Citations

AbstractBackgroundMany treatments targeting frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) are in the developmental pipeline, but the rarity of the disease, coupled with the behavioral and motor features of FTLD, make it challenging to identify sufficient trial participants who can attend frequent in‐person visits. Decentralized clinical trial designs with remote evaluations are attractive alternatives but require validated tools for symptom tracking. Our previous cross‐sectional analyses showed that cognitive tasks deployed via the ALLFTD Mobile App are reliable and sensitive to early stages of disease. The current study seeks to evaluate whether unsupervised smartphone cognitive tests are sensitive to longitudinal changes that occur with increasing FTLD disease stage.MethodThe study included 194 participants (mean baseline age 54.30, SD = 15.66; mean education = 16.52, SD = 2.31; 55.2% women) who were asymptomatic (Clinical Dementia Rating plus FTLD (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD) = 0 [n = 109; 43 carriers of FTLD‐associated genetic variants]), prodromal (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD = 0.5 [n = 39]), or symptomatic (CDR®+NACC‐FTLD>0.5 [n = 46]) at baseline. Participants completed ALLFTD Mobile App smartphone versions of Stroop, flanker, and 2‐back tasks, as well as an adaptive associative memory task, every six months for up to two years. Linear‐mixed effects models investigated the effect of disease severity on cognitive trajectories by testing the interaction of baseline CDR®+NACC‐FTLD box score and time on smartphone test scores. Analyses were repeated in the subsample of asymptomatic/prodromal CDR®+NACC‐FTLD<1) familial FTLD mutation carriers (C9orf72, n = 27; MAPT, n = 16). All models controlled for age, education, and sex.ResultGreater baseline disease severity was associated with lower cognitive scores across all tasks (β range: ‐0.28 to ‐0.13; p’s < 0.001), and faster rates of decline on the memory and 2‐back tasks (β range: ‐0.15 to ‐0.07; p’s<0.04). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic and prodromal individuals (CDR®+NACC FTLD<1), greater baseline disease severity was still associated with lower scores across most tasks (β range: ‐0.48 to ‐0.27; p’s<0.002; 2‐back: β = ‐0.19, p = 0.26). When the sample was restricted to asymptomatic/prodromal mutation carriers, disease severity remained associated with the memory and flanker tasks (β range: ‐0.85 to ‐0.45; p’s<0.01).ConclusionThis study provides initial evidence that longitudinal smartphone‐based cognitive measurements capture the accelerated cognitive worsening that accompanies increasing disease progression in FTLD.

AbstractBackgroundSubjective cognitive concerns are common in functionally intact adults, potentially indicating future cognitive decline. Remote smartphone cognitive testing holds promise for objectively tracking cognition in individuals reporting complaints. In our initial exploration of the link between subjective cognitive complaints and digital clinical outcomes, we examined participants' self‐reported cognitive complaints' association with smartphone tests on memory and executive functioning.MethodsParticipants, without self‐reported MCI or dementia, were recruited from the UCSF Brain Healthy Registry (BHR) to complete cognitive tasks on their personal smartphone with the ALLFTD Mobile App. Participants also completed the 12‐item Everyday Cognition Screening Tool (ECog‐12), assessing subjective cognitive impairment, online as part of BHR. Average ECog‐12 scores, including Memory and Executive Functioning subdomains, were calculated. Correlations between scores from online ECog‐12 scores and app‐based smartphone tasks were examined. Regression analyses, adjusting for age, education, and sex, were performed to evaluate the relationship between ECog‐12 and smartphone tasks (Stroop & Flanker) measuring executive function and memory.ResultsOut of 2,283 invited BHR participants, 456 (mean age: 64.6 years (SD = 11.8) and education: 16.3 years (SD = 2.4)) completed smartphone tasks (81.1% completion rate). Age was negatively associated with executive functioning and memory tasks (ß’s = ‐0.51 to ‐0.54, p’s<0.05), while higher education correlated with better performance (ß’s = 0.10‐0.14, p’s<0.05). Sex was not significantly associated with performance on any task (ß’s = ‐0.04 to 0.09, p’s>0.05). Subjective cognitive concerns were linked to tasks of executive functioning (Stroop: ß = ‐0.18, p = 0.002) and memory (ß = ‐0.14, p = 0.02). Endorsement of executive functioning items on ECog‐12 associated with Stroop performance (ß = ‐0.16, p = 0.005), and memory‐specific complaints were related to memory performance (ß = ‐0.1, p = 0.09). The relationship with flanker scores was not significant (ß = ‐0.08, p = 0.17). Similar patterns emerged with the online ECog‐12; online and app‐based scores are strongly correlated (ß = 0.75, p<0.05).ConclusionsIn this cognitively intact sample, subjective cognitive concerns were linked to poorer performance on ALLFTD Mobile App tasks assessing executive functioning and memory. These findings suggest that unsupervised remote smartphone testing merits further consideration to monitor cognition in individuals with subjective cognitive concerns. Subsequent studies in deeply phenotyped cohorts with follow‐up assessments are essential for understanding the clinical relevance of these results.

