Citations

Introduction Mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke has traditionally been performed via transfemoral access (TFA). However, newer literature on the subject suggests that trans‐radial access (TRA) may be equally efficacious. Materials and Methods Using relevant keywords, online databases (including Pubmed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane) were queried from inception until May 2024. Abstracts and full texts were screened according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines to shortlist studies that met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias assessment was performed according to the New Castle Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0. All dichotomous outcomes were reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RevMan software was used to perform the statistical analysis. Results Thirteen observational studies and one randomized clinical trial were included in this meta‐analysis. The total sample size was 4973, of which 4074 patients (81.2%) were included in the TFA group and 899 (18.8%) were included in the TRA group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of successful recanalization (OR=0.92; 95% CI 0.66‐1.27; p =0.60), first‐pass recanalization (OR=0.84; 95% CI 0.69‐1.01, p =0.06), access to reperfusion time (mean difference ‐2.99 minutes; 95% CI ‐8.33 to 2.44, p =0.27) and favorable functional outcome. Mortality and rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable between the two groups as well, but access site complications were significantly lower in the TRA group (OR=0.57; 95% CI 0.37‐0.88; p =0.01). Conclusion Trans‐radial access for thrombectomy in large vessel acute ischemic strokes is comparable to trans‐femoral access in terms of efficacy and has a lower incidence of access site complications. Randomized clinical trial data on head‐to‐head comparison of two techniques is limited, underscoring the importance of conducting pragmatic clinical trials.

Background: Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) is the most dreaded complication after reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to estimate and compare risks of sICH after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) depending on the location of the large vessel occlusion, concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis, timing of treatment, and core size. Methods: Randomized controlled trials were included, following a comprehensive search of different databases from inception to 1 March 2024. Random-effect models in a meta-analysis were employed to obtain the pooled risk ratios (RRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for sICH with MT, and were then compared to other reperfusion treatment regimens, including best medical treatment and intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Results: MT in the anterior circulation was associated with a significantly higher risk of sICH as compared with no-MT (RR: 1.46; 95%CI: 1.03–2.07; p = 0.037). The risk of sICH was comparable between the MT and MT+IVT groups (RR: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.57–1.03; p = 0.079). There was no difference in sICH risk with MT as compared with no-MT within 6 h of last known well (RR: 1.14; 95%CI: 0.78–1.66; p = 0.485) and beyond that time (RR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.80–2.08; p = 0.252); the risk of sICH was also comparable between MT conducted within 6 h of last known well and MT conducted beyond that time (p = 0.512). The sICH risk for MT in the posterior circulation (RR: 7.48; 95%CI: 2.27–24.61) was significantly higher than for MT in the anterior circulation (RR: 1.18; 95%CI: 0.90–1.56) (p = 0.003). MT was also associated with a significantly higher sICH risk than no-MT among patients with large core strokes (RR: 1.71; 95%CI: 1.09–2.66, p = 0.018). Conclusions: When evaluating cumulative evidence from randomized controlled trials, the risk of sICH is increased after MT compared with patients not treated with MT. Yet, the difference is largely driven by the greater risk of sICH in patients treated with MT for posterior circulation occlusions and, to a lesser degree, large core strokes. Concomitant use of intravenous thrombolysis and the use of MT in the extended therapeutic window do not raise the risk of sICH.

ABSTRACT As the number of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters continues to increase, it is important to understand what factors influence not only thrombus formation within the aneurysm cavity but also fibrin accumulation across the device and its associated disruption and blockage of the inflow stream. Both processes contribute to the eventual occlusion of the aneurysm or its continued patency and incomplete occlusion which may require future re‐treatment. To investigate fibrin accumulation on flow diverters placed across the neck of cerebral aneurysms, a previously developed computational model that couples flow and fibrin dynamics is used in combination with experimental in vitro models of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Fibrin accumulation was previously investigated in four glass models of cerebral aneurysms with varying parent artery geometries placed in a flow loop at different flow rates. Corresponding computational models were constructed and compared with the experimental findings. The computational model based on fibrin production stimulated from flow shear stress and subsequent adhesion to device wires was able to reproduce and explain the fibrin accumulation patterns observed in the experimental aneurysms treated with flow diverters. Specifically, these models indicated that increasing vessel curvature, flow rate, and thrombin concentration induced faster fibrin accumulation and associated aneurysm inflow disruption and blockage. The models described and tested in this paper are valuable to understand the detailed mechanisms leading to aneurysm occlusion and healing or incomplete occlusions after treatment with flow diverting devices.

