Citations

PURPOSE A multi-cancer detection test using a targeted methylation assay and machine learning classifiers was validated and optimized for screening in prospective, case-controlled Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02889978 ) substudy 3. Here, we report test performance in a subgroup of participants with symptoms suspicious for cancer to assess the test's ability to potentially facilitate efficient diagnostic evaluation in symptomatic individuals. METHODS We evaluated test performance (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cancer signal origin [CSO] prediction accuracy) in participants with clinically presenting cancers (CPCs) and noncancer with underlying medical conditions and among two subgroups (65 years and older and GI cancers). Overall survival (OS) of participants who had a cancer signal detected/not detected was compared with SEER-based expected survival. RESULTS A total of 2,036 cancer and 1,472 noncancer participants were included. Specificity was high in all noncancer participants (99.5% [95% CI, 98.4 to 99.8]). In participants with CPCs, the overall sensitivity was 64.3% (95% CI, 62.2 to 66.4) and the overall accuracy of CSO prediction in true positives was 90.3%. For GI cancers, the overall sensitivity was 84.1% (95% CI, 80.6 to 87.1). In participants 65 years and older, test performance was similar to that of all participants. Individuals with cancers not detected had a significantly better OS than that expected from SEER ( P < .01). CONCLUSION This test detected a cancer signal with high specificity and CSO prediction accuracy and moderate sensitivity in symptomatic individuals, with especially high performance in participants with GI cancers. The survival analysis implied that the cancers not detected were less clinically aggressive than cancers detected by the test, providing prognostic insights to physicians. This multi-cancer detection test could facilitate efficient workup and stratify cancer risk in symptomatic individuals.

Abstract Introduction: A test that detects cancer signal across multiple cancer types and predicts signal (tissue) origin (SO) could aid in more efficient diagnostic workup and shorten time to cancer diagnosis in individuals with signs and symptoms.Methods: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA; NCT02889978) study is a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter, case-control study to develop and validate a multi-cancer detection test. The 2nd CCGA substudy utilized a targeted methylation-based cell-free DNA assay and machine learning algorithm and included assessment of test performance (sensitivity and SO prediction accuracy) in a subgroup of participants with clinically presenting cancers (CPCs) that were undiagnosed prior to blood draw. Specificity was assessed in the noncancer group and subgroups with confounding (nonmalignant) conditions (CCs; eg, cirrhosis) and noncancer participants enrolled in hematology clinics (HCs).Results: Specificity was 99.5% (95% confidence interval: 98.2-99.9%; 396/398), 93.8% (71.7-99.7%; 15/16), and 99.3% (96.0-100.0%; 136/137) for the noncancer group, CCs subgroup, and HCs subgroup, respectively. Overall sensitivity among those with CPCs was 66.4% (62.2-70.3%; 344/518). Sensitivity of cancer signal detection increased with increasing clinical stage (Table). SO prediction accuracy was 91.7% (88.3-94.3%; 300/327) among CPC participants with cancers detected, excluding those with multiple or unknown primaries. The test demonstrated prognostic value as detected cancer participants had worse survival probability than those not detected. Conclusions: This multi-cancer detection test detected cancer signals and predicted SO in individuals with CPCs with high specificity. These findings support further clinical development of this multi-cancer detection test that could accelerate the diagnostic resolution of symptomatic cancers. Table. Sensitivity by Clinical Stage Across Cancer Type in Clinically Presenting CancersClinical StagePositive Test/Total Cancer; Sensitivity (95% CI)All*344/518; 66.4% (62.2-70.3%)I33/122; 27.0% (20.0-35.5%)II60/102; 58.8% (49.1-67.9%)III103/121; 85.1% (77.7-90.4%)IV136/147; 92.5% (87.1-95.8%)Not expected to be staged9/21; 42.9% (24.5-63.5%)Non-informative2/4; 50.0% (15.0-85.0%)CI, confidence interval.*One participant who had a positive test result had multiple primaries with clinical stage I and not-expected-to-be-staged. Citation Format: Alan H. Bryce, Minetta C. Liu, Michael V. Seiden, David D. Thiel, Donald Richards, Carlos Becerra, Kathryn N. Kurtzman, Xiaoji Chen, Tony Wu, Quan Zhang, Jingjing Gao, Nan Zhang, Earl Hubbell, Arash Jamshidi, Eric T. Fung, Eric A. Klein. Performance of a cell-free DNA-based multi-cancer detection test as a tool for diagnostic resolution of symptomatic cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB058.

