Dugger, Brittany N.

Abstract Background Hispanic individuals are at a 1.5‐times higher risk for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias yet remain underrepresented in research. Longitudinal Hispanic cohorts provide antemortem biospecimen, cognitive, and epidemiological data, and GWAS/admixture mapping analyses identify Hispanic ancestry as a modifier of Alzheimer's disease‐associated gene expression. Additionally, antemortem‐based studies suggest an altered pathological burden in Hispanic individuals, with neuropathological reports revealing a disproportional anatomy‐dependent burden of Alzheimer's pathologies in Hispanic decedents. Despite these advances, few analyses investigate differential gene expression in dementia from postmortem brain of Hispanic decedents. To address the current knowledge gap, we investigated neuroinflammatory gene expression in Hispanic decedents with single or mixed etiology dementia. Method To quantify gene expression, RNA was extracted from postmortem frontal cortex brain tissue of Hispanic and non‐Hispanic decedents with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 6), cerebrovascular disease (CVD, n = 6), or a mixture of the two etiologies (ADCVD, n = 6). Following quality control, extracted RNA was hybridized to the NanoString Human Neuroinflammation panel, and gene expression quantified via SPRINT nCounter. Analysis was completed with NanoString Advanced Analysis criteria via ROSALIND®. Low counts and low background genes were omitted from analysis. Result Comparison of Hispanic decedents with either AD or ADCVD to non‐Hispanic decedents reveals shared pathway enrichment of the Astrocyte Function gene set. Respective to non‐Hispanic decedents, we find two genes in Hispanic AD and seven genes in Hispanic ADCVD that are differentially expressed. Across all samples, gene expression analysis indicates P2RY12, NRP2, PRKACB , and seven other genes are increased at the transcript level in the frontal cortex of Hispanic decedents with CVD when compared to either Hispanic or non‐Hispanic decedents with other etiologies. Conclusion These preliminary findings suggest an ancestry‐ and etiology‐specific transcriptional profile in CVD, and point to few genes modified by ancestry in AD and ADCVD. Ongoing experiments aim to determine differential gene expression relative to pathology, and to develop functional genetic models for screening. Overall, we seek to identify Hispanic ancestry‐ and disease‐specific genes among dementia etiologies as an avenue for precision medicine dementia care among an at‐risk, underrepresented population.

Abstract Our understanding of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias (ADRD) has grown exponentially, thanks to significant investments by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). This article celebrates the 40th anniversary of the NIA's Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers, highlighting the pivotal role of neuropathology as the bedrock for neurodegeneration research. Neuropathology has championed the key principles of proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread. Furthermore, neuropathologic studies advanced our understanding of ADRD prevalence, heterogeneity, clinical–pathological correlations, and genetic underpinnings, spurring biomarker development for target engagement and disease monitoring. Disease‐modifying therapies for AD were inspired and informed by neuropathology. The neuropathology community is poised to refine diagnostics, leveraging digital pathology and integrating genetics and pathomics to enhance subtyping for novel precision medicine approaches. Despite some common misconceptions and logistical challenges, neuropathology continues to be a critical component of the ADRD research infrastructure, serving as a key bridge between allied basic and clinical sciences. Highlights We celebrate 40 years of NIA‐funded ADRCs and their contributions through neuropathology studies that have significantly advanced our understanding and treatment of ADRD. Neuropathology uncovers principles of neurodegenerative disease: proteinopathy, selective vulnerability, and stereotypic spread, informing diagnostics and therapies. Development of AD biomarkers with reference to neuropathology enhances accuracy in diagnosis and monitoring, paving the way for targeted disease‐modifying therapies. Integration of digital pathology, genetics, and novel tools in neurodegeneration research promises advanced precision medicine approaches and refined diagnostics. Misconceptions and logistical challenges to neuropathological research are addressed to improve understanding and collaboration.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Few African American (AA) donors have been included in post mortem Alzheimer's disease (AD) studies compared to European‐ancestry (EA) individuals. METHODS We generated transcriptome‐wide bulk pre‐frontal cortex (PFC) gene expression data from 125 AA donors with neuropathologically determined AD and 82 AA controls. RESULTS Transcriptome‐wide significant differential expression was observed with 482 genes. The most significant, ADAMTS2 , showed 1.52 times higher expression in AD cases ( p = 2.96x10 −8 ). Comparison of findings with those from a recent gene expression study of EA brain donors revealed substantial concordance, including ADAMTS2 . Other associations not observed in EA results may be especially relevant to AD risk in the AA population. Examination of AA AD GWAS‐implicated variants identified several expression quantitative trait loci. CONCLUSION This first large‐scale AA brain AD gene expression study identified many differentially expressed genes, including ADAMTS2 , and supports gene expression as a molecular pathway underlying the impact of several AA AD risk variants. Highlights We performed the largest African American brain tissue Alzheimer's disease (AD) gene expression study. Expression differences for 482 genes, notably ADAMTS2 , were study‐wide significant. Many significant differentially expressed genes are involved in energy metabolism. Several previously known AD‐associated variants in African Americans are eQTLs. These results advance knowledge of the genetic basis of AD in the AA population.

