Citations

Abstract Introduction The impact of multiple feeding arteries on clinical outcomes of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) is not well understood. This study aims to compare outcomes between AVMs with multiple versus single feeding arteries. Patients and Methods Data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance cohorts. Subgroup analysis was conducted for ruptured and unruptured AVMs and different treatment options, and multivariable logistic regression was applied to assess the impact of feeding artery origin. Results Among 953 patients, 661(69.4%) had multiple feeding arteries, and 292 (30.6%) had a single feeding artery. After PSM, which included 422 matched patients (211 in each group), the differences in obliteration rates (68.7% vs 74.8%, OR 0.73, 95% CI: 0.48–1.12, p = 0.16) and symptomatic complications (15.6% vs 11.8%, OR 1.37, 95% CI: 0.78–2.41, p = 0.25) were not significant. Subgroup analysis comparing ruptured and unruptured AVMs and different treatment options showed no significant differences across all subgroups. Multivariable analysis identified PICA feeders as significantly associated with increased odds of all complications (OR 7.33, 95% CI: 2.14–25.1, p = 0.002). Discussion and Conclusion AVMs with a single feeding artery were more likely to present with rupture, but no significant differences in obliteration rates or complications were observed between the groups after PSM. These findings suggest that while the number of feeding arteries may influence the initial presentation, it does not appear to impact overall treatment success or patient prognosis. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Background: Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are complex vascular anomalies with a high risk of hemorrhage and neurological deficits, especially when located in eloquent brain regions. The eloquence of an AVM location is a critical factor in the treatment planning, influencing both the risk of complications and long-term functional outcomes. This study aims to compare outcomes between eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study utilized data from the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs (MISTA) consortium. Patients with eloquent and non-eloquent AVMs were compared on baseline characteristics, angiographic outcomes, and functional outcomes using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Results: The study included 1013 patients, with 498 (49.2%) AVMs located in eloquent regions and 515 (50.8%) in non-eloquent regions. In unadjusted analysis, eloquent AVMs had lower complete obliteration rates (67.6% vs 79.5%, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.39–0.72, p < 0.001) and higher complication rates (24.5% vs 19.0%, OR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.02–1.86, p = 0.03) compared to non-eloquent AVMs. After IPTW adjustment, eloquent AVMs continued to show significantly higher odds of overall complications (OR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.12–2.52, p = 0.01) and symptomatic complications (OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.12–2.80, p = 0.01). Secondary analysis within the eloquent group indicated that embolization was linked to an elevated risk of complications. Surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complications rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. Conclusion: AVMs in eloquent brain areas present higher risks of complications and lower obliteration rates, emphasizing the need for cautious, individualized treatment planning. Within the eloquent group, embolization increased the risk of complications, while surgery and radiosurgery showed comparable functional outcomes at last follow-up and complication rates with higher complete obliteration rates in surgery. These findings highlight the importance of location in AVM management and support further research focusing on comparing treatment strategies for AVMs in eloquent brain areas.

OBJECTIVE The definitive influence of prestroke disability on outcomes in patients with a low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large-vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prestroke disability on outcomes in this specific population. METHODS Data from 32 international centers for AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who underwent EVT between January 2013 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Low ASPECTS and prestroke disability were defined as ASPECTS values of 2–5 and prestroke modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≥ 2. The primary outcome was a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were independent ambulation (mRS scores of 0–3) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, good functional outcome (mRS scores of 0–2) or a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days, successful recanalization, and 90-day mortality. Safety outcomes were any intracranial hemorrhage or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was defined as an intracranial hemorrhage with an associated worsening of ≥ 4 points in the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without prestroke disability. RESULTS Of 293 patients, 50 (17.1%) had a prestroke disability. Of 50 patients, 20 (40.0%), 24 (48.0%), and 6 (12.0%) had prestroke mRS scores of 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The primary outcome showed no significant difference between the two groups. Compared with patients without prestroke disability, those with prestroke disability had a significantly smaller proportion of independent ambulation or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03–0.53) and good functional outcome or return to prestroke mRS score (adjusted OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.05–0.91). Other secondary and safety outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS The present study indicated that prestroke disability was not associated with a return to the prestroke mRS score at 90 days or intracranial hemorrhage. Physicians should not routinely exclude AIS-LVO patients with a low ASPECTS who have prestroke disability from EVT based on prestroke disability alone.

