Citations

Clear

5353 citation(s) found for "St Louis, E K".

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors in myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q
Navarro, Vı́ctor , Haferlach, Claudia, Chan, Onyee , Schulz, Felicitas , Briski, Robert , Al-Ali, Najla, Xicoy, Blanca , Lopez-Cadenas, Felix, Bosch, Francesc, Aguilera, Anna, Meggendorfer, Manja , Eder, Lea Naomi, Jérez, Andrés, Betz, Beate, Kewan, Tariq, Zindel, C., Al‐Kali, Aref , Platzbecker, Uwe, Haase, Detlef Thomas, Zeidan, Amer M., Fenaux, Pierre, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Germing, Ulrich, Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P., Haferlach, T, Montoro, Maria Julia , Navarro, Víctor , Chan, Onyee , Kubota, Yasuo , Briski, Robert , Xicoy, Blanca , Romero, Anna Aguilera , Campagna, Alessia , Lanino, Luca , Santini, Valeria , Bernal, Teresa , Such, Esperanza , Platzbecker, Anne Sophie , Gurnari, Carmelo , Zindel, Carla , Kulasekararaj, Austin , Voso, Maria Teresa , Sekeres, Mikkael A , Venugopal, Sangeetha , Al-Kali, Aref , Diez-Campelo, Maria , Wiseman, Daniel H , Della Porta, Matteo Giovanni , Komrokji, Rami S , Solé, Francesc , Palomo, Laura , Valcárcel, David , Acha, Pamela , Haferlach, Claudia , Al‐Ali, Najla, Cadenas, Félix López , Bosch, Francesc, Jerez, Andrés , Wang, Y C , Campagna, Alessia , Lanino, Luca , Santini, Valeria , Gurnari, Carmelo , Kulasekararaj, Austin , Voso, Maria Teresa , Sekeres, Mikkael A. , Varela, Nicolas A Diaz , Platzbecker, Uwe , Haase, Detlef, Zeidan, Amer M. , Fenaux, Pierre , Díez‐Campelo, María , Garcia‐Manero, Guillermo , Wiseman, Daniel H. , Germing, Ulrich , Maciejewski, Jaroslaw P. , Komrokji, Rami S. , Solé, Françesc , Haferlach, Torsten , Valcárcel, David

Mayo Clinic

Blood Advances | July 17, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020633 | PMID 42466989 Get It

