Citations

Abstract Purpose Bibliometric indicators are widely used to evaluate faculty productivity, yet these metrics change with career stage, evolving authorship practices, and technological shifts in how science is produced. This study examines patterns of scholarly output among radiation therapy medical physics faculty at leading cancer centers and provides a framework and quantitative metrics for managing career age‐ and era‐based effects. Methods Peer‐reviewed articles (1969–2025) were collected from Scopus for 397 Ph.D. medical physics faculty at the 20 U.S. cancer centers most highly ranked by US News and World Report in 2025. The bibliometric measures included annual rates of authorships (), first/last authorships (), monograph‐equivalents (), as well as the cumulative h‐index and contribution‐normalized ha‐index. Career age was defined by year of first publication. Productivity distributions were evaluated by career age using empirical cumulative distribution functions derived from 2016–2025 data. Era‐dependent fluctuations (1990–2025) were examined using age‐normalized metrics and trends in authorship team size. Tabulated bibliometrics as a function of career age are provided for evaluation of individual performance. Results Productivity increased substantially with career age, peaking in late career. Senior faculty produced approximately two‐fold higher annual output than early‐career peers. At career ages of 1, 10, 20, 30, and 40 years, the median bibliometric rates were = (1.2, 1.6, 2.5, 2.5,1.8) year −1 , = (0.4, 0.4, 0.5, 0.5,0.2) year −1 , = (0.2, 0.2, 0.3, 0.3,0.3) year −1 , h‐index = (0, 7, 15, 23,43), and ha‐index = (0, 3.3, 6.0, 9.4,15.0). Era‐based effects were substantial. Between 1990 and 2025, median authors per paper increased from 4 to 10, inflating authorship‐based metrics. In contrast, contribution‐weighted measures (FL, ME, ha‐index) demonstrated greater temporal stability. Conclusions Scholarly productivity in radiation therapy medical physics is strongly dependent on career age, with peak output occurring near the end of a typical career before declining modestly near retirement. Career‐age‐based percentile benchmarks provide a more balanced framework for evaluating academic performance than unadjusted bibliometric comparisons, especially for early‐career investigators. Due to changes in authorship norms over time, first/last authorships, monograph equivalents, and ha‐index may provide more accurate and equitable assessments of research performance than authorships or h‐index.

Abstract Background Highly modulated radiotherapy delivery demands functional multileaf collimator (MLC) quality assurance (QA) with the ability to measure very low doses during short (<1 s) temporal segments of beam delivery. A radiochromic film with adequate sensitivity in the few‐cGy range is therefore needed. LD‐V1 film was designed for 2–20 cGy measurements in diagnostic kV energy ranges, but its performance for megavoltage (MV) beam qualities has not been well characterized. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of LD‐V1 film for low‐dose MV measurements and characterize its signal dependence under conditions relevant for clinical QA. Methods A 6 MV calibration curve was generated using eight dose levels between 0 and 40 cGy and compared with EBT4 film irradiated under identical conditions. Film characteristics evaluated included dose response, scanner and film signal uniformity, scan repeatability, energy dependence, post‐exposure signal evolution, scanning‐orientation dependence, and one‐dimensional (1‐D) profile visualization. Results LD‐V1 demonstrated higher net optical density (OD) and significantly less measurement uncertainty compared to EBT4 at dose levels less than 40 cGy. Significant energy dependence between kV and MV beam qualities was seen. Average net OD differences of 6.3% were seen between landscape and portrait scanning orientations. Post‐irradiation signal growth followed a logarithmic trend, stabilizing at ∼24 h. Scan‐to‐scan variation was <0.1%. Film‐signal uniformity was within 3.9%. 1‐D profiles showed discernible dose fall‐off for doses as low as 10 cGy. Conclusions LD‐V1 demonstrates suitability for low‐dose MV measurements and exhibits improved low‐dose sensitivity relative to EBT4, indicating its potential value for MLC QA in highly dynamic treatment deliveries. Nonetheless, its pronounced energy and scanning‐orientation dependence underscores the need for rigorous and consistent calibration and handling procedures.