Abstract Introduction: A multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test as a complement to existing screening tests could increase the number of cancer cases detected in a population, potentially improving patient outcomes and survival as well as decreasing harmful and aggressive treatments. The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978) was designed to develop and validate a blood-based MCED test analyzing plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect cancer signals across multiple cancer types and simultaneously predict their signal origin. Here, the results of the third and final pre-specified CCGA validation sub-study for a refined MCED test in a large cohort in preparation for clinical use are reported. Methods: CCGA is a prospective, multicenter, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (overall population N=15,254). In this sub-study (n=5309), key primary objectives were to evaluate test performance for cancer signal detection (specificity, overall sensitivity, sensitivity by clinical stage) and signal origin prediction (accuracy). cfDNA from evaluable samples was analyzed using a targeted methylation bisulfite sequencing assay and a machine learning algorithm. The classifier was trained to target a specificity of 99.4% and locked before analysis of the independent validation set. Overall, 4077 participants comprised the independent validation set with confirmed status (cancer: n=2823; non-cancer: n=1254 with non-cancer status confirmed at year-one follow-up). MCED test results are reported for this confirmed status set. Results: Mean (SD) age in the cancer and non-cancer groups was 62.6 (11.76) and 56.2 (12.63) years, respectively. Specificity for cancer signal detection was 99.5% (1248/1254; 95% confidence interval: 99.0-99.8%). Overall sensitivity for cancer signal detection was 51.5% (1453/2823; 49.6-53.3%); sensitivity increased with stage (Stage I: 16.8% [14.5-19.5%], Stage II: 40.4% [36.8-44.1%], Stage III: 77.0% [73.4-80.3%], Stage IV: 90.1% [87.5-92.2%]). Stage I-III sensitivity was 67.6% (593/877; 64.4-70.6%) in a pre-specified set of 12 high-signal cancers accounting for ~63% of annual US cancer deaths [1] and was 40.7% (863/2118; 38.7-42.9%) in all cancers. Cancer signals were detected across &gt;50 cancer types [2]. Overall accuracy of signal origin prediction in true positives was 88.7% (87.0-90.2%). Conclusions: In this pre-specified, large-scale, clinical validation sub-study of CCGA, the MCED test detected cancer signals across &gt;50 cancer types, which is critical to maximize the number of cancer cases detected in a population. This MCED test performed with high specificity and high accuracy of signal origin prediction. These data lay the foundation for population-scale clinical implementation of this test. 1.US Mortality Data 1969-2016 (www.seer.cancer.gov); based on 2015-2016. 2.Amin et al. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93e99. Citation Format: Eric A. Klein, Donald Richards, Allen Cohn, Mohan Tummala, Rosanna Lapham, David Cosgrove, Gina Chung, Jessica Clement, Jingjing Gao, Nathan Hunkapiller, Arash Jamshidi, Kathryn Kurtzman, Michael V. Seiden, Charles Swanton, Minetta C. Liu. Clinical validation of a targeted methylation-based multi-cancer early detection test [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr LB013.

Abstract Purpose: We recently reported the development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) targeted methylation (TM)-based sequencing approach for a multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test that includes cancer signal origin prediction. Here, we evaluated the prognostic significance of cancer detection by the MCED test using longitudinal follow-up data. Experimental Design: As part of a Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA) substudy, plasma cfDNA samples were sequenced using a TM approach, and machine learning classifiers predicted cancer status and cancer signal origin. Overall survival (OS) of cancer participants in the first 3 years of follow-up was evaluated in relation to cancer detection by the MCED test and clinical characteristics. Results: Cancers not detected by the MCED test had significantly better OS (P &lt; 0.0001) than cancers detected, even after accounting for other covariates, including clinical stage and method of clinical diagnosis (i.e., standard-of-care screening or clinical presentation with signs/symptoms). Additionally, cancers not detected by the MCED test had better OS than was expected when data were adjusted for age, stage, and cancer type from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. In cancers with current screening options, the MCED test also differentiated more aggressive cancers from less aggressive cancers (P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusions: Cancer detection by the MCED test was prognostic beyond clinical stage and method of diagnosis. Cancers not detected by the MCED test had better prognosis than cancers detected and SEER-based expected survival. Cancer detection and prognosis may be linked by the underlying biological factor of tumor fraction in cfDNA.

