Citations

Background: Pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) is a rare interstitial lung disease (ILD) associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). Its clinical characteristics and outcomes in SARDs remain poorly defined. Objectives: To describe demographics, imaging patterns, and outcomes in SARD-associated PPFE. Methods: Patients diagnosed with PPFE and SARDs at Mayo Clinic (2000-2024) were included. PPFE diagnosis was confirmed by high-resolution computed tomography, and SARD diagnoses were established by rheumatologists. Results: Fifteen of 62 patients with PPFE had SARDs with majority having systemic sclerosis (SSc)(n= 7, 46%). Median age at PPFE diagnosis was 57.2 years; 80% were female; 40% were ever-smokers; 40% required supplemental oxygen; 5 had pulmonary hypertension. Coexisting ILD patterns included UIP (26.7%) and NSIP (20%). Coexisting ILD patterns included usual interstitial pneumonia (26.7%) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (20%). Three patients died, including two with SSc. Conclusion: Systemic sclerosis was the most frequently observed SARD among patients with PPFE, and may coexist with other ILD patterns; recognition may inform risk stratification, multidisciplinary evaluation, and longitudinal follow-up.

Objective Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can stabilize or improve lung function in systemic sclerosis–related interstitial lung disease (SSc‐ILD). We hypothesized that combining MMF with pirfenidone (PFD) would produce a significantly more rapid and/or greater improvement in lung function. Methods A randomized (1:1), double‐blind, placebo (PLA)‐controlled phase 2 trial was conducted in SSc‐ILD in which patients received PFD or PLA (801 mg three times daily) along with MMF (1,500 mg twice daily) for 18 months. The primary outcome was change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC‐%). Linear mixed‐effects models assessed treatment differences in a modified intention‐to‐treat population. Results Only fifty‐one of 150 intended subjects (34%) were randomized (MMF+PLA, n = 24; MMF+PFD, n = 27). The FVC‐% improved from baseline to 18 months by 2.24 ± 1.35 (least‐squares mean [LSM] ± SEM) in the MMF+PLA group and 2.09 ± 1.28 in the MMF+PFD group (LSM treatment difference −0.14; P = 0.93). Median time to achieve a ≥3% improvement in FVC‐% was numerically faster in the MMF+PFD versus MMF+PLA group (12.3 vs 17.8 months, respectively), but the difference was not significant ( P = 0.33). For secondary outcomes, only the change over 18 months in the Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29‐item physical function score, favoring MMF+PFD, reached statistical significance ( P = 0.04). Although other related patient‐reported outcomes (PROs) numerically favored the MMF+PFD group, as did quantitative high‐resolution computed tomography measures of ILD, the differences between groups did not reach statistical significance. Early withdrawals from study medication and adverse events of special interest were numerically greater with MMF+PFD (n = 8 vs 2 and n = 20 vs 7, respectively). Conclusion In this underpowered study, there was no statistically significant treatment difference in overall change in FVC‐% between groups. MMF+PFD was not as well tolerated as MMF+PLA.

Introduction: Cardiac involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) can present variably from being asymptomatic to manifesting with heart failure, conduction abnormalities, pulmonary hypertension, and pericardial effusion. Symptomatic cardiac involvement portends a poor prognosis and worse overall survival. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV), an angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, has been shown to significantly reduce hospitalization rates and morbidity in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to investigate the effects of SV treatment in patients with SSc and heart failure. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients with SSc was conducted using an electronic data capture tool. Patients with SSc treated with SV between January 2015 and August 2023 were identified. Comprehensive clinical phenotyping and longitudinal data analysis were performed to characterize the sub-type of patients and evaluate clinical outcomes, including hospitalizations and mortality, laboratory markers, and echocardiographic findings. Results: Twenty-four patients with SSc were treated with SV for a mean duration of 20.6 months. HFrEF was the primary indication for SV use in 91% of patients, primarily due to non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (87.5%). There was a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure from 128 mmHg to 114 mmHg (p < 0.001) and NT-proBNP levels from 15,130 pg/mL to 5082 pg/mL (p = 0.046). In the 19 patients with baseline and follow-up echocardiograms, there was a significant improvement in LVEF from 40.3% to 47.7% (p = 0.014). Hypotension was a common side effect leading to discontinuation of SV (n = 4, 16.7%). Serum creatinine had trends of improvement (1.9 mg/dL to 1.3 mg/d), though it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.057). Conclusions: This study showed that SV effectively improved cardiac symptoms and function in patients with SSc presenting with HFrEF. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the role of SV in the treatment of other manifestations of SSc.

