Citations

Clear

2302 citation(s) found for "El‐Am, Edward".

A Scoping Review of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Are They Associated with Increased Gastric Contents, Regurgitation, and Aspiration Events?
Chang, Marvin G. , Ripoll, Juan G. , Lopez, Ernesto , Krishnan, Kumar , Bittner, Edward A. , Ripoll, Juan G , Lopez, Ernesto

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Clinical Medicine | October 23, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 6336

10.3390/jcm13216336 | PMID 39518474 Get It

Background: The increased popularity and ubiquitous use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) for the treatment of diabetes, heart failure, and obesity has led to significant concern for increased risk for perioperative aspiration, given their effects on delayed gastric emptying. This concern is highlighted by many major societies that have published varying guidance on the perioperative management of these medications, given limited data. We conducted a scoping review of the available literature regarding the aspiration risk and aspiration/regurgitant events related to GLP-1 RAs. Methods: A librarian-assisted search was performed using five electronic medical databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science Platform Databases, including Web of Science Core Collection, KCI Korean Journal Database, MEDLINE, and Preprint Citation Index) from inception through March 2024 for articles that reported endoscopic, ultrasound, and nasogastric evaluation for increased residual gastric volume retained food contents, as well as incidences of regurgitation and aspiration events. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text of articles to determine eligibility. Data extraction was performed using customized fields established a priori within a systematic review software system. Results: Of the 3712 citations identified, 24 studies met eligibility criteria. Studies included four prospective, six retrospective, five case series, and nine case reports. The GLP-1 RAs reported in the studies included semaglutide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, and exenatide. All studies, except one case report, reported patients with confounding factors for retained gastric contents and aspiration, such as a history of diabetes, cirrhosis, hypothyroidism, psychiatric disorders, gastric reflux, Barrett’s esophagus, Parkinson’s disease, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, gastric polyps, prior abdominal surgeries, autoimmune diseases, pain, ASA physical status classification, procedural factors (i.e., thyroid surgery associated with risk for nausea, ketamine associated with nausea and secretions), and/or medications associated with delayed gastric emptying (opioids, anticholinergics, antidepressants, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, DPP-IV inhibitors, and antacids). Of the eight studies (three prospective and five retrospective) that evaluated residual contents in both GLP-1 users and non-users, seven studies (n = 7/8) reported a significant increase in residual gastric contents in GLP-1 users compared to non-users (19–56% vs. 5–20%). In the three retrospective studies that evaluated for aspiration events, there was no significant difference in aspiration events, with one study reporting aspiration rates of 4.8 cases per 10,000 in GLP-1 RA users compared to 4.6 cases per 10,000 in nonusers and the remaining two studies reporting one aspiration event in the GLP-1 RA user group and none in the non-user group. In one study that evaluated for regurgitation or reflux by esophageal manometry and pH, there was no significant difference in reflux episodes but a reduction in gastric acidity in the GLP-1 RA user group compared to the non-user group. Conclusions: There is significant variability in the findings reported in the studies, and most of these studies include confounding factors that may influence the association between GLP-1 RAs and an increased risk of aspiration and related events. While GLP-1 RAs do increase residual gastric contents in line with their mechanism of action, the currently available data do not suggest a significant increase in aspiration and regurgitation events associated with their use and the withholding of GLP-1 RAs to reduce aspiration and regurgitation events, as is currently recommended by many major societal guidelines. Large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) may be helpful in further elucidating the impact of GLP-1 RAs on perioperative aspiration risk.
Development of acute kidney injury following repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection is associated with increased mortality and complications: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
Goyal, Aman , Maheshwari, Surabhi, Abbasi, Haleema Qayyum , Mashkoor, Yusra , Shamim, Urooj, Chambari, Mahla , Kelaiya, Arjun , Safi, Darsh , Saeed, Humza , Jain, Hritvik , Pokhrel, Prakriti , Ullah, Irfan , Ullah, Irfan , Goyal, Aman , Ullah, Irfan

Mayo Clinic

Cardiovascular Endocrinology & Metabolism | October 22, 2024 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1097/xce.0000000000000314 | PMID 39439591 Get It

