of SCC is therefore considered to be poor, and the role of adjuvant therapy is uncertain. Here we report two institutions' experience with resectable pancreatic SCC. Methods: Six patients with pancreatic SCC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (4 patients) and the Mayo Clinic (2 patients) were identified from prospectively collected pancreatic cancer databases and re-reviewed by pathology. All six patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinicopathologic data was analyzed, and the literature on pancreatic SCC was reviewed. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 27-60). Half of the patients were male, and half were known smokers. All six masses were limited to the pancreatic head. Median tumor size was 3 cm, and all cases had positive lymph nodes except for one patient who only had five nodes sampled. There was no perioperative mortality, although three patients had postoperative complications. All six patients received adjuvant chemotherapy therapy, five of whom were given cisplatin and etoposide. Of these five patients, three were known to have received radiation, while the remaining two had a plan for radiation at an outside facility. Median survival was 20 months with a range of 9-173 months. The patient who lived for 9 months received chemotherapy only, while the patient who lived for 173 months was given chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide and represents the longest reported survival time from pancreatic SCC to date. Conclusions: Pancreatic SCC is an extremely rare form of cancer with a poor prognosis. Patients in this surgical series showed improved survival rates when compared to prior experiences with both resected and unresectable cases. Cisplatin and etoposide appears to be the preferred chemotherapy regimen, although its efficacy remains uncertain, as does the role of combined modality treatment with radiation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

265 Background: Gemcitabine (G) is the standard treatment for first- line PanC. PanC is one of the most hypoxic solid tumors. TH-302 is an inert prodrug of brominated isophosphoramide mustard and undergoes selective activation in deep hypoxia. As a single agent, tumor responses were reported in patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma, SCLC, and head/neck cancer at TH-302 weekly doses of 480-575 mg/m2. Methods: Eligible pts for the PanC expansion of this phase I/II study ( NCT00743379 ) had ECOG <1, locally advanced or metastatic PanC previously untreated with systemic chemotherapy other than adjuvant G, 5FU, and/or radiation. IV TH-302 was dosed at 240-575 mg/m2 (240 or 340 in expansion) with standard dose G (1000 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Serum protein and microRNA hypoxia biomarkers were analyzed at baseline, start of cycle 3 and end of study. Results: 46 PanC subjects (12 locally advanced, 34 distant mets); median age: 63 (range 41-83); 24 male; ECOG 0/1 in 29/17 pts; RECIST response rate (RR) of 21%, median PFS of 6.1 mo (95%CI 4.8, 7.7) and median survival of 11.4 mo (95%CI 6.0, not reached) were observed. RR was 23% with median survival of 7.4 mo in pts with distant mets. 52% of pts had a >50% decrease in CA19-9. Common adverse events were skin or mucosal toxicity, nausea, fatigue and vomiting; most grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 68%, 64%, and 20% of pts respectively. The dose intensities at 240 mg/m2 and 340 mg/m2 were similar and related to hematologic toxicities. Skin toxicities were less common at 240 mg/m2. A TH-302 dose response was present with higher RR and PFS at 340 mg/m2. Initial serum hypoxia biomarkers did not identify a preferential pt population. Conclusions: The activity and clinical benefits of the combination of TH-302 with G in first line PanC are promising as compared to previous studies of G alone. TH-302 adds to the hematologic toxicity of G, but the regimen is well tolerated. The safety and activity provided rationale for comparing TH-302 plus G versus G alone in a randomized phase II trial ( NCT01144455 ) and indicate TH-302 may complement G by penetrating into the hypoxic regions of the PanC tumors where activation induces cytotoxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

