Citations

Institution: Mayo Clinic Clear

Showing 10 of 108060 citations.

What is the ideal orthopaedic call plan for a level one trauma center?
Patel, Parth, Brutus, Katja, Crain, Andrew , Dahiya, Rockey , Foster, Cameron, Madbak, Firas , Young, Porter

Orthopedic Reviews | December 22, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.52965/001c.154365 | PMID 41450482 Get It

Background Level I trauma centers employ various orthopaedic call strategies based on resources and surgeon subspeciality availability. Objective We hypothesize when surgeons fellowship trained in trauma are solely on call that patient outcomes will be improved compared to a combined plan. Methods Retrospective cohort study from two 24-month time periods at an academic level one trauma center. The first cohort consisted of only trauma surgeons taking call. The second cohort consisted of a combination of trauma and other subspecialities taking call. The primary outcome analyzed was time from admission to operating room for hip, femoral shaft, distal femur, tibia shaft, pelvic ring and acetabulum fractures. Secondary outcomes analyzed included length of stay, 90 day incidence of reoperation, mortality, VTE and readmission. Results Eight hundred and fifty seven patients in the trauma cohort and 992 patients in the combined cohort met the inclusion criteria. The time from admission to index surgical procedure was significantly shorter in the trauma cohort (1.7 vs 2.4). Length of stay (8.95 vs 11 days) and 90 day mortality (1.8% vs 3.8%) was improved in the trauma cohort. There was no difference in 90 day rate of VTE, readmission or reoperation. Length of stay and time to OR in pelvic ring injuries and acetabulum fractures were doubled compared to the hybrid group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that when trauma fellowship trained surgeons are the only ones taking call patients have a shorter time from admission to index surgical procedure, length of stay and lower mortality rate.
Ferritin H Knockout Induces Differential Immunomodulatory Drug Responses in Multiple Myeloma Cell Lines
Sharma, Aarti , Pathangey, Latha , Chirackal, Sinto Sebastian, Shim, Kevin G. , Fonseca, Rafael Salvador Santos , Swaminathan, Sundararaman , Shim, Kevin G , Fonseca, Rafael

European Journal of Haematology | December 22, 2025 | Volume: 116 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 391-401

10.1111/ejh.70084 | PMID 41423250 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs) are a cornerstone in the successful management of multiple myeloma (MM). However, acquired IMiD resistance leading to disease relapses remains a major barrier. Hydrogen peroxide generation and oxidative stress are key mediators that determine IMiD's effectiveness in MM. Iron plays a key role in the generation of oxidative stress; therefore, cellular iron levels are tightly governed. FTH1 is the major iron storage protein that tightly regulates cellular iron availability. Hence, the present study is targeted to investigate the role of FTH1 in MM and IMiD resistance. Methods IMiD‐sensitive and IMiD‐resistant MM cells were analyzed for expression of iron‐metabolism genes. CRISPR‐cas9‐mediated knockout of FTH1 was performed and the after‐effects were assessed through multiple experiments. Results Initial analysis showed a positive correlation between FTH1 expression and IMiD resistance in MM cells. FTH1 ‐KO reduced IMiD sensitivity in the KMS11 cell line but had no effect on the RPMI8226 cell line. RNA‐seq data showed downregulation of ER‐stress and calcium signaling genes after FTH1 ‐KO. Further, KMS11‐ FTH1 KO cells exhibited lower intracellular ROS, labile‐iron, and mitochondrial superoxide levels along with increased CD63, suggesting activation of L‐ferritin secretory pathways. Conclusion Data reveals a link between FTH1 , labile iron, ROS, and IMiD resistance in MM cells.
Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Standards for Reporting of Multiplex Immunohistochemistry/Immunofluorescence Assays (STORMI)
Sater, Sam, Bifulco, Carlo B, Rodriguez-Canales, Jaime, Yeong, Joe, Akturk, Guray, Angelo, Michael, Ballesteros-Merino, Carmen, Bankhead, Peter, Basu, Subham, Blando, Jorge M, Brajkovic, Saska, Cassano, Marco, Chen, Benjamin J , Coskun, Ahmet F, Cottrell, Tricia R, Andrea, Carlos E De, Edwards, Robin H, Engle, Logan L , Fan, Rong , Feldman, Michael, Fox, Bernard A. , Galon, Jerome, Gartrell, Robyn, Gnjatic, Sacha, Green, Benjamin F, Hellebust, Anne, Hewitt, Stephen, Hollmann, Travis J, Horn, Lucas A , Howat, William J, Hoyt, Clifford C, Jensen, Shawn M, Kulasinghe, Arutha, Lassoued, Wiem , Lott, Steven, Mansfield, James, Marwitz, Sebastian , Netto, George, Page, David B. , Parra, Edwin, Rodig, Scott J, Salgado, Roberto, Schapiro, Denis, Schalper, Kurt A , Sunshine, Joel C , Surace, Michael J, Szalay, Alexander S, Thurin, Magdalena, Villasboas, Jose C, Wharton, Keith, Wistuba, Ignacio I, Yearley, Jennifer H, Yuan, Yinyin, Zaki, Geroge, Ziai, James, Gnjatic, Sacha , Netto, George J. , Egelston, Colt , Engle, Logan L , Ernstoff, Marc S. , Fan, Rong , Fox, Bernard A , Gulley, James L , Horn, Lucas A , Lassoued, Wiem , Marwitz, Sebastian , Page, David B , Rimm, David , Schalper, Kurt A , Sunshine, Joel C , Taube, Janis M , Gnjatic, Sacha , Sater, Sam, Bifulco, Carlo B, Rodriguez-Canales, Jaime, Yeong, Joe Poh-Sheng , Akturk, Guray, Angelo, Michael, Ballesteros-Merino, Carmen, Bankhead, Peter, Basu, Subham, Blando, Jorge M, Brajkovic, Saška, Cassano, Marco , Chen, Benjamin J , Coskun, Ahmet F, Cottrell, Tricia R, Andrea, Carlos E De, Edwards, Robin H, Feldman, Michael, Galon, Jérôme , Gartrell, Robyn, Green, Benjamin F, Hellebust, Anne, Hewitt, Stephen, Hollmann, Travis J, Howat, William J, Hoyt, Clifford C, Jensen, Shawn M, Kulasinghe, Arutha, Lott, Steven, Mansfield, James, Parra, Edwin, Rodig, Scott J, Salgado, Roberto, Schapiro, Denis , Surace, Michael J, Szalay, Alexander S. , Thurin, Magdalena, Villasboas, Jose C, Wharton, Keith, Wistuba, Ignacio I. , Yearley, Jennifer H, Yuan, Yinyin, Zaki, Geroge, Ziai, James

