Hashash, Jana

Abstract Background Immune dysregulation, immunosuppressive therapy and active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increase susceptibility to respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. We evaluated the risk of RSV infection in patients with active and nonactive IBD. Methods Using the TriNetX Analytics Network from October 2024 through March 2025, we identified adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with IBD. Patients were classified as having active IBD if they had recent IBD complications, IBD-related surgery, or elevated inflammatory markers (within preceding 6 months); those without recent complications,surgeries, or elevated inflammatory markers were classified as having nonactive IBD within the same period. Outcomes were assessed within 180 days after the index date and included RSV infection, bacterial pneumonia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation. Results Among 141 763 patients (47 883 patients with active IBD, 93 880 patients with nonactive IBD), 2879 patients with active IBD and 3583 with nonactive IBD received the RSV vaccination. After matching, each cohort included 46 308 patients. Active IBD was associated with higher odds of RSV infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.18-2.04), bacterial pneumonia (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 2.08-3.19), ICU admissions (aOR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.88-2.28), and mechanical ventilation (aOR, 2.41; 95% CI, 2.01-2.88). RSV risk remained higher among patients with active IBD both with and without systemic corticosteroid exposure. Among RSV-vaccinated patients, RSV infection rates were not significantly different between active and nonactive IBD (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.78-1.79). Conclusion Patients with active IBD had higher risk of RSV infection. Increased RSV risk was observed both among patients with active IBD with and without systemic corticosteroid exposure. Among RSV-vaccinated patients, RSV infection rates were not significantly different between active and nonactive IBD. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Abstract Background Appendectomy has been proposed to influence ulcerative colitis (UC) outcomes, but its effect based on timing before or after diagnosis and long-term UC outcomes remains unclear. Materials and Methods Using TriNetX U.S. Collaborative Network, we identified adults with UC (2010-2024) who underwent appendectomy before or after diagnosis. Two 1:1 propensity score-matched comparisons were performed: appendectomy-before-UC and appendectomy-after-UC versus controls. The primary outcome was a 5-year composite of oral/intravenous (IV) corticosteroid use or colectomy. Secondary outcomes included individual composite outcomes and advanced therapy initiation in biologic-naive patients. Subgroup analyses stratified by age and biologic exposure were also performed. Results After matching, appendectomy after UC diagnosis showed no association with the composite outcome (aHR 0.98, 95% CI, 0.83-1.16), oral steroids (aHR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.75-1.09), IV steroids (aHR 1.11, 95% CI, 0.87-1.43), colectomy (aHR 1.24, 95% CI, 0.77-1.99), or advanced therapy initiation (aHR 0.97, 95% CI, 0.63-1.48). Appendectomy before UC diagnosis also showed no difference in the composite outcome (aHR 0.91, 95% CI, 0.76-1.09), oral steroids (aHR 0.88, 95% CI, 0.72-1.08), colectomy (aHR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.60-1.63), or advanced therapy initiation (aHR 0.77, 95% CI, 0.53-1.13). However, IV steroid use was reduced (aHR 0.68, 95% CI, 0.51-0.90, P = .006). In subgroup analyses, advanced therapy initiation was lower in patients aged 18-40 years following appendectomy after UC diagnosis (aHR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.33-0.96, P = .03). Conclusion Appendectomy was not associated with improved long-term UC outcomes of oral/IV steroid use, colectomy or initiation of advanced therapy regardless of timing.

ABSTRACT Complete esophageal obstruction is a rare but serious complication of endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVBL). We present the case of a 75-year-old man with cirrhosis and esophageal varices who developed acute esophageal obstruction following EVBL, which was successfully managed with a combination of endoscopic scissors to cut the band and through-the-scope balloon dilation, restoring luminal patency and recanalization of the esophagus. This case highlights the importance of prevention, early recognition, and timely management of this rare but important complication of EVBL. Key management options addressed include preventive, conservative, and interventional strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Background Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of herpes zoster (HZ) infection due to innate immune abnormalities and use of immunosuppressive therapy. The recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is recommended, but its efficacy in preventing recurrent HZ among patients with IBD is not well established. Methods Using data from the TriNetX Linked Network, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with IBD and a prior uncomplicated HZ episode. Patients with IBD who received RZV were propensity score-matched 1:1 with those who did not. The primary outcome was subsequent HZ complications. Secondary outcomes included subtypes of HZ complications and recurrent uncomplicated HZ. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated via Cox proportional hazards models. Results After matching, 1260 vaccinated and 1260 unvaccinated patients with IBD were included. Compared to the unvaccinated cohort, patients receiving RZV had a significantly reduced incidence of HZ complications (7.4% vs. 14.5%; HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58–0.97; P = .028). Postherpetic neuralgia was notably decreased (5.8% vs. 12.5%; HR, 0.66; P = .010), and no central nervous system involvement occurred among vaccinated patients. Protective effects were more pronounced in patients with ulcerative colitis, females, and those not receiving immunosuppressive therapy. Conclusions RZV substantially lowers the risk of HZ complications in patients with IBD, offering significant clinical benefits to those at high risk due to immunosuppression. These findings underscore the importance of RZV as part of preventive care strategies in patients with IBD.

INTRODUCTION: Evidence-based recommendations for sexual practices regarding anoreceptive intercourse (ARI) do not exist in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA). This study surveys providers on perspectives and attitudes related to sexual practices after IPAA. METHODS: We developed a 23-item survey and distributed it to providers caring for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. RESULTS: 95% of providers believe that it is important to discuss sexual orientation or practices before IPAA, but only 27% routinely discuss this. 50% did not feel comfortable and 74% did not feel confident discussing ARI recommendations with patients who underwent or will undergo IPAA. DISCUSSION: Future interventions should aim to standardize recommendations regarding feasibility and time line to safe ARI after IPAA.