Giannini, Caterina

Abstract Circumscribed meningeal melanocytic neoplasms (CMMNs) represent a spectrum of rare central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Knowledge of their clinical behavior and molecular correlates remains limited. In this single‐institution retrospective study, we analyzed 31 patients (14 male, 17 female; median age, 59 years) diagnosed with CMMN between 2004 and 2025. In this patient cohort, based on the current World Health Organization Central Nervous System Tumor Classification (WHO CNS5) criteria, the majority of cases (18, 58.1%) fell into the intermediate‐grade melanocytic tumor (IMT) category based on histology, with either increased mitotic activity, CNS invasion, or both; 7 (22.6%) were melanocytomas, 5 (16.1%) melanomas, and 1 (3.2%) indeterminate case because of limited tissue. By next‐generation sequencing, mutations were identified in GNAQ/GNA11 in 21/24 cases, BAP1 in 5/23 (2 IMT, 3 melanoma), EIF1AX in 9/21 (1 melanocytoma, 8 IMT), and SF3B1 in 3/23 (2 IMT, 1 melanoma). Primary sites were spinal (20), posterior fossa (6), and supratentorial (5). During follow‐up, progression was observed in 5/6 melanocytomas, 9/13 IMTs, and 4/5 melanomas, suggesting a high frequency of progression across all groups. Two‐year progression‐free survival was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.5%–100.0%) for melanocytoma, 55.9% (95% CI, 26.7%–85.2%) for IMT, and 25.0% (95% CI, 0.0%–67.4%) for melanoma. Five‐year overall survival (OS) was 80.0% (95% CI, 44.9%–100.0%) for melanocytoma, 65.3% (95% CI, 37.0%–93.6%) for IMT, and 0.0% for melanoma. OS was significantly worse in melanoma compared with melanocytoma ( p = 0.002). BAP1 mutation correlated with worse OS (hazard ratio 8.73, p = 0.006). Upfront maximal safe resection appeared to be associated with improved outcomes in selected patients, whereas radiotherapy and systemic therapy did not demonstrate clear additional benefit in this cohort. In summary, our study shows that all CMMNs, irrespective of grade, have a high propensity to recur and melanoma histology and BAP1 mutation are associated with significantly worse OS.

ABSTRACT IDH-mutant astrocytomas maintain telomeres through the alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) pathway, producing extreme inter-arm telomere length heterogeneity, yet how this heterogeneity shapes structural genome evolution remains unknown. Using Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing of 20 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, we profiled structural variants (SVs), copy number variants, extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) and measured allele-specific telomere lengths from individual long reads. We identified pervasive complex rearrangements, including chromothripsis and foldback events consistent with breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, and widespread ecDNAs. SV breakpoints were enriched at telomeric and centromeric regions regardless of local telomere length, revealing constitutive structural fragility. Arm-level telomere length analysis uncovered a dual-mode model: arms with short telomeres preferentially harbored breakage-associated events, while arms with long ALT-maintained telomeres were enriched for ecDNA and amplification-associated events. These findings identify chromosome-arm-specific telomere length as a determinant of structural genome evolution in ALT-driven tumors.

Abstract Background Intracranial mesenchymal tumors, FET::CREB fusion-positive (ICMT), show fusions involving FET RNA-binding protein family genes (EWSR1 or FUS) and CREB family of transcription factors (ATF1, CREB1, or CREM). The methylation signature(s), gene expression characteristics, and clinical behavior of this important tumor type require further characterization. Methods We study the methylation profiles of 81 ICMT cases (61 newly profiled cases and 20 cases from publicly available sources). Clinicopathologic and genomic data were recorded for each case when available. Results ICMT showed a relatively distinct methylation signature compared to related tumors. Among the 65 cases where fusion types were documented, the identified fusions included EWSR1::ATF1 (25 cases), EWSR1::CREB1 (12 cases), EWSR1::CREM (21 cases), FUS::CREM (3 cases), and SMARCA2::CREM (4 cases). We confirmed the prior description of 2 distinct subgroups of ICMT (subclasses A and B). The majority of the cases belonged to subclass A (n = 69; 85%), which showed a higher median age compared to subclass B patients (26 years vs. 15 years). Subclass B cases (n = 12; 15%) showed shorter progression-free survival (P < 0.01). Gene expression analysis of ICMT showed key overexpressed markers in ICMT, with significant CREM overexpression regardless of fusion type, when compared to either meningioma alone or a larger group of CNS tumors. Conclusions This work provides further characterization of ICMT as an important CNS mesenchymal neoplasm that is prone to tumor recurrence, showing 2 prognostically relevant methylation subclasses and warranting diagnostic distinction from other epigenetically and histologically related tumors. ICMTs show substantial overexpression of the CREM gene, independent of fusion type.