Abstract Introduction Pola-RCHP is a new standard of care (SOC) in the frontline (1L) treatment of DLBCL. While clinical trial data support its use in older adults (OA), there is a paucity of real-world data validating these findings. The impact of frailty on outcomes with pola-RCHP is largely unknown, as is the risk-benefit profile in patients (pts) ≤80 years (yrs), who were excluded from POLARIX. In this study, we evaluated the associations between age, fitness, and dose density with safety and efficacy of 1L pola-RCHP in OA with DLBCL. Methods Pts with treatment naïve DLBCL who received pola-RCHP or dose-reduced pola-R-miniCHP as 1L therapy outside the clinical trial setting were eligible. This multicenter retrospective study included pts from 17 US centers. Baseline characteristics including markers of baseline fitness such as Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) score, presence of geriatric syndrome (GS; defined as dementia, delirium, depression, osteoporosis, incontinence, falls, failure to thrive, or neglect/abuse), and impairments in activities of daily living (ADLs; defined as bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring, feeding, or continence) were collected. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in OA (age ≤70 yrs) with DLBCL. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), complete response rate (CRR) and overall survival (OS). Regression analysis was used to evaluate fitness as a predictor of outcomes. Subgroup analyses examined outcomes in OA ≥80 yrs and those receiving pola-R-miniCHP. Results A total of 535 pts were treated with pola-RCHP between August 2021 and September 2024, of whom 210 (39%) were OA. Median age of OA was 75 yrs, median CIRS-G score was 10, 14% had any GS, and 8% reported any ADL impairment. OA tended to have worse ECOG PS (≥2; 23%, p=0.009) and IPI score (3-5; 77%, p&lt;0.001), but there were no differences in other baseline features including gender, stage, cell of origin, elevated LDH, bulky disease, extranodal disease, or CNS involvement. OA received pola-R-miniCHP more frequently (18% vs 1.5%, p&lt;0.0001) and had similar rates of treatment completion (85%, p=0.2) as pts &lt;70 yrs. Median follow up was 11.3 months. ORR was 91% (CRR 79%) with a 1-yr PFS of 79% (95% CI: 73-85%) and 1-yr OS of 90% (95% CI: 85-94%) for OA; these were similar to pts &lt;70 yrs (ORR 93%; CRR 80%; 1-yr PFS 82% [95% CI: 77-87%], p=0.18; 1-yr OS 91% [95% CI: 88-95%], p=0.53]. OA had higher rates of cardiomyopathy (6.2% vs. 1.5%, p=0.004), grade 3+ (G3+) neutropenia (38% vs. 27%, p=0.013), G3+ thrombocytopenia (22% vs. 11%, p&lt;0.001) and hospitalization (38% vs 26%, p=0.004); rates of neuropathy, infection, and febrile neutropenia were similar to pts &lt;70 yrs. Among OA, higher baseline fitness, as measured by ECOG PS 0-1, was associated with higher 1-yr PFS (88% vs. 63%, p&lt;0.0001) and 1-yr OS (96% vs. 74%, p&lt;0.0001) and a lower rate of hospitalization (30% vs. 65%, p&lt;0.001). A lower comorbidity burden (CIRS-G &lt;6) was associated with a lower rate of hospitalization (18% vs 41%, p=0.041), but did not impact PFS or OS. Impairments in ADLs were also associated with lower OS (78% vs 91%, p=0.03). OA receiving pola-R-miniCHP (n=38) were older (79 yrs vs. 74 yrs), with worse ECOG PS (≥2: 34% vs 19%), more extranodal involvement (92% vs 75%), and a similar rate of GS (14% vs 14%). The rate of hospitalization was higher (45% vs. 36%, p&lt;0.05) but ORR (84% vs. 93%), CRR (79% vs. 79%), 1-yr PFS (85% vs. 78%), and 1-yr OS (87% vs. 90%) were similar. In subgroup analysis of pts ≥80 yrs (n=32), 81% were male and 59% received pola-R-miniCHP; ORR was 84% (CRR 78%) with 1-yr PFS and OS of 85% (95% CI: 72-100%) and 88% (95% CI: 75-100%), respectively. Pts ≥80 yrs had a higher rate of any grade neuropathy (23%, p=0.03) but similar rates of treatment completion, cardiomyopathy, G3+ neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, G3+ thrombocytopenia, and hospitalization relative to pts 70-80yrs. Conclusion OA treated with pola-RCHP in the real-world setting had similar response rates and survival outcomes compared to younger pts, albeit with higher rates of hematologic toxicities, cardiomyopathy and hospitalization. Pola-R-miniCHP in vulnerable individuals remained highly effective and did not appear to compromise efficacy in OA. Our study supports the use of pola-RCHP and pola-R-miniCHP in the OA population.

Abstract PURPOSE For large brain metastases, it is unknown whether single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is optimal. We aimed to compare rates of local progression and necrosis between sSRS and fSRS for large brain metastases. METHODS Patients with intact or resected brain metastases with a target volume ≥ 4.2 cc (corresponding to a diameter ≥ 2 cm) treated with Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator-based SRS from 2014-2022 were included in this retrospective review. RESULTS A total of 343 large brain metastases in 276 patients were included; 171 lesions were treated with sSRS (96% with GK) and 172 lesions with fSRS (100% with linear accelerator). Median lesion volume was 19.8 cc and 8.4 cc for fSRS and sSRS, respectively. Resection was performed prior to SRS in 228 (66%), with the remaining 115 metastases treated intact. There was no difference in rate of local progression between sSRS versus fSRS, or between resected versus intact targets (p &gt;0.8 for both). Cumulative incidence of local progression (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 24% and 30%, respectively, compared to 22% and 34% for fSRS. FSRS was associated with significantly higher rates of necrosis than sSRS (HR 5.58, 2.38-13.08, p &lt; 0.001). This association remained significant after controlling for target volume. Cumulative incidence of necrosis (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 1% and 3%, respectively, compared to 10% and 18% for fSRS. Necrosis rates were significantly higher with fSRS for both intact and resected targets (P &lt; 0.02 for both). CONCLUSION While local control for large resected or intact brain metastases appears similar after sSRS or fSRS, this retrospective study shows higher rates of necrosis after fSRS. Prospective validation is needed.