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates the repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). This systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of AKI in these patients. A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar identified relevant studies on the predictors and outcomes of AKI following TAAD repair. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints included stroke, dialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and other complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were used, with significance set at P < 0.05. Twenty-one studies (10 396 patients) were analyzed. AKI was associated with higher risks of 30-day mortality (risk ratio = 3.98), stroke (risk ratio = 2.05), dialysis/CRRT (risk ratio = 32.91), cardiovascular (risk ratio = 2.85) and respiratory complications (risk ratio = 2.13), sepsis (risk ratio = 4.92), and re-exploration for bleeding (risk ratio = 2.46). No significant differences were noted in sternal wound infection, tracheostomy, paraplegia, or hepatic failure. AKI significantly increases mortality, morbidity, hospital, and ICU stay duration in TAAD repair patients.
Barriers to global engagement for African researchers: A position paper from the Alliance for Medical Research in Africa (AMedRA)
Gaye, Bamba , Singh, Gurbinder , Gaye, Ngone Diaba, Ka, Mame Madjiguène , Seck, Daouda, Gueye, Khadidiatou, Kitara, David Lagoro , Lassale, Camille , Anne, Malick, Diaw, Mor , Gaye, Magaye, Fall, Abdou Salam , Diongue, Aïda, Seck, Ibrahima , Belkhadir, Jamal , Wone, I, Gueye, Sérigne Maguèye , Sow, Papa Salif , Kohen, Jamal Eddine, Vogelsang, Dorothea, Mbaye, Maïmouna Ndour, Liyong, Elisabeth Alice, Kengne, André Pascal , Sougou, Ndèye Mariéme, Ba, Awa, Tukakira, John, Lorenz, Thiess , Kabore, Elisé , Muzumala, Malaizyo Gabriel, Olanrewaju, A. I., Jaiteh, Lamin , Délicat-Loembet, Lucrèce M. , Alson, Aimée Olivat Rakoto, Niang, Khadim, Mwebaze, Ernest , Nakatumba‐Nabende, Joyce , Machuve, Dina , Adie, Prestone, Hanne, Fatoumata, Sougou, Marième, Koffi, Kouassi Gustave, Luwanda, Lameck, Mekonnen, Demeke, Ebeid, Fatma Soliman Elsayed , Enama, Jean Paul, Zeba, Mohamadi , Guedou, Fernand Aimé, Mbélesso, Pascal , Carter, Jennifer , Coulibaly, Bakary, Dramé, Mohamed Lamine, Mouanga, Alain Maxime , Lacroix, Philippe, Diagana, Mouhamadou , Ekouévi, Didier Koumavi , Houinato, Dismand, Faye, Adama , Wambugu, Vivien , Kamaté, Jean, Lalika, Mathias , Ale, Boni Maxime , Fall, Ibrahima Socé , Samb, Abdoulaye, Jobe, Modou , Isiozor, Nzechukwu Michael , Gaye, Ngone Diaba, Seck, Daouda , Seck, Sidy Mohamed , Sow, Abdourahmane , Diongue, Aïda, Lamptey, Roberta , Sobngwi, Eugène , Muzumala, Malaizyo G. , Maina, Ciira wa , Adie, Prestone, Tine, Roger Clément Kouly , Koffi, K. G. , Sattler, Elisabeth Lilian Pia , Enama, Jean-Paul, Coulibaly, Bakary, Preux, Pierre‐Marie , Nsoesie, Elaine Okanyene , Tshilolo, Léon Muepu

Mayo Clinic

Journal of Global Health | October 18, 2024 | Volume: 14 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.7189/jogh.14.03042 | PMID 39421942 Get It

Medical Therapies for Prevention and Treatment of Inflammatory Pouch Disorders—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Syal, Gaurav , Barnes, Edward L. , Raffals, Laura E. , Kazzi, Elie S. Al , Haydek, John P. , Agrawal, Manasi , Singh, Siddharth , Barnes, Edward L , Al Kazzi, Elie , Haydek, John

Mayo Clinic

American Journal of Gastroenterology | October 16, 2024 | Volume: 120 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 135-150