Background Identifying eloquent regions associated with poor outcomes based on CT perfusion (CTP) may help inform personalized decisions on selection for endovascular therapy (EVT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. This study aimed to characterize the relationship between CTP-defined hypoperfusion and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) subitem deficits. Methods Patients with anterior circulation LVO, baseline CTP, itemized NIHSS at presentation and 24 hours were included. CTP was analyzed using e-CTP (Brainomix, UK). Time to maximal contrast (Tmax) prolongation was defined as >6 s, and penumbra as the difference between Tmax and ischemic core (relative cerebral blood flow<30%). Voxel-lesion-symptom mapping was performed using sparse canonical correlation analysis. For each NIHSS subitem, and total NIHSS, the associations were plotted between Tmax voxels with baseline NIHSS, and penumbra voxels with delta NIHSS (24 hours minus baseline). Results This study included 171 patients. Total NIHSS was predicted by hypoperfusion in left frontal cortex and subcortical white matter tracts. Voxels associated with neurological recovery were symmetrical and subcortical. Limb deficits were associated with respective motor cortex regions and descending motor tracts, with negative correlation within the contralateral hemispheres. A similar but smaller cluster of voxels within the penumbra was associated with NIHSS improvement. Language impairment correlated with left frontal cortex and superior temporal gyrus voxels. With the exception of dysarthria, significant associations were observed and more diffusely distributed in all other NIHSS subitems. Conclusions These results demonstrate the feasibility of hypoperfusion-to-symptom mapping in LVO. Symptom-based mapping from presenting imaging could refine treatment decisions targeting specific neurological deficits.

Background As the use of flow diverters has expanded in recent years, predicting successful outcomes has become more challenging for certain aneurysms. Objective To provide neurointerventionalists with an understanding of the available machine learning algorithms for predicting the success of flow diverters in occluding aneurysms. Methods This study followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the four major medical databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science) were screened. The study included original research articles that evaluated the predictive abilities of various machine learning algorithms for determining the success of flow diverters in achieving aneurysm occlusion. Results Five studies out of 217 were included based on our criteria. The included studies used various variables (patient demographics, aneurysm and parent artery characteristics, flow diverter and hemodynamic-related features, and angiographic parametric imaging) to predict flow diverter treatment outcomes. The machine learning algorithms used, along with their respective accuracy rates, were as follows: logistic regression (61% and 85%), support vector machine (88%), Gaussian support vector machine (90%), linear support vector machine (85%), decision tree (80%), random forest (87%), k-nearest neighbors (83% and 85%), XGBoost (87%), CatBoost (86%), deep neural networks (77.9%), and recurrent neural networks (74%).Two studies trained the machine learning models with both all features and the most significant features. Both studies observed that the accuracy of machine learning models decreased by removing the insignificant features. Conclusion The current literature indicates that machine learning algorithms can be trained to predict the success of flow diverters with an accuracy of up to 90%.

Introduction: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for enhancing stroke diagnosis, aiding treatment decision making, and improving overall patient care. Leading AI-driven platforms such as RapidAI, Brainomix®, and Viz.ai have been developed to assist healthcare professionals in the swift and accurate assessment of stroke patients. Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Characteristic descriptive measures were gathered as appropriate from all included studies, including the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and comparison of the available tools. Results: A total of 31 studies were included, of which 29 studies focused on detecting acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or large vessel occlusions (LVOs), and 2 studies focused on hemorrhagic strokes. The four main tools used were Viz.ai, RapidAI, Brainomix®, and deep learning modules. Conclusions: AI tools in the treatment of stroke have demonstrated usefulness for diagnosing different stroke types, providing high levels of accuracy and helping to make quicker and more precise clinical judgments.