Abstract Limbic predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC) is highly prevalent in late life and a common co‐pathology with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC). LATE‐NC is a slowly progressive, amnestic clinical syndrome. Alternatively, when present with ADNC, LATE‐NC is associated with a more rapid course. With the emergence of anti‐amyloid therapeutics, discrimination of LATE‐NC from ADNC is critical and will lead to greater clinical recognition of amnestic patients without ADNC. Furthermore, co‐pathology with LATE‐NC may influence outcomes of these therapeutics. Thus there is a need to identify patients during life with likely LATE‐NC. We propose criteria for clinical diagnosis of LATE as an initial framework for further validation. In the context of progressive memory loss and substantial hippocampal atrophy, criteria are laid out for probable (amyloid negative) or possible LATE (amyloid biomarkers are unavailable or when amyloid is present, but hippocampal neurodegeneration is out of proportion to expected pure ADNC). Highlights Limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy (LATE) is a highly prevalent driver of neuropathologic memory loss in late life. LATE neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC) is a common co‐pathology with Alzheimer's disease neuropathologic change (ADNC) and may influence outcomes with emerging disease‐modifying medicines. We provide initial clinical criteria for diagnosing LATE during life either when LATE‐NC is the likely primary driver of symptoms or when observed in conjunction with AD. Definitions of possible and probable LATE are provided.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) missing heritability remains extensive despite numerous genetic risk loci identified by genome‐wide association or sequencing studies. This has been attributed, at least partially, to mechanisms not currently investigated by traditional single‐marker/gene approaches. Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) aggregate sparse genetic information across the genome to identify individual genetic risk profiles for disease prediction and patient risk stratification. Recent advancements have pivoted on innovative approaches utilizing OMICS data to construct such risk scores.MethodWe employed a random forest algorithm to identify a list of gene candidates from bulk RNA sequencing data in prefrontal cortex from 565 AD brain samples (non‐Hispanic Whites, n = 399; Hispanics, n = 113; African American, n = 12) across six U.S. brain banks. Subsequently, we calculated their effect size on Braak staging using regression models to construct a polytranscriptomic risk score (PTRS). We employed two distinct models: “Ethnicity‐Agnostic” Model (randomly assigning samples to training and testing samples) and “Ethnicity‐Aware” Model (assigning NHW samples to training and Hispanics to testing sample). Analysis of variance and the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve (ROC AUC) was used to evaluate PTRS’s classification performances. We validated findings using the Religious Orders Study/Memory and Aging Project study (ROS/MAP, n = 1,095).ResultWe found a significant difference in PTRS between samples with low vs. high Braak stages (≤4 vs. ≥5, p = 1*E‐04; Figure 1 upper panel). AUC was found to be 79‐81%, consistently in both Ethnicity‐Agnostic and Ethnicity‐Aware models (Figure 1 lower panel). Finally, the PTRS in ROS/MAP yielded a similar classification performance (p = 2*E‐04, AUC = 77%).Conclusioncontrary to prior studies, we developed a PTRS with optimal transferability across ethnicities. This underscores the importance of developing novel tools to stratify and harmonize large brain repositories for AD.

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s Disease (AD) presents complex molecular heterogeneity, influenced by a variety of factors including heterogeneous phenotypic, genetic, and neuropathologic presentations. Regulation of gene expression mechanisms is a primary interest of investigations aiming to uncover the underlying disease mechanisms and progression.MethodWe generated bulk RNA‐sequencing in prefrontal cortex from 565 AD brain samples (non‐Hispanic Whites, n = 399; Hispanics, n = 113; African American, n = 12) across six U.S. brain banks, and conducted differential gene expression and enrichment analyses. We sought to identify cross‐ancestry and ancestry‐specific differentially expressed genes (DEG) and pathways across Braak stages, adjusting for sex, age at death, and RNA quality metrics. We validated our findings using the Religious Orders Study/Memory and Aging Project study (ROS/MAP, n = 1,095). Lastly, we validated top DEG using publically‐available human single‐nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) data.ResultAD‐known genes VGF (LFC = ‐0.661, padj = 3.78) and ADAMTS2 (padj = 1.21) were consistently differentially expressed across statistical models, ethnic groups, and replicated in ROS/MAP (Figure 1). Genes from the heat shock protein (HSP) family, e.g. HSPB7 (padj = 3.78), were the top DEG, also replicated in ROS/MAP. Ethnic‐stratified analyses prioritized TNFSF14 and SPOCD1 as top DEG in Hispanic samples. Gene set enrichment analysis highlighted several significantly pathways, including “TYROBP causal network in microglia” (WP3945; padj = 1.68) and “Alzheimer Disease” (WP5124; padj = 4.24). snRNAseq validated several DEG, including VGF downregulated in neurons (padj = 1.1).ConclusionTo our knowledge, this is the largest diverse transcriptome study for AD in post‐mortem tissue. We identified perturbated genes and pathways resulting in cross‐ethnic and ethnic‐specific findings, ultimately highlighting the importance of diversity in AD investigations.