261 Background: Mapatumumab is a fully human agonist monoclonal antibody to the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor 1 (TRAIL-R1). Sorafenib targets Mcl-1, a key TRAIL resistance protein, and accordingly could enhance mapatumumab's pro-apoptotic activity. Based on this and on preclinical data on mapatumumab in HCC cell lines, the current dose-escalation study is evaluating mapatumumab in combination with sorafenib in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: Eligible patients had advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A or Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score < 15, and were positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody. Intravenous mapatumumab was administered at 3, 10 or 30 mg/kg every 21 days with sorafenib (400 mg twice daily) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included events considered at least possibly related to mapatumumab and/or its interaction with sorafenib. Tumor measurements were performed every 2 cycles. Dose escalation required at least 3 patients in a cohort to receive >= 50% of full-dose sorafenib in the first 2 cycles. Results: To date, 19 patients have been enrolled in the 3 mg/kg (n=6), 10 mg/kg (n=9) and 30 mg/kg (n=4) cohorts and have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1 to 24 cycles); 4 patients have received >= 11 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. DLTs that prompted expansion of the 3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg cohorts were elevations of amylase and/or lipase (1 at 3 mg/kg, 1 at 10 mg/kg). Other Grade 3-4 events considered at least possibly related to mapatumumab and/or its interaction with sorafenib included hepatic pain (1/17), thrombocytopenia (1/17), increased aspartate aminotransferase (1/17), increased lipase (1/17), and increased gamma-glutamyltransferase (1/17). Two patients have had a partial response and 4 patients have had stable disease lasting > 12 weeks, based on investigator assessment. Conclusions: Mapatumumab was well-tolerated at doses up to 30 mg/kg in combination with sorafenib in patients with HCC and viral hepatitis. A randomized phase II study of this combination in patients with advanced HCC is planned. [Table: see text]

251 Background: To assess the effect of adjuvant therapy in gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC). Methods: Retrospective review was conducted at five institutions to identify pts who had surgery for confirmed dx of GBC from 1985-2008 (N = 189). Pts were excluded if they had chemo alone (N = 8), path other than adenoca (N= 7), carcinoma in situ (N=1), < 30 days of follow-up (N = 2), or missing data (N=14). Of the remaining 156 pts, 58 received surgery only and 98 received adj RT ± chemo. Kaplan-Meier was used for overall survival (OS) and Cox proportional hazards to compare risk factors. Results: Median age of dx was 64.4, 68.0% were female, 37.9% had ≥ stage 2b, 37.2% had + nodes, and 32.1% had + margins. Overall, 35.9% of the patients had simple cholecystectomy (SC) only and 64.1% had radical resection (ER). mOS for pts treated with surgery alone was 49.7 months (95% CI: 24.8 to Inf). On univariate analysis, + margins (HR 2.72, p<0.001) was associated with worse OS, whereas ER compared to SC improved survival in both univariate (HR 0.46, p<0.001) and multivariate (HR 0.53, p=0.033) analyses after adjusting for node/margins, T-stage, adj RT, age, gender, and institution. mOS for the entire cohort vs. adj RT (median 50.4 Gy) ± chemo was 30.7 months (95% CI: 19.2 to 46.9) vs. 26.9 months (95% CI: 15.5 to 39.1). But, compared to surgery alone, the adj group was more likely to have had node +, margin +, or T-stage 3+ (all p<0.001). The adj RT group was also less likely than surgery alone pts to have undergone ER (p = 0.007). On multivariate analysis, decreased OS was also found for node + (HR 2.09, p=0.004), margin + (HR 1.84, p=0.043), and T3/T4 disease (HR 2.37, p=0.002). After adjusting for surgical extent, node, margin, T stage, age, gender, and institution, there was improved OS with adj therapy (HR: 0.43, p = 0.020). When stratified by surgical extent, the risk estimate for adj RT improved OS among those with SC (n=56; HR 0.20, p=0.135) and ER (n=100; HR 0.46, p=0.067), but was not statistically significant. Conclusions: ER was associated with improved OS, whereas node/margin+ and T-stage 3+ were associated with worse survival. In multivariate analysis, adj RT improved OS after surgery. Given the poor prognosis of GBC patients with advanced disease, consideration of adj therapy is appropriate. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

