Citations

Abstract Background In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), studies have described different HFpEF phenogroups based on medical comorbidities and variable echocardiographic, invasive hemodynamic, and biomarker data. We hypothesized that myocardial histopathologic findings may define phenogroups with differing clinical features and outcomes in patients with HFpEF. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients with left HF and EF ≥50% who underwent right ventricular septal endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) at our institution between 2001 and 2022 to investigate HF etiology. Patients with infiltrative or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, sarcoidosis, myocarditis, primary valvular heart disease, constrictive pericarditis, isolated right HF, or insufficient EMB samples were excluded. Clinical, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic data were collected. The severity of hypertrophy and fibrosis on EMB specimens was characterized (semiquantitative grading) by experienced cardiac pathologists based on standard histologic stains. Patients were stratified into four phenogroups based on EMB findings: "mild" (none/mild hypertrophy and fibrosis), "hypertrophy" (moderate/marked hypertrophy, minimal/mild fibrosis), "fibrosis" (moderate/marked fibrosis, none/mild hypertrophy), and "severe" (moderate/marked hypertrophy and fibrosis). Results Among the 121 patients analyzed, the median age was 67 years, 50% were female and cardiovascular conditions were common (Table 1). Fibrosis was graded as minimal in 21% (n=25), mild in 64% (n=77), moderate in 12% (n=15), and marked in 3% (n=4). Hypertrophy was graded as none in 4% (n=5), mild in 41% (n=50), moderate in 40% (n=48), and marked in 15% (n=18). Only one patient had the isolated "fibrosis" phenogroup and was excluded from further analysis, while 54 had the "mild", 48 had the "hypertrophy", and 18 had the "severe" phenogroup (Table 1). The "hypertrophy" phenogroup exhibited significantly higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, RV dilation, and higher pulmonary artery pressures. Over a median follow-up of 7.9 years (3.1–13.8), mortality rate varied according to the histopathologic phenogroups (Figure 1, p=0.034) with "severe" having the worst and "mild" having the best outcomes. Survival analyses based on fibrosis grades alone, hypertrophy grades alone, or echocardiographic hypertrophy did not reveal significant differences (all p = NS). Differences in survival remained significant adjusting for age (HR 3.39, 95% CI 1.20-9.58). Conclusions The integrated severity of histopathologic hypertrophic and fibrotic remodeling defined HFpEF phenogroups with variable prognosis. Clinical features did not reliably identify histopathologic phenogroups. These data suggest that advanced myocardial phenotyping (e.g., gene, protein, metabolism) may reveal unique HFpEF myocardial subtypes in need of specific therapies.Figure 1

AbstractBackgroundThe prognosis in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains poor.ObjectivesWe sought to describe survival post heart transplantation (HT) in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid recipients, highlight waitlist times within the new allocation system across three Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions, and describe multiorgan transplantation (MOT) in hereditary amyloidosis.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of end‐stage CA patients who underwent HT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2020. Wait time was compared in the new versus old OPTN allocation era starting December 18, 2018 by Wilcoxon rank sum test. All‐cause mortality for those with and without CA was compared using Kaplan–Meier estimates with log rank analysis, censoring December 16, 2022.ResultsFifty‐five patients with CA underwent HT between 2007 and 2020, 8 light chain amyloidosis (AL) (14.5%), 28 hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) (50.9%), 17 wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) (30.9%), and 2 hereditary apolipoprotein A1 (AApoA1) amyloidosis patients (3.6%). No significant difference in overall survival post‐transplant was seen in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid (p = 0.816). Median time to HT was shorter in the new system, 45 days (IQR 24, 78) versus 174 days (IQR 76.5, 483.5), p = 0.006. There was a decline in MOT in hereditary amyloidosis over time with the concomitant rise in disease‐targeted therapies.ConclusionsHT survival in CA patients was similar to non‐amyloid patients. The new allocation system benefits this cohort with shorter wait times. There is less MOT in hereditary amyloidosis with increased utilization of disease‐targeted therapy.