Myelodysplastic syndromes with isolated deletion of chromosome 5q [MDS-del(5q)] constitute a distinct biological entity traditionally associated with favorable outcomes, although up to one quarter of patients progress to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Existing prognostic models, developed in heterogeneous MDS populations, may not adequately capture risk within this subgroup. We assembled an international cohort of 682 patients with MDS-del(5q) to evaluate the performance of the IPSS-R and IPSS-M, identify prognostic variables, and develop a disease-specific prognostic tool, the IPSS-del(5q). Most patients were classified as lower-risk by IPSS-R (94.4%) and IPSS-M (85.5%), yet both systems showed limited discriminatory ability (C-indices ≈0.5). Independent adverse prognostic factors included age ≥70 years, male sex, anemia (hemoglobin ≤10 g/dL), thrombocytopenia (platelets ≤100×10⁹/L), the presence of one additional chromosomal abnormality, ≥2 gene mutations, SF3B1 mutations, and high-risk TP53 status. Six variables were included in the IPSS-del(5q), stratifying patients into standard-risk (74.3%) and high-risk (25.7%) groups with significantly different LFS (69.2 vs. 32.0 months; p<0.01). Moreover, this model reclassified 19.1% of lower-risk IPSS-R and 14.6% of lower-risk IPSS-M patients into the high-risk IPSS-del(5q) group. However, its discriminative power remained modest, with a C-index of 0.60. Overall, this study provides the most comprehensive prognostic evaluation of MDS-del(5q) to date, demonstrates the limited discriminatory capacity of existing MDS scores in this entity, and underscores the need to develop refined disease-specific prognostic approaches for this MDS subtype.
Cross-cohort analysis of expression and splicing quantitative trait loci in TOPMed
Blackwell, Thomas W., Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J. , Cho, Michael H. , Christenson, Stephanie A. , Durda, Peter , Gabriel, Stacey , Hersh, Craig P. , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, S.-J., Joehanes, Roby, Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching‐Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C. Y. , Manichaikul, Ani , Paik, David T. , Saferali, Aabida , Smith, Joshua D. , Taylor, Kent D. , Wang, Jiongming , Weinstock, Joshua S. , Weiss, Jeffrey, Wheeler, Heather E. , Zhou, Ying , Zoellner, Sebastian, Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R.G. , Ortega, Victor E. , Johnson, Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Abecasis, Gonçalo , Nickerson, Deborah A. , Ardlie, Kristin G., Woodruff, Prescott G. , Bowler, Russell P. , Meyers, Deborah A. , Reiner, Alex, Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S. , Silverman, Edwin K. , Rich, Stephen S., Heard‐Costa, Nancy L. , Tang, Hua, Rotter, Jerome I. , Smith, Albert V. , Aguet, François, Scott, Laura J. , Raffield, Laura M. , Parker, Stephen C.J. , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan, Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Pankow, James, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric, Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng, Rich, Stephen S. , Pankow, James S. , Reiner, Alex P. , Aguet, François , Johnson, W. Craig , Ardlie, Kristin , Orchard, Peter , Kachuri, Linda , Castaldi, Peter J , Cho, Michael H , Christenson, Stephanie A , Durda, Peter , Hersh, Craig P , Huntsman, Scott , Hwang, Seungyong , Joehanes, Roby , Johnson, Mari , Li, Xingnan , Lin, Honghuang , Liu, Ching-Ti , Liu, Yongmei , Mak, Angel C Y , Manichaikul, Ani W , Paik, David T , Smith, Joshua D , Taylor, Kent D , Tracy, Russell P , Wang, Jiongming , Wang, Mingqiang , Weinstock, Joshua S , Weiss, Jeffrey , Wheeler, Heather E , Zhou, Ying , Zöllner, Sebastian , Wu, Joseph C , Mestroni, Luisa , Graw, Sharon , Taylor, Matthew R G , Ortega, Victor E , Johnson, W Craig , Gan, Weiniu , Gupta, Namrata , Ardlie, Kristin , Woodruff, Prescott G , Bowler, Russell P , Reiner, Alexander P , Kooperberg, Charles , Ziv, Elad , Vasan, Ramachandran S , Silverman, Edwin K , Rich, Stephen S , Heard-Costa, Nancy , Tang, Hua , Rotter, Jerome I , Smith, Albert V , Levy, Daniel , Aguet, François , Scott, Laura J , Raffield, Laura M , Parker, Stephen C J , Pankow, James S , Tracy, Russell P. , Wu, Joseph C. , Larson, Martin G. , Cupples, L. Adrienne , Abe, Namiko, Almasy, Laura, Ament, Seth, Anugu, Pramod, Auer, Paul, Avramopoulos, Dimitrios, Balasubramanian, Adithya, Barr, R. Graham, Barwick, Lucas, Beaty, Terri, Becker, Diane, Becker, Lewis, Beitelshees, Amber, Benos, Takis, Bezerra, Marcos, Bis, Joshua, Brody, Jennifer, Broeckel, Ulrich, Broome, Jai, Bunting, Karen, Buth, Erin, Carey, Vincent, Carty, Cara, Casaburi, Richard, Chaffin, Mark, Chang, Christy, Chang, Yi-Cheng, Chavan, Sameer, Chen, Bo-Juen, Chen, Wei-Min, Choi, Seung Hoan , Chuang, Lee-Ming, Chung, Ren-Hua, Conomos, Matthew, Cornell, Elaine, Crandall, Carolyn, Crapo, James, Curtis, Jeffrey, Damcott, Coleen, David, Sean, Fuentes, Lisa de las, Vries, Paul de, Deka, Ranjan, DeMeo, Dawn, Devine, Scott, Dinh, Huyen, Doddapaneni, Harsha, Duan, Qing, Duggirala, Ravi, Eaton, Charles, Ekunwe, Lynette, Boueiz, Adel El, Emery, Leslie, Farber, Charles, Farek, Jesse, Franceschini, Nora, Frazar, Chris, Fu, Mao, Fullerton, Stephanie M., Fulton, Lucinda, Gao, Shanshan, Gao, Yan, Gass, Margery, Geiger, Heather, Ghosh, Auyon, Gignoux, Chris, Glahn, David, Gogarten, Stephanie, Gong, Da-Wei, Goring, Harald, Grine, Daniel, Gu, C. Charles, Guan, Yue, Hall, Michael, Han, Yi, Harris, Daniel, Heavner, Ben, Herrington, David, Hobbs, Brian, Hong, Elliott, Hoth, Karin, Hsiung, Chao (Agnes), Hu, Jianhong, Hung, Yi-Jen, Huston, Haley, Hwu, Chii Min, Jackson, Rebecca, Jain, Deepti, Johnsen, Jill, Johnston, Rich, Jones, Kimberly, Kessler, Michael, Khan, Alyna, Khan, Ziad, Kim, Wonji, Kimoff, John, Kinney, Greg, Kramer, Holly, Lange, Christoph, Lange, Ethan, Laurie, Cathy, Laurie, Cecelia, LeBoff, Meryl, Lee, Sandra, Lee, Wen-Jane, Levine, David, Lewis, Joshua, Li, Yun, Lin, Xihong, Liu, Simin, Liu, Yu, Make, Barry, Manning, Alisa, Manson, JoAnn, Martin, Lisa, Marton, Melissa, Mathai, Susan, May, Susanne, McArdle, Patrick, McDonald, Merry-Lynn, McFarland, Sean, McGoldrick, Daniel, McHugh, Caitlin, Mei, Hao, Meigs, James, Menon, Vipin, Min, Nancy, Moll, Matt, Momin, Zeineen, Montasser, May, Mychaleckyj, Josyf C, Naik, Rakhi, Naseri, Take, Natarajan, Pradeep, Nelson, Sarah C., Neltner, Bonnie, Nessner, Caitlin, Nkechinyere, Osuji, O'Connell, Jeff, O’Connor, Tim, Ochs-Balcom, Heather, Okwuonu, Geoffrey, Parker, Cora, Peloso, Gina, Peralta, Juan Manuel, Perez, Marco, Perry, James, Peters, Ulrike, Phillips, Lawrence S, Pollin, Toni, Becker, Julia Powers, Boorgula, Meher Preethi, Psaty, Bruce, Qiao, Dandi, Rafaels, Nicholas, Rajendran, Mahitha, Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura, Ratan, Aakrosh, Reed, Robert, Regan, Elizabeth, Reupena, Muagututi‘a Sefuiva, Robillard, Rebecca, Roselli, Carolina, Ruczinski, Ingo, Runnels, Alexi, Russell, Pamela, Ryan, Kathleen, Sabino, Ester Cerdeira, Salimi, Shabnam, Salvi, Sejal, Salzberg, Steven, Sandow, Kevin, Santibanez, Jireh, Schwander, Karen, Sciurba, Frank, Sériès, Frédéric , Shetty, Amol, Shetty, Aniket, Silver, Brian, Skomro, Robert, Smith, Tanja, Smoller, Sylvia, Snively, Beverly, Stilp, Adrienne M., Storm, Garrett, Streeten, Elizabeth, Su, Jessica Lasky, Sung, Yun Ju, Sylvia, Jody, Szpiro, Adam, Taub, Margaret, Taylor, Simeon, Thornton, Timothy A., Threlkeld, Machiko, Tinker, Lesley, Tirschwell, David, Tiwari, Hemant, Tong, Catherine, Tsai, Michael, Vaidya, Dhananjay, Walker, Tarik, Wallace, Robert, Walts, Avram, Wang, Fei Fei, Wang, Heming, Watson, Karol, Watt, Jennifer, Weng, Lu-Chen, Wessel, Jennifer, Williams, Kayleen, Wilson, Carla, Wilson, James, Winterkorn, Lara, Wong, Quenna, Wu, Baojun, Xu, Huichun, Yanek, Lisa, Yang, Ivana, Zekavat, Seyedeh Maryam, Zhao, Snow Xueyan, Zhao, Wei, Zhu, Xiaofeng

