Ezzeddine, Omar Abou

Background A multidisciplinary approach improves guideline‐directed medical therapy in systolic heart failure (HF), but its efficacy in patients with HF due to cardiac sarcoidosis is unreported. Methods and Results In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed 848 patients from our institutional cardiac sarcoidosis clinics, identifying those with a cardiac sarcoidosis diagnosis, HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) at index evaluation, and echocardiograms within 90 days and 11 to 36 months. Patients were stratified by participation in a pharmacist‐led medication therapy management (MTM) program for guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization (MTM versus non‐MTM [NMTM]) without randomization. Demographics, left ventricular ejection fraction, guideline‐directed medical therapy (quantified by Kansas City Medical Optimization score), and immunosuppressive therapy were assessed. Primary outcomes included changes in Kansas City Medical Optimization score, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiovascular event–free survival (unplanned HF hospitalization, left ventricular assist device /heart transplant, or death). The final cohort included 111 patients (median age, 57 years; 34% women; 64% New York Heart Association class I–II); 43 (39%) were MTM and 68 (61%) were NMTM. Mean Kansas City Medical Optimization score was similar at index evaluation (MTM, 23.2; NMTM, 29.6; P =0.83). At follow‐up (median, 16 months), the Kansas City Medical Optimization score increased significantly in both groups (MTM, 23.2 to 74.8; P <0.001; NMTM, 29.6 to 58.7; P <0.001) but was higher in MTM ( P =0.001). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction trended toward higher values in MTM (44.4% versus 40.0%, P =0.05). The primary clinical outcome occurred in 1 MTM (2.3%) and 16 NMTM (23.5%) patients, with higher risk in NMTM (hazard ratio, 11.97 [95% CI, 1.58–90.54]; P =0.002). Conclusions In this retrospective cohort study, a pharmacist‐led MTM program was associated with favorable guideline‐directed medical therapy optimization and lower risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis with HF.

Abstract Background Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a difficult to diagnose inflammatory heart disease. Certain types of genetic cardiomyopathy have been reported to masquerade as inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The utility of genetic testing in the evaluation of inflammatory cardiomyopathy is not completely explored and data regarding the prevalence of genetic cardiomyopathies in patients with presumed CS is limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients evaluated from May 2020 to October 2022 in our Cardiac Sarcoid Clinic diagnosed with presumed CS as inferred by either fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) - computed tomography (CT) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or both. Pertinent demographic, genetic, electrocardiographic, and imaging data for these patients was extracted from the electronic medical record. Results Genetic testing was obtained in 47 (22%) of the 213 presumed CS patients, among whom 43 (91%) presented with suspected isolated CS, and 4 (9%) with possible cardiac involvement in the setting of systemic sarcoidosis. Among the patients who underwent genetic testing, 10 (21 %) had a pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant(s) in a genetic cardiomyopathy-susceptibility gene, including DSP (n=2), LMNA, FHL1, TPM1, MYBPC3, NRAS, MYH7 (n=2) and TTN (n= 2) genes. All P/LP patients had FDG uptake, and in those with CMR data, 100% had late gadolinium enhancement. The seven patients with P/LP who underwent endomyocardial biopsy had no evidence of granulomatous inflammation. Immunosuppression was initiated in 60% of the P/LP patients before knowledge of genetic results. Conclusion Patients suspected to have CS may have concomitant or primarily genetic cardiomyopathy that may masquerade as an inflammatory phenotype Genetic testing should be considered in these patients, not only to clarify the diagnosis and its prognostic and therapeutic implications, but also to offer cascade screening for the family of patients with P/LP variants who otherwise would not have been considered to have a heritable disease.

Abstract Background Sarcoidosis is an infiltrative inflammatory condition affecting multiple organs, with cardiac involvement designated as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). It has been proposed that inflammatory conditions like sarcoid increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), defined as pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to the hypercoagulable environment created by inflammation. Purpose Although previous studies have demonstrated an association with sarcoidosis and VTE, these studies failed to account for steroid use (crucial for sarcoid treatment) as an important confounder. Also, no major studies have been done previously assessing the risk of VTE in CS specifically. The objective of this investigation is to determine the association between CS, steroid treatment for CS, and VTE. Methods Patients referred to our institution with concern for sarcoid/CS were retrospectively assessed. Specific variables of interest including general baseline characteristics and those specific to CS were analyzed for their association with VTE development. Results Using Heart Rhythm Society guidelines, 649 patients were split into three categories: 235 with no sarcoid (NS), 91 with extra-cardiac sarcoid (ECS) only, and 323 with CS. In univariate analysis, 39 (12%) CS patients developed a PE vs 9 (4%) NS patients (OR 3.44, p=0.0003) and 44 (14%) CS patients developed DVT vs 18 (8%) NS patients (OR 1.90, p=0.02). In multivariate regression analysis however, neither CS nor ECS was an independent risk factor for VTE (p&gt;0.05) but steroid use was a strong predictor of VTE (HR 3.12, p=0.007 for PE, HR 6.17, p&lt;0.0001 for DVT). Also, steroid dose was found to be an independent predictor for both PE (p=0.001) and DVT (p=0.007) in a Cox proportionate hazards model (significance appeared at &gt;17.5 mg daily on a receiver operating characteristic curve). Conclusion Contrary to previous studies, the current study found that neither sarcoidosis nor CS is an independent risk factor for VTE. Rather, steroid therapy for CS treatment leads to an increased prevalence of VTE, specifically at a dose above 17.5 mg daily. More research is required to clarify this relationship and assess the importance of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy and potentially VTE prophylaxis in CS management. Steroid use and time to PE/DVT Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None