Malkov, Victor

Abstract Background Highly modulated radiotherapy delivery demands functional multileaf collimator (MLC) quality assurance (QA) with the ability to measure very low doses during short (<1 s) temporal segments of beam delivery. A radiochromic film with adequate sensitivity in the few‐cGy range is therefore needed. LD‐V1 film was designed for 2–20 cGy measurements in diagnostic kV energy ranges, but its performance for megavoltage (MV) beam qualities has not been well characterized. Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of LD‐V1 film for low‐dose MV measurements and characterize its signal dependence under conditions relevant for clinical QA. Methods A 6 MV calibration curve was generated using eight dose levels between 0 and 40 cGy and compared with EBT4 film irradiated under identical conditions. Film characteristics evaluated included dose response, scanner and film signal uniformity, scan repeatability, energy dependence, post‐exposure signal evolution, scanning‐orientation dependence, and one‐dimensional (1‐D) profile visualization. Results LD‐V1 demonstrated higher net optical density (OD) and significantly less measurement uncertainty compared to EBT4 at dose levels less than 40 cGy. Significant energy dependence between kV and MV beam qualities was seen. Average net OD differences of 6.3% were seen between landscape and portrait scanning orientations. Post‐irradiation signal growth followed a logarithmic trend, stabilizing at ∼24 h. Scan‐to‐scan variation was <0.1%. Film‐signal uniformity was within 3.9%. 1‐D profiles showed discernible dose fall‐off for doses as low as 10 cGy. Conclusions LD‐V1 demonstrates suitability for low‐dose MV measurements and exhibits improved low‐dose sensitivity relative to EBT4, indicating its potential value for MLC QA in highly dynamic treatment deliveries. Nonetheless, its pronounced energy and scanning‐orientation dependence underscores the need for rigorous and consistent calibration and handling procedures.

Abstract Background MR‐guided adaptive radiotherapy (ART) allows for daily plan optimization based on patient‐specific anatomy. Accumulated doses, driven by deformable image registration (DIR), of daily fractions can provide cumulative dose metrics and insights into toxicity and tumor control. In prostate ART, inter‐ and intra‐factional deformations, particularly due to bladder and rectum, pose a challenge to accurate DIR generation. Purpose To quantify geometric and dosimetric accuracy of a proposed prostate MR‐to‐MR DIR approach to support MR‐guided ART dose accumulation. Methods We evaluated DIR accuracy in 25 patients treated with 30 Gy in five fractions on a 1.5 T MR‐linac using an adaptive workflow. For all patients, a reference MR was used for planning, with three images collected at each fraction: adapt MR for adaptive planning, verify MR for pretreatment position verification and beam‐on for capturing anatomy during radiation delivery. We assessed three DIR approaches: intensity‐based, intensity‐based with controlling structures (CS), and intensity‐based with controlling structures and points of interest (CS + P). DIRs were performed between the reference and fraction images and within fractions (adapt‐to‐verify and adapt‐to‐beam‐on). For the evaluation, we propagated CTV, bladder, and rectum contours using the DIRs and compared each to manually delineated contours using Dice similarity coefficient, mean distance to agreement, and dose–volume metrics. Results CS and CS + P improved geometric agreement between manual and propagated contours over intensity‐only DIR. For example, mean distance to agreement (DTA mean ) for reference‐to‐beam‐on intensity‐only DIR was 0.131 ± 0.009 cm (CTV), 0.46 ± 0.08 cm (bladder), and 0.154 ± 0.013 cm (rectum). For the CS, the DTA mean values were 0.018 ± 0.002, 0.388 ± 0.14, and 0.036 ± 0.013 cm. Finally, for CS + P, these values were 0.015 ± 0.001, 0.025 ± 0.004, and 0.021 ± 0.002 cm. Dosimetrically, comparing CS and CS + P for reference to beam‐on DIRs resulted in a change of CTV D98% from [−29 cGy, 19 cGy] to [−18 cGy, 26 cGy], bladder D5cc from [−51 cGy, 544 cGy] to [−79 cGy, 36 cGy], and rectum D1cc from [−106 cGy, 72 cGy] to [−52 cGy, 74 cGy]. Conclusion CS improved geometric and dosimetric accuracy over intensity‐only DIR, with CS + P providing further performance improvement, particularly for bladder. However, session image segmentation remains a challenge, which may be addressed with automated contouring.

