Praska, Corinne E

Abstract Diffuse hemispheric glioma, H3 G34‐mutant (DHG‐H3 G34) has been primarily molecularly characterized by methylation profiling and sequencing studies. We describe an integrated histomolecular evaluation including high‐resolution copy number profiling of a series of 60 DHG‐H3 G34 to further our understanding of the spectrum of genetic changes associated with this tumor type. Cases were clinically tested using an 187‐gene mutation and fusion targeted neuro‐oncology next‐generation sequencing panel ( n = 60) and Oncoscan chromosomal microarray ( n = 26) by a single laboratory (2018–2022). A subset of cases had immunohistochemical results for OLIG2 ( n = 42), p53 ( n = 48), and ATRX ( n = 46), and methylation array data ( n = 8). Median age at testing was 21 years (range, 12–50). No significant difference was noted in clinical, histopathological, and mutational profile between pediatric and adult patients. H3‐3A G34 mutations included G34R ( n = 56; 94%), G34V ( n = 3), and a non‐canonical G34E ( n = 1). Concurrent mutations most often involved TP53 ( n = 55; 92%), ATRX ( n = 50; 83%), and PDGFRA ( n = 34; 57%). A reportedly primary tumor was confirmed to be hypermutant and had a PMS2 mutation. A single case also showed an FGFR3::FAM184B fusion. All cases with available chromosomal microarray data had unbalanced genomes, which were often complex (14/26; 54%). The most frequent recurrent copy number abnormalities were losses involving 3q, 4q, 10q, 13q, and 18q, and 17p copy‐neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) encompassing TP53 . This copy number profile was reminiscent of that seen in Grade 4 IDH‐mutant astrocytomas. Collectively, a TP53 abnormality at copy number (12/26, all cnLOH), sequence (55/60) and protein expression (46/48) level was detected in all 60 cases. In conclusion, integrated high‐resolution copy number and histomolecular analysis expanded the spectrum of genetic changes associated with DHG‐H3 G34, including the presence of universal TP53 abnormalities with frequent cnLOH—a copy number abnormality that has been largely unrecognized—for this new 2021 World Health Organization central nervous system tumor type.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.

AbstractBackgroundOligodendroglioma is genetically defined by concomitant IDH (IDH1/IDH2) mutation and whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Codeletion of 1p/19q traditionally evaluated by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) cannot distinguish partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Partial 1p/19q codeletion called positive by FISH is diagnostically a “false-positive” result. Chromosomal microarray (CMA) discriminates partial from whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Herein, we aimed to estimate the frequency of partial 1p/19q codeletion that would lead to a false-positive FISH result.MethodsFISH 1p/19q codeletion test probe coordinates were mapped onto Oncoscan CMA data to determine the rate of partial 1p/19q codeletion predicted to be positive by FISH. Diffuse astrocytic gliomas with available CMA data (2015–2018) were evaluated and classified based on IDH1-R132H/ATRX/p53 immunohistochemistry, IDH/TERT promoter targeted sequencing, and/or CMA according to classification updates. Predicted false-positive cases were verified by FISH whenever possible.ResultsThe overall estimated false-positive FISH 1p/19q codeletion rate was 3.6% (8/223). Predicted false positives were verified by FISH in 6 (of 8) cases. False-positive rates did not differ significantly (P = .49) between IDH-mutant (4.6%; 4/86) and IDH-wildtype (2.9%; 4/137) tumors. IDH-wildtype false positives were all WHO grade IV, whereas IDH-mutant false positives spanned WHO grades II-IV. Testing for 1p/19q codeletion would not have been indicated for most false positives based on current classification recommendations.ConclusionSelective 1p/19q codeletion testing and cautious interpretation for conflicting FISH and histopathological findings are recommended to avoid potential misdiagnosis.

Abstract Background Twenty-five germline variants are associated with adult diffuse glioma, and some of these variants have been shown to be associated with particular subtypes of glioma. We hypothesized that additional germline variants could be identified if a genome-wide association study (GWAS) were performed by molecular subtype. Methods A total of 1320 glioma cases and 1889 controls were used in the discovery set and 799 glioma cases and 808 controls in the validation set. Glioma cases were classified into molecular subtypes based on combinations of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation, telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutation, and 1p/19q codeletion. Logistic regression was applied to the discovery and validation sets to test for associations of variants with each of the subtypes. A meta-analysis was subsequently performed using a genome-wide P-value threshold of 5 × 10−8. Results Nine variants in or near D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase (D2HGDH) on chromosome 2 were genome-wide significant in IDH-mutated glioma (most significant was rs5839764, meta P = 2.82 × 10−10). Further stratifying by 1p/19q codeletion status, one variant in D2HGDH was genome-wide significant in IDH-mutated non-codeleted glioma (rs1106639, meta P = 4.96 × 10−8). Further stratifying by TERT mutation, one variant near FAM20C (family with sequence similarity 20, member C) on chromosome 7 was genome-wide significant in gliomas that have IDH mutation, TERT mutation, and 1p/19q codeletion (rs111976262, meta P = 9.56 × 10−9). Thirty-six variants in or near GMEB2 on chromosome 20 near regulator of telomere elongation helicase 1 (RTEL1) were genome-wide significant in IDH wild-type glioma (most significant was rs4809313, meta P = 2.60 × 10−10). Conclusions Performing a GWAS by molecular subtype identified 2 new regions and a candidate independent region near RTEL1, which were associated with specific glioma molecular subtypes.