10.14309/ajg.0000000000003136 | PMID 39466277 Get It

INTRODUCTION: Pouchitis and Crohn's-like disease of the pouch (CLDP) are common in patients who undergo ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. We conducted separate systematic reviews to evaluate the effectiveness of available interventions to prevent and treat pouchitis and CLDP. METHODS: Through systematic literature reviews, we identified studies that evaluated the effectiveness of probiotics, antibiotics, 5-aminosalicylates, nonsystemic oral corticosteroids, and advanced therapies for prevention and treatment of pouchitis and CLDP for meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were occurrence of pouchitis for pouchitis prevention and clinical response for pouchitis and CLDP treatment. We estimated the relative effectiveness of these interventions using the existing placebo response rates or hypothetical spontaneous improvement rates derived from clinical trials of pouchitis, ulcerative colitis, and Crohn's disease. RESULTS: Probiotics were effective for primary (relative risk [RR] 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05–0.62) and secondary prevention (RR 0.17; 95% CI 0.09–0.34) of pouchitis. Antibiotics were effective for treatment of acute and chronic pouchitis (12 cohorts; RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.34–2.01; response rate 65%; 95% CI 52–75) with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole-based regimens being more effective than rifaximin. Advanced therapies were effective for treatment of chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis (31 cohorts; RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.28–2.56; response rate 50%; 95% CI 43–57) and CLDP (10 cohorts; RR 2.49; 95% CI 1.87–3.73; response rate 74%; 95% CI 68–79) without significant difference between classes. DISCUSSION: Multiple medical interventions are effective for prevention and treatment of pouchitis and CLDP. Given the overall low quality of data, further research is needed to confirm these findings.
Comparative diagnostic utility of Rockall and Glasgow-Blatchford scores in non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kozai, Landon, Tan, Arvin, Nebrejas, Kevin Edward, Nishimura, Yoshito

Mayo Clinic

European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology | October 14, 2024 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 161-166

10.1097/meg.0000000000002867 | PMID 39400553 Get It

Introduction The Rockall score and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) are two scoring systems validated in the evaluation of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, no meta-analysis exists to summarize the current data and clarify the use of Rockall score and GBS focusing on non-variceal UGIB. We aimed to evaluate and compare the utility of the Rockall score and GBS in predicting clinical outcomes in non-variceal UGIB. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for all peer-reviewed articles using the terms including ‘Glasgow-Blatchford’, ‘Rockall’, and ‘gastrointestinal bleed’ from their inception to 22 March 2023. Outcomes included mortality, rebleeding, need for blood transfusion, and need for surgical intervention. Results Seven studies with 755 participants with non-variceal bleeding were included in the analysis. Pooled analysis demonstrated no difference in the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) between GBS and Rockall score to predict mortality [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.01, 95% CI: −0.06 to 0.08] or rebleeding (WMD = 0.04, 95% CI: −0.03 to 0.11). GBS had a higher AUROC to predict the outcomes compared to Rockall score for the needs for transfusion (WMD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.01–0.16) and surgical intervention (WMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14–0.29). Conclusion The GBS could be superior to the Rockall score in predicting the needs for transfusion and surgical intervention in non-variceal UGIB. However, both scores demonstrate low performance for predicting mortality or rebleeding.
Rapid and Accurate Diagnosis and Prognosis of Acute Infections and Sepsis from Whole Blood Using Host Response mRNA amplification and Result Interpretation by Machine-Learning Classifiers
Liesenfeld, Oliver , Arora, Sanjay , Aufderheide, T. P., Fischer, Miriam, Giamarellos‐Bourboulis, Evangelos J. , House, Stacey L. , Humphries, Roger L., Liu, Edward , Mace, Sharon E. , May, Larissa, Michelson, Edward A. , Panacek, Edward A., Self, Wesley H. , Smithline, Howard , Steingrub, Jay S. , Heukelom, Paul Van , Weissman, Alexandra , Wolk, Donna M. , Buturović, Ljubomir , Damaraju, Nandita , Lu, Cici, Whitfield, Natalie N. , Shapiro, Nathan I. , Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J , Aufderheide, Tom P. , Clements, Casey M. , DeVos, Elizabeth , Fischer, Miriam, Gill, Jasreen Kaur , Osborn, Tiffany Medlin , Rothman, Richard Eric , Wilson, Matthew, Wright, David W. , Hasin-Brumshtein, Yehudit , Shak, Joshua R., Khatri, Purvesh , Sweeney, Timothy E.

Mayo Clinic

No container title available | October 10, 2024 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-5194992/v1 Get It