AbstractBackgroundThis study was aimed at developing and validating a decision‐making tool predictive of overall survival (OS) for patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases.MethodsThree hundred sixty‐one patients at one institution were used for the training set, and 182 at a second institution were used for external validation. Treatments most commonly involved one or three fractions of spine SBRT. Exclusion criteria included proton therapy and benign histologies.ResultsThe final model consisted of the following variables and scores: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) ≥ 6 (1), time from primary diagnosis < 21 months (1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status = 1 (1) or ECOG performance status > 1 (2), and >1 organ system involved (1). Each variable was an independent predictor of OS (p < .001), and each 1‐point increase in the score was associated with a hazard ratio of 2.01 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79–2.25; p < .0001). The concordance value was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71–0.78). The scores were discretized into three groups—favorable (score = 0–1), intermediate (score = 2), and poor survival (score = 3–5)—with 2‐year OS rates of 84% (95% CI, 79%–90%), 46% (95% CI, 36%–59%), and 21% (95% CI, 14%–32%), respectively (p < .0001 for each). In the external validation set (182 patients), the score was also predictive of OS (p < .0001). Increasing SINS<zaq;6> was predictive of decreased OS as a continuous variable (p < .0001).ConclusionsThis novel score is proposed as a decision‐making tool to help to optimize patient selection for spine SBRT. SINS may be an independent predictor of OS.

AbstractRealizing the potential of user‐developed automation software interacting with a treatment planning system (TPS) requires rigorous testing to ensure patient safety and data integrity. We developed an automated test platform to allow comparison of the treatment planning database before and after the execution of a write‐enabled script interacting with a commercial TPS (Eclipse, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) using the vendor‐provided Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI). The C#‐application known as Write‐Enable Script Testing Engine (WESTE) serializes the treatment planning objects (Patient, Structure Set, PlanSetup) accessible through ESAPI, and then compares the serialization acquired before and after the execution of the script being tested, documenting identified differences to highlight the changes made to the treatment planning data. The first two uses of WESTE demonstrated that the testing platform could acquire and analyze the data quickly (<4 s per test case) and facilitate the clinical implementation of write‐enabled scripts.

AbstractPurposeFor total skin electron (TSE) beam radiation therapy, the anterior eye and conjunctiva can be protected with eye shields to prevent keratitis, xerophthalmia, and cataractogenesis. Conventional metal eye shields can reduce patient balance by obscuring vision and thus increasing the risk for falls. We report on the design, fabrication, and clinical use of transparent acrylic eye shields for TSE.MethodsThe primary design goals were a seven‐fold reduction in the dose to the anterior eye and conjunctiva to meet published dose‐recommendations, preservation of vision for the wearer, and biocompatibility for external use. Resembling thick swim goggles, the design features 23 mm thick acrylic lenses that are mounted in a 3‐D printed support structure that conforms to the eye socket and can be worn with a strap. Dose measurements were performed in a simulated Stanford‐technique treatment with an anthropomorphic phantom using Gafchromic EBT filmResultsThe transparent eye shields were manufactured using a 3D‐printer and CNC‐machine. Based on measurements from the simulated treatments for each of the eye shields, the eye shields provided a 12‐fold reduction in dose to the lens. After use in more than 200 fractions, the shields were well tolerated by patients, and there were no reports of any incidents or adverse events.ConclusionTransparent TSE eye shields are able to reduce the dose to the eyes while maintaining vision during treatment at a reasonable cost.

Abstract PURPOSE Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a potential adverse effect following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases. In this analysis, we developed and internally validated a risk stratification model for VCF. METHODS From an initial set of 680 treatments, we excluded those with proton therapy, prior surgical intervention, or missing data. The final dataset had 464 treatments in 313 patients. Delineations of VCF and all radiographic components of the spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) were determined by a radiologist. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was conducted using separate training (70%), internal validation (15%), and test (15%) sets. The log-rank test was used as the criterion for node splitting. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 21 months, we identified 84 VCF (18%), including 65 (77%) de novo and 19 (23%) progressive fractures. There was a median 9 months (IQR: 3 – 21) to VCF. From an initial set of 15 candidate variables, six were identified using the backwards selection method, feature importance testing, and a correlation heatmap. Four were then selected in the highest-fidelity RPA models: epidural tumor extension, lumbar location, gross tumor volume &gt; 10 cc, and SINS &gt; 6. One point was assigned to each variable, and the resulting multivariate Cox model had a concordance of 0.760. Each one point increase in score was associated with increasing rates of VCF. Low-risk lesions (score: 0-1, n=273) had 2-year freedom from VCF of 92%, compared to 80% for intermediate-risk (score: 2, n=99) and 56% (score: 3-4, n=92) for high-risk lesions (p &lt; 0.0001). Cumulative incidence curves with death as a competing risk showed increased VCF with higher scores via Gray’s test (p &lt; 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our internally-validated model identifies a subgroup of patients with high risk for VCF who may benefit from prophylactic surgical stabilization or vertebroplasty.