Citations

Deregulated inflammatory signaling via STAT family transcription factors, particularly STAT1, underlies a variety of immune-related diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease. Whereas activation of STATs by JAKs via canonical receptor-driven JAK–STAT signaling is well understood, little is known about JAK-independent mechanisms of STAT activation. Here, we identify the understudied nonreceptor tyrosine kinase TNK1 as a therapeutically targetable, JAK-independent activator of STAT signaling. Using a multiomics approach, we mapped a network of TNK1 substrates associated with protein condensates and proinflammatory signaling, including STAT1. We found that TNK1, but not its sister kinase ACK1, directly phosphorylates STATs at well described STAT-activating JAK sites. In cells, TNK1-mediated STAT1 phosphorylation and activation occurs independently of JAKs. Imaging and interactomics data suggest that TNK1 interacts with STAT1 in cytosolic condensates, which likely compartmentalize TNK1-substrate interactions. We show that an intrinsically disordered proline-rich region in TNK1, which includes a 14-3-3 docking phosphorylation site, is required for the formation of kinase-active TNK1 condensates and STAT1 phosphorylation. Mutations within the proline-rich region that eliminate 14-3-3 binding increase formation of TNK1 condensates, suggesting a model in which 14-3-3 acts as a clamp that constrains the flexible PRR to inhibit condensate formation and STAT1 activation. Finally, we show that TNK1 is a targetable driver of STAT1-mediated inflammation in the gut as inhibition of TNK1 reduces active STAT1 in the colon and ameliorates colitis symptoms in mice.

Abstract Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor-related adult-onset leukoencephalopathy with axonal spheroids and pigmented glia (CSF1R-ALSP) is a rare, fatal, autosomal-dominant neurodegenerative disorder caused by pathogenic CSF1R variants and characterized by progressive cognitive, