Citations

Abstract Introduction High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional power delivery (CPD) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy, procedural efficiency, and safety profile remain uncertain. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.Gov databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HPSD with CPD ablation for PVI in patients with AF. Random-effects models were used to pool hazard ratios (HR) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Seven RCTs with 1,006 patients (514 HPSD, 489 CPD) were included. No significant differences were found in freedom from arrhythmia during the follow-up period (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.41–1.45; p=0.424). AF recurrence did not differ (RR 0.94; 95% CI 0.65–1.36; p=0.733) between groups. HPSD had a significantly shorter procedural (MD -22.61 min; 95% CI -33.18, -12.04; p<0.001) and RF ablation (MD -15.70 min; 95% CI -20.86, -10.55; p<0.001) times, with comparable fluoroscopy time (MD 0 min; 95% CI -0.44, 0.45; p=0.99) between groups. Conclusion In patients with AF undergoing PVI, HPSD did not increase freedom from arrhythmia as compared with CPD ablation, however it was associated with shorter procedure and RF ablation times. These findings suggest that HPSD may be a more efficient approach without compromising clinical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Introduction Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for about half of the cases of heart failure. HFpEF and atrial fibrillation (AF) often coexist and share similar risk factors. The objective of this study is to examine the differences in risk of clinical outcomes among drug refractory AF patients with concomitant HFpEF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs). Methods Using the Optum PanTher Electronic Health Record (EHR) database, adult HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% and an AF diagnosis with a history of AAD prescription between January 2014 and March 2021 were identified. Patients were classified into CA or AAD groups based on their subsequent treatment for AF. The primary outcome of interest included a composite of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia‐related inpatient admissions and electrical cardioversions in the 57–730 days post‐index treatment period (follow‐up extended to 1095 days for sub‐analysis). Overall HF‐related admissions and systolic HF‐related admissions were assessed as secondary outcomes. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) of propensity scores was used to balance the two cohorts on study covariates. Cox regression analyses were performed to examine outcomes in the covariate‐balanced cohorts. Results The final sample included 586 CA and 1436 AAD patients. The cohorts were well balanced on patient demographics and clinical characteristics after applying IPTW. Patients treated with CA had a significantly lower rate of primary composite outcome as compared to those treated with AADs (15.4% vs. 24.9%, log‐rank p test = 0.001). Cox model revealed a 34% lower risk of atrial arrhythmia related admissions and cardioversion among patients treated with CA versus AADs in the 57–730 days post‐index treatment period (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50–0.87, p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in HF and systolic HF‐related admissions between the two groups (except in the subgroup analysis of patients < 70 years of age, patients with paroxysmal AF, and patients with persistent AF). Similar results were observed in sub‐analyses with 57–1095 days of follow‐up. Conclusion Among drug refractory AF patients with concomitant HFpEF, CA was shown to reduce the risk of recurrent arrhythmias as compared to AAD continuation.

ABSTRACT Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life‐threatening arrhythmia that requires both relatively rapid and accurate detection in intensive care units (ICUs). Continuous monitoring systems play a crucial role in detecting them. However, previous studies have reported that nearly 9 out of 10 arrhythmia alarms in ICUs tend to be false positives, which usually transpire to a well‐documented phenomenon called “alarm fatigue” that leads to desensitization, delayed responses, and increased cognitive burden on healthcare providers. Methods We developed a deep learning based, one‐dimensional convolutional neural network (1D‐CNN) to classify VT alarms using multiple raw waveform inputs, including two electrocardiogram (ECG) leads, photoplethysmogram (PPG) and arterial blood pressure (ABP) signals. The model was trained using the publicly available VTaC Arrhythmia Benchmark Dataset. We used the 10‐second waveform segments that preceded each VT alarm, pre‐processed and then used them to train the machine learning model to correctly classify the VT alarm. Results On the test set, the model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.901, overall accuracy of 83.22%, F1‐score of 73.3%, sensitivity of 77.53%, specificity of 85.63%, and positive predictive value of 69.57%. The model successfully detected over three‐quarters of them while significantly reducing false positive rates for the detection of VT. Conclusions This study demonstrates that a deep learning based 1D‐CNN model using short segments of raw waveform data can achieve robust performance in distinguishing true and false VT alarms.

Abstract Background Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are a proximate mechanism of sudden cardiac death, yet national patterns in place of death (POD) and their determinants remain sparsely described. We quantified 25-year trends and factors associated with POD among UAs decedents in the United States. Methods We analyzed CDC WONDER Multiple Cause of Death data (1999–2024) for adults ≥25 years with ventricular arrhythmias (ICD-10 I47.2, I49.0) as underlying cause. POD was categorized as inpatient, outpatient/emergency department (ED), home, hospice/nursing, or other/unknown. Covariates included age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, and urbanization. We calculated Annual and Average Annual Percent Changes (AAPCs and APC) using Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates (AAMRs), and fit multinomial logistic regression (reference = inpatient) to obtain adjusted odds ratios (ORs, 95% CIs). Results Among 433,988 ventricular arrhythmia (VA) deaths, POD was inpatient 62.0%, outpatient/ED 18.1%, home 11.1%, hospice/nursing 5.8%, other 3.1%. Inpatient deaths increased from 57.8% (1999) to 66.1% (2024). AAMRs declined sharply from 13.3 per 100,000 in 1999 to 6.3–6.5 during 2010–2019, then rose to 7.4 in 2021 and fell to 6.8 in 2024. In home vs inpatient: ≥85 years, medium/small metropolitan counties and rural counties had higher odds of VA deaths, whereas younger age groups, females, Black, American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander individuals and Hispanic individuals had lower odds. In outpatient/ED vs inpatient: 25–44 years, 45–64 years, males, Black, American Indian and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals had higher odds, whereas ≥85 years and females had lower odds. In hospice/nursing facilities: ≥85 years, females, Whites, non-Hispanic individuals, medium/small metropolitan counties and rural counties had higher odds of VA deaths, whereas younger age groups, Black, American Indian, Asian/Pacific Islander individuals and Hispanic individuals had markedly lower odds. Conclusion From 1999–2024, VA deaths shifted toward hospitals. Persistent disparities by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and rurality highlight the need to expand equitable advance care planning and device deactivation discussions.

ABSTRACT Background Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is a life‐threatening arrhythmia frequently observed in structural heart diseases, including LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy, a genetic disorder associated with high risk of sudden cardiac death and progressive systolic dysfunction. While catheter ablation is an established therapeutic option for VT, its efficacy in cardiac laminopathy remains poorly defined. Objectives To synthesize available evidence on the role and outcomes of VT ablation in patients with cardiac laminopathy. Methods A systematic review and single‐arm meta‐analysis was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies reporting VT ablation outcomes in LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy. An inverse variance random‐effects model was applied for meta‐analysis of proportions. Results Seven studies (six cohorts, one abstract) comprising 62 patients (mean age 53.2 ± 9.7 years; 85% male; 88% with implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator) were included. An endocardial/endo‐epicardial approach was used in 93% of cases. Acute procedural success was achieved in 37% (95% CI: 14%–63%; I² = 27.4%), and 28% required multiple procedures. Over a median follow‐up of 26 (9–35) months, VT recurrence occurred in 91% (95% CI: 76%–100%; I² = 37.2%). All‐cause mortality was 54% (95% CI: 39%–70%; I² = 28%), predominantly from cardiac causes (51%, 95% CI: 25%–76%; I² = 53%), and 14% (95% CI: 1%–34%; I² = 42%) underwent heart transplantation. Conclusions In LMNA‐related cardiomyopathy, catheter ablation is associated with high VT recurrence, limited long‐term success, and substantial cardiovascular mortality and transplantation rates, underscoring the importance of ICD implantation and the need for alternative strategies, including variant‐specific and molecularly targeted therapies.

ABSTRACT Introduction Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, data on its efficacy in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF are limited. Methods Using the TriNetX network, we identified patients with sarcoidosis, heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 35%, and either left bundle branch block (LBBB) or prolonged QRS duration ( > 150 ms) between 2014 and 2019. Patients were categorized into two cohorts: (1) those who received CRT and (2) those who received an ICD‐only implant. Five‐year outcomes included all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%. Results Out of 245 eligible patients, we identified a cohort of 87 patients (mean age 62.6 ± 9.5 years) who received CRT and 87 patients (mean age 62.1 ± 11.1 years) who received ICD‐only implant, with similar propensity scores, and included them in a comparative analysis. At 5‐year follow‐up, the CRT group demonstrated outcomes comparable to the ICD‐only implant group for all‐cause mortality (14.9% vs. 20.7%; HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.31–1.28; p = 0.19), all‐cause hospitalization (83.9% vs. 77.0%; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.89–1.73; p = 0.19), and heart failure exacerbation (28.7% vs. 28.7%; HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.52–1.57; p = 0.72). The proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50% was also similar in both groups (LVEF > 40%, 43.7% vs. 33.3%; HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.80–2.10; p = 0.29; LVEF > 50%, 31.0% vs. 17.2%; HR 1.72; 95% CI 0.92–3.24; p = 0.09). Conclusion CRT implantation had similar long‐term outcomes compared to ICD‐only implantation in patients with sarcoidosis and HFrEF, particularly all‐cause mortality, all‐cause hospitalization, heart failure exacerbation, and the proportion of patients with improvement in LVEF to greater than 40% and greater than 50%.

ABSTRACT Background Transvenous lead removal (TLR) in patients with a history of mediastinal radiation poses unique challenges due to potential radiation‐induced fibrosis, vascular changes, and anatomical distortion, which may increase procedural complexity and complication risk. However, contemporary data on clinical outcomes in this population remain limited. Methods We analyzed the National Readmissions Database (2016–2021) to identify adults (≥ 18 years) undergoing TLR. Patients were stratified by prior mediastinal radiation. Baseline characteristics were compared using standard statistical tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between prior mediastinal radiation and in‐hospital outcomes, 30‐day mortality, and 30‐day readmissions after adjustment for demographics and comorbidities. Results A total of 48,985 patients underwent TLR, of whom 735 (1.5%) had a history of mediastinal radiation. Compared with patients without radiation, those with prior radiation were older (70.1 vs. 66.2 years, p < 0.01), were more frequently females (38.2% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.01), and had higher rates of valvular heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. Adjusted analyses demonstrated no increased risk of in‐hospital mortality (2.3% vs. 3.4%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41–1.18, p = 0.29) or major complications, including cardiac arrest, pericardial complications, vascular injury, pulmonary complications, or embolic events. Similarly, (3.6% vs. 5.3%; aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.48–1.43, p = 0.35) and 30‐day all‐cause readmissions (8.7% vs. 9.1%; aOR 0.81, 95% CI 0.64–1.28, p = 0.70) were not significantly different between groups. Subgroup analyses by indication for TLR (infection vs. mechanical complication) revealed no differences in outcomes. Conclusion Despite theoretical concerns, prior mediastinal radiation was not associated with excess procedural risk or worse short‐term outcomes after TLR. These findings may inform procedural planning and risk counseling in clinical practice.