Abstract High-dose methotrexate (MTX) results in high rates of acute kidney injury (AKI), neutropenia, and hepatotoxicity. Glucarpidase is a recombinant enzyme that cleaves MTX, but clinical data supporting its use are scarce. We examined the association between glucarpidase administration and outcomes in adults with MTX-AKI from 28 cancer centers across the United States using a sequential target trial emulation framework. The primary end point was kidney recovery at hospital discharge, defined as survival to discharge with serum creatinine &lt;1.5-fold baseline and without dialysis dependence. Key secondary end points were time to kidney recovery, neutropenia, and transaminitis on day 7, and time to death. Using multivariable logistic and Cox regression models, we compared outcomes in patients who received glucarpidase within 4 days following MTX initiation with those in patients who did not. Among 708 patients with MTX-AKI, 209 (29.5%) received glucarpidase. Overall, 183 (25.8%) had a primary end point event. Glucarpidase receipt was associated with a 2.70-fold higher adjusted odds of kidney recovery (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69–4.31) compared with no glucarpidase receipt. Patients treated with glucarpidase also had faster time to kidney recovery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.18–3.33) and lower risks of grade ≥2 neutropenia (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28–0.91) and grade ≥2 transaminitis (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.28–0.91) on day 7. There was no difference in time to death (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.49–1.18). These data suggest glucarpidase may improve both renal and extrarenal outcomes in patients with MTX-AKI.

INTRODUCTION: The alfapump system has been shown to be a possible alternative to repeat therapeutic paracentesis (TP) in selected patients with refractory ascites (RA). The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of alfapump on ascites control and quality of life in these patients. METHODS: Patients with cirrhosis and RA requiring ≥2 TPs 30 days prior were enrolled and followed for 24 months postimplant. Primary efficacy end point assessed at 6 months was reduction in paracentesis requirement; safety end point was device-related adverse events resulting in intervention, explant, or death. RESULTS: Forty patients with RA (mean Model of End-stage Liver Disease-Sodium: 15 ± 4) received an alfapump. TP requirement was decreased from 3.2 ± 1.5 sessions per month preimplant to 0.2 ± 0.6 sessions per month at 6 months postimplant ( P < 0.001), with 77% of patients having ≥50% reduction. Six pumps (15%) were explanted within 6 months due to device-related adverse events, 3 (7.5%) due to pump site skin erosion, and 3 (7.5%) due to bladder discomfort. Twenty-four renal events occurred in the 0–6 month postimplant period; 16 cases were readily reversible stage 1 acute kidney injury. Ascites-related symptoms assessed with an Ascites Q score improved from 51.0 ± 19.3 preimplant to 32.2 ± 21.9 at 6 months postimplant ( P < 0.001). Physical but not mental components of Short Form 36 improved ( P < 0.001). The 5 deaths within 6 months postimplant were not directly related to the device or alfapump therapy. DISCUSSION: The alfapump system effectively controlled ascites, which improved quality of life. It may be considered as an alternative to repeat TP in select patients with RA. Complication rates were similar to those expected in patients with RA.

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Pivotal trials have fixed a maximum ICI duration of 2 years, without a compelling rationale. A shorter treatment duration has the potential to improve patients' quality of life and reduce both toxicity and cost without compromising efficacy. Here we examine whether early treatment discontinuation (ETD) before 13 months in patients without progressive disease (PD) can lead to similar long-term disease control compared with a longer treatment duration (LTD). Methods To assess whether ETD is associated with similar outcomes compared with LTD, we assembled an international cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with ICIs who stopped treatment for a reason other than PD within 395 days (ETD group) and compared them to those who continued for >395 days (LTD group). Outcomes were adjusted for patient/tumor characteristics. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Of 976 patients, 137 and 394 were allocated to the ETD and LTD groups, respectively. In the ETD group, treatment was discontinued due to toxicity (n=56), objective response (n=43), surgery (n=28), patient decision (n=2) or other reasons (n=8). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups: 22% in both groups received both anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) + anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4); all others received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. ORR to ICIs was 81% in both groups. Median duration of treatment was ~7 months in the ETD and ~24 months in the LTD group. After a median follow-up of 44 months (IQR: 30–67), similar PFS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.40, p=0.69) and OS (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.99, p=0.62) from the start of ICIs were observed in ETD and LTD patients. In the ETD group, 28 (20%) patients had a PFS event and 9 restarted ICIs with a disease control rate of 66%. Conclusions In our international series of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, ETD of ICIs in the absence of PD did not seem detrimental in terms of PFS and OS compared with continuing treatment beyond 1 year. Randomized clinical trials to compare short and long treatment duration are now warranted.