Background A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline‐directed medical therapy in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis is unreported. Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional cardiac sarcoidosis clinics, identifying those with a cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis, HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11 to 36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist‐led medication therapy management (MTM) program for guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization (MTM versus non‐MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, left ventricular ejection fraction, guideline‐directed medical therapy (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in Kansas City Medical Optimization score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiovascular event–free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device /heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age, 57 years; 34% women; 64% New York Heart Association class I–II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean Kansas City Medical Optimization score was similar at index evaluation (MTM, 23.2; NMTM, 29.6; P =0.83). At follow‐up (median, 16 months), the Kansas City Medical Optimization score increased significantly in both groups (MTM, 23.2 to 74.8; P <0.001; NMTM, 29.6 to 58.7; P <0.001) but was higher in MTM ( P =0.001). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction trended toward higher values in MTM (44.4% versus 40.0%, P =0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (hazard ratio, 11.97 [95% CI, 1.58–90.54]; P =0.002). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist‐led MTM program was associated with favorable guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis with HF.

Introduction: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) often results in systolic heart failure (HF) and responds favorably to guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT). A multidisciplinary team approach to HF care is recommended but few published examples exist in CS patients. Methods: We queried an institutional registry of 599 CS patients (2000-2023) for patients with index LVEF < 50% (within 90 d of index CS evaluation) and follow-up TTE within 11-36 months. In our CS medication therapy management (MTM) program (started 1/8/2019), pharmacists conduct independent visits with CS patients (in person or remote), discuss GDMT tolerance and symptoms, review monitoring laboratory studies, and adjust GDMT (ACEi/ARB/ARNi, beta-blocker, MRA, and/or SGLT2i) via collaborative practice agreement with the CS cardiologists. Patients were classified as MTM (≥1 MTM encounter) or NMTM patients (0 encounters). We compared (1) GDMT, (2) cardiac remodeling, and (3) clinical outcomes (event free survival to first heart failure hospitalization, LVAD, heart transplant, or death). Results: Nineteen percent (113/599) CS patients met inclusion criteria (34% female, 92% white, median age 57 y, 19% definite CS, 58% probable CS, 31% presumed CS), with 44 MTM (median 11.5 encounters, IQR 11) and 69 NMTM patients. Both MTM and NMTM patients were on a median 2 GDMT agents at index evaluation (p=0.21). At follow-up (median 19 mo MTM, 15 mo NMTM, p=0.05), MTM patients were on more GDMT agents than NMTM (median 3.0 vs 2.0, p<0.001), with higher % target dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNi (98% vs 71%, p=0.009), beta-blocker (87% vs 57%, p=0.004), and SGLT2i use (30% vs 9%, p=0.004), but similar MRA use (48% vs 32%, p=0.09). Immunosuppressive therapy was used in 88% patients (89% MTM vs 87% NMTM, p=0.79). Index LVEF was similar (MTM 36%, NMTM 32%, p=0.07). Mean change in LVEF (excluding LVAD/transplant patients) demonstrated a non-significant trend towards improved remodeling in MTM (+8.6%) vs NMTM patients (+5.5%; p=0.39). MTM patients exhibited lower risk of the clinical outcome (1/44 MTM vs 16/69 MTM patients; univariable HR 0.08 [95%CI 0.01 - 0.63], log-rank p=0.016). Conclusions: A pharmacist MTM program for CS patients with HF is associated with improved GDMT uptitration and clinical outcomes, emphasizing the value of collaborative multidisciplinary CS care.