Background Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are abnormal connections between feeding arteries and draining veins, associated with significant risks of haemorrhage, seizures and other neurological deficits. Preoperative embolization is commonly used as an adjunct to microsurgical resection, with the aim of reducing intraoperative complications and improving outcomes. However, the efficacy and safety of this approach remain controversial. Methods This study is a subanalysis of the Multicenter International Study for Treatment of Brain AVMs consortium. We retrospectively analysed 486 patients with brain AVMs treated with microsurgical resection between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent microsurgery alone (n=245) and those who received preoperative embolization, followed by microsurgery (n=241). Propensity score matching was employed, resulting in 288 matched patients (144 in each group). The primary outcomes were rates of complete AVM obliteration and functional outcomes (measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)). Secondary outcomes included complication rates, mortality, hospital length of stay and postsurgical rupture. Results After matching, the complete obliteration rate was 97% with no significant difference between the microsurgery-only group and the preoperative embolization group (p=0.12). The proportion of patients with an mRS score of 0–2 at the last follow-up was similar in both groups (83% vs 84%; p=0.67). The median hospital stay was significantly longer for the embolisation group (9 days vs 7 days; p=0.017). Complication rates (24% vs 22%; p=0.57) and mortality rates (4.9% vs 2.1%; p=0.20) were comparable between the two groups. No significant differences were observed in postsurgical rupture, recurrence or retreatment rates. Conclusions In this large multicentre study, preoperative embolization did not significantly improve AVM obliteration rates, functional outcomes or reduce complications compared with microsurgery alone.

OBJECTIVE Tobacco smoking is among the factors known to significantly augment the risk of untreated intracranial aneurysm (IA) growth and rupture. Smoking appears to have a variable effect on different endovascular treatment modalities. The impact of smoking on the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device use for wide-neck IAs has not been evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of WEB devices by smoking status. METHODS A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted on the data of patients from 36 sites worldwide treated with the WEB device for intracranial saccular aneurysms. Patients were stratified based on smoking status (current, former, and never smokers). The Student t-test and chi-square test were performed for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. RESULTS Of 1376 patients with available smoking status, 504 were current smokers, 358 were former smokers, and 514 were never smokers. Upon adjusting for significant confounders, no association was found between smoking and recurrence outcomes (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.69–2.80; p = 0.36), thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, and mortality among IAs treated with the WEB device. There was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between former and never smokers (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.70–2.18; p = 0.46). The location of aneurysms differed between smoking groups, with former smokers having more anterior circulation aneurysms compared with current and never smokers (99.0% vs 96.9% vs 95.3%; p = 0.01). In terms of clinical symptoms, headache and dizziness were more common in the never smokers compared with current and former smokers (13.9% vs 8.9% vs 7.7%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS This large-scale study suggests no significant correlation between smoking and the recurrence of IAs treated with the WEB device. Biological studies are warranted to better understand the biological impact of smoking on the growth and rupture of treated IAs.