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | December 21, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e012280

10.1136/jitc-2025-012280 | PMID 41423269 Get It

Multiplex immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry (mIF/IHC) are increasingly employed antibody-based technologies that use tissue sparingly and facilitate the detection of co-localized or neighboring biomarkers. Specifically, these platforms enable spatial analyses of the tumor microenvironment as well as extended applications, for example, describing normal tissue anatomy, autoimmunity, infectious diseases, etc. mIF/IHC has greatly enhanced biomarker discovery efforts, and a growing number of studies suggest superiority to traditional IHC. Standardization of staining approaches, reporting of image analysis strategies and resultant data is critical for facilitating cross-study comparisons, validation, deployment, and generalization of findings. To address this challenge, The Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) previously published two articles providing best practice guidelines for mIF/IHC staining, image analysis, and data sharing. Here, SITC convened stakeholders to develop the third article in the series, a consensus checklist for scientific reporting of mIF/IHC data to support and complement the best practice guidelines. The checklist includes critical components of mIF/IHC applications to be defined within publications such as detailed descriptions of analytical validation; image acquisition, selection, and registration methods; and cell clustering and spatial analysis strategies, amongst others. Such information will help with data reproducibility and comparison across studies towards future drug and assay development.
Poor Mobilization and Plerixafor Use in Matched Related Peripheral Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Donors
Draper, Nicole, Connelly‐Smith, Laura , Alquist, Caroline R. , Fernando, Leonor P. , Jones, Andrew R. , Schmidt, Amy E. , Harmon, Charles S., Lee, Esther , Linnik, Yevgeniy , Cooling, Laura , Godbey, Elizabeth A, Cooling, Laura , Godbey, Elizabeth A. , Schwartz, Joseph E. , Jones, Andrew, Harmon, Charles

Journal of Clinical Apheresis | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/jca.70074 | PMID 41420827 Get It

ABSTRACT Plerixafor (PLX) is FDA approved for use in autologous peripheral blood stem cell donors but not in allogeneic donors. This study was completed by members of the ASFA HPC Donor Subcommittee to examine the incidence and characteristics of poor mobilizers (PM) among matched related donors (MRD), as well as factors associated with PLX use in MRD. Risks of poor mobilization in MRD were older age, especially donors older than 60 years, lower baseline platelet counts, and heavier recipients. PLX use in PM was low but safe, tripling the success rate for collection. This study adds evidence to the body of literature to support use of PLX in allogeneic donors who are PM.
IL-33 blockade attenuates vascular inflammation in a mouse model of Kawasaki disease vasculitis
Carvalho, Thacyana Teixeira de , Ross, B. Evan, Atici, Asli E. , Gomez, Angela C, Fishbein, Michael C, Aubuchon, Emily , Lee, Youngho, Lee, R., Jr, Waldiceu Verri, Chen, S. C., Crother, Timothy R. , Arditi, Moshe , Rivas, Magali Noval , Noval Rivas, Magali , Jena, Prasant Kumar , Fishbein, Michael C. , Lee, Youngho , Jacobsen, Elizabeth A. , Jr, Waldiceu Aparecido Verri