Introduction: Unexplained high-grade AV block (AVB) in patients age <65 years is among the salient features of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Guidelines recommend that CS patients with high-grade AVB should receive an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) rather than a permanent pacemaker (PPM). However, in clinical practice, CS may be recognized after PPM implantation for high-grade AVB. Aims: To evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with CS after PPM implantation for high-grade AVB and assess the decision-making and rationale for upgrade to ICD/CRT-D. Methods: Retrospective review of the Mayo Clinic Sarcoid Registry (n=848) was performed to identify all patients for which a PPM was implanted for high-grade AVB prior to the diagnosis of CS. Baseline clinical and imaging characteristics were collected during index evaluation at our institution. Decision-making for ICD upgrade, lead management strategy, immunosuppression initiation, and outcomes were assessed. Results: Overall, 29 of 848 (3.4%) of CS patients (62% probable/definite CS; 77% male; median (IQR) age 56 (48-61) years; and median (IQR) LVEF 58% (50-62) received a PPM for high-grade AVB prior to a CS diagnosis. Median (IQR) interval between PPM implant and index evaluation was 10 (3-23) months. Eight of 29 patients underwent upgrade to ICD (n=4) or CRT-D (n=4). Among them, the pacing lead was extracted in 4. All patients were upgraded for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD), with 3 of them also having LVEF<50% requiring upgrade to CRT-D. Twenty-two (79%) patients in the total cohort were treated with immunosuppression. During median (IQR) follow-up 37 months (11-74), 1 patient in the upgrade group had sustained VT appropriately treated with anti-tachycardia pacing. No events were documented among patients in the non-upgrade group. At last follow-up, 6 (75%) patients in the upgrade group and 12 (57%) in the non-upgrade group were pacemaker dependent. Median LVEF change was 0% in patients who underwent upgrade to CRT-D and –0.2% in those who underwent upgrade to ICD or no upgrade. Conclusions: In this cohort of patients diagnosed with CS several months after a PPM had been implanted for high-grade AVB, incident VT/VF was infrequent with contemporary CS management. In the absence of other SCD risk factors, CS patients who received a PPM for high-grade AVB prior to their CS diagnosis may not require ICD upgrade.

Background: Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) carries an elevated risk of developing ventricular arrhythmias (VA) but there remains limited evidence supporting the role of catheter ablation in this population. Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for VA in ATTR-CA. Methods: An electronic database was used to identify all patients suspected of having ATTR-CA who underwent catheter ablation for VA at our institution between January 2010 and December 2023. Patients who did not meet the diagnosis of ATTR-CA and had a negative workup who underwent catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were used to form a control group matched for age, sex and left ventricular ejection fraction at a ratio of 2:1. Results: 20 controls and 10 cases of ATTR-CA were identified. Examining the two groups at baseline (Table 1), the mean age at index ablation was 67.7±7.0 and 68.6±8.1 years (p=0.359), mean follow-up time was 4.1±3.1 and 4.2±2.6 years (p=0.494), and the proportion of males was 100% and 90% respectively. The ATTR-CA group had a significantly higher proportion of chronic kidney disease (90% vs. 50%, p=0.032) and prior stroke or thrombotic events compared to the control group (50% vs. 10%, p=0.026) with similar CHA 2 DS 2 VASc scores (4.2±1.6 vs. 3.8±1.3, p=0.233). Both groups had comparable left ventricular ejection fraction (41.4%±14% vs. 46.9%±15.2%, p=0.173), VT/PVCs at presentation (40%/60% vs. 25%/75%, p=0.77), use of antiarrhythmics (70% vs. 60%, p=0.592), and high proportion of atrial fibrillation/flutter (70% vs. 90%, p=0.168). Procedural (261.2±101.2 vs. 265.7±125.6 mins, p=0.449) and total energy delivery time (1442.9±1509.1 vs. 1744.6±956.2 secs, p=0.296) was not significantly different in the two groups. Both groups had a significant decrease in PVC burden postablation with a reduction from 26.8% to 3.8% (p=0.024) and from 27.1% to 13.6% (p=0.028) in the ATTR-CA and control group respectively. A downward trend was seen in antitachycardia pacing events for VT postablation in the ATTR-CA (14.7±9.8 vs. 5.3±6.7, p =0.184) and control (193±387.6 vs. 0.67±1.2. p=0.139) groups. No major complications occurred after ablation (Table 2). Mean time to recurrence post-index ablation was similar between both groups (1620.4±483.8 vs. 1498.8±291.4 days, p=0.987, Figure 1). Conclusions: Catheter ablation appears to be safe and effective for VT and PVCs in patients with ATTR-CA.