Background The contact aspiration (CA) technique is often used to perform endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS); however, rescue strategies are necessary if CA fails to achieve recanalization. This study investigates the outcomes of incorporating stent retriever (SR) thrombectomy in the rescue strategy following failed CA. Methods EVT patients with failed CA attempts were identified from a large multicenter registry and stratified by rescue technique: CA alone or incorporating SR in the rescue strategy. Outcomes included successful recanalization, 90-day functional outcomes (defined by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results Among 1885 patients with failed CA attempts, conversion to SR was associated with higher recanalization rates (85.2% vs 80.6%; p=0.03), higher rates of second-pass recanalization (31.2% vs 23.4%; p<0.001), and better 90-day outcomes (mRS 0–2: 35.2% vs 29.9%; p=0.04) when compared with repeated CA attempts. Trevo SRs showed higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=1.9; p=0.02), second-pass recanalization (aOR=1.7; p=0.01), and reduced odds of sICH (aOR=0.3; p=0.02). EmboTrap SRs were associated with higher odds of 90-day mortality (aOR=2.6; p=0.004) and sICH (aOR=2.9; p=0.04) and lower odds of recanalization (aOR=0.5; p=0.03). Conclusions Incorporating SR in the rescue strategy after a failed CA improves recanalization rates and functional outcomes. Trevo SRs demonstrated superior efficacy and safety when incorporated into the rescue strategy.

Background: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO) presents unique treatment challenges. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is emerging as a viable option for these patients, yet the role of pre-stroke aspirin treatment is unclear. This study evaluates the impact of pre-stroke low-dose aspirin on outcomes in DMVO patients undergoing MT. Methods: We conducted a multinational, multicenter, propensity score-weighted analysis within the Multicenter Analysis of primary Distal medium vessel occlusions: effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy (MAD-MT) registry. Patients with AIS due to DMVO, treated with MT, were included. We compared outcomes between patients on pre-stroke low-dose aspirin (75–100 mg) and those not on antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome was functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 0–2). Secondary outcomes included excellent functional outcome at 90 days (mRS, 0–1), mortality, and day 1 post-MT National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Safety outcomes focused on hemorrhagic complications, including symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Results: Among 1354 patients, 150 were on pre-stroke low-dose aspirin. After applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), aspirin use was associated with significantly better functional outcomes (mRS, 0–2: odds ratio (OR) = 1.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.14 to 3.12) and lower 90-day mortality (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.32 to 1.00). The aspirin group had lower NIHSS scores on day 1 (β = −1.5, 95% CI = −2.8 to −0.27). The sICH rate was not significantly different between the groups (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.43). Conclusions: Pre-stroke low-dose aspirin was associated with improved functional outcomes and reduced mortality in patients with DMVO undergoing MT, without a significant increase in sICH. These findings suggest that low-dose aspirin may be safe and associated with more frequent excellent outcomes for this patient population. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results and assess long-term outcomes.

Background Current randomized controlled trials are investigating the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) stroke. Whether best medical management (MM) is more efficient than unsuccessful vessel recanalization during MT remains unknown. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using data from 37 academic centers across North America, Asia, and Europe between September 2017 and July 2021. Only patients with occlusion of the distal branches (M2 and M3) of the middle cerebral artery territory were included. Unsuccessful MT was defined as a modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 0–2a. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounders. The primary outcome was functional independence, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at 90 days after treatment. Multivariable regression analysis was used to assess factors associated with the primary outcome. Results Of 2903 patients screened for eligibility, 532 patients were analyzed (266 per group) after propensity score matching. The MM group had superior functional outcomes, with 32% achieving mRS 0–1 at 90 days compared with 21% in the MT group (P=0.011). Patients in the MM group also had significantly lower rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) (3.4% vs 16%, P<0.001) and any hemorrhage (18% vs 48%, P<0.001). On multivariable regression, unsuccessful MT was associated with reduced odds of functional independence (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.85, P=0.011) and increased odds of sICH (OR 4.32, 95% CI 1.84 to 10.10, P<0.001). Mortality rates were similar between groups (27% in MM vs 29% in MT, P=0.73). Conclusion Unsuccessful MT for MeVO was linked to worse outcomes than best MM. These findings highlight the risks of prolonged attempts and emphasize the importance of efficient procedural decision-making to reduce complications and improve patient outcomes.

