Hellou, Mona Mustafa

Aims Extensor mechanism disruption is a major complication following total knee arthroplasty, with treatment often consisting of extensor mechanism reconstruction utilizing monofilament polypropylene mesh (Marlex mesh, C. R. Bard, Inc). Infection following this procedure is devastating, often resulting in revision surgery and mesh removal, with permanent limb dysfunction. This study evaluated the in vitro ability of vancomycin-loaded polypropylene mesh to inhibit growth of isolates of three Staphylococcus species from patients with periprosthetic joint infection. Methods The mesh was prepared in two configurations – single-layer and eight-layer – and soaked for ten minutes in either sterile water (control) or vancomycin solution (50 mg/ml), after which the mesh was placed on tryptic soy agar plates inoculated with staphylococci and incubated at 37°C for 18 to 24 hours. Zones of inhibition were measured daily over seven days, with mesh transferred to freshly inoculated plates daily. Testing was performed in triplicate, with experiments repeated three times for each bacterial isolate. A total of 30 clinical isolates were tested (five methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus epidermidis , five methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis , ten methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , and ten Staphylococcus lugdunensis ). Results Across all species, the eight-layer vancomycin-loaded mesh produced statistically significantly larger median zones of inhibition than the single-layer mesh. The antibacterial activity of the eight-layer mesh persisted through to day 7, while the single-layer mesh showed reduced activity by days 4 to 5. Conclusion Compared with single-layer vancomycin-loaded mesh, multilayer vancomycin-loaded mesh, which mimics clinical application, provides enhanced and sustained antibacterial activity in vitro. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2026;15(8):998–1004.

Abstract Background Streptococcus agalactiae (group B Streptococcus [GBS]) may cause pneumonia or may colonize the respiratory tract, making its clinical significance uncertain when detected in respiratory specimens. This study aimed to assess whether clinicians interpreted GBS detected by the BIOFIRE Pneumonia Panel (BF-PP) as a pathogen implicated in pneumonia. Methods This retrospective cohort study included adult patients hospitalized with suspected pneumonia at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, between September 2020 and February 2025. Cases were independently classified into pathogen and nonpathogen groups by 2 infectious diseases (ID) specialists, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of both groups were recorded. A subgroup analysis of patients who had an ID consultation was performed. Results A total of 109 cases were included. GBS was considered a pneumonia pathogen in 47.7% of cases and a nonpathogen in 52.3%. ID consultation was performed in 33.0% of cases, with GBS considered a pathogen in 30.6% of those. Common comorbid conditions included pulmonary, gastrointestinal, neurologic, and cardiovascular disease and obesity. Rates of endotracheal intubation were similar in the pathogen and nonpathogen groups (51.9% vs 50.9%, respectively), with the in-hospital mortality rate being numerically but not significantly higher in the former versus the latter (21.2% vs 14.0%; P = .33); findings were similar in the ID-assessed subgroup. In 76.1% of GBS detections, other microorganisms—most commonly Staphylococcus aureus—were codetected. Only 10.2% of BF-PP GBS-positive specimens were culture positive for GBS. Conclusions While GBS is not an uncommon pneumonia pathogen, the clinical significance of its detection by BF-PP is uncertain in many cases.

ABSTRACT Pneumonia may be caused by a diverse group of microorganisms; however, a microbiologic diagnosis is not universally made. Molecular tests such as the BIOFIRE FILMARRAY Pneumonia Panel (BF-PP) offer the possibility of rapid identification of potential pneumonia pathogens. This retrospective analysis was conducted as a sub-study of a recently published randomized controlled trial. Specimens from patients with suspected pneumonia were tested by the BF-PP, with results compared to cultures. The overall BF-PP positivity rate was 44.8% (252/563), and was higher [64.6% (164/254)] in specimens from patients ultimately diagnosed with pneumonia. Discrepancies between the BF-PP and cultures were most common for Streptococcus pneumoniae , Haemophilus influenzae , Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus agalactiae . Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) between the BF-PP and culture were 91.4% (CI 86.3%–94.9%) and 83.6% (CI 79.5%–87.2%), respectively. For most bacteria, a correlation between high genomic abundance (genomic copies/mL) reported from the BF-PP and culture growth abundance was found. In specimens from patients ultimately diagnosed with pneumonia, clinical consistency—assessed based on whether BF-PP results aligned with associated culture results—was 79.9% and was highest for bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens. The BF-PP has reliable analytical performance and offers the potential advantage over conventional cultures of providing higher detection rates and more rapid results. Interestingly, despite the use of this advanced molecular diagnostic tool, one-third of pneumonia cases remained without a microbiologic etiology. IMPORTANCE This study evaluates the BIOFIRE FILMARRAY Pneumonia Panel by comparing its performance to conventional cultures in a real-world patient population (including patients ultimately diagnosed as not having pneumonia) using different types of specimens. Findings show a higher detection rate of microorganisms with the panel compared to cultures, suggesting that this test could aid in tailoring treatments for pneumonia. However, challenges remain and require further study, including distinguishing true pathogens from colonizing microorganisms and determinig why one-third of patients diagnosed with pneumonia still lacked a microbiologic etiology.