Citations

242 Background: We evaluated plasma cell free based genomic aberrations for prognosticating survival of newly diagnosed metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients (pts). Methods: Plasma was collected from mHSPC pts enrolled between 2009-2014. Platelet poor plasma (PPP) fractions were processed uniformly and cell free DNA (cfDNA) extracted using Qiagen kits. Pts were followed after initiating hormonal therapy until death. Next Gen Sequencing (NGS) of cfDNA was performed using Illumina HiSeq X for a preselected panel of 128 genes (PredicineDDR-77 cancer driver genes; 29 genes in BRCA-FA homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) pathway; 22 DNA damage repair pathway genes). Statistical analyses of plasma genome based aberrations with overall survival (OS) were performed in R 3.5.1. Cox proportional-hazard models were used for survival analysis. Results: An average of 2.5 ml PPP from 99 pts yielded a median of 10.5 ng (range: 2.8-702) cfDNA per sample. 15/99 pt samples with a yield < 5 ng were excluded from sequencing; 9/99 samples failed NGS. Median follow-up time was 80.2 months (mths) (Range: 74.7, 87]); median OS was 69.1 mths (range: 54,NR). 29 pts with full NGS data had high volume metastatic disease. cfDNA yield correlated with metastatic volume (P = 0.01). Univariate analysis revealed both variables prognostic for OS (Metastatic volume: log-rank P=0.01, HR=2.1, 95% CI: 1.1-3.8; cfDNA yield: P =0.04, HR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.03-1.7). Multivariate regression showed prognostic value of cfDNA yield remained independent of metastatic volume (P = 0.03, HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02-1.76). 54/67 samples with NGS data had at least one mutation/copy number variation detected. Top mutated genes included TP53 (N=18), ATM (N=9), CHEK2 (N=7), FANCM (N=6), RB1 (N=6), BRCA2 (N=5), PIK3CA (N=4) and 37/67 pts harbored 1≥ variant in HDR pathways. These pts had a shorter survival (median: 58.6 mths) (P=0.04, HR= 2.28, 95% CI: 1.01-5.18) and pts with ATM mutations did significantly worse (median survival: 47.4 mths) (HR=4.03, P=0.0005, 95% CI: 1.73-9.37). Conclusions: Plasma cfDNA yield is prognostic for survival in newly diagnosed mHSPC state and presence of HRD pathway genomic aberrations in plasma cfDNA are associated with poor survival.

Study Design. Secondary analysis of a large administrative database. Objective. The objectives of this study are to: 1) identify the incidence and cause of 90-day readmissions following primary elective lumbar spine surgery, 2) offer insight into potential risk factors that contribute to these readmissions, and 3) quantify the cost associated with these readmissions. Summary of Background Data. As bundled-payment models for the reimbursement of surgical services become more popular in spine, the focus is shifting toward long-term patient outcomes in the context of 90-day episodes of care. With limited data available on national 90-day readmission statistics available, we hope to provide evidence that will aid in the development of more cost-effective perioperative care models. Methods. Using ICD-9 coding, we identified all patients 18 years of age and older in the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) who underwent an elective, inpatient, primary lumbar spine surgery. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of 90-day readmission while controlling for a multitude of confounding variables and completed a comparative cost analysis. Results. We identified 169,788 patients who underwent a primary lumbar spine procedure. In total 4268 (2.5%) were readmitted within 90 days. There was no difference in comorbidity burden between cohorts (readmitted vs. not readmitted) as quantified by the Elixhauser Comorbidity index. Independent predictors of increased odds of 90-day readmission were: anemia, uncomplicated diabetes and diabetes with chronic complications, surgical wound disruption and acute myocardial infarction at the time of the index admission, self-pay status, and an anterior surgical approach. Implant complications were identified as the primary related cause of readmission. These readmissions were associated with a significant cost increase. Conclusion. There are clearly identifiable risk factors that increase the odds of hospital readmission within 90 days of primary lumbar spine surgery. An overall 90-day readmission rate of 2.5%, while relatively low, carries significantly increased cost to both the patient and hospital. Level of Evidence: 3