3072 Background: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978) previously demonstrated that a blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test utilizing cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing in combination with machine learning could detect cancer signals across multiple cancer types and predict cancer signal origin. Cancer classes were defined within the CCGA study for sensitivity reporting. Separately, cancer types defined by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) criteria, which outline unique staging requirements and reflect a distinct combination of anatomic site, histology and other biologic features, were assigned to each cancer participant using the same source data for primary site of origin and histologic type. Here, we report CCGA ‘cancer class’ designation and AJCC ‘cancer type’ assignment within the third and final CCGA3 validation substudy to better characterize the diversity of tumors across which a cancer signal could be detected with the MCED test that is nearing clinical availability. Methods: CCGA is a prospective, multicenter, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (overall population N = 15,254). Plasma cfDNA from evaluable samples was analyzed using a targeted methylation bisulfite sequencing assay and a machine learning approach, and test performance, including sensitivity, was assessed. For sensitivity reporting, CCGA cancer classes were assigned to cancer participants using a combination of the type of primary cancer reported by the site and tumor characteristics abstracted from the site pathology reports by GRAIL pathologists. Each cancer participant also was separately assigned an AJCC cancer type based on the same source data using AJCC staging manual (8th edition) classifications. Results: A total of 4077 participants comprised the independent validation set with confirmed status (cancer: n = 2823; non-cancer: n = 1254 with non-cancer status confirmed at year-one follow-up). Sensitivity was reported for 24 cancer classes (sample sizes ranged from 10 to 524 participants), as well as an “other” cancer class (59 participants). According to AJCC classification, the MCED test was found to detect cancer signals across 50+ AJCC cancer types, including some types not present in the training set; some cancer types had limited representation. Conclusions: This MCED test that is nearing clinical availability and was evaluated in the third CCGA substudy detected cancer signals across 50+ AJCC cancer types. Reporting CCGA cancer classes and AJCC cancer types demonstrates the ability of the MCED test to detect cancer signals across a set of diverse cancer types representing a wide range of biologic characteristics, including cancer types that the classifier has not been trained on, and supports its use on a population-wide scale. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978.

3071 Background: Disparities in cancer screening and outcomes based on factors such as gender, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity are well documented.1 The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (CCGA; NCT02889978) was designed to develop and validate a blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) test analyzing plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to detect cancer signals across multiple cancer types and simultaneously predict cancer signal origin. Findings stratified by race/ethnicity from the third and final CCGA validation sub-study are reported. Methods: CCGA is a prospective, multicenter, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (overall N = 15,254). In this pre-specified exploratory analysis from the third substudy, key objectives were to evaluate test performance for cancer signal detection (specificity, overall sensitivity, and sensitivity by clinical stage) among racial/ethnic groups. Plasma cfDNA from evaluable samples was analyzed using a targeted methylation bisulfite sequencing assay and a machine learning approach. Overall, 4077 participants comprised the independent validation set with confirmed status (cancer: n = 2823; non-cancer: n = 1254). The groups stratified by race/ethnicity were White Non-Hispanic, Black Non-Hispanic, Other Non-Hispanic (including but not limited to Asian, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, American Indian, Alaska Native), Hispanic (all races), and Other/unknown. The study was not powered to detect statistical differences between groups. Results: Cancer and non-cancer groups were predominantly White (2316/2823, 82.0% and 996/1254, 79.4%, respectively). Across racial/ethnic groups, specificity for cancer signal detection was 99.6% (White Non-Hispanic: 992/996, 95% confidence interval [99.0-99.8%]), 100.0% (Black Non-Hispanic: 85/85 [95.7-100.0%]), 100.0% (Other Non-Hispanic: 33/33 [89.6-100.0%]), 98.1% (Hispanic: 101/103 [93.2-99.5%]), and 100% (Other/unknown: 37/37 [90.6-100.0%]). Despite slight differences in cancer type and staging across racial/ethnic groups, overall sensitivity for cancer signal detection among groups ranged from 43.9% to 63.0% (White Non-Hispanic: 50.5%, 1169/2316 [48.4-52.5%], Black Non-Hispanic: 53.9%, 104/193 [46.8-60.8%], Other Non-Hispanic: 43.9%, 25/57 [31.8-56.7%], Hispanic: 63.0%, 121/192 [56.0-69.5%], and Other/unknown: 52.3%, 34/65 [40.4-64.0%]). For all racial/ethnic groups, sensitivity generally increased with clinical stage (with limited exceptions at Stage IV in some groups with small sample sizes). Conclusions: The MCED test demonstrated consistent specificity and sensitivity across racial/ethnic groups, though results are limited by sample size for some groups. These findings indicate broad applicability and support clinical implementation of this MCED test on a population scale. 1. Zavela et al. Brit J Cancer 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978.