238 Background: Dual inhibition of the EGFR pathway using erlotinib and the monoclonal antibody panitumumab results in greater antitumor activity in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. A trial evaluating this approach was conducted. Methods: A safety analysis was initially performed with 6 patients at P 4 mg/kg every two weeks, E 100 mg daily, G 1000 mg/m2 weekly of a 28-day cycle. PGE was well tolerated with a grade 3 fatigue as only dose-limiting toxicity. Patients (pts) were then randomized to either PGE or GE alone. Eligibility included: no prior chemo, ECOG PS 0-1, bilirubin <2x UL, AST <2.5x UL. CT scans every 2 cycles. Results: 93 pts (46-GE; 47-PGE) were randomized from January to August, 2010. Median age 61 years and 65% male. ECOG PS 0 (51%) and PS 1 (49%). No significant differences in baseline characteristics observed between treatment arms. 81 pts evaluable for AEs; 37 (46%) had a maximum grade 3 (at least possibly related to treatment), and 12 (15%) maximum grade 4 or 5. Treatment arms similar with respect to the overall AEs with exception grade 1-3 acneiform rash, GE (65%) vs. PGE (85%). Commonly occurring grade 4 AEs (at least possibly related) consisted of thrombosis (3 pts) and thrombocytopenia (2 pts). Two grade 5 events occurred in PGE arm—duodenal hemorrhage (possibly related) and pancolitis with multisystem failure (unlikely). An additional PGE pt died 30 days off study (grade 5 CHF, possibly). 54 patients (67%; 31-GE, 23-PGE) ended treatment; 38 (70%) for disease progression (24-GE; 14-PGE). Other reasons for treatment discontinuation: AEs (9; 17%), pt refusal (4; 7%), death on study (2; 4%), other (1). In 81 pts with at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy, the median PFS for GE 2.0 months and 3.3 months for PGE. Accrual for the study was recently completed and overall and 6-month survival data will be presented. Conclusions: This study involved an initial run-in design to define tolerable doses of dual EGFR inhibitors, PGE, in pancreatic cancer patients. Although preliminary, the randomized phase II portion has been completed and differences between GE and PGE in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, PFS, are observed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

158 Background: There is an unmet medical need for effective treatments for patients with advanced pNET. Systemic therapies for advanced pNET are limited both by toxicity and efficacy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has shown promising antitumor activity in 2 phase II studies, leading to further investigation in the largest phase III randomized controlled trial completed in pNET patients. Methods: Patients with advanced low- or intermediate-grade pNET were randomly assigned to everolimus 10 mg/d orally + best supportive care (BSC; n = 207) or placebo + BSC (n = 203). Long-acting somatostatin analogs (SSAs) were permitted as BSC during the study. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). At progression (RECIST), patients could be unblinded and those randomly assigned to placebo were offered open-label everolimus. Results: Compared with placebo, everolimus reduced the risk of progression by 65% and increased median PFS by more than 6 months, from 4.6 to 11.0 months (HR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.27-0.45; p < 0.0001), by investigator review (primary endpoint). Median PFS by central review was consistent (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.26 to 0.44; p < 0.001] in favor of everolimus. Eighteen-month PFS estimates were 34% for everolimus (95% CI: 26-43) vs 9% (95% CI: 4-16) for placebo. Everolimus demonstrated a significant PFS benefit across all patient subgroups according to baseline characteristics and prior SSA use. Prior SSA use was 49% in the everolimus arm and 50% in the placebo arm. Updated analyses of the impact of concomitant SSA will be reported. The most common drug-related adverse events were stomatitis, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and infections (primarily upper respiratory); most were grade 1 or 2. Stomatitis (6.9% vs 0%), anemia (6% vs 0%), and hyperglycemia (5% vs 2%) were the most common grade 3-4 events. Conclusions: Everolimus significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo in patients with advanced pNET in this large phase III clinical trial. This benefit was seen across all patient subgroups. Treatment resulted in a significant 6.4-month prolongation in median PFS. Everolimus had an acceptable and predictable safety profile. [Table: see text]

