Citations

Showing 10 of 107895 citations.

Comparison of clinical, radiographic and genomic alterations between histologic and molecular glioblastoma, IDH -wildtype
Lachance, Daniel H , Decker, Paul A. , Kosel, Matthew , Odukoya, AbdulLateef, Maqbool, Muhammad Asad , Jenkins, Robert B. , Eckel‐Passow, Jeanette E. , Odukoya, Lateef A , Kollmeyer, Thomas M. , Praska, Corinne E, Odukoya, AbdulLateef A, Tobin, William Oliver, Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Vaubel, Rachel A, Ida, Cris M, Jenkins, RB , Eckel-Passow, Jeanette E , Odukoya, Lateef A , Lachance, Daniel , Decker, Paul A. , Drucker, Kristen , Praska, Corinne , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Shafqat, Shameel , Tobin, W. Oliver , Parney, Ian F. , Burns, Terry C. , Galanis, Evanthia , Giannini, Caterina , Vaubel, Rachael A. , Ida, Cristiane M.

Mayo Clinic

Neuro-Oncology Advances | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdaf260 | PMID 41908146 Get It

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.
The State of Published Science in Clinical Neuropsychology’s Lifespan Journals: A Mixed Methods Examination of Scope, Approaches, and Content
Woods, Steven Paul , Patten, Ryan Van , Briceño, Emily M. , Calamia, Matthew , Clark, Alexandra L. , Fonseca, Luciana M, Kunicki, Zachary J. , Farias, Sarah, Fonseca, Luciana Mascarenhas , Van Patten, Ryan , Block, Cady, Calamia, Matthew , Clark, Alexandra L , Kunicki, Zachary J , Block, Cady K. , Jones, Jacob D. , Farias, Sarah Tomaszewski

Mayo Clinic

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/arclin/acaf122 | PMID 41615397 Get It

Abstract Objective Clinical neuropsychology is an evidence-based discipline that draws heavily from the field’s peer-reviewed journal articles. However, our scientific understanding of the methods and content that comprise the articles published in clinical neuropsychology journals is quite limited. Method A mixed methods approach was used to describe the aims, methods, and content of clinical neuropsychology’s major lifespan journals. Six-hundred articles were randomly sampled from the 2020–2024 volumes of six lifespan clinical neuropsychology journals. All articles were coded across 42 dimensions, including article type, population, design, methods, ability domains, and miscellaneous topics (e.g., brain health). The aims/scope sections of the journals were subjected to qualitative analyses, to identify relevant themes. Results The most common article content was observed in the areas of empirical/data-driven studies, cross-sectional and observational designs, older and neurological participants, cognitive testing of higher-order abilities, and psychometrics/methods. Results showed significant between-journal differences for some of these content areas at broadly medium effect sizes (e.g., experimental design, brain health topics). Qualitative analyses yielded five shared themes, suggesting that the lifespan clinical neuropsychology journals are interested in submissions on brain-behavior relationships, clinical applications, both clinical and healthy/typical populations, professional/guild matters, and multidisciplinary investigations. Conclusions The scientific content published within clinical neuropsychology’s six primary lifespan journals varies in some dimensions, but largely focuses on cross-sectional, observational studies of psychometrics and higher-order cognition. The implications of these findings for future research in clinical neuropsychology are contextualized for authors, reviewers, and readers.
Novel Compounds as 5-HT2A Agonists for Treating Mental Illness or CNS Disorders
Sabnis, Ram W. , Sabnis, Anika R.

Mayo Clinic

ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 79-80

10.1021/acsmedchemlett.5c00731 | PMID 41531978 Get It

Increased Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections and Response to Doxycycline in Midwest United States
Douvoyiannis, Miltiadis , Rothstein, Tanner E. , Patel, Robin

Mayo Clinic

Clinical Pediatrics | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 65 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 153-157