Abstract Background: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas study (NCT02889978) is a multi-center, case-control, observational study with longitudinal follow-up (n=15,254; 56% cancer, 44% non-cancer) to support development of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) multi-cancer early detection test. Previously, we reported that a targeted methylation assay detected and localized &gt;20 cancer types at &gt;99% specificity in individuals with cancer.1,2 Here, we report prediction of cancer (presence/absence) and tissue of origin (TOO) in individuals enrolled with clinical suspicion of cancer but without pathologic diagnosis or treatment at time of enrollment. Methods: Plasma cfDNA from blood samples collected prior to clinical diagnosis was subjected to targeted methylation sequencing. Samples were divided into a training set and an independent validation set to train and validate a machine learning classifier to assess cancer and predict TOO. Performance was assessed in a subset of participants enrolled with suspicion of cancer; subsequently, cancer was confirmed by evaluating a pathologic specimen. Results: Participants being evaluated for suspicion of cancer were classified as confirmed cancer (&gt;20 cancer types; n=164 in training, n=75 in validation) or confirmed non-cancer (n=49 training, n=15 validation). In the confirmed non-cancer group, all training and validation samples were correctly predicted as non-cancer (100% specificity). In the confirmed cancer group, cancer detection across all stages was 40.2% (66/164; 95% confidence interval [CI], 32.7-48.2%) in training and 46.7% (35/75; 95% CI, 35.1-58.6%) in validation. Excluding stage I renal cancers (where detection/tumor fraction is low in plasma and which comprised 20% of participants in this subset) detection across stages was 50.4% (66/131; 95% CI, 41.5-59.2%) and 59.3% (35/59; 95% CI, 45.7-71.9%), respectively. In stages II and above, detection was 70.7% (58/82; 95% CI, 59.6-80.3%) and 78.9% (30/38; 95% CI, 62.7-90.4%), respectively. For detected cancers, TOO was predicted in 93.9% (62/66) samples in training and 100% (35/35) in validation. Of those with a TOO call, accuracy was 85.5% (53/62; 95% CI, 74.2-93.1%) and 97.1% (34/35; 95% CI, 85.1-99.9%), respectively. Conclusion: A cfDNA multi-cancer detection test has shown the potential to predict cancer and TOO in individuals with suspicion of cancer ahead of histologic diagnosis with performance comparable to those with confirmed cancer at the time of blood collection. This was achieved with high specificity and TOO accuracy. The high specificity suggests that the false positive rate could be comparable in populations with average versus higher risk (suspicion) of cancer. These findings suggest that a cfDNA multi-cancer detection test could accelerate the diagnostic resolution of suspicion of cancer. References: 1. Oxnard GR, et al. ASCO Breakthrough Meeting 2019; Abstract 44. 2. Oxnard GR, et al. ESMO Annual Meeting 2019; Abstract 5639. Citation Format: David D. Thiel, Xiaoji Chen, Kathryn N. Kurtzman, Jessica Yecies, Tony Wu, Quan Zhang, Hai Liu, Nan Zhang, Eric T. Fung, Michael V. Seiden, Minetta C. Liu, Geoffrey R. Oxnard, Earl Hubbell, Alexander M. Aravanis, Anne-Renee Hartman, Eric A. Klein. Prediction of cancer and tissue of origin in individuals with suspicion of cancer using a cell-free DNA multi-cancer early detection test [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT021.

