Citations

ABSTRACT Complete esophageal obstruction is a rare but serious complication of endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL). We present the case of a 75-year-old man with cirrhosis and esophageal varices who developed acute esophageal obstruction following EVBL, which was successfully managed with a combination of endoscopic scissors to cut the band and through-the-scope balloon dilation, restoring luminal patency and recanalization of the esophagus. This case highlights the importance of prevention, early recognition, and timely management of this rare but important complication of EVBL. Key management options addressed include preventive, conservative, and interventional strategies to improve patient outcomes.

18 Background: Studies have shown that African Americans (AA) are at increased risk for Colorectal Cancer (CRC) compared to other groups. Despite advancements in CRC screening modalities, few studies have investigated disparities in CRC screening among this vulnerable population. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients of age 45 or older who were seen in Family Medicine (FM), Internal Medicine (IM), or Gastroenterology (GI) between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2021 at the Mayo Clinic. Information was collected regarding patient characteristics (age, sex, Charlson comorbidity score, race), and outcomes (whether a Cologuard test was ordered on the same day as the initial appointment, and whether the patient underwent a colonoscopy within 1 year after the initial appointment). Categorical variables were summarized with number and percentage of patients. Outcomes were compared between race groups (Caucasian, AA, Asian, Other) using unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression models. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, and Charlson comorbidity score. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. P-values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant, and all statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Overall, 558,078 were included for analysis and 14,607 (2.6%) were AA. Overall, AA patients for less likely to have Cologuard ordered compared to Caucasians (OR=0.62, p<0.001), notably driven by patient seen in the FM group (OR=0.54, p<0.001) and no statistically significant difference was observed in the IM and GI groups (p=0.055 and p=0.43, respectively). Notably, compared to Caucasian patients, Asian patients were overall more likely to have Cologuard ordered (OR=1.23, p=0.003). In multivariable analysis assessing the likelihood of having a colonoscopy performed within 1 year of the initial appointment, the likelihood of a colonoscopy within 1 year of initial clinic visit was significantly lower for AA compared to Caucasian patients (OR=0.50, p=0.028). This difference was strongest in FM patients (OR=0.26, p=0.022) and was not significant for IM (OR=0.67, p=0.37) or GI (OR=2.31, p=0.25). Conclusions: In this study, we found that AA ethnicity is associated with reduced likelihood of having Cologuard ordered compared to Caucasian patients. Furthermore, AA patients were less likely to have colonoscopy ordered within 1 year of initial visit clinic visit among the overall cohort, highlighting important disparities in CRC screening among this vulnerable patient population notably for those seen in the FM group. Future studies are needed to assess other barriers for CRC screening in this population.

Abstract Background Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are increasingly found on cross-sectional imaging, with the majority having a low risk for malignancy. The added value of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in risk stratification remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of three FNA needles on diagnostic accuracy, clinical management, and the ability to accrue fluid for tumor markers. Methods A multicenter prospective trial randomized 250 patients with PCLs ≥ 13 mm 2:1:1 to 19G Flex, 19G, and 22G needles with crossover for repeated FNA procedures. Diagnostic accuracy was established at 2-year follow-up, with the final diagnosis from surgical histopathology or consensus diagnosis by experts based sequentially on clinical presentation, imaging, and aspirate analysis in blinded review. Results Enrolled patients (36 % symptomatic) had PCLs in the head (44 %), body (28 %), and tail (26 %). Percentage of cyst volume aspirated was 78 % (72 % – 84 %) for 19G Flex, 74 % (64 % – 84 %) for 22G, and 73 % (63 % – 83 %) for 19G (P = 0.84). Successful FNA was significantly higher for 19G Flex (89 % [82 % – 94 %]) and 22G (82 % [70 % – 90 %]) compared with 19G (75 % [63 % – 85 %]) (P = 0.02). Repeated FNA was required more frequently in head/uncinate lesions than in body and tail (P < 0.01). Diagnostic accuracy of the cyst aspirate was 84 % (73 % – 91 %) against histopathology at 2-year follow-up (n = 79), and 77 % (70 % – 83 %) against consensus diagnosis among nonsurgical cases (n = 171). Related serious adverse events occurred in 1.2 % (0.2 % – 3.5 %) of patients. Conclusions Our study results demonstrate a statistically significant difference among the three needles in the overall success rate for aspiration, but not in the percentage of cyst volume aspirated. Flexible needles may be particularly valuable in sampling cystic PCLs in the pancreatic head/uncinate process.