Mayo Clinic

Science | July 16, 2026 | Volume: 393 | Issue: 6808 | Pages: No page available

10.1126/science.adx2989 | PMID 42462027 Get It

Most genetic variants associated with complex traits are hypothesized to regulate gene expression. To understand the genetics underlying gene expression variability, we characterized 14,324 RNA-sequencing samples from the Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine program and performed expression and splicing quantitative trait locus (e/sQTL) analyses in six tissues and cell types, including whole blood ( n = 6454) and lung ( n = 1291). We detected tens of thousands of secondary cis-e/sQTLs, showing that secondary cis-e/sQTL discovery remains unsaturated. We fine-mapped UK Biobank–derived genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals from 164 traits and identified e/sQTL colocalizations for 10,611 GWAS signals, including 7096 that colocalize with secondary e/sQTLs. Our results suggest that even larger e/sQTL analyses will uncover additional secondary e/sQTLs, further benefiting GWAS interpretation.
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Analysis of Hematologic Neoplasms: A 20-Year Review of Proficiency Testing Results From the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics Cytogenetics Committee
Peterson, Jess F., Tang, Guilin, Mixon, Christopher, Zepeda-Mendoza, Cinthya J., Sukov, William R., Zou, Ying S., Nusapan, Rangsinee, Tan, Julian, Dvorak, James, Velagaleti, Gopalrao V., Fang, Min, Levy, Brynn, Miron, Patricia M., Cao, Yang, Astbury, Caroline, Gardner, Juli-Anne, Peterson, Jess F. , Tang, Guilin , Mixon, Christopher , Zepeda‐Mendoza, Cinthya , Sukov, William R. , Zou, Ying S , Nusapan, Rangsinee , Dvorak, James, Velagaleti, Gopalrao V.N. , Fang, Min , Miron, Patricia Minehart , Astbury, Caroline , Gardner, Juli-Anne