10.1177/00099228251392096 | PMID 41400014 Get It

37 cases of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia were diagnosed in children in North Dakota, over 3.5 months (35 by PCR); 44% harbored macrolide-resistance. Children with macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae had a longer period of coughing prior to diagnosis (+ 3.9 days, p=0.048), a longer duration of illness (+ 5.4 days, p=0.011) and earlier resolution of fever after initiation of doxycycline (- 0.92 days, p=0.025) compared to those without macrolide resistant M. pneumoniae.
Recommendations for the diagnostic work‐up of cutaneous small vessel vasculitis – Position Statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Vasculitis and Vasculopathy Task Force
Alpsoy, Erkan , Caproni, Marzia , Wetter, David A. , Goebeler, Matthias , Schneider, Stefan W. , Sălăvăstru, Carmen , Llamas‐Velasco, Mar , Akyol, Melih , Dutz, Jan , Jachiet, M. , Kawakami, Tamihiro , Piette, Warren W., Ratzinger, Gudrun , Szepietowski, Jacek C. , Schneider, Stefan W , Llamas-Velasco, Mar , Marzano, Angelo Valerio , Jachiet, Marie , Mariotti, Elena Biancamaria , Maronese, Carlo A , Monfort, Jean-Benoît , Ratzinger, Gudrun , Werth, Victoria P , Szepietowski, Jacek C , Caproni, Marzia , Levell, Nick J. , Maronese, Carlo Alberto , Micheletti, Robert , Werth, Victoria P. , Sunderkötter, Cord

Mayo Clinic

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 946-962

10.1111/jdv.70249 | PMID 41399325 Get It

Abstract Background Small vessel vasculitides (SVV) comprise a heterogeneous group of cutaneous SVV (CSVV) that can be skin‐limited or systemic. Given their diverse forms and symptoms and the lack of a standardized diagnostic approach, it is crucial to establish clear and consensus‐driven recommendations for diagnosis. Objectives To standardize diagnosis for the detection of the type, extent, potential causes or underlying conditions of CSVV. Methods International experts comprised the panel. The Delphi panel data was collected through two rounds of questionnaires. Agreement was measured using an 11‐point Likert scale (0 = strongly disagree, 10 = strongly agree). A 7‐vote minimum was required for agreement on each statement. Delphi panel statements scoring 3–7 were discussed during the meeting. Results 20 experts participated in the first round of the Delphi panel, while 17 experts took part in the second. They agreed that the diagnosis of CSVV relies on a combination of clinical manifestations, laboratory findings and histopathology. Palpable purpura on the lower extremities is recognized as the most reliable hallmark for most SVV and a sign of immune complex vasculitis. When the latter is suspected, a skin biopsy for direct immunofluorescence (DIF) should be obtained from an early, partially blanchable macule because the type of perivascular immunoglobulin is important for further diagnosis. The proper selection of biopsy sites for routine HE biopsy depends on the morphology of lesions. A comprehensive medical history and selected laboratory testing should be conducted to investigate organ involvement, potential causes and associated conditions. The extent of diagnostic procedures should be based on the severity, duration, systemic symptoms and recurrence of SVV. Conclusions Experts reached a strong consensus on the management of CSVV patients, culminating in the first International Consensus Statement for adult CSVV. This statement proposes a practical management algorithm and underscores the importance of collaboration in rare diseases management.
Molecular Stratification of Antiphospholipid Syndrome Through Integrative Analysis of the Whole‐Blood RNA Transcriptome
Ambati, Amala, Kmeťová, Katarína , Navaz, Sherwin, Hoy, Claire K., Sarosh, Cyrus , Navarro-Mendoza, Erika, Kahlenberg, J. Michelle , Zuo, Yu , Kmetova, Katarina , Kahlenberg, J Michelle , Duarte-García, Alí , Knight, Jason S , Zuo, Yu , Ambati, Amala, Ma, Feiyang , Tambralli, Ajay , Gudjonsson, Johann E , Madison, Jacqueline A. , Duarte‐García, Alí

Mayo Clinic

Arthritis & Rheumatology | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1124-1133

