Citations

Importance Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is associated with reduced cognition. It is uncertain whether revascularization might be an effective treatment for cognitive impairment in these patients. Objective To test whether any cognitive benefit from revascularization of high-grade, asymptomatic ICA stenosis varies based on the degree of baseline cerebral hemodynamic impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This substudy was conducted within a multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial. Adults (aged 35-86 years) without dementia with eighth-grade education or higher and unilateral asymptomatic ICA stenosis greater than or equal to 70% were enrolled from January 2018 to July 2024 at 61 sites in North America (last follow-up in July 2025). Of 607 participants screened from 2485 in CREST-2, 392 were enrolled. Magnetic resonance or computed tomographic perfusion imaging tested for baseline hemodynamic impairment defined by delayed time-to-peak (TTP) arrival of intravenous contrast in the hemisphere ipsilateral minus contralateral to the stenotic artery. Intervention Carotid revascularization (endarterectomy or stenting) plus intensive medical management (IMM) vs IMM alone. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the difference in composite cognitive z score over 1 year based on 5 cognitive tests. The primary analysis tested for an interaction between treatment group (revascularization vs IMM alone) and degree of baseline hemodynamic impairment among those with reduced baseline cognition (cognitive z score ≤−1.0 SD). Results Of 392 participants enrolled (mean age, 71 years; 125 [32%] females), 61 were excluded for missing baseline imaging and 40 for missing cognitive examinations or other covariates, leaving 291 with complete data. Fifty-one had reduced cognition at baseline (25 in the revascularization group and 26 in the IMM alone group). TTP ranged from no interhemispheric TTP delay to a more-than-2-second delay. Mean (SD) cognitive z scores were −1.36 (0.51) at baseline and −1.17 (0.47) at 1 year in the revascularization group and −1.34 (0.83) at baseline and −1.01 (0.97) at 1 year in the IMM alone group. The primary analysis showed no difference in cognition by treatment group over 1 year, adjusting for treatment group × hemodynamic status interaction and other covariates (adjusted difference in cognitive z score, −0.15 SD [95% CI, −0.54 to 0.24]). The interaction was not significant (β estimate = 0.018 [95% CI, −0.025 to 0.061]; P = .40). Conclusions and Relevance In this substudy of a randomized clinical trial, there was no differential effect of revascularization vs IMM alone on cognition over 1 year by cerebral hemodynamic status among those with baseline reduced cognition, suggesting that revascularization does not improve cognitive dysfunction by restoring flow to the brain in chronic asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03121209