Mayo Clinic

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | July 16, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.5858/arpa.2026-0083-cp | PMID 42457191 Get It

Context.— One objective of the College of American Pathologists/American College of Medical Genetics Cytogenetics Committee is to ensure the accurate detection and clinical interpretation of abnormalities observed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis when evaluating hematologic neoplasms. Objective.— To report a 20-year performance summary (2005–2024) of FISH challenges focusing on hematologic neoplasms. Design.— A retrospective review was performed from 2005 through 2024 to identify FISH challenges specifically addressing hematologic neoplasms. The overall performance of participants was evaluated to identify potential recurring errors of clinical relevance. Results.— A total of 124 hematologic neoplasm FISH challenges from 2005 to 2024 were provided to participating laboratories, including 45 paper challenges (results and/or images were provided for interpretation purposes), 43 liquid challenges (bone marrow aspirate or peripheral blood), and 36 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue challenges. Of the 124 challenges, 120 (97%) exceeded the required 80% consensus for grading purposes. Of the 4 failed challenges (3%), 2 (1 liquid, 1 paper) involved the interpretation of atypical FISH signal patterns; 1 (paper) involved the interpretation of FISH signal patterns correlating involvement by myeloid versus lymphoid interphase nuclei; and 1 (liquid) likely involved a specimen processing or handling error that resulted in discordant participant responses. All 36 FFPE tissue challenges exceeded the 80% consensus for grading purposes. Conclusions.— This 20-year retrospective review demonstrates that clinical cytogenomic laboratories have been and continue to be highly proficient in the detection and interpretation of FISH abnormalities associated with hematologic neoplasms.
Modifiable Risk Factors and Attributable Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality in US States, 1990-2023
Benziger, Catherine P., Stark, Benjamin A., Johnson, Catherine O., Roth, Gregory A., Collaborators, GBD 2023 US IHD, Abohashem, Shady, Ahmed, Syed Anees, Al-Aly, Ziyad, Alsabri, Mohammed A., Antony, Catherine M., Aravkin, Aleksandr Y., Areda, Demelash, Bell, Michelle L., Brauer, Michael, Chi, Gerald, Criqui, Michael H., Dai, Xiaochen, Doshi, Ojas Prakashbhai, Doshi, Rajkumar Prakashbhai, E’mar, Abdel Rahman, Elhadi, Muhammed, Göbölös, Laszlo, Haile, Demewoz, Hebert, Jeffrey J., Hemmati, Mehdi, Ibrahim, Ramzi, Kankam, Samuel Berchi, Kantar, Rami S., Khubchandani, Jagdish, Kim, Min Seo, Kimokoti, Ruth W., Kisa, Adnan, Kokkorakis, Michail, Kumar, Ashish, Liu, Xuefeng, Lv, Lei, Mahmoudi, Morteza, Manla, Yosef, Martinez-Piedra, Ramon, Marzouk, Sammer, Mensah, George A., Mestrovic, Tomislav, Miller, Ted R., Mokdad, Ali H., Mougin, Vincent, Mustafa, Ahmad, Nassar, Mahmoud, Natto, Zuhair S., Nugen, Fred, Parikh, Romil R., Pasovic, Maja, Patil, Shankargouda, Puvvula, Jagadeesh, Ramasamy, Shakthi Kumaran, Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa, Root, Kevin T., Sawhney, Monika, Schuermans, Art, Shariff, Mariam, Shuval, Kerem, Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin, Singh, Rohit, Stafford, Lauryn K., Taiba, Jabeen, Tanwar, Manoj, Teramoto, Masayuki, Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Tran, Thang Huu, Uppal, Dipan, Vinayak, Manish, Yuce, Deniz, Murray, Christopher J. L., Moran, Andrew E., Kimokoti, Ruth W , Liu, Xuefeng , Nassar, Mahmoud , Singh, Rohit , Tanwar, Manoj , Yu, Hairui , Taiba, Jabeen , Benziger, Catherine P. , Stark, Benjamin, Johnson, Catherine O., Roth, Gregory A. , Collaborators, GBD, Abohashem, Shady , Al‐Aly, Ziyad , Antony, Catherine M, Aravkin, Aleksandr Y. , Areda, Demelash, Bräuer, Michael , Chi, Gerald , Criqui, Michael H. , Doshi, Ojas Prakashbhai , Doshi, Rajkumar , E’mar, Abdel Rahman, Elhadi, Muhammed, Göbölös, László , Haile, Demewoz , Hébert, Jeffrey J. , Hemmati, Mehdi , Ibrahim, Ramzi , Kankam, Samuel Berchi , Kantar, Rami S. , Khubchandani, Jagdish , Kısa, Adnan , Kokkorakis, Michail , Lv, Lei , Mahmoudi, Morteza , Manla, Yosef , Martínez, Ramón , Marzouk, Sammer , Mensah, George A. , Meštrović, Tomislav , Miller, Ted R. , Mokdad, Ali H. , Mougin, Vincent , Mustafa, Ahmad , Nassar, Mahmoud, Nugen, Fred , Pasovic, Maja , Puvvula, Jagadeesh , Rashid, Ahmed Mustafa , Root, Kevin T., Sawhney, Monika, Schuermans, Art , Shariff, Mariam , Shuval, Kerem , Simegn, Gizeaddis Lamesgin , Stafford, Lauryn K , Teramoto, Masayuki , Thirunavukkarasu, Sathish, Uppal, Dipan , Vinayak, Manish , Yuce, Deniz, Murray, Christopher J. L., Moran, Andrew Edward