Clinical and Experimental Immunology | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 220 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/cei/uxaf086 | PMID 41533763 Get It

Abstract The immune mechanisms underlying Kawasaki disease (KD), a febrile systemic vasculitis in children, are poorly understood. Reports indicate elevated levels of circulating IL-33 in acute KD patients; however, if IL-33 contributes to the pathogenesis of KD vasculitis remains unclear. Here, we used the Lactobacillus casei cell wall extract (LCWE)-induced murine model of KD to determine the contribution of IL-33 to vasculitis development. We observed increased expression of Il33 transcripts and IL-33 protein in LCWE-induced cardiovascular lesions. Bone marrow chimera experiments suggest that IL-33 production by both hematopoietic and stromal cells is important for LCWE-induced KD vasculitis; however, single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and flow cytometric analysis revealed that stromal cells were the predominant sources of IL-33. Furthermore, immune cells infiltrating LCWE-induced cardiovascular lesions expressed Il1rl1 transcripts, coding for the IL-33 receptor ST2. In vitro stimulation of bone marrow-derived macrophages with IL-33 enhanced their production of IL-1b and TNF-α. In vivo blockade of IL-33, using either neutralizing IL-33 antibody or Il33-/- mice, effectively attenuated LCWE-induced cardiovascular inflammation. Our results indicate that IL-33 contributes to LCWE-induced vascular inflammation through redundant mechanisms across multiple immune cell subsets rather than a single population and highlight IL-33 as a potential therapeutic target.
Assessment of Clinical Significance of Molecular Streptococcus agalactiae Detection in Patients With Suspected Pneumonia
Hellou, Mona Mustafa , Li, Guyu , Igwilo-Alaneme, Rita , Virk, Abinash, Hellou, Elias , Lancaster, Zane D., Patel, Robin, Patel, Robin , Mustafa Hellou, Mona , Virk, Abinash , Lancaster, Zane, Patel, Robin , Hellou, Elias , Virk, Abinash

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf781 | PMID 41531502 Get It

Abstract Background Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]) may cause pneumonia or may colonize the respiratory tract, making its clinical significance uncertain when detected in respiratory specimens. This study aimed to assess whether clinicians interpreted GBS detected by the BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel (BF-PP) as a pathogen implicated in pneumonia. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between September 2020 and February 2025. Cases were independently classified into pathogen and nonpathogen groups by 2 infectious diseases (ID) specialists, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of both groups were recorded. A subgroup analysis of patients who had an ID consultation was performed. Results A total of 109 cases were included. GBS was considered a pneumonia pathogen in 47.7% of cases and a nonpathogen in 52.3%. ID consultation was performed in 33.0% of cases, with GBS considered a pathogen in 30.6% of those. Common comorbid conditions included pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and cardiovascular disease and obesity. Rates of endotracheal intubation were similar in the pathogen and nonpathogen groups (51.9% vs 50.9%, respectively), with the in-hospital mortality rate being numerically but not significantly higher in the former versus the latter (21.2% vs 14.0%; P = .33); findings were similar in the ID-assessed subgroup. In 76.1% of GBS detections, other microorganisms—most commonly Staphylococcus aureus—were codetected. Only 10.2% of BF-PP GBS-positive specimens were culture positive for GBS. Conclusions While GBS is not an uncommon pneumonia pathogen, the clinical significance of its detection by BF-PP is uncertain in many cases.
Abandoning Reproductive Science Betrays Us All
Weng, Jessica , Wayland, Jennifer L. , Mysorekar, Indira U. , Bonney, Elizabeth A. , Mysorekar, Indira U , Weng, Jessica

American Journal of Reproductive Immunology | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 94 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/aji.70199 | PMID 41420492 Get It

Inflammation rewires the enteric nervous system through neurogenic monocyte recruitment
Kurapati, Sravya , Shin, Changsik , Szabo, Krisztina , Liu, Yu , Ashraf, Azree Zaffran, Koscsó, Balázs , Dash, Chinmayee , Kruckow, Katherine L. , Navarro, L Guerrero, Clark, Amanda M. , Saha, Monalee , Nagaraj, Sushma , Wang, Wenhui , Zhu, Jun , Thomson, Travis , Shulzhenko, Natalia , Morgun, Andrey , Pasricha, Pankaj J. , Peters, Lauren A., Bogunovic, Milena , Ashraf, Azree Z , Navarro, Leonardo E , Brown, Kevin , Thomson, Travis , Shulzhenko, Natalia , Morgun, Andrey , Baer, Christina E , Srinivasan, Shanthi , Kulkarni, Subhash , Pasricha, Pankaj Jay , Peters, Lauren A , Bogunovic, Milena , Clark, Amanda M. , Kulkarni, Subhash