10.1002/art.70021 | PMID 41399015 Get It

Objective Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a thromboinflammatory disorder characterized by clinical and mechanistic heterogeneity that complicates early diagnosis and hinders targeted treatment. We aimed to identify distinct molecular endotypes among antiphospholipid antibody (aPL)–positive patients using whole‐blood transcriptomics. Methods Whole‐blood RNA sequencing was performed on 174 aPL‐positive patients, including those with primary APS (n = 102), secondary APS (n = 29), and aPL positivity without classifiable APS (n = 43). Unsupervised machine learning and immune cell deconvolution defined transcriptomic clusters and immune landscapes. Results Four transcriptionally distinct clusters were identified. At one end of the spectrum, cluster 1 showed up‐regulation of ribosomal and metabolic pathways and down‐regulation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), NETosis, and Hippo/interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) signaling. In contrast, cluster 4 exhibited the opposite pattern, with strong up‐regulation of mTOR, NETosis, and Hippo/IL‐6 signaling. Cluster 2 demonstrated modest enrichment in messenger RNA processing and amino acid metabolism, and cluster 3 showed biosynthetic suppression with mild Hippo/IL‐6 activation. Clinically, cluster 4 stood out with higher IgG anticardiolipin and anti–β 2 ‐glycoprotein I positivity, elevated neutrophil counts, and increased urine protein‐to‐creatinine ratios. Immune deconvolution revealed distinct cell type profiles: cluster 1 was lymphoid predominant; cluster 2 had a balanced composition; cluster 3 was enriched in Treg cells, natural killer cells, macrophages, mast cells, and memory B cells; and cluster 4 was dominated by myeloid cells, including neutrophils, eosinophils, and dendritic cells. Distinct immune pathway activations were linked to clinical features, including white matter lesions, seizures, and cardiac valve disease. Conclusion This study reveals four endotypes of aPL‐positive patients, a step toward personalized medicine for APS through pathway‐informed stratification and therapy.
Assessing the Impact of Time to Diagnosis and Treatment for Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
DuBrock, Hilary M. , Silvert, Eli , Doddahonnaiah, Deeksha , Wagner, Tyler , Sandros, Marinella , DuBrock, Hilary M , Murugadoss, Karthik , López, David Ortiz

Mayo Clinic

Pulmonary Circulation | December 16, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/pul2.70208 | PMID 41409317 Get It

