Rosenthal, Julie

Background Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR‐CM) has a specific pathophysiology, with myocardial stiffening and systolic dysfunction only in advanced stages. We aimed to investigate the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in ATTR‐CM compared with heart failure. Methods In this multicenter, observational study, patients with ATTR‐CM receiving CRT (n=101) were matched to patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy by sex, age, and implantation type (CRT with versus without defibrillator versus conduction system pacing, upgrade versus first implant). We evaluated changes in QRS duration and echocardiographic parameters following CRT implantation and at the most recent available assessments. The study end points were all‐cause death alone or combined with heart failure hospitalization. Results Patients with ATTR‐CM (median age, 76 [interquartile range, 72–83] years, 98% men, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 30% [26–33]) showed greater QRS shortening after CRT implantation ( P =0.012), but not after a median of around 1 year ( P =0.152). There were no significant differences in the absolute LV ejection fraction changes immediately after implantation (+7 [+2/+10] versus +3 [0/+9] units; P =0.124), or to the last echo ( P =0.796), which was performed after 1.3 years in patients with ATTR‐CM and 2.9 years in patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy. Patients with ATTR‐CM had a shorter survival than controls ( P <0.001 for both end points). Patients with ATTR‐CM experiencing an early improvement in LV ejection fraction had a longer survival (log‐rank, 4.3; P =0.038). Conclusions Following CRT implantation, patients with ATTR‐CM show QRS narrowing and improvement in LV ejection fraction, not different from patients without amyloid cardiomyopathy. Early favorable LV remodeling seems to be associated with a lower risk of all‐cause death.

Introduction: Sex-based differences in outcomes among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) remain underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate sex-specific differences in cardiovascular outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving SGLT2 inhibitors alongside guidelinedirected medical therapy (GDMT). Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX global research network. Adults with HFrEF treated with SGLT2is and GDMT were stratified by sex. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory data. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and acute heart failure (HF) events; secondary outcomes included hospitalizations, arrhythmias, renal outcomes, and advanced therapies. Results: After PSM, 17,408 male and 17,408 female patients were analyzed. Male patients had lower odds of acute HF events (aOR: 0.949; 95% CI: 0.909–0.991), all-cause hospitalizations (aOR: 0.933; 95% CI: 0.895–0.973), and renal failure (aOR: 0.915; 95% CI: 0.870–0.962). No significant differences were observed in all-cause mortality (aOR: 1.003; 95% CI: 0.926–1.087) or heart transplantation, although LVAD use was more frequent in males (aOR: 1.416; 95% CI: 1.053–1.905). Discussion: The findings highlighted potential sex-based disparities in outcomes for patients with HFrEF on SGLT2is. Differential prescribing patterns, comorbidity burden, or timing of therapy initiation may contribute to observed differences. Conclusion: Among HFrEF patients treated with SGLT2is, males experienced lower risks of HF events, hospitalizations, and renal failure compared to females, despite similar mortality. Further research is needed to understand and address sex-specific disparities in HFrEF management.

AbstractBackgroundThe prognosis in patients with advanced cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains poor.ObjectivesWe sought to describe survival post heart transplantation (HT) in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid recipients, highlight waitlist times within the new allocation system across three Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) regions, and describe multiorgan transplantation (MOT) in hereditary amyloidosis.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of end‐stage CA patients who underwent HT at Mayo Clinic from January 2007 to December 2020. Wait time was compared in the new versus old OPTN allocation era starting December 18, 2018 by Wilcoxon rank sum test. All‐cause mortality for those with and without CA was compared using Kaplan–Meier estimates with log rank analysis, censoring December 16, 2022.ResultsFifty‐five patients with CA underwent HT between 2007 and 2020, 8 light chain amyloidosis (AL) (14.5%), 28 hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) (50.9%), 17 wildtype transthyretin (ATTRwt) (30.9%), and 2 hereditary apolipoprotein A1 (AApoA1) amyloidosis patients (3.6%). No significant difference in overall survival post‐transplant was seen in amyloid compared with non‐amyloid (p = 0.816). Median time to HT was shorter in the new system, 45 days (IQR 24, 78) versus 174 days (IQR 76.5, 483.5), p = 0.006. There was a decline in MOT in hereditary amyloidosis over time with the concomitant rise in disease‐targeted therapies.ConclusionsHT survival in CA patients was similar to non‐amyloid patients. The new allocation system benefits this cohort with shorter wait times. There is less MOT in hereditary amyloidosis with increased utilization of disease‐targeted therapy.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a distinct form of coronary artery disease that represents a major cause of death beyond the first year after heart transplantation. The pathophysiology of CAV is still not completely elucidated; it involves progressive circumferential wall thickening of both the epicardial and intramyocardial coronary arteries. Coronary angiography is still considered the gold-standard test for the diagnosis of CAV, and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) can detect early intimal thickening with improved sensitivity. However, these tests are invasive and are unable to visualize and evaluate coronary microcirculation. Increasing evidence for non-invasive surveillance techniques assessing both epicardial and microvascular components of CAV may help improve early detection. These include computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and vasodilator stress myocardial contrast echocardiography perfusion imaging. This review summarizes the current state of diagnostic modalities and their utility and prognostic value for CAV and also evaluates emerging tools that may improve the early detection of this complex disease.