Abstract Background: Earlier cancer detection could identify tumors when they are more treatable and thus may improve clinical outcomes. A blood-based multicancer early detection test using circulating tumor cell-free DNA (cfDNA) offers the potential to address this unmet need. Our previous discovery work identified whole-genome bisulfite sequencing as outperforming whole-genome and targeted sequencing approaches for multicancer detection across stages. We thus developed a targeted methylation (TM) assay for multicancer detection and tissue-of-origin (TOO) localization. Methods: Participants were from the Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA; NCT02889978) and STRIVE (NCT03085888) studies, both prospective, multicenter, observational studies with longitudinal follow-up. cfDNA samples spanning &gt;20 cancer types of all stages were divided into a cross-validated training set and an independent validation set; there were 3,583 evaluable samples in training (1,530 cancer; 2,053 noncancer) and 1,803 in validation (678 cancer; 1,125 noncancer). Performance in a prespecified set of 12 high-signal cancers was also reported (anus, bladder, colon/rectum, esophagus, head and neck, liver/bile-duct, lung, lymphoma, ovary, pancreas, plasma cell neoplasm, stomach). This multicancer early detection test evaluated cfDNA for the presence of cancer and localization of TOO; the TM classifier was trained to target &gt;99% specificity. Precision was defined as the fraction of correct calls. Results: Participants with and without cancer were similar in age. Specificity across all cancer types in the training and validation sets was 99.8% (95% CI, 99.2-99.9%) and 99.3% (98.3-99.8%), respectively, which reflects a consistent (P=0.292) false positive rate of &lt;1%. Across all cancer types, aggregate sensitivity was also consistent between the training and validation sets (55% [53-58%] and 55% [51-59], respectively; P=0.897). In the validation set, aggregate sensitivity in the prespecified group was 76% (73-78%); detection was 39% (27–52%) in stage I (n=62), 69% (56–80%) in stage II (n=62), 83% (75–90%) in stage III (n=102), and 92% (86–96%) in stage IV (n=130). Overall, the classifier assigned a TOO across &gt;20 cancer types in 96% of samples (344/359); of these, the TOO was correct in 93% (321/344) of cases, which was consistent with training set analyses. Conclusions: This multicancer early detection test detected cancer signal across &gt;20 cancer types with a single, fixed, low false positive rate and highly accurate TOO localization. Importantly, results in the independent validation set were consistent with the training set, demonstrating the robustness of machine learning classifier training, and confirms that data were not overfitted. These data support the feasibility of a single blood-based test that can detect multiple cancers, supporting further clinical development in preparation for the return of results. Citation Format: Anne-Renee Hartman, Geoffrey Oxnard, Eric Klein, Michael Seiden, Earl Hubbell, Oliver Venn, Arash Jamshidi, Nan Zhang, John Beausang, Samuel Gross, Kathryn Kurtzman, Eric Fung, Brian Allen, Alexander Fields, Hai Liu, Mikkael Sekeres, Donald Richards, Peter Yu, Alexander Aravanis, Minetta Liu. Multicancer detection of early-stage cancers with simultaneous tissue localization using a plasma cfDNA-based targeted methylation assay [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr IA02.

Abstract Background The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA; NCT02889978) study is a prospective, multi-center, observational, case-control study with longitudinal follow-up to support the development of a plasma cfDNA-based multi-cancer early detection assay. We previously reported that the fraction of tumor-derived cfDNA fragments in plasma (estimated tumor fraction [TF]) is associated with detection of multiple cancer types using a prototype whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) assay in a pre-specified substudy. In addition, detectability of breast cancer varied by hormone-receptor (HR) status: HR negative (HR-) breast cancer had a higher detection rate than the overall breast cancer cohort. Here, we performed a planned in-depth analysis of the breast cancer cohort to understand the main clinical and biological determinants of detectability using our WGBS assay. Methods Blood samples were prospectively collected from participants (pts) with newly-diagnosed, untreated breast cancer. In a pre-specified CCGA substudy, 511 (31.4%) of 1,628 pts had a clinicopathologic diagnosis of breast cancer (any stage, excluding stage 0) and a WGBS result. Pre-specified biological and clinical factors were assessed for correlation with TF: clinical stage, pathologic N stage, lesion size (by imaging), T stage, histologic grade, hormone receptor (HR) status, and proliferative rate (Ki-67 by IHC [MIB-1 clone]) via univariate and multivariate analyses. Ki-67 was obtained from pathology reports provided by enrollment sites and also assessed centrally (Mayo Clinic [Rochester, MN]). Stage-specific differences in detection rates between HR positive (HR+) and HR- breast cancers due to biological differences such as histologic grade and/or proliferative rate was also assessed. Results Of 511 pts, 94 (18.4%; 48.9% HR- and 12.3% in HR+) had WGBS-detected cancer. Higher TF was significantly associated with cancer detection (p&lt;0.001). In univariate analyses, the variables significantly associated with TF were clinical stage, pathological N stage, and histologic grade (p&lt;0.001 each). Primary lesion size was modestly correlated with TF (all stages combined: Spearman's correlation coefficient rs=0.4, p&lt;0.001), and when grouped by early and late stages (stages I/II: rs=0.27, p&lt;0.01; stages III/IV: rs=0.50, p&lt;0.01); clinical T stage was significantly associated with TF only when all stages were combined (p&lt;0.001). Proliferative rate (Ki-67) was positively correlated with TF at stages I/II (rs=0.29, p&lt;0.05) but not III/IV (rs=-0.24, p=0.34); Ki-67 results obtained through Mayo were similar to that from enrollment sites (Pearson’s correlation coefficient rp=0.68, p&lt;0.001). HR- breast cancers had significantly higher TF versus HR+ breast cancers only at stage II (p&lt;0.001). In addition, compared to HR+ breast cancers, HR- breast cancers had a significantly higher proportion of high histologic grade (p&lt;0.001 at stages I and II) and proliferative rate at earlier stages (p&lt;0.05 at stages I, II, and III). In the multivariate analysis, clinical stage (stage III vs I and IV vs I) and HR status remained the most significantly associated with TF (p&lt;0.001 each). Conclusions Using a prototype methylation-based plasma cfDNA cancer detection assay, TF was found to be associated with detection, and with clinical and biological features of breast cancer. Features routinely used to assess clinical aggressiveness (eg, HR- status and histologic grade) also demonstrated stage-specific associations with TF. Given the known relationship between TF and detection, these data suggest that clinical and biological cancer features may also provide insight into the variability of cancer detection using plasma-based cfDNA tests. Citation Format: Minetta C. Liu, Jodi M. Carter, Daniel W. Visscher, Karla Kopp, Rita Shaknovich, Xiaoji Chen, Kathryn N. Kurtzman, Shilpen Patel, Jacqueline D. Brooks, Carlo R. Cosenza, Jafi A. Lipson, Donald A. Richards, Fergus J. Couch, Zhao Dong, Hai Liu, Oliver Venn, Joerg Bredno, Eric T. Fung, Anne-Renee Hartman. Blood-based cancer detection in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA): Evaluating clinical and pathologic tumor characteristics in participants with breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-01-01.

283 Background: Cancers of the esophagus, stomach, pancreas, gallbladder, liver, bile duct, colon and rectum will account for 17% of incident cancer diagnoses and 26% of cancer-related deaths in the US in 2019. We developed a methylation-based cfDNA early multi-cancer detection test that also can predict the tissue of origin (TOO) of these and other cancers types; performance of this test for gastrointestinal (GI) tract cancers is reported here. Methods: The Circulating Cell-free Genome Atlas (CCGA; NCT02889978) study is a prospective, multi-center, observational, case-control study with longitudinal follow-up, enrolling individuals with cancer ( > 20 cancers, all stages, newly diagnosed) and without cancer. Plasma cfDNA was subjected to a cross-validated targeted methylation (TM) sequencing assay. Methylation fragments were combined across targeted genomic regions and assigned a probability of cancer and a predicted TOO. GI cancer classes were upper GI (esophagus/stomach, n = 67), pancreas/gallbladder/extrahepatic bile duct (n = 95), liver/intrahepatic bile duct (n = 29), and colon/rectum (n = 121). Results: Detection across all GI cancers was 82% (95% CI 77-86) at a > 99% pre-set specificity. Overall predicted TOO accuracy was 92% (88-95) among the samples for which TOO was predicted (6/255 had indeterminate predicted TOO). The table shows performance by GI cancer type. Conclusions: Simultaneous detection at high specificity ( > 99%) of multiple cancer types, including GI cancers across stages at high sensitivity (82%), was shown using TM analysis of cfDNA. Accurate (92%) localization of cancers to specific regions of the GI tract was also achieved. Detection of multiple GI cancers from a single noninvasive blood test could be a practical method for detecting GI and other cancers, and may facilitate diagnostic work-ups. Clinical trial information: NCT02889978. [Table: see text]