125 Background: Esophageal cancer is best managed by multimodality therapy, frequently with chemotherapy (C) or chemo- radiotherapy (CRT) preceding resection. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly accepted, but studies of MIE in advanced esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer after induction CRT are lacking. This report presents the data on MIE as part of tri-modality therapy for esophageal cancer at Mayo Clinic in Arizona (MCA). Methods: Patients (pts) who underwent CRT before or after MIE for cancer at MCA between November 2006 and May of 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Results: 46 pts (40 males, and 6 females) met study criteria and were reviewed. Median age was 62 years (41-88 years). 45 pts (98%) had adenocarcinoma and one pt had squamous carcinoma. Initial clinical stage was IIA in 10 pts (22%), IIB in 3 pts (7%), III in 26 pts (55%), and IVA in 7 pts (15%) with positive celiac nodes. 43 pts (93%) underwent preoperative CRT with additional intra-operative radiotherapy in 4 pts. Median operating time was 354 min (range 211-567 min), median blood loss was 225 ml (range 50-1,400 ml), and median hospital stay was 8 days (range 5-48 days). 19 pts (41%), including the 3 who did not undergo preoperative CRT, received postoperative C or CRT due to either residual disease at resection or to local recurrence. 30 of 43 pts undergoing MIE after CRT were down staged (11 CR [25.6%], 10 near CR [23.3%]) demonstrating a major response to neoadjuvant therapy in 48.9% of pts. One pt died in hospital (from ARDS and sepsis subsequent to aspiration pneumonia) and two pts died within 30 days of surgery (one from pulmonary embolism, and the other from unknown causes) for a 30 day surgical mortality of 6.5%. 29 pts (63%) had a complication of surgery including 11 (24%) minor and 18 (39%) major complications. After a median follow-up of 13 months (range 0.9-43 months) 16 pts were diagnosed with recurrent disease and 10 of these pts have died of their disease. Conclusions: CRT with MIE is associated with an acceptable morbidity and mortality level for pts with locally advanced esophageal cancer. These results compare favorably with morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates in open esophagectomy pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Purpose: The Conquer Cancer Foundation (CCF), the philanthropic arm of ASCO, is responsible for funding innovative clinical research. CCF wants to broaden its donor base instead of relying predominantly on health-care companies. Our Leadership Development Program (LDP) group was tasked with identifying potential donor sources and making recommendations to increase funding. Materials and Methods: We selected three sources to research: the general public, crowdsourcing/social media, and ASCO members. We subsequently focused our efforts on ASCO members, of whom only 2% to 3% are donors to CCF and < 8% are repeat donors. To analyze this low rate, we sent out two separate surveys to various groups of members within ASCO. Results: We identified lack of knowledge as a major deterrent to giving; surprisingly, even those who hold ASCO leadership positions or participated in committees lacked knowledge about CCF funding. Also, the misconception that ASCO is rich and does not need philanthropic support deterred giving; however, respondents would donate if given the right message that stresses the need of continued member-led donations. Conclusion: ASCO members, including those in leadership positions, need to be engaged more aggressively to support CCF. Increased education and updating the CCF message is likely to provide the greatest impact on higher member donation, repeated donations, and facilitate CCF’s goal of diversifying its donor base away from healthcare companies. Furthermore, we recommend using technology, such as mobile applications, and providing incentives and visibility to major donors.

LBA7005 Background: In meta-analyses, platinum-based adjuvant (adj) chemotherapy (CT) in completely resected NSCLC increased cure rate by ∼5%. At BR.19 initiation, adj study results with third-generation agents were unavailable. Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, showed activity in monotherapy trials. We report a trial of adj gefitinib versus placebo after complete resection of NSCLC. Methods: Patients (pts) with stage IB-IIIA NSCLC were stratified by sex, stage, histology, post-op radiation, and after Jan 2003, adj CT. Pts were randomized to gefitinib 250 mg or placebo daily x 2 years. Study endpoints included overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS), toxicity, preplanned correlative studies. Study closed prematurely in Apr. 2005. Trial committee and NCIC CTG staff remained blinded to study drug. Results: 503 pts randomized (Sep 2002-Apr 2005); median age 67, males 54%, PS 0 54%; stage IB 49%, II 38%, III 13%; adenocarcinoma 59%, squamous 28%; ever smokers 89%; adj CT 17%; lobectomy 82%. Commonest grade 3/4 toxicities = fatigue 5%, rash 4% and diarrhea 5%. grade 3+ pneumonitis in 7 (1.4%) pts and led to death in 1. Median follow-up is 4.7 yrs; median treatment time is 4.8 mos. For gefitinib versus placebo, median DFS is 4.2 yrs versus not yet reached (NYR) HR1.22 (95% C.I. 0.93-1.61), p=0.15 and median OS 5.1 yrs versus NYR HR 1.24 (95% C.I. 0.94-1.64), p=0.14. In multivariate analysis, tumor size >4cm was predictive of poor DFS (p<0.0001) and never smoking for better OS with gefitinib (p=0.02). Results for KRAS and EGFR copy are available on 350 and 348 pts respectively. KRAS mutations were neither prognostic HR 1.12 (95% C.I. 0.67-1.86), p=0.66 nor predictive of gefitinib benefit (p = 0.16) on OS. EGFRcopy whether low/high polysomy or amplification was neither prognostic (p=0.77) nor predictive of OS benefit from gefitinib. Conclusions: Adjuvant gefitinib after complete resection of early stage NSCLC did not confer DFS or OS advantage in overall population. KRAS and EGFR copy were neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit from gefitinib. EGFR mutational analysis will be presented. [Table: see text]