Introduction: The prevalence and prognostic significance of PVC and NSVT in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), especially in patients with normal or mildly decreased LV function, are not well known and were investigated in the current study. Methods: We included 192 patients with definite and probable CS with LVEF>35%, no prior history of VT/VF or sudden cardiac death, who underwent up to 48 hours of Holter monitoring. They were followed retrospectively for the composite endpoint of sustained VT/VF, advanced heart failure therapy, and all-cause mortality. We performed multivariable analysis for the association of PVC burden and NSVT with the composite endpoint. Covariates were considered if they were present in at least 95% of the study sample and were significantly associated with the composite endpoint in univariable analysis. Results: The median PVC burden in the overall population was 0.3% (IQR 0.02-2.5%) and 36 (18.8%) patients had a PVC burden ≥5%. Sixty-two (32.3%) patients had NSVT detected during monitoring. The PVC burden and prevalence of NSVT in patient subgroups are shown in Figures 1 and 2. A total of 33 (17.2%) patients experienced one of the composite endpoints at a median follow-up of 3 years. In the multivariable analysis (Figure 3), PVC burden ≥5% versus <5% (HR 3.96 [1.19, 5.97], p-value <0.01) and presence of NSVT (HR 4.55 [2.09, 9.94], p-value <0.01) were associated with the composite outcome. Conclusion: Our results suggest that a high PVC burden and the presence of NSVT carry isolated prognostic value in CS. In addition, ventricular ectopy does not appear to be an indicator of disease activity based on abnormal uptake on PET scan.

AbstractIntroductionLittle is known regarding the prevalence and prognostic implications of non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in patients with wild‐type transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTRwt‐CA). We aimed to investigate the prevalence of NSVT in patients with ATTRwr‐CA, and the association of NSVT with sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and all‐cause mortality.MethodsIn a cohort of ATTRwt‐CA patients from 2011 to 2022 without prior sustained VA, we ascertained the presence and characteristics of NSVT during clinically indicated ambulatory Holter monitoring. Patients were stratified based on the presence of NSVT at baseline. The primary and secondary endpoints of sustained VA and all‐cause mortality, respectively, were assessed during follow‐up.ResultsThe cohort included 217 patients with ATTRwt‐CA (95% males, median age 75 years; median NYHA class 2). Baseline Holter monitoring demonstrated NSVT in 116 (53%) patients. During a median follow‐up of 27 months (IQR 16–45) after the index Holter monitor, 11 (5.1%) patients reached the primary endpoint of sustained VA (incidence 1.8 per 100 person‐years, all monomorphic VT), and 46 (21%) patients died. In univariable Cox proportional hazard model, NYHA class 3 or 4 heart failure (p = .048), the presence of NSVT (p = .04), the duration of longest NSVT run (p = .029), and the percentage of ventricular ectopy (p < .001) were associated with the primary outcome. When adjusting for age and NYHA class 3 or 4 heart failure, the presence of NSVT remained associated with the primary outcome (p = .03). All‐cause mortality was not significantly different between patients with and without NSVT. A cutoff for ventricular ectopy burden of 0.5%, the median for all patients in this study, was associated with increased risk in sustained VA (log‐rank p = .004) and mortality (log‐rank p = .02).ConclusionNSVT is highly prevalent among ATTRwt‐CA patients undergoing clinically indicated Holter monitoring and may confer an increased risk of incident sustained VA.