Objectives: Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic high-grade internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis confers a risk of stroke and cognitive decline, but correlations between degree of stenosis and hemodynamic impairment are derived from small case series only. Using baseline data from 282 participants in the Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis – Hemodynamics (CREST-H) study, we hypothesized that degree of stenosis, measured by peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) in the ipsilateral ICA, would correlate with time-to-peak (TTP) delay using MR (n=275) or CT (n=7) perfusion scans, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk variables. Methods: Using a 7-10MHz Doppler probe, ICA PSV and EDV were assessed. Doppler results were adjudicated centrally. Dynamic contrast perfusion imaging was standardized across 61 CREST-H sites, using sequential T2*-weighted time-sequence scanning (e.g. TR=1500, TE=25ms, flip angle=60deg, phase=128, slice thickness=5mm for GE 3T magnet). CTP was acquired with standard clinical protocols. TTP delay was calculated in the ipsilateral versus contralateral MCA/ACA territories using OLEA software. Linear regression used TTP delay as the outcome variable and PSV and EDV as predictor variables, adjusting for covariates.The 282 with complete data for all variables were included in the analysis. Results: Among 392 CREST-H participants, 63% were men, 7% Black, 3% Hispanic, 33% with less than college education. Tables 1a/b show the regression results for PSV and EDV as main predictor variables. PSV and EDV on the index side significantly correlated with TTP delay (p=0.004, p=0.002 respectively). Neither PSV nor EDV on the non-index side correlated with TTP delay (p=0.49, p=0.82). Compared with moderate exercise, vigorous exercise correlated with lower TTP delay in both models (p=0.05. p=0.04). Compared with college graduates, those with HS education had longer TTP delays in both models (p=0.03. p=0.02). Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis, higher flow velocities correlated with greater TTP delays, suggesting an increasing hemodynamic impairment with greater degree of stenosis above 70%. Our findings have implications for management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis which are being tested in the CREST-H and CREST-2 studies. Exercise and education may independently impact cerebral hemodynamics.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral hemodynamic impairment in patients with asymptomatic high-grade (>70%) internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis is associated with risk of stroke and cognitive decline, but correlations between the degree of stenosis and hemodynamic impairment are derived from small case series. Using baseline data from 242 participants in the CREST-H study (Carotid Revascularization and Medical Management for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis–Hemodynamics), we hypothesized that the degree of stenosis in the ICA would correlate with time-to-peak (TTP) delay in ipsilateral cerebral blood flow using MR/CT perfusion scans, adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk variables. METHODS: From all participants, ICAs were insonated using a 7 to 10 MHz probe for peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity. Dynamic contrast perfusion imaging was standardized across 61 CREST-H sites, using standard sequential T2*-weighted perfusion imaging. CT perfusion used standard clinical protocols. TTP delay was calculated in the ipsilateral versus contralateral hemispheres. In cross-sectional analysis, linear regression was used to model TTP delay as the outcome variable and PSV, end diastolic velocity, and PSV ICA/common carotid artery ratio on the index and nonindex side as primary predictor variables in 6 separate models, adjusting for covariates, followed by automated backward elimination model reduction. RESULTS: Among 392 CREST-H participants, the 242 with complete data for all variables were included in the regression analysis (age, 70±7.6; 62% M). End diastolic velocity on the index side correlated with TTP delay (β=0.003, P =0.005). PSV had a similar correlation but did not reach significance (β=0.001, P =0.099), nor did ICA/common carotid artery ratio (β=0.003, P =0.126). Nonindex side PSV, end diastolic velocity, and ICA/common carotid artery ratio showed no correlation with TTP delay ( P =0.268, P =0.495, P =0.380, respectively). Circle of Willis completeness did not correlate with TTP. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with high-grade asymptomatic carotid stenosis, higher end-diastolic flow velocities correlated with greater TTP delays, supporting a definition of hemodynamically significant stenosis. Our findings have implications for the management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis, which will be tested in the CREST-H study. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03121209.

Background Rather than considering carotid stenting and endarterectomy to be rival procedures, they ought to be seen as complementary, with some patients more suited to one procedure over another. The respective patient populations best suited for optimal outcomes with stenting and endarterectomy differ substantially. Hence, the CREST‐2 (Carotid Revascularization, Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial‐2) ( study was designed as 2 separate 2‐arm randomized trials run in parallel. One trial compares intensive medical management with and without stenting; the other, intensive medical management with and without endarterectomy. Each trial has a recruitment target of 1240 patients with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis, randomized 1:1 in each arm. To ensure patient safety and give stenting the best possible chance of demonstrating net benefits in stroke prevention, CREST‐2 adopted a rigorous procedure for evaluating, monitoring, and approving operators to enroll in the trial. The CREST‐2 Registry was established to allow for recent experience for applicant stent operators. Methods The CREST‐2 Registry is a prospective, multicenter, short‐term observational study of carotid stenting allowing use of multiple devices. Results The registry enrolled its first patient in September 2014, and as of October 2, 2023, a total of 9830 patients have been treated by 207 different stent operators from 103 different clinical centers. In this mixed cohort of asymptomatic (61.1% of the cohort) and symptomatic (38.9%) patients, the 30‐day stroke rate is 1.8% and the combined 30‐day stroke or death rate is 2.6%. At its peak in March 2016, the registry achieved an enrollment rate of 142 cases/month. As of October 20, 2023, a total of 104 patients remain to be enrolled in the CREST‐2 stenting trial. Conclusion The registry has facilitated assembly of a high‐performing team of stent operators for the CREST‐2 trial. With continued support of the many operators, we anticipate completing enrollment by the summer of 2024.