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Cardiology | July 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamacardio.2026.2435 | PMID 42455550 Get It

Importance Ischemic heart disease (IHD), the leading cause of death in the US, is predominantly due to modifiable risk factors. Estimates of IHD mortality attributable to risk factors provide evidence for health policy decision-making. Objective To estimate the burden of IHD death attributable to risk factors in the US from 1990-2023. Design, Setting, and Participants The Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 (GBD 2023) used vital records and a broad set of epidemiologic data to estimate IHD death rates, risk factor exposure, and relative risk curves for risk-outcome pairs for 1990-2023 for the general population. Data analysis was performed from October 2024 to December 2025. Exposure Twelve metabolic, behavioral, and environmental risk factors. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were IHD death rates per 100 000 persons, counts, and attributable risks from 1990-2023 by age, sex, and US state. Estimates include 95% uncertainty intervals (UI). IHD death rates were estimated using ensemble modeling methods. Risk exposures were estimated using bayesian meta-regression methods. Relative risks were estimated following the Burden of Proof framework. Results In 2023, there were 473 000 IHD deaths (95% UI, 414 000-510 000) in the US, a decrease of 58.7% (95% UI, 56.8%-61.0%) in age-standardized rate since 1990. Between 2010 and 2023, there was a 19.0% decrease (95% UI, 15.0%-22.9%) for males and a 24.5% decrease (95% UI, 20.3%-29.7%) for females in IHD death rates. High systolic blood pressure (SBP), dietary risks, and high low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were the leading risk factors for IHD deaths in 2023, accounting for 47.2% (95% UI, 36.4%-57.0%), 38.6% (95% UI, 17.2%-56.8%), and 28.5% (95% UI, 19.3%-39.6%) of IHD deaths, respectively. Increased exposure to several risk factors substantially increased their attributable burden for IHD deaths in 2023, with high fasting plasma glucose (FPG) increasing 38.8% (95% UI, 11.5%-81.1%) and high body mass index (BMI) increasing 54.5% (95% UI, 41.8%-66.3%) since 1990. Smoking and particulate matter pollution had the greatest decrease in attributable IHD mortality since 1990, at 33.3% (95% UI, 23.6%-41.7%) and 74.9% (95% UI, 46.7%-88.8%), respectively. Conclusion and Relevance Per the results of this systematic analysis of GBD 2023, a total of 88.7% (95% UI, 83.4%-92.5%) of IHD deaths were attributable to modifiable risk factors in the US in 2023, with high SBP, dietary risks, and high LDL-C being the greatest contributors. High BMI and high FPG showed the largest attribution increases, while exposure to other risks did not increase significantly for the population.
Outcomes and Costs After Robotic vs Laparoscopic Complex Elective Cholecystectomy
Caldwell, Katharine E., Threlkeld, Edie, Litrel, Joseph, Brocke, Tiffany, Fields, Ryan C., Panni, Roheena Z., Nguyen, Trang, Leigh, Natasha, Sanford, Dominic E., Caldwell, Katharine E. , Threlkeld, Edie, Litrel, Joseph, Brocke, Tiffany K , Fields, Ryan C., Panni, Roheena Z. , Leigh, Natasha L. , Sanford, Dominic E.