Bevacizumab (BCZ), commercially known as Avastin, is a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Initially recognized as a breakthrough in oncology, it has since gained FDA approval for various ocular conditions and more recently, for the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Bevacizumab's ability to inhibit excessive neovascularization suggests it may have a potential role in treating chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH). Recent studies have shown that the pathophysiology of cSDH is more complex than previously understood, with VEGF concentrations in subdural fluid significantly exceeding those in serum, contributing to the high recurrence rates. Intra-arterial administration of bevacizumab has shown promising results in recent case series against chronic subdural hematoma, and may be a viable alternative to middle meningeal artery embolization. If successful, this treatment could significantly decrease the rate of recurrence and result in lower rates of severe neurological complications such as visual loss. This literature review explores the connection between bevacizumab and cSDH, focusing on the pharmacological, safety, and delivery aspects of this approach while summarizing the current evidence supporting its use.

BACKGROUND: The EXCELLENT registry aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EMBOTRAP Revascularization Device in an all-comer population in a real-world setting, with a focus on the composition of retrieved clots. METHODS: EXCELLENT is a prospective, global registry of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with EMBOTRAP as the first-line mechanical thrombectomy device conducted at 34 sites (25 sites contributing clot) from September 2018 to March 2021, utilizing core imaging and central histology laboratories blinded to clinical data, independent 90-day modified Rankin Scale assessment and Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: After screening 3799 patients, a total of 997 subjects (mean age, 70.0±14.2 years; 51.8% women; 19.7% non-White) were included. The first-pass modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b rate was 64.5% (623/966), first-pass mTICI ≥2c was 39.1% (378/966), and final mTICI ≥2b was 94.5% (931/985). A total of 427/912 (46.8%) patients achieved a 90-day modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 or ≤baseline. Embolization to a new territory occurred in 0.2% (2/984), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours in 1.6% (16/997). The 90-day mortality was 19.1% (175/918). Device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 5.9% (54/912) through 90 days. The mean RBC percentage of retrieved clots was 45.62±21.372. Among patients who achieved mTICI ≥2b with the first pass, 15.7% (52/331) and 9.7% (32/331), respectively, had RBC-poor (<25%) and RBC-rich (>75%) clots. Patients with no clot retrieved in any procedural pass had a lower percentage of hyperdense or susceptibility vessel sign on baseline imaging (58.9% versus 74.7%; P <0.001), pointing to a potential preprocedure indicator of challenging clot. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCELLENT registry informs real-world practices in mechanical thrombectomy and sheds light on the range of clots effectively retrieved by current technology. This is the first report of detailed patient characteristics where mechanical thrombectomy maneuvers failed to remove any clot material. Although the composition of nonretrievable clots cannot be assessed histologically, the results support the notion that no retrieval may be correlated with imaging findings suggesting clots lower in RBC. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03685578.

Background Aneurysm treatments are crucial to minimize the rupture risk. The underlying molecular processes mediating cellular remodeling, endothelialization, and aneurysm healing following endovascular treatment are poorly understood. The current study aims to explore circulating miRNA as a treatment and outcome-associated biomarkers in patients undergoing endovascular treatment. Methods Patients undergoing endovascular interventions for unruptured intracranial aneurysms, using either flow diverter placement or coil embolization, were enrolled. Blood samples were collected before the intervention and during a follow-up period between 6 and 18 months. Total mRNA/miRNA was isolated from plasma, followed by RNA-seq analysis. Gene Ontology analysis was used to identify pathways linked to altered miRNA expression. Results Twenty-three patients participated, with 13 (56.5%) undergoing flow diversion and 10 (43.5%) coil embolization. The median follow-up sample collection time was 10.70 months (SEM ± 1.32). No significant differences in angiographic occlusion were noted between intervention groups. Differentially expressed miRNAs were not identified between groups at baseline. However, at follow-up, 39 miRNAs were upregulated and 41 were downregulated, independent of intervention. Notably, three miRNAs (miR-4746-5p, miR-4685-3p, and miR-490-3p) were downregulated in the flow diversion group compared to the coil embolization group. Bioinformatics analysis revealed associations with upregulated fluid shear stress, p53, adherens junction pathways, along with downregulated apoptosis pathways. Conclusions This study suggests that fluid shear stress and apoptosis may influence aneurysm healing or thromboembolic events in flow diverter-treated patients. Further research is warranted to elucidate the functional significance of these findings in treatment outcomes, providing valuable insights for improved patient care in intracranial aneurysm management.