ABSTRACT Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease with significant morbidity and mortality. Due to nonspecific symptoms, diagnosis can be challenging and subject to substantial delays. Using data from Mayo Clinic′s electronic health records, we looked at causes of delayed diagnosis and whether earlier diagnosis means better outcomes. This retrospective cohort study included adults with PAH confirmed by right heart catheterization (RHC) between 2015 and 2019. Univariate and multivariate analyses evaluated the association of 229 clinical and laboratory features with time to PAH diagnosis and survival outcomes. Early diagnosis was defined as < 6 months and a delayed diagnosis as ≥ 22.2 months from an eligible event. Survival probability was determined using Kaplan‐Meier analysis . The study enrolled 160 patients. The most common initial PAH symptoms were dyspnea (42.5%) and fatigue (16.9%). It took a median of 7, 13, 26, and 123 days from eligible event to the first X‐ray, electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and RHC, respectively. Factors most closely associated with delayed diagnosis were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, normal creatinine, high systolic blood pressure, acute respiratory infection, normal iron, normal diastolic blood pressure, and being male aged 18.5 to < 25 years. Compared with delayed diagnosis patients (22.6%), more early diagnosis patients saw a pulmonologist (35.3%) before another provider. After 5 years, 73% of patients in the early diagnosis and 31% in the delayed diagnosis group were still alive. This study identified factors associated with a delayed diagnosis of PAH and found that earlier diagnosis and treatment initiation were associated with significantly improved survival.
Twelve-Month Results From the CISTO Study Comparing Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Sparing Therapy for Recurrent High-Grade Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer
Gore, John L. , Wolff, Erika M. , Nash, Michael G. , Comstock, Bryan A. , Gilbert, Scott M. , Chang, Sam S., Chisolm, Stephanie , MacLean, Douglas B., Wright, Jonathan L. , Kates, Max , Pohar, Kamal S. , Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J, Nepple, Kenneth G. , Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Master, Viraj A. , Chen, David YT , Mossanen, Matthew , O’Neil, Brock , Tyson, Mark D. , Mansour, Ahmed M. , Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B. , Kukreja, Janet Baack , Peyton, Cheri L. , Nix, Jeffrey W. , Dickstein, Rian, Sankin, Alex , Lane, Brian R. , Bassett, Jeffrey C. , Patel, Sanjay , Lee, Eugene K. , Ritch, Chad R. , Follmer, Kristin , Kim, Sung Min , Kessler, Larry G. , group, on behalf of the CISTO Collaborative, Gore, John L., Smith, Angela B., Wolff, Erika M., Comstock, Bryan A., Nash, Michael G., Follmer, Kristin M., Lee, Jenney R., Kim, Sung Min, Kessler, Larry G., Gilbert, Scott M., Chang, Sam S., Wright, Jonathan L., Kates, Max R., Pohar, Kamal S., Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J., Nepple, Kenneth G., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Woldu, Solomon L., Master, Viraj A., Chen, David Y.T., Mossanen, Matthew, Daneshmand, Siamak, O'Neil, Brock B., Tyson, Mark D., Westerman, Mary E., Kamat, Ashish M., Mansour, Ahmed M., Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B., Kukreja, Janet B., Modi, Parth K., Garg, Tullika, Peyton, Charles C., Nix, Jeffrey W., Dickstein, Rian, Gadzinski, Adam J., Sankin, Alex, Shore, Neal D., Lane, Brian R., Bassett, Jeffrey C., Patel, Sanjay, Morris, David S., Macleod, Liam C., Lee, Eugene K., Ritch, Chad R., Chisolm, Stephanie, MacLean, Douglas B., Almeida, Fred, Murray, Mary Beth Ballard, Lindsey, Nancy, Lipman, Robert, Oliver, Richard M., Roscoe, Lori A., Sachse, Karen, Lotan, Yair, Porten, Sima P., Taylor, Jennifer M., Steinberg, Gary D., Catto, James W.F., Downs, Tracy M., Malin, Jennifer L., Davicioni, Elai, Rios, Patricia, Yano, Marielle, Jun, Grace, Li, Casey, Nefcy, Christopher, Basu, Anirban, Heagerty, Patrick J., Catto, James W.F. , Sankin, Alexander , Woldu, Solomon L , Master, Viraj A , Chen, David Y T , Daneshmand, Siamak , O'Neil, Brock B , Westerman, Mary E , Kamat, Ashish M. , Modi, Parth K , Peyton, Charles C , Gadzinski, Adam J , Shore, Neal , Patel, Sanjay , Ritch, Chad R , Follmer, Kristin M , Kim, Sung Min , Kessler, Larry G , Bivalacqua, Trinity J. , Daneshmand, Siamak , Westerman, Mary E. , Garg, Tullika K. , Shore, Neal D. , Morris, David S. , Macleod, Liam Connor , Lee, Jenney R. , Smith, Angela B. , group, on behalf of the CISTO Collaborative, Gore, John L., Smith, Angela B., Wolff, Erika M., Comstock, Bryan A., Nash, Michael G., Follmer, Kristin M., Lee, Jenney R., Kim, Sung Min, Kessler, Larry G., Gilbert, Scott M., Chang, Sam S., Wright, Jonathan L., Kates, Max R., Pohar, Kamal S., Guzzo, Thomas J., Bivalacqua, Trinity J., Nepple, Kenneth G., Montgomery, Jeffrey S., Scarpato, Kristen R., Woldu, Solomon L., Master, Viraj A., Chen, David Y.T., Mossanen, Matthew, Daneshmand, Siamak, O'Neil, Brock B., Tyson, Mark D., Westerman, Mary E., Kamat, Ashish M., Mansour, Ahmed M., Chamie, Karim, Riggs, Stephen B., Kukreja, Janet B., Modi, Parth K., Garg, Tullika, Peyton, Charles C., Nix, Jeffrey W., Dickstein, Rian, Gadzinski, Adam J., Sankin, Alex, Shore, Neal D., Lane, Brian R., Bassett, Jeffrey C., Patel, Sanjay, Morris, David S., Macleod, Liam C., Lee, Eugene K., Ritch, Chad R., Chisolm, Stephanie, MacLean, Douglas B., Almeida, Fred, Murray, Mary Beth Ballard, Lindsey, Nancy, Lipman, Robert, Oliver, Richard M., Roscoe, Lori A., Sachse, Karen, Lotan, Yair, Porten, Sima P., Taylor, Jennifer M., Steinberg, Gary D., Catto, James W.F., Downs, Tracy M., Malin, Jennifer L., Davicioni, Elai, Rios, Patricia, Yano, Marielle, Jun, Grace, Li, Casey, Nefcy, Christopher, Basu, Anirban, Heagerty, Patrick J.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 274-285