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Surgery | July 15, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamasurg.2026.2650 | PMID 42455567 Get It

Importance As the use of robotic cholecystectomy increases, its value remains poorly defined for complex elective cholecystectomy (CEC), where complex gallbladder pathology results in increased technical difficulty. Objective To determine whether a robotic approach is associated with improved clinical outcomes and altered total hospital cost as compared with a laparoscopic approach for patients undergoing CEC. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed data from an academic hepatobiliary referral center for patients who underwent cholecystectomy from August 2018 to August 2024. CEC was defined by preoperative criteria: prior aborted or partial cholecystectomy, presence of a cholecystostomy tube, and/or history of gallbladder perforation or fistula. Exposure Robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite of an unplanned postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or interventional radiology procedure. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative complications, and operative and total hospital costs. Results A total of 863 patients underwent cholecystectomy and met inclusion criteria; 525 (60.8%) were female and 338 (39.2%) were male, and their median (IQR) age was 61 (45-71) years. Among patients undergoing CEC, the laparoscopic approach was independently associated with an increased need for unplanned endoscopic or percutaneous intervention compared with the robotic group (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.24-14.52; P = .02). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups in patients undergoing non-CEC. Patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach had significantly reduced operating room costs when compared with patients undergoing a robotic approach in both the CEC ($7720 vs $8936, respectively) and non-CEC groups ($6368 vs $ 8351, respectively). However, there was no difference in the overall total cost of care between laparoscopic CEC and robotic CEC groups ($14 309 vs $14 476, respectively). The overall total cost of care was significantly higher for patients undergoing robotic non-CEC as compared with laparoscopic non-CEC ($11 416 vs $9925, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance This study found that for complex gallbladder disease, robotic cholecystectomy offers a clinical advantage, reducing complications and downstream interventions without increasing the overall costs of care. These findings suggest strategic application of the robotic platform may offer clinical advantages in high-complexity gallbladder surgery, maximizing patient benefit and resource efficiency.
Clinical considerations for immune dysregulation and immunodeficiency in Down syndrome
Gans, Melissa , Wyke, Matthew , Manothummetha, Kasama , Lesmana, Harry , Squire, Jacqueline D. , Schmitt, Erica G. , Ale, Hanadys , Shin, Joyce , Chaimowitz, Natalia , Camacho, Juanita Valdes , Wyke, Matthew , Manothummetha, Kasama , Lesmana, Harry , Squire, Jacqueline , Lopes, Joao Pedro , Schmitt, Erica G , Ale, Hanadys , J Shin, Junghee , Chaimowitz, Natalia , Baloh, Carolyn , Bogunovic, Dusan , Espinosa, Joaquin , Gans, Melissa D.

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Human Immunity | July 15, 2026 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.70962/jhi.20260052 | PMID 42459548 Get It

Down syndrome (DS), the genetic condition caused by trisomy 21 (T21), is characterized by lifelong immune dysregulation leading to high rates of autoimmune disorders, elevated risk of complications from infections, immune hypersensitivity, and a unique form of immunodeficiency. It is now appreciated that DS shares key hallmarks with interferonopathies, with vast remodeling of all branches of the immune system, hypercytokinemia, and widespread autoantibody production. Here within, we review the existing literature with an emphasis on clinical considerations toward monitoring, management, and therapeutic opportunities. We highlight recent research advances that illuminate diagnostic approaches to evaluate immune dysregulation in DS. We also discuss the evidence supporting specific immunomodulatory strategies that could have multidimensional benefits in this population, including JAK inhibitors, intravenous immunoglobulin, and B cell–depleting agents.
Shotgun metagenomic analysis reveals taxonomic and functional alterations in the gut microbiome across prodromal and symptomatic Lewy body disease
Zhao, Xiaowei, McCarter, Stuart J., Gupta, Vinod K., Grant, Kiera M., Louis, Erik K. St., Kantarci, Kejal, Savica, Rodolfo, Hill, Max, Vuong, Helen E., Staley, Christopher, Boeve, Bradley F., Ross, Owen A., Teigen, Levi M., Sung, Jaeyun, Sung, Jaeyun , St Louis, Erik K, Sung, Jaeyun , McCarter, Stuart J. , Gupta, Vinod K. , Grant, Kiera M., Kantarci, Kejal, Savica, Rodolfo , Hill, Max, Vuong, Helen E. , Staley, Christopher , Boeve, Bradley F. , Teigen, Levi

Mayo Clinic

Frontiers in Microbiomes | July 15, 2026 | Volume: 5 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.3389/frmbi.2026.1834726 | PMID 42529077 Get It

Background Lewy body disease (LBD) is a progressive neurodegenerative a-synucleinopathy, whereas isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) is recognized as a prodromal stage of LBD. Although growing evidence implicates the gut–brain axis in neurodegeneration, the taxonomic and functional roles of the gut microbiome across the prodromal-to-symptomatic LBD continuum remain poorly defined. Methods Here, we performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing on stool samples from 25 patients with LBD (10 mild cognitive impairment due to LBD [MCI-LB] and 15 dementia with Lewy bodies [DLB]), 10 individuals with iRBD, and their household matched cohabitant controls to characterize disease-associated microbial alterations while minimizing environmental confounding. Results Despite no significant differences in global microbial diversity, we identified convergent shifts in microbial taxa, metabolic pathways, and gene families across disease stages. Both LBD and iRBD showed increased abundance of microbial taxa potentially associated with gut barrier disruption, as well as higher abundance of functional pathways related to lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis. LBD showed lower abundance of pathways related to complex carbohydrate fermentation, and both groups showed lower abundance of pathways associated with neurotransmitter-related metabolism. In particular, pathways and gene families associated with starch degradation were reduced in LBD, and those associated with histidine-to-glutamate/ GABA metabolism were reduced in both groups. Discussion These exploratory findings represent the first high-resolution, shotgun metagenomic characterization of gut microbiome alterations across the LBD continuum, highlighting functional patterns that may serve as candidate markers of disease progression in future longitudinal and mechanistic studies.
Clinical Recommendations for Remote Robotic Assisted Surgery From the CRSA 2025 International Consensus Conference
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle , Kavoussi, Louis, Wren, Sherry M. , Fowler, Dennis, Anvari, Mehran, Bianco, Francesco, Liang, Xiao, Li, Zheyong, Yin, Xiaoyu, Piccoli, Micaela, Marks, John, Shen, Baiyong, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara, Hagendoorn, Jeroen, Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew, Oleynikov, Dmitry, Jones, Stephanie B., Bindal, Vivek , Kim, Hyun Koo, Hyung, Woo Jin, Hashimoto, Daniel, Chen, Liaohai Leo, Burt, Bryan M., Lafaro, Kelly, Elli, Fernando, Wilson, Erik, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Morgan, Annette, Bartlett, Stephen T., Rashidi, Laila, Yu, Liu, Gawkins, Bill, Hinoul, Piet, Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee, Raoof, Mustafa, Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya, Bernard, Jordana , Wang, Yulun, Broering, Dieter C., Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo, Fong, Yuman , Raptis, Dimitri , Wren, Sherry M , Aldousari, Saad , Ruurda, Jelle P. H. , Bindal, Vivek , Melstrom, Laleh , Celotto, Francesco , Kudsi, Yusef , Ratti, Francesca , Bernard, Jordana , Kavoussi, Louis R., Fowler, Dennis L. , Anvari, Mehran , Bianco, Francesco Maria , Piccoli, Micaela , Marks, John, Ko, Clifford, Seeliger, Barbara , Hagendoorn, Jeroen , Essani, Rahila, Walsh, R. Matthew , Oleynikov, Dmitry , Hyung, Woo Jin , Hashimoto, Daniel A. , Burt, Bryan M. , Lafaro, Kelly J. , Elli, Fernando, Bianchi, Paolo Pietro, Rashidi, Laila, Hinoul, Piet , Peine, Bill, Woo, Yanghee , Raoof, Mustafa , Jones, Daniel, Deshpande, Supriya , Bröering, Dieter C. , Giulianotti, Pier Cristoforo

Mayo Clinic

World Journal of Surgery | July 14, 2026 | Volume: 50 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2274-2288

10.1002/wjs.70468 | PMID 42444290 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Implementation of remote robotic‐assisted surgery (rRAS) has the potential to significantly improve access to high‐quality surgical care for patients worldwide. Advances in robotic systems and telecommunications now enable highly reliable, low latency, and cybersecure connectivity. These technological developments, together with the broader adoption of telemedicine, have driven an increasing interest in the implementation of rRAS. Methods The Clinical Robotic Surgery Association (CRSA) convened a conference to develop international clinical recommendations for rRAS using the Danish Model of Consensus. The society identified five key issue categories and invited a panel of experts to address specific questions for each. Panel members and a jury of 10 unbiased, non‐expert in rRAS professionals participated in a day‐long conference on November 19, 2025 (Los Angeles, USA). During the conference, participants presented, discussed, and reached consensus on specific guidelines relevant to each category. Immediately after the conference, the jury reviewed and approved the recommended guidelines. Results Multiple recommendations were approved for each of the following categories: Operating Models, Roles and Responsibilities (2 recommendations), Clinical Pathway (2 recommendations), Emergency Management (8 recommendations), Technical Considerations (5 recommendations), and Medico‐legal and Ethical Considerations (4 recommendations). Conclusions There was consensus that with recent advances in telecommunication and robotic technologies, rRAS can be offered safely and effectively if the identified safeguards are realized. Adoption of rRAS is expected to continue advancing rapidly.
Drivers of Diagnostic Variation in a Digital Global Kidney Transplant Reader Study
Hofstraat-Boersma, Rianne, Long, Romy du , Buzzanca, Giorgio , Abiola, Adeyemi A., Albadri, Sam, Ali, Zahabia, Altaleb, Ahmed, Banu, Sultana G., Barry, Marc , Bhalodia, Ami , Bianco, Paola, Broecker, Verena , Buelow, Roman, Cheunsuchon, Boonyarit , Crisi, Giovanna M., Daneshvar, Simin, Dokouhaki, Pouneh, Drachenberg, C., Florquin, Sandrine, Gibson, Ian W., Gujarathi, Saurabh, Hendricks, Allen R. , Islam, Jaynul, Ismail, Wesam, Jagannathan, Geetha , Kläger, Johannes, Krizova, Adriana , Kurien, Anila A., Kwon, Boomi , Ledesma, Felipe L., Martin, Jonne, Mehta, Shweta S., Messias, Nidia , Mignano, Salvatore , Miranda, Monik E., Moeckel, Gilbert, Pala, Chiara, Ranson, Marc A., Rodriguez, A Castell, Rosenberg, Avi, Setty, Suman , Sheaff, M., Soares, Maria F.S., Surintrspanont, Jerasit , Terinte-Balcan, George, Testa, Francesca , Ticas, David O. Hendriquez, Toniolo, Maria F., Midden, Dominique van, Velagapudi, R, Viswanathan, Seethalakshmi , Stillfried, Saskia von, Kalverboer, Nienke , Bruns, Imke B. , Callegaro, Giulia , Vries, A A F De, Peters-Sengers, Hessel, Kers, Jesper, Hofstraat, Rianne , Adefidipe, Adeyemi Abiola, Albadri, Sam , Angioi, Andrea , Banu, Sultana Gulshana, Bianco, Paola, Buelow, Roman David, Chauveau, Bertrand , Chen, Guoli , Crisi, Giovanna Maria, Dendooven, Amélie , Drachenberg, Cinthia Beskow , Farris, Alton B. , Ferlicot, Sophie , Florquin, Sandrine , Fontana, Francesco , Gibier, Jean‐Baptiste , Gibson, Ian W. , Husain, Sufia , Ismail, Wesam, Kläger, Johannes Philipp , Kozakowski, Nicolas , Kurien, Anila Abraham , L’Imperio, Vincenzo , Ledesma, Felipe L , Low, Julia P. , Miranda, Monik Ediana , Price, Brendon , Ranson, Marc Andres, Roelofs, Joris J. T. H. , Sadeghipour, Alireza , Sekulic, Miroslav , Setty, Suman , Soares, Maria Fernanda , Terinte‐Balcan, George , Ticas, David Henriquez, Toniolo, María Fernanda , Midden, Dominique van , Velagapudi, Ramya Krishna , Stillfried, Saskia Freifrau von , Wu, Chih‐Ying , Water, Bob van de , Helm, Danny van der , Sengers, Hessel Peters , Kers, Jesper

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | July 13, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.64898/2026.07.09.26357318 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Diagnostic interpretation of kidney allograft biopsies using the Banff classification remains variable, but the determinants of this variability are not fully defined. We performed a global, fully digital multi-reader study to identify the principal drivers of disagreement in Banff-based assessment. Methods Thirty-six kidney transplant biopsies were independently scored by 67 renal pathologists on a standardized digital platform. Readers assessed Banff lesions on hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid–Schiff, and Jones’ silver stains; final diagnostic categories were assigned using prespecified Banff-based decision rules. Interobserver agreement was quantified with Gwet’s agreement coefficient (AC) statistics. Determinants of diagnostic agreement were evaluated using pairwise mixed-effects logistic regression, and reader similarity was examined by principal component analysis (PCA) with post hoc molecular annotation. Results Agreement for final diagnostic categories was moderate (Gwet’s AC1, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63). Lesion-level agreement varied substantially, with lowest agreement for selected threshold-dependent inflammatory or semi-quantitative lesions, including interstitial inflammation in areas of IFTA, peritubular capillaritis and arteriolar hyalinosis. Diagnostic concordance differed markedly across biopsies, indicating strong case-level heterogeneity. In pairwise models, differences in active inflammatory and vascular lesion scoring were the strongest correlates of diagnostic disagreement; reader experience and geography contributed minimally. Principal component analysis showed reader variation was organized along two dominant axes: a rejection-calling threshold axis linked mainly to tubulointerstitial inflammatory injury, and a T cell-mediated (TCMR/TI) and antibody-mediated/microvascular (AMR/MVI) inflammation-oriented phenotypic classification axis. Conclusion Interobserver variation in Banff-based kidney transplant biopsy assessment is structured rather than random and driven mainly by how readers threshold and integrate key inflammatory lesion compartments rather than experience or geographic location.