Seeley, William W.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Risk factors associated with sporadic non‐amnestic and early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) remain underexamined. METHODS We investigated a large, clinically heterogeneous, AD cohort for frequencies of established risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus) alongside novel factors (non–right‐handedness, learning disability, seizures, autoimmune disease). RESULTS Early‐onset AD possessed lower frequencies of established risk factors (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus, all p < 0.001) and higher frequencies of novel factors (non–right‐handedness, learning disability, active seizure, all p < 0.001; remote seizure, p = 0.002; and autoimmune disease, p = 0.007). An age at onset < 70 maximally distinguished novel from typical factors. Principal component analysis loaded novel factors into two components, non–right‐handedness and learning disability versus seizure and autoimmune disease, which combined, resulted in an exponential decrease in age at onset from one factor alone. DISCUSSION Identifying novel factors enriched in early‐onset and non‐amnestic AD introduces new theories of AD susceptibility and phenotypic heterogeneity, with significant implications for disease prediction and treatment. Highlights We identified a suite of novel factors overrepresented in early‐onset and non‐amnestic AD. These factors can be broadly conceptualized as neurodevelopmental (non–right‐handedness and learning disability) and neural environmental (seizure and autoimmunity). The combination of these factors produced exponential decreases in AD age at onset, compared to each alone, supporting a new theoretical framework for understanding AD risk with implications for disease prediction, prevention, and therapeutic intervention.

ABSTRACT Objective Autosomal dominant progranulin ( GRN ) pathogenic variants are a genetic cause of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Though clinical trials for GRN ‐related therapies are underway, there is an unmet need for biomarkers that can predict symptom onset and track disease progression. We previously showed that asymptomatic GRN variant carriers exhibit thalamocortical hyperconnectivity that increases with age, presumably as they are approaching symptom onset. Whether hyperconnectivity arises concomitantly with markers of neurodegeneration remains unclear. Methods Utilizing T1 and task‐free functional magnetic resonance imaging from 49 asymptomatic and 26 symptomatic GRN variant carriers, we determined the relationships between functional connectivity, as measured by voxelwise whole‐brain degree, and GRN ‐relevant markers of disease progression, including plasma neurofilament light chain concentrations, cerebrospinal fluid complement C1q and C3b protein levels, obsessive‐compulsive disorder symptom severity, and gray matter volume. Results Neurofilament light chain concentrations were associated with frontotemporoparietal and thalamic hyperconnectivity in asymptomatic GRN variant carriers and extensive regions of atrophy in symptomatic carriers. Complement levels were associated with regions of hyperconnectivity, but not gray matter volume, in symptomatic carriers. Obsessive‐compulsive disorder symptom severity was associated with hypoconnectivity across all GRN carriers. Asymptomatic carriers with thalamic hyperconnectivity tended to have lower gray matter volume in the bilateral insula and left lateral parietal cortex, early regions of atrophy in GRN ‐frontotemporal dementia. Interpretation In asymptomatic carriers, the co‐occurrence of hyperconnectivity, high neurofilament light chain, and low gray matter volume suggests that functional hyperconnectivity may portend the onset of clinical decline. These findings point toward hyperconnectivity as an indicator of approaching symptomatic onset.

AbstractBackgroundAs new anti‐amyloid immunotherapies emerge for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it is clear that early diagnosis of AD pathology is crucial for treatment success. This can be challenging in atypical presentations of AD and, together with our reliance on CSF or PET scans, can, at times, lead to delayed diagnosis. Here, we further explore the possible role of plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 217 (P‐tau217) for the detection of primary AD or AD co‐pathology when frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders are the main clinical presentation.MethodParticipants were recruited through ALLFTD, a North American multisite research consortium for the longitudinal assessment of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. After excluding cases with known FTD‐causing mutations, 573 participants with sporadic disease, mild cognitive/behavioral impairment, or healthy familial controls evaluated between 2014 and 2023 were included in this analysis (45.8% female, median age 66 years). 39 of those cases underwent neuropathological evaluation. Plasma P‐tau217 was measured with the Eli Lilly electrochemiluminescence‐based assay. P‐tau217 concentrations were compared by phenotype, disease severity, genotype, and, when available, neuropathological diagnosis with non‐parametric tests. Its diagnostic performance was tested with ROC curves. Associations between plasma P‐tau217 concentrations and clinical scales of global cognition, memory, executive function, motor function, and social cognition with linear regressions and non‐parametric tests.ResultPlasma P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and amnestic dementia (AmDem), compared to participants with normal cognition or other FTD phenotypes. P‐tau217 concentrations were higher in APOE e4 carriers, compared to non‐carriers, regardless of phenotype, but were not affected by disease severity. P‐tau217 concentrations showed associations with clinical measures of global cognition, memory, and executive function, but had no associations with measures of motor function or social cognition. Plasma P‐tau217 concentrations were elevated in high and intermediate ADNC scoring, or more advanced Braak stages, even when AD was not the primary pathology.ConclusionEven when FTD is suspected, high plasma p‐tau 217 concentrations are strongly associated with underlying AD as primary pathology or contributing co‐pathology. Plasma P‐tau217 could be a tool to support the development of disease‐modifying therapies for atypical Alzheimer’s disease presentations or for FTD cases with Alzheimer’s disease co‐pathology.