Journal of Experimental Medicine | December 20, 2025 | Volume: 223 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1084/jem.20251761 | PMID 41774078 Get It

Proper organization of the enteric nervous system (ENS) is critical for normal gastrointestinal (GI) physiology. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) disrupts key GI functions, including bowel motility. However, in many IBD patients, motility disorders persist even during remission, suggesting an irreversible ENS defect secondary to IBD. Here, we show that postinflammatory GI motility dysfunction arises from structural remodeling of the ENS, driven by a combination of neuronal loss and neurogenesis. During mucosal inflammation, enteric neurons upregulate CCL2 expression, facilitating the recruitment of monocytes into the myenteric plexus within the intestinal muscle. Monocyte-derived macrophages infiltrate the myenteric ganglia, contributing to excessive ENS remodeling and postinflammatory motility dysfunction. This neuroimmune axis is counterbalanced by a hypoxia-induced stress response in enteric neurons mediated by HIF1α. Enhancing the neuron-intrinsic hypoxia pathway limits ENS remodeling and preserves motility. In summary, this study presents a mechanistic model of postinflammatory GI motility dysfunction and proposes a therapeutic strategy to maintain ENS integrity and function during inflammation.
Management of splanchnic venous thrombosis after splenectomy in hematologic diseases: systematic review, meta-analysis, and consensus guidelines
Lluís, Núria , Kunzler, F. , Asbun, Domenech , Manresa‐Rocamora, Agustín , Blasco‐Peris, Carles , Alseidi, Adnan, Chan, Carlos , Conrad, Claudius, Ferrone, Cristina R. , Telem, Dana A. , Vega, Eduardo A. , Romano, Fabrizio, Khatkov, I. E. , Conlon, Kevin C. , Feldman, Liane S. , Barabanshikova, Maria V., Giménez, Mariano , Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Dimachk, M., Gangaraju, Radhika , Mehta, Rakesh, Ross, Sharona , Perretta, Silvana , Taner, Timuçin , Shen, Yu‐Min, Demetrashvili, Zaza , Nagalla, Srikanth, Asbun, Horacio J. , Chan, Carlos H.F. , Chan, Carlos H F , Tsamalaidze, Levan , Teh, Catherine , Conrad, Claudius , Targarona, Eduardo M. , Reitano, Elisa , Dudina, Galina A. , Al‐Samkari, Hanny , Freed, Jason A. , Cappellini, Maria Domenica , Nakamura, Masafumi , Lim, Ming Y , Hilal, Mohammad Abu , Alexakis, N. , de’Angelis, Nicola , Bouvy, Nicole D. , Marco, Pascual , Llamas, Pilar , Sánchez-Cabús, Santiago , Lluı́s, Fèlix

International Journal of Surgery | December 19, 2025 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 5604-5614

10.1097/js9.0000000000004485 | PMID 41417989 Get It

Background: Splanchnic venous thrombosis (SVT) is a potentially severe and frequently underdiagnosed complication following splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Despite its clinical importance, no standardized, evidence-based guidelines currently exist to inform perioperative prevention, diagnosis, or treatment in this population. Materials and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines to estimate the incidence and risk factors for SVT after splenectomy in patients with hematologic diseases. Twenty-eight observational studies comprising 5025 patients were included. Risk factor data were analyzed using random-effects models. In parallel, an international Delphi consensus process was performed involving 35 experts (hematologists and surgeons) from 14 countries. Experts were assigned to five domain-specific groups and developed clinical statements on prophylaxis, diagnosis, and management of SVT. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement, and recommendations were graded using the GRADE framework. Results: The pooled incidence of SVT after splenectomy was 11.4%, with higher rates in studies using routine imaging (20.7%) and those conducted at single centers (15.1%). Splenic size and weight were significant risk factors, while age, BMI, and platelet count were not. Disease-specific risk was highest in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, lymphoma, and thalassemia. The Delphi process generated 25 consensus statements, 14 of which were classified as strong recommendations. Key guidance included perioperative vaccination, individualized thromboprophylaxis with BMI-adjusted low molecular weight heparin, selective Doppler-based screening in high-risk patients, and stepwise anticoagulation regimens based on thrombus burden and clinical evolution. Conclusion: This study presents the first international consensus-based guidelines for managing SVT after splenectomy in patients with hematologic disease. Developed through systematic evidence synthesis and expert consensus, these recommendations provide a practical framework rather than definitive standards of care and support individualized prevention, detection, and treatment strategies in this high-risk population.