AbstractBackgroundThe Uniform Data Set (UDS) neuropsychological battery, administered across Alzheimer’s Disease Centers (ADC), includes memory tests but lacks a list‐learning paradigm. ADCs often supplement the UDS with their own preferred list‐learning task. Given the importance of list‐learning for characterizing memory, we aimed to develop a harmonized memory score that incorporates UDS memory tests while allowing centers to contribute differing list‐learning tasks.MethodWe applied item‐banking confirmatory factor analysis to develop a composite memory score in 5,287 participants (mean age 67.1; SD = 12.2) recruited through 18 ADCs and four consortia (DiverseVCID, MarkVCID, ALLFTD, LEADS) who completed UDS memory tasks (used as linking‐items) and one of five list‐learning tasks. All analyses used linear regression. We tested whether memory scores were affected by which list‐learning task was administered. To assess construct validity, we tested associations of memory scores with demographics, disease severity (CDR Box Score), an independent memory task (TabCAT Favorites, n = 675), and hippocampal volume (n = 811). We compared performances between cognitively unimpaired (n = 279), AD‐biomarker+ MCI (n = 26), and AD‐biomarker+ dementia (n = 98). In a subsample with amyloid‐ and tau‐PET (n = 49), we compared memory scores from participants with positive vs negative scans determined using established quantitative cutoffs.ResultModel fit indices were excellent (e.g., CFI = 0.998) and factor loadings were strong (0.43‐0.93). Differences in list‐learning task had a negligible effect on scores (average Cohen’s d = 0.11). Higher memory scores were significantly (p’s<.001) correlated with younger age (β = ‐0.18), lower CDR Box Scores (β = ‐0.63), female sex (β = 0.12), higher education (β = 0.19), larger hippocampal volume (β = 0.42), and an independent memory task (β = 0.71, p<0.001). The memory composite declined in a stepwise fashion by diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired>MCI>AD dementia, p<0.001). On average, amyloid‐PET positivity was associated with lower composite scores, but was not statistically significant (β = ‐0.34; p = 0.25; d = 0.40). Tau‐PET positivity was associated with worse performance, demonstrating a large effect size (β = ‐0.75; p<0.002; d = 0.91).ConclusionThe harmonized memory score developed in a large national sample was stable regardless of contributing list‐learning task and its validity for cross‐cohort ADRD research is supported by expected associations with demographics, clinical measures, and Alzheimer’s biomarkers. A processing script will be made available to enhance cross‐cohort ADRD research.

AbstractBackgroundSex differences in neurodegenerative diseases can impact accurate diagnosis and management. Emerging data suggest there may be sex differences in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) prevalence and clinical manifestation. However, prior studies lacked longitudinal assessment and were limited in capturing sex differences in earliest stages of disease (e.g., preclinical). We evaluated how sex impacts longitudinal clinical outcomes in individuals carrying autosomal dominant variants for FTD.Method337 participants carrying pathogenic variants in MAPT, GRN, or C9orf72 completed longitudinal evaluations (2.4 average visits, range = 1‐6), including neuropsychological and functional assessments, and plasma analyzed for neurofilament light chain (NfL). FTLD Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (FTLD‐CDR) classified disease stage at study entry (FTLD‐CDR = 0: asymptomatic; FTLD‐CDR = 0.5: MCI; FTLD‐CDR> 0.5: Dementia). Linear mixed‐effects models evaluated the effect of sex on longitudinal clinical trajectories, including the effect of disease stage at study entry.ResultMale and female carriers were similarly distributed with respect to baseline demographics and most clinical outcomes. However, women exhibited higher baseline NfL than men. Not accounting for disease stage, men and women did not show statistical differences on cognitive, functional, or NfL trajectories. However, when accounting for disease stage, there was a significant interaction between baseline disease stage, sex, and time on cognitive, NfL, and functional trajectories. While sex differences were not statistically significant among asymptomatic carriers, women with MCI/dementia evidenced more rapid cognitive, NfL and functional decline over time compared to men. To evaluate the role of pathology burden, we tested the interaction between baseline NfL, sex, and time on clinical outcomes stratified by disease stage. In asymptomatic participants, women showed an attenuated adverse relationship between baseline NfL and clinical trajectories compared to men. No statistically significant sex differences were evident in the relationship between baseline NfL and clinical outcomes in participants with MCI/dementia.ConclusionIn familial FTD, women evidenced steeper clinical declines than men after symptom onset. Accounting for pathology, baseline NfL was a stronger predictor of clinical decline in asymptomatic men compared to women. NfL may be a less sensitive prognostic tool for clinical progression in women with FTD, particularly early in disease. This may reflect early “cognitive resilience” to neurodegeneration in women.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common young‐onset dementia. Challenges to in‐person FTD evaluations (e.g., behavioral symptoms, disease rarity), highlight the need to develop remote, low‐burden assessment techniques. A growing literature supports passive digital phenotyping for monitoring neurobehavioral change. Thus, we examined the utility of passively collected data from smartphones to detect prodromal or symptomatic FTD compared to that of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), a common cognitive screener.Method199 adults enrolled in the ALLFTD Mobile App study (mean age = 53.4 [SD = 15.2]; 58% women) completed up to 6 months of passive smartphone monitoring via the ALLFTD Mobile App. 55% were unimpaired [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0], 22% had prodromal FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD = 0.5], and 23% had symptomatic FTD [CDR®+NACC FTLD≥1] with a variety of syndromic presentations. Battery percentage was collected frequently (median interval = 45 min), and total daily battery usage was calculated as a proxy for smartphone use (higher battery usage = more smartphone use). Daily step counts were also passively collected. Logistic regression classified prodromal or symptomatic FTD vs. unimpaired as a function of: MoCA score [Model 1]; 7 passive features characterizing average, inter‐day variability, and changes over time in smartphone use and movement [Model 2]; or passive smartphone features and MoCA [Model 3]. Analyses were repeated excluding participants with symptomatic FTD to detect prodromal FTD vs. unimpaired.ResultThe area under the curves (AUCs) for detecting prodromal or symptomatic FTD (vs. unimpaired) from the MoCA alone [Model 1] and passive smartphone features alone [Model 2] were 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.85) and 0.77 (95%CI: 0.70‐0.84), respectively. Their combination [Model 3] resulted in a significantly improved AUC of 0.86 (95%CI: 0.80‐0.92) compared to Model 1 (p = 0.001). Significant Model 3 predictors included average daily battery usage (p = 0.02), slopes of change in step count (p = 0.04), and MoCA score (p<0.01). When distinguishing prodromal FTD from unimpaired, passive smartphone features alone (AUC = 0.75) were significantly better than the MoCA alone (AUC = 0.66; p<0.01), and their combination had the largest AUC (0.80).ConclusionResults support the utility of novel passively collected information from smartphones for detecting and monitoring FTD without contributing to assessment burden. With continued validation, passive digital monitoring methodologies have potential to increase access to dementia care.

Background: Previous research has reported higher rates of both injury and illness among Paralympic athletes compared with Olympic athletes during the Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games, but no studies have directly compared injury and illness incidence between Olympic and Paralympic athletes competing in a Summer Games. Purpose: To compare injury and illness rates between Olympic and Paralympic Team USA athletes competing in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: All injuries and illnesses that occurred among the Team USA athletes competing in the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic or Paralympic Games were documented. A total of 701 Team USA athletes (53.6% female) competed in the Tokyo 2020 Summer Olympic Games, across 34 different sports. For the Tokyo 2020 Summer Paralympic Games, a total of 245 athletes (51.6% female) competed across 20 sports. Incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 athlete-days were calculated according to sex, sport, anatomic location, and illness type. IR ratios (IRRs) were calculated to compare IRs between male and female athletes and between Olympic and Paralympic athletes. Results: Overall, there were no differences in injury incidence (IRR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.84-1.68) or illness incidence (IRR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.41-1.15) between Olympic and Paralympic athletes. Male Paralympic athletes were less likely to sustain an illness compared with female Paralympic athletes (IRR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.11-0.90). Conclusion: There were no differences in injury or illness rates between Olympic and Paralympic Team USA athletes competing at the Tokyo 2020 Summer Games, contrary to previous comparisons among winter sport athletes. These results challenge the prevailing notion that Summer Paralympic athletes are at greater injury and illness risk, suggesting that factors beyond Olympic or Paralympic Games participation influence health concerns.