Abstract Background National guidelines recommend genomic profiling of tumor tissue to guide precision therapy. We compared the specimen adequacy for genomic profiling and yield of DNA between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Methods In our tandem, randomized controlled trial, consecutive patients undergoing EUS for evaluation of pancreatic masses underwent both conventional EUS-FNA with a 25-gauge needle and paired EUS-FNB (19 or 22-gauge needle), with the order randomized (EUS-FNA first followed by EUS-FNB, or vice versa). A minimum of one pass with each needle was obtained for histology. Second and third passes were performed to collect DNA. Specimens were evaluated by a cytopathologist blinded to the needle type. Specimen adequacy for genomic profiling was calculated based on FoundationOne clinical diagnostic (CDx) adequacy requirements. We compared the adequacy for genomic profiling DNA (quantity) and histology yields with both needles. Results Analysis included 50 patients (25 men; mean age 68 [standard deviation (SD) 13] years), with a mean lesion size of 38 (SD 17) mm; 37 lesions (74 %) were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The mean DNA concentrations in PDAC by FNB and FNA needles were 5.930 (SD 0.881) µg/mL vs. 3.365 (SD 0.788) µg/mL, respectively (P = 0.01). The median standardized histology score per pass with EUS-FNB was 5 (sufficient for histology) and for EUS-FNA was 2 (enough for cytology). Specimen adequacy for genomic profiling and yield of DNA was significantly higher with FNB than with FNA needles. Conclusions In this study, adequacy for genomic profiling, DNA, and histology yield were considerably superior using an EUS-FNB needle compared with an EUS-FNA needle.

Objective It is unclear whether endoscopic assessment of scars after colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has to include biopsies, even if endoscopy is negative. Vice versa, endoscopic diagnosis of recurrent adenoma may not require biopsy before endoscopic reinterventions. We prospectively analysed various endoscopic modalities in the diagnosis of recurrence following EMR. Design We conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy after EMR of large (≥20 mm) colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopists predicted recurrence and confidence level with four imaging modes: high-definition white light (WL) and narrow-band imaging (NBI) with and without near focus (NF). Separately, 26 experienced endoscopists assessed offline images. Results Two hundred and thirty patients with 255 EMR scars were included. The prevalence of recurrent adenoma was 24%. Diagnostic values were high for all modes (negative predictive value (NPV) ≥97%, positive predictive value (PPV) ≥81%, sensitivity ≥90%, specificity ≥93% and accuracy ≥93%). In high-confidence cases, NBI with NF had NPV of 100% (95% CI 98% to 100%) and sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93% to 100%). Use of clips at initial EMR increased diagnostic inaccuracy (adjusted OR=1.68(95% CI 1.01 to 2.75)). In offline assessment, specificity was high for all imaging modes (mean: ≥93% (range: 55%–100%)), while sensitivity was significantly higher for NBI-NF (82%(72%–93%)%)) compared with WL (69%(38%–86%); p<0.001), WL-NF (68%(55%–83%); p<0.001) and NBI (71%(59%–90%); p<0.001). Conclusion Our study demonstrates very high sensitivity and accuracy for all four imaging modalities, especially NBI with NF, for diagnosis of recurrent neoplasia after EMR. Our data strongly suggest that in cases of high confidence negative optical diagnosis based on NBI-NF, no biopsy is needed to confirm absence of recurrence during colorectal EMR follow-up. A high confidence positive optical diagnosis can lead to immediate resection of any suspicious area. In all cases of low confidence, biopsy is still required. Trial registration number NCT02668198 .

Abstract Background Proximal esophageal stents are poorly tolerated and have a high risk of complications. We report our experience using fully covered, biliary, self-expandable metal stents (B-SEMS) and narrow-diameter, esophageal, self-expandable metal stents (NDE-SEMS) for this group of patients. Methods 24 patients underwent placement of B-SEMS or NDE-SEMS for proximal esophageal lesions between 1 January 2011 and 31 July 2016. The outcomes included improvement of dysphagia, healing of fistulas, and adverse events. Results 10 patients received B-SEMS and 14 had NDE-SEMS. Median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 0.5 – 62 months). In both cohorts, stents were left in place for a mean of 6 weeks. The dysphagia score decreased in 7 (70 %) and 10 (71.4 %) patients, and fistulas resolved in 3/5 (60.0 %) and 5/8 (62.5 %) patients with B-SEMS and NDE-SEMS, respectively. Stent migration occurred in three patients (30.0 %) with B-SEMS and five patients (35.7 %) with NDE-SEMS. Conclusions Both stents were well tolerated and resulted in overall improvement of dysphagia in 70.8 % of patients. B-SEMS appeared to be more favorable for cervical esophageal lesions with narrower diameters, while NDE-SEMS may be better for more distal lesions.