Many hospitalists incorporate point‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) into their daily practice to answer specific diagnostic questions or to guide performance of invasive bedside procedures. However, standards for hospitalists in POCUS training and assessment are not yet established. Most internal medicine residency training programs, the major pipeline for incoming hospitalists, have only recently begun to incorporate POCUS in their curricula. The purpose of this document is to inform a broad audience on what POCUS is and how hospitalists are using it. This document is intended to provide guidance for the hospitalists who use POCUS and administrators who oversee its use. We discuss POCUS 1) applications, 2) training, 3) assessments, and 4) program management. Practicing hospitalists must continue to collaborate with their local credentialing bodies to outline requirements for POCUS use. Hospitalists should be integrally involved in decision‐making processes surrounding POCUS program management.

This case report describes an 83-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities who presented with melena and coffee-ground emesis with diagnostic studies evident for a large prepyloric gastrointestinal stromal tumor. She underwent combined laparoendoscopic transgastric resection surgery for the tumor, performed by a team of gastroenterologist and thoracic surgeon with a successful outcome. The case and videos in this report provide a descriptive demonstration of the steps leading up to the surgical intervention followed by a step-by-step illustration of the combined surgical technique, thus highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary approach for optimal treatment of prepyloric gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) characterized with ≥2 extrahepatic organ failures in cirrhosis carries a high mortality. Outcomes of patients listed for liver transplantation (LT) after ACLF and after LT are largely unknown. The North American Consortium for the Study of End‐Stage Liver Disease prospectively enrolled 2793 nonelectively hospitalized patients with cirrhosis; 768 were listed for LT. Within 3 months, 265 (35%) received a LT, 395 remained alive without LT, and 108 died/delisted. Compared with nonlisted patients, those listed were younger and more often had ACLF, acute kidney injury, and a higher admission Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. ACLF was most common in patients who died/delisted, followed by those alive with and without LT respectively, (30%, 22%, and 7%, respectively; P < 0.001). At LT, median MELD was 27.9% and 70% were inpatients; median time from hospitalization to LT was 26 days. Post‐LT survival at 6 months was unchanged between those with and without ACLF (93% each at 6 months). There was no difference in 3‐ and 6‐month mean post‐LT creatinine in those with and without ACLF, despite those with ACLF having a higher mean pre‐LT creatinine and a higher rate of perioperative dialysis (61%). In conclusion, patients with and without ACLF had similar survival after transplant with excellent renal recovery in both groups.

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for prevention of the first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP; primary prophylaxis 1°) and subsequent episodes (secondary prophylaxis 2°). We aimed to compare outcomes in cirrhotic inpatients on 1° vs 2° SBP prophylaxis. METHODS: Data from North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease were evaluated for cirrhosis details, reasons for admission/medications, inpatient course recorded, and outcomes over 90 days. Outcomes (intensive care units, acute kidney injury, inpatient/90-day mortality) were compared between the 2 groups after propensity-matching on admission model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and serum albumin. RESULTS: Among the 2,731 patients enrolled, 305 were on 1° and 187 on 2° SBP prophylaxis. After propensity-matching, 154 patients remained in each group. Patients on 1° prophylaxis were more likely to have admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( P = 0.02), with higher intensive care unit admissions (31% vs 21%; P = 0.05) and inpatient mortality (19% vs 9%; P = 0.01) than the 2° prophylaxis group. Patients on 2° prophylaxis had higher total (22% vs 10%; P = 0004), readmission (16% vs 9%; P = 0.03), and nosocomial (6% vs 0.5%; P = 0.01) SBP rates with predominant Gram-negative organisms compared to 1° prophylaxis patients. At 90 days, 1° prophylaxis patients had a higher mortality (35% vs 22%; P = 0.02) and acute kidney injury incidence (48% vs 30%; P = 0.04) compared to 2° prophylaxis patients. DISCUSSION: In this inpatient cirrhosis study, despite prophylaxis, a high proportion of patients developed SBP, which was associated with mortality. Cirrhotic inpatients on 1° prophylaxis had worse outcomes than those on 2° prophylaxis when propensity-matched for the MELD score and serum albumin during the index admission and 90-day follow-up.