Abstract Background Glioblastoma IDH-wildtype (GBM) may be diagnosed histologically (hGBM) or based on molecular features when microvascular proliferation and histologic necrosis are absent (mGBM). Clinical and radiographic distinction between hGBM and mGBM remains unclear. Methods 101 hGBM cases were matched to 109 mGBM cases by age, sex, year of diagnosis, and TERT promoter mutation (TERTp) status. Clinical outcome, radiographic, and molecular features were compared across mGBM and hGBM. Results Median time from first MRI to diagnosis was longer for mGBM versus hGBM (34 vs 7 days, p < .001). mGBM more often presented with seizures (51% vs 26%, p < .001), gliomatosis pattern (12% vs 2%, p = .005), basal ganglia involvement (17% vs 0%, p < .001). Contrast enhancement appeared on MRI for 98% (96/98) of hGBM and 50% (54/107) of mGBM (p < .001). mGBM with non-enhancing MRI were rarely multifocal (2% vs 30%, p < .001). mGBM harbored fewer total copy number alterations (median 20 vs 16.5, p = .029), less often had EGFRamp (34% vs 48%, p = .051), isolated chromosome 10 loss (84% vs 96%, p = .013), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (56% vs 77%, p = .005). Median overall survival was longer for mGBM (2.16 vs 1.44 years, p < .001), and for mGBM without MRI contrast enhancement versus hGBM with enhancement (3.11 vs 1.62 years, adjusted p = .003). mGBM without +7/−10 or without CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion had longer survival and time-to-progression versus hGBM with these alterations. Conclusion mGBM with MRI enhancement may represent undersampled or early/evolving hGBM. mGBM that are non-enhancing, present with seizures, prolonged time to diagnosis, absent CDKN2A/B alteration or +7/−10 may represent other IDH-wildtype entities.

Abstract Background Disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) in high-grade brain tumors is characterized by contrast accumulation on diagnostic imaging. This window of opportunity study correlates contrast imaging features with the tumor distribution of BBB-permeable (levetiracetam) and -impermeable (cefazolin) drugs. Methods Patients with a clinical diagnosis of a high-grade brain tumor underwent MRI for surgical planning. Cefazolin and levetiracetam were administered prior to skin incision, and serial plasma and image-registered tumor samples were collected during the operation. Drug levels were measured by LC-MS/MS, tissue drug levels were corrected for residual blood, and tumor-to-plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Intraoperative microdialysis was performed in a subset of patients to measure the same two drugs. Results Tumor (n = 125) and plasma (n = 261) samples were available for analysis from 42 operative cases. Across all samples, the tumor-to-plasma ratio was significantly lower for cefazolin (marginal mean [MM]: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.11–0.19) as compared to levetiracetam (MM: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.64–0.75; P < .001). When compared between contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing regions, tumor-to-plasma ratios for cefazolin varied by 4.4-fold (0.27, 95% CI: 0.20–0.35 vs. 0.06, 95% CI: 0.04–0.08, respectively; P < .001), and varied for levetiracetam by 1.4-fold (0.88, 95% CI: 0.78–0.97 vs. 0.61, 95% CI: 0.55–0.66, respectively; P < .001). These results were confirmed with the intra-operative microdialysis and a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Conclusions This study demonstrates significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in drug delivery for both levetiracetam and cefazolin within high-grade brain tumors that is not necessarily predicted by clinical MR imaging and may reflect tumor-induced changes in both perfusion and BBB integrity.