Abstract Many patients in the emergency department present with signs and symptoms that arouse concern for sepsis; however, other explanations are also possible. There are currently no rapid tests used in clinical practice that reliably distinguish the presence of a bacterial or viral infection vs. a non-infectious etiology and can predict a patient’s likelihood to decompensate. The diagnostic and prognostic uncertainty in “gray zone” patients complicates the decision to begin therapy as clinicians need to balance the risk of withholding therapy vs. the risk of the therapy itself (e.g., overtreatment with antibiotics and hospitalization, which is costly, potentially harmful, and contributes to antibiotic resistance). The TriVerity™ Test uses isothermal amplification and machine-learning algorithms to quantify and interpret mRNA expression levels to determine both likelihood of bacterial infection, viral infection, or no infection, and whether the patient will likely require one or more critical interventions within 7 days. The three scores each fall into one of five interpretation bands ranging from Very high to Very low. Testing takes approximately 30 minutes using the proprietary Myrna™ Instrument with an operator hands-on-time of under one minute. We enrolled 1,222 patients from 22 emergency departments (ED) to validate the performance of the TriVerity Test. Patients were treated as per local standard of care and were followed for 28 days. Bacterial and viral TriVerity results were validated against clinically adjudicated infection status; the illness severity TriVerity result was validated against the need for at least one critical interventions within 7 days. The bacterial TriVerity result had high AUROC for the diagnosis of bacterial infection (0.83; 80% CI 0.81–0.85) and divided bacterial infection likelihood scores into five interpretation bands with increasing likelihood ratios of infection ranging from Very low (LR- 0.08, 80% CI 0.06–0.11) to Very high (LR + 8.04, 80% CI 5.72–11.78). The AUROC for the bacterial TriVerity result was significantly higher compared to AUROCs for C-reactive protein, procalcitonin or white blood cell count. Similarly, the viral TriVerity score showed high AUROC for the diagnosis of viral infection (0.91; 80% CI 0.90–0.93) and likelihood ratios from Very low (LR- 0.09, 80% CI 0.05–0.14) to Very high (LR + 40.93; 80% CI 29.11–79.23). The TriVerity Illness Severity score showed a high AUROC for the prediction of illness severity (0.77; 80% CI 0.77–0.81) with scores divided into five interpretation bands with increasing likelihood ratios ranging from Very low (LR- 0.22; 80% CI 0.14–0.33) to Very high (LR + 11.33; 80% CI 7.31–17.00). TriVerity illness severity results allowed marked re-classification of the risk for “ICU-level care” as compared to clinical assessment (qSOFA scores) alone. In conclusion, TriVerity provides rapid, highly accurate and actionable results for the diagnosis and prognosis of patients with suspected acute infection and/or sepsis, supporting a major unmet medical need. TriVerity may improve personalized management of patients with suspected acute infections and suspected sepsis for improved overall healthcare outcomes.
Comparing stand-alone endovascular embolization versus stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of arteriovenous malformations with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III: a propensity score matched study
Musmar, Basel , Adeeb, Nimer , Roy, Joanna M. , Abdalrazeq, Hammam , Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Atallah, Elias , Salim, Hamza , Sheehan, Jason , Ogilvy, Christopher S. , Riina, Howard A. , Naamani, Kareem El, Ironside, Natasha , Ataoglu, Cagdas , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Keleş, Abdullah , Muram, Sandeep , Sconzo, Daniel , Rezai, Arwin, Erginoğlu, Ufuk , Sen, Rajeev , Burkhardt, Jan‐Karl , Starke, Robert M., Başkaya, Mustafa K. , Altschul, David , McAvoy, Malia , Aslan, Assala , Abushehab, Abdallah, Swaid, Christian, Abla, Adib A. , Rosenwasser, Robert H. , Stapleton, Christopher J. , Koch, Matthew J. , Srinivasan, Visish M. , Dannenbaum, Mark J. , Pukenas, Bryan , Smith, Edward, Alaraj, Ali , Patel, Aman B. , Cuellar, Hugo H, Lawton, Michael T. , Guthikonda, Bharat , Jabbour, Pascal , Smith, Edward R. , Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula , Salim, Hamza , Ogilvy, Christopher S , Kandregula, Sandeep , Dmytriw, Adam A , Essibayi, Muhammed Amir , Griessenauer, Christoph J , Levitt, Michael R , Altschul, David J , Aslan, Assala , Stapleton, Christopher , Koch, Matthew J , Chen, Peng R , Dannenbaum, Mark J , Choudhri, Omar , Alaraj, Ali , Guthikonda, Bharat , Jabbour, Pascal , Abla, Adib , Musmar, Basel , Keles, Abdullah , Erginoglu, Ufuk , Smith, Edward , Kondziolka, Douglas , Kandregula, Sandeep , Dmytriw, Adam A. , Naamani, Kareem El , Abdelsalam, Ahmed , Kumbhare, Deepak , Rezai, Arwin, Pöppe, Johannes , Sen, Rajeev D, Griessenauer, Christoph J. , Sekhar, Laligam N. , Levitt, Michael R. , Gooch, Michael Reid , Blackburn, Spiros , Choudhri, Omar , Orbach, Darren B. , Mosimann, Pascal J , Aziz‐Sultan, Mohammad Ali , Morcos, Jacques J. , Jabbour, Pascal