Abstract Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease (SARD) primarily associated with articular involvement, but is often associated with lung involvement, sometimes preceding articular symptoms. Common pulmonary manifestations include interstitial lung disease (ILD), airway, and serosal involvement. RA-related pleural disease can mimic empyema due to the pleural fluid's green, pus-like appearance, exudative nature, low pH, markedly low glucose, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Empyema sometimes yields negative cultures which can accentuate the diagnostic challenge in such cases. This report presents a patient with RA-related pleural lung disease who was referred to our hospital with trapped lung presumed to be secondary to empyema in the setting of pleural-based pulmonary abscess. Case Report A 66-year-old female with a 22-year history of RA presented with recurrent right-sided pleural effusions and progressive dyspnea over three years. Her initial presentation in 2022 involved a large right-sided pleural effusion, suspected to result from a ruptured pleural-based pulmonary abscess that led to empyema and subsequently a trapped lung. Pleural fluid analysis showed elevated LDH (1364 U/L), low glucose (45 mg/dL), high cholesterol (121 mg/dL), and low triglycerides (79 mg/dL). Due to refractory exudative effusion and a comprehensive negative infectious evaluation (bacterial, mycobacterial, and fungal cultures), RA-related pleural disease was suspected. The patient underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which revealed pleural-based rheumatoid nodules and pleural thickening. (figure1) Lung and pleural biopsies confirmed RA-associated fibrinous pleuritis, RA-associated follicular bronchiolitis, and usual interstitial pneumonitis. Given the complexity of the infection, a thoracotomy with decortication and pleurectomy was planned and conducted in stages. Immunosuppressive regimen was switched from leflunomide to rituximab. Discussion This case underscores the diagnostic complexity in distinguishing RA-associated pleural effusion from empyema. Features such as pleural nodularity resembling a pulmonary abscess, unilateral exudative effusion, grossly purulent pleural fluid, low pH and glucose, and elevated LDH levels led to an initial misdiagnosis of empyema. Characteristic pleural fluid, along with persistent negative cultures and absence of sepsis pointed towards RA-related pleural disease. VATS and biopsy were instrumental in establishing the final diagnosis through characteristic histopathological findings of RA-associated pleural, parenchymal and airway involvement. Conclusion For RA patients with pleural effusion suggestive of empyema, especially in the context of negative cultures and no signs of sepsis, RA-related pleural disease should be a consideration. Early recognition and timely immunosuppressive therapy escalation can prevent complications such as trapped lungs and reduce the necessity for extensive surgical interventions. Figure1:

AbstractPeripheral spondyloarthritis (pSpA) encompasses multiple entities affecting the musculoskeletal system with classic findings of synovitis, enthesitis, and tenosynovitis. It remains poorly defined when compared with the axial spondyloarthritides due to nonspecific symptoms, ill-defined imaging findings, and lack of specific testable biomarkers. Previous research has tried to distinguish between the two disease entities using clinical presentations, scoring systems, and radiographic findings; however, overlap remains. We summarize the current classification of pSpA, imaging findings, and the distinction between these entities and axial spondyloarthritis.

Background and Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of connective tissue disease (CTD). (a) Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) can be utilised to improve dyspnoea and quality of life in patients with chronic lung conditions, including both obstructive and restrictive lung diseases. (b) This study aims to determine if PR can be a useful therapy to improve functional capacity and self-reported measures of dyspnoea in patients with CTD-ILD. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of CTD-ILD at a tertiary centre were prospectively enrolled to receive PR in this study. The primary outcome was a change in the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) between baseline and 8 weeks after PR. The secondary outcome measures included pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS→) Dyspnoea, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), which were collected before and at 8 weeks after PR. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Twenty-one patients were included in the data analysis. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1 . Following PR, there was a statistically significant improvement in the 6MWT ( Figure 1 ). Improvement in scores was observed in LCQ and the symptom domain of the SGRQ. Trends towards improvement were noted in PROMIS → Dyspnoea scores. Conclusion: In CTD-ILD patients, an 8-week course of PR led to improvements in functional capacity (6MWT) and certain quality of life domains (LCQ and symptom domain of SGRQ). Future studies are required to determine the longer-term benefit of PR in CTD-ILD patients and if these improvements are sustained.