10.1200/jco-25-01324 | PMID 41397208 Get It

PURPOSE To compare patient-reported and clinical outcomes between radical cystectomy (RC) and bladder-sparing therapy (BST) in patients with recurrent high-grade non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This pragmatic, prospective observational cohort study was designed with patients, who selected and prioritized outcomes. Eligible adults were candidates for both RC or BST, had previous induction Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), and received their last treatment within 12 months. The primary outcome was the EORTC-QLQ-C30 physical function scale at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included other EORTC-QLQ-C30 scales, depression, anxiety, bladder cancer–specific quality of life (QOL), financial burden, and cancer-specific outcomes. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) was used to calculate average treatment effect (ATE) estimates between arms. Inverse probability weighted risk ratios (wRR) were calculated using quasi-Poisson regression. RESULTS Of 570 participants (mean age 71.4 years; 21% female), 371 selected BST and 199 selected RC. Physical function was significantly worse in the RC arm at 3 months; by 9 months, there was no difference between arms, and at 12 months, physical function did not differ (ATE, 0.9; 95% CI, –0.6 to 2.4; P = .22). RC was associated with better emotional function, generic health-related QOL, and financial burden, and lower depression and anxiety, while BST was associated with better bowel and sexual health. Cancer-specific survival was 99% for BST versus 96% for RC (wRR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.01). RC was associated with a higher risk of adverse events and serious adverse events, including a 90-day mortality rate of 2.5%. CONCLUSION Most patient-prioritized outcomes were similar or better among participants who chose RC compared with BST. These findings support the continued role of RC in managing recurrent high-grade NMIBC.
Activity of a Phage Collection Against Staphylococci from Periprosthetic Joint Infections
Vaillant, James J. , Herren, Sebastian , Jo, Jay‐Hyun , Fackler, Joseph , Greenwood‐Quaintance, Kerryl E. , Suh, Gina A. , Suh, Gina A , Greenwood-Quaintance, Kerryl , Herren, Sebastian C , Vaillant, James , Parmar, Krupa , Lee, Martin , Patel, Robin

Mayo Clinic

JBJS Open Access | December 15, 2025 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.2106/jbjs.oa.23.00174 Get It

Background: Phages are being assessed for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Staphylococci are the most common cause of PJI. Phages are traditionally considered to be strain-specific and restricted to specific species. We aimed to assess the in vitro activity of a collection of staphylococcal phages against a selection of clinical Staphylococcus isolates recovered from PJI over a 20-year period. Methods: The activity of 37 staphylococcal phages was evaluated against 204 staphylococcal isolates, including 102 Staphylococcus aureus, 81 Staphylococcus epidermidis , and 21 Staphylococcus lugdunensis , using a tetrazolium dye–based metabolic assay. Standardized inocula of bacteria and phage were incubated over 48 hours. Growth inhibition ≥8 hours was considered indicative of phage activity. Results: A total of 7,548 phage-isolate pairs were assessed. Overall, 31 of 37 phages had activity against at least 1 isolate. The most broadly active phage showed activity against 50 of 195 isolates (26%) tested. Twenty-three phages showed cross-species activity, with 11 phages active against all 3 Staphylococcus species, and 12 phages active against 2 species. Of all S. aureus isolates tested, 61% were susceptible to at least 1 phage, while 31% and 76% of S. epidermidis and S. lugdunensis isolates were susceptible to at least 1 phage, respectively. Conclusions: This is the largest library of phages evaluated against staphylococci from PJI. Results show that staphylococcal phages can have cross-species activity, suggesting that phage libraries may offer cross-species coverage of clinically encountered staphylococcal isolates from PJI. Level of Evidence: Level V . Mechanism-based reasoning. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.