Introduction/Purpose The multicenter, prospective, single‐arm, controlled, non‐randomized SCENT trial on flow diverter (FD) treatment for intracranial aneurysms (IA) was analyzed for patients’ age and IA characteristics impacting stroke and occlusion rates over 5 years. Materials and Methods Impact on major ipsilateral stroke and IA occlusion was studied by stratifying age as </= 65 years versus >65 years. Twice as many subjects treated were </= 65 years old (n=119/180). Product‐limit (Kaplan‐Meier) estimates of time to both endpoints, stratified by age group, were created. Univariate predictors of time to stroke were identified by including candidate variables in univariable proportional hazards regression models. Those variables found to be significant (p<0.10) at the univariate level were entered into a multivariable survival model to identify independent predictors. The stepwise selection produced a final reduced model with a significance level to both enter and stay set at 0.05. Results When parent artery stenosis and IA size were entered into a multiple‐stepwise survival model, only stenosis remained as an independently significant predictor of time to stroke. At 3‐year follow‐up, there were a total of 23 strokes (12.8%), with 11 (47.8%) occurring in subjects </= 65 years; there was a greater risk for seniors (HR1.96, 95% CI 0.83‐4.78, p=.122). Four patients (4/180; 2.2%) experienced aneurysm ruptured within the first week post‐treatment, with 3 being </= 65 and the fourth aged 66 years. No new strokes were reported between 3 and 5 years. Complete IA occlusion rates for seniors were 60.0% (33/55), 67.6% (25/37), and 85.7% (18/21) at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, as compared to 79.1% (87/110), 82.5% (66/80), and 91.8% (56/61) for younger subjects. The time to complete IA occlusion was shorter in younger patients (HR1.53, 95% CI 1.07‐2.19, p=.020). Five subjects (2.8%) underwent retreatment, 2 in 60‐year‐old patients, and one each aged 64, 70, and 75. Conclusion Stroke, early rupture risk, and aneurysm occlusion in patients treated with FD are related to age and pre‐existing parent artery stenosis, IA size, and location. With demographic shifts, future treatments need to focus on expedited and improved healing.

Objective Preclinical studies suggest that robotic carotid artery stenting (CAS) could be superior to manual CAS. However, very limited comparative data exists comparing robotic and manual CAS patients. In addition, no data exists comparing the costs of manual and robotic CAS. Methods All robotic CAS cases at 2 academic neurosurgery centers were retrospectively reviewed and 1:1 propensity matched with manual CAS cases. Personnel costs, supply costs, and total procedure costs were collected in collaboration with hospital administration using time‐driven activity‐based cost‐analysis (TDABC). Results 24 robotic CAS cases were performed between 2019 and 2023. Co‐morbidities and baseline procedural characteristics were well‐matched between robotic and manual cases. Unplanned manual conversion was observed in only one robotic case (4.2%). Robotic CAS complications and outcomes were comparable to manual. Robotic CAS was associated with a significantly increased fluoroscopy time (29.0 vs. 19.2 min.; p<0.001). Robotic procedure time (88.9±18.2 min.) was significantly (p=0.003) higher than manual (68.72±22.4 min.). Health professional costs ($1,589.71±176.92, $1,375.99±233.39, p<0.005), supply cost ($3,918.25±421.20, $2,152.74±1,030.26, p<0.001) and total procedure costs ($5,306.11±608.95, $3,437.56±1,165.67, p<0.001) were greater for robotic CAS. Conclusions With a low rate of technical failure and post‐operative complications, we show robotic carotid artery stenting is safe and feasible in the first multi‐center and largest sample to date. In addition, robotic CAS achieves comparable clinical outcomes. Robotic CAS was associated with increased fluoroscopy time, but fluoroscopy time decreased as operators gained familiarity with the CorPath GRX. Robotic CAS was associated with a greater procedural cost, which was driven by greater personnel and supply costs. Our findings highlight the need for further studies to optimize robotic CAS and reduce its associated costs.