AbstractIntroductionUsing diagnostic CT for radiotherapy (RT) planning can bypass traditional CT simulation but introduces challenges in patient positioning and Hounsfield unit (HU) fidelity, affecting dose accuracy. Here a Varian Ethos adaptive‐driven CT direct‐to‐treatment (DtT) multi‐fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) workflow is presented.MethodsThis study employed institutional diagnostic PET‐CT images to generate an initial reference Ethos treatment plan. HU and dosimetric accuracy were validated for PET‐CT, Ethos CBCT images (with and without Hypersight (HS), and the gold‐standard helical CT simulators). Following the SBRT reference plan creation on the low dose diagnostic PET‐CT, the first fraction was delivered with a newly generated adaptive plan calculated on the HS CBCT (Ethos) images. For multi‐fraction treatments, the first day CBCT images and adaptive plan become the reference for subsequent IGRT treatments. This study includes workflow validation and initial three patient experience.ResultsThe DtT adaptive SBRT workflow was successfully implemented, with initial end‐to‐end testing demonstrating feasibility. In‐house solutions were introduced to facilitate the adaptive to IGRT plan conversion. The Ethos system, especially with HS, maintained HU fidelity and dose calculation accuracy comparable to helical CTs. On‐table adaptive sessions were within 37–51 min, aligning with single‐fraction palliative studies. Subsequent non‐adaptive IGRT fractions were efficiently completed within 7–27 min.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates the feasibility of DtT adaptive‐driven multifraction SBRT using diagnostic PET‐CT. This approach reduces the need for on‐site patient presence prior to treatment, expands planning lead times, and improves overall efficiency in radiotherapy for well selected patients.

Abstract Background Magnetic Resonance‐guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) systems are increasingly used in clinical practice, necessitating a dedicated dosimetry protocol to address the challenges posed by the presence of strong magnetic fields. Purpose AAPM TG351 introduces a reference dosimetry protocol for external beam MRgRT systems, aligning with AAPM TG51 reports and incorporating elements from the IAEA TRS398 code of practice. Methods The protocol offers practical guidance on beam quality and dosimetry setup in the presence of strong magnetic fields. It reviews relevant literature to identify reference‐class chambers suitable for external beam MRgRT systems and determines their beam quality conversion and other relevant correction factors through a detailed analysis of available data and associated uncertainties. Results AAPM TG351 offers a comprehensive dosimetry protocol for external beam MRgRT systems, addressing the unique challenges posed by the presence of magnetic fields. It includes detailed guidance for measurement setups, a list of reference‐class chambers appropriate for reference dosimetry in MRgRT systems, and updated beam quality conversion and correction factors. Additionally, the protocol presents an in‐depth analysis of the uncertainty budget, identifying key contributors and providing strategies to minimize uncertainties, thereby enhancing clinical accuracy and reliability. Conclusions This protocol provides a practical, evidence‐based reference for medical physicists conducting reference dosimetry in external beam MRgRT systems.

AbstractBackgroundMagnetic resonance (MR)‐guided radiation therapy provides capabilities to utilize high‐resolution and real‐time MR imaging before and during treatment, which is critical for adaptive radiotherapy. This emerging modality has been promptly adopted in the clinic settings in advance of adaptations to reference dosimetry formalism that are needed to account for the presence of strong magnetic fields. In particular, the influence of magnetic field on the uncertainty of parameters in the reference dosimetry equation needs to be determined in order to fully characterize the uncertainty budget for reference dosimetry in MR‐guided radiation therapy systems.PurposeTo identify and quantify key sources of uncertainty in the reference dosimetry of external high energy radiotherapy beams in the presence of a strong magnetic field.MethodsIn the absence of a formalized Task Group report for reference dosimetry in MR‐integrated linacs, the currently suggested formalism follows the TG‐51 protocol with the addition of a quality conversion factor kBQ accounting for the effects of the magnetic field on ionization chamber response. In this work, we quantify various sources of uncertainty that impact each of the parameters in the formalism, and evaluate their overall contribution to the final dose. Measurements are done in a 1.5 T MR‐Linac (Unity, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) which integrates a 1.5 T Philips MR scanner and a 7 MVFFF linac. The responses of several reference‐class small volume ionization chambers (Exradin:A1SL, IBA:CC13, PTW:Semiflex‐3D) and Farmer type ionization chambers (Exradin:A19, IBA:FC65‐G) were evaluated throughout this process. Long‐term reproducibility and stability of beam quality, , was also measured with an in‐house built phantom.ResultsRelative to the conventional external high energy linacs, the uncertainty on overall reference dose in MR‐linac is more significantly affected by the chamber setup: A translational displacement along y‐axis of ± 3 mm results in dose variation of < |0.20| ± 0.02% (k = 1), while rotation of ± 5° in horizontal and vertical parallel planes relative to relative to the direction of magnetic field, did not exceed variation of < |0.44| ± 0.02% for all 5 ionization chambers. We measured a larger dose variation for xy‐plane (horizontal) rotations (< |0.44| ± 0.02% (k = 1)) than for yz‐plane (vertical) rotations (< ||0.28| ± 0.02% (k = 1)), which we associate with the gradient of kB,Q as a function of chamber orientation with respect to direction of the B0‐field. Uncertainty in Pion (for two depths), Ppol (with various sub‐studies including effects of cable length, cable looping in the MRgRT bore, connector type in magnetic environment), and Prp were determined. Combined conversion factor kQ× kB,Q was provided for two reference depths at four cardinal angle orientations. Over a two‐year period, beam quality was quite stable with being 0.669 ± 0.01%. The actual magnitude of was measured using identical equipment and compared between two different Elekta Unity MR‐Linacs with results agreeing to within 0.21%.ConclusionIn this work, the uncertainty of a number of parameters influencing reference dosimetry was quantified. The results of this work can be used to identify best practice guidelines for reference dosimetry in the presence of magnetic fields, and to evaluate an uncertainty budget for future reference dosimetry protocols for MR‐linac.