Mayo Clinic

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery | October 4, 2024 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1382-1390

10.1136/jnis-2024-022326 | PMID 39366733 Get It

Background Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives. Objective To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III. Methods This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. Results The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03). Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group. Conclusion Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed.
Assessment and impact of age on the efficacy and safety among patients in the etrasimod ELEVATE UC clinvical programme
Lichtenstein, Gary, Allegretti, Jessica R. , Irving, Peter M., Charabaty, Aline, Kuehbacher, Tanja, Bananis, Eustratios , Woolcott, John , Dalam, Alexis B, Lazin, K., Keating, Michael J. , McDonnell, A, Allegretti, Jessica R. , Loftus, Edward V. , Banerjee, Rupa , Charabaty, Aline , Lazin, Krisztina , Danese, Silvio

Mayo Clinic

Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie | October 2, 2024 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 09 | Pages: e605-e606

10.1055/s-0044-1789701 Get It

Proposed Nutrition Competencies for Medical Students and Physician Trainees
Eisenberg, David M. , Cole, Alexis R. , Maile, Edward J. , Salt, Matthew , Leib, Emily Broad , Findley, Trevor, Massa, Jennifer , Albin, Jaclyn , Alston, Meredith , Barkoukis, Hope , Buckhold, Fred R. , Danoff, Robert, Delichatsios, Helen K., Devries, Stephen , Dewar, Stephanie , Rocco, Jennifer Di , Duggan, Christopher , Frates, Beth, Hansen, Pamela A., Haramati, Aviad , Harlan, Timothy S., Hauser, Michelle E. , Leopold, David , Lewis, Joanna , Locke, Amy , Mann, Joshua R. , McClure, Auden C. , Misra, Saroj, Murano, Tiffany , Pierce-Talsma, Stacey , Potts, Stacy , Reilly, Jo Marie , Ring, Melinda , Sampang, Suzanne, Shafto, Kate, Shiue, Linda, Slusser, Wendelin , Stone, Terri, Studer, Karen , Thomas, Olivia , Trilk, Jennifer L. , Oxentenko, Amy, Armstrong, Elizabeth, Essel, Kofi D. , McWhorter, John Wesley , Oxentenko, Amy S. , Edgar, Laura

Mayo Clinic

JAMA Network Open | September 30, 2024 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 9 | Pages: e2435425

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.35425 | PMID 39348126 Get It

Importance In 2022, the US House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution (House of Representatives Resolution 1118 at the 117th Congress [2021-2022]) calling for meaningful nutrition education for medical trainees. This was prompted by increasing health care spending attributed to the growing prevalence of nutrition-related diseases and the substantial federal funding via Medicare that supports graduate medical education. In March 2023, medical education professional organizations agreed to identify nutrition competencies for medical education. Objective To recommend nutrition competencies for inclusion in medical education to improve patient and population health. Evidence Review The research team conducted a rapid literature review to identify existing nutrition-related competencies published between July 2013 and July 2023. Additional competencies were identified from learning objectives in selected nutrition, culinary medicine, and teaching kitchen curricula; dietetic core competencies; and research team–generated de novo competencies. An expert panel of 22 nutrition subject matter experts and 15 residency program directors participated in a modified Delphi process and completed 4 rounds of voting to reach consensus on recommended nutrition competencies, the level of medical education at which they should be included, and recommendations for monitoring implementation and evaluation of these competencies. Findings A total of 15 articles met inclusion criteria for competency extraction and yielded 187 competencies. Through review of gray literature and other sources, researchers identified 167 additional competencies for a total of 354 competencies. These competencies were compiled and refined prior to voting. After 4 rounds of voting, 36 competencies were identified for recommendation: 30 at both undergraduate and graduate levels, 2 at the undergraduate level only, and 4 at the graduate level only. Competencies fell into the following nutrition-related themes: foundational nutrition knowledge, assessment and diagnosis, communication skills, public health, collaborative support and treatment for specific conditions, and indications for referral. A total of 36 panelists (97%) recommended nutrition competencies be assessed as part of licensing and board certification examinations. Conclusions and Relevance These competencies represent a US-based effort to use a modified Delphi process to establish consensus on nutrition competencies for medical students and physician trainees. These competencies will require an iterative process of institutional prioritization, refinement, and inclusion in current and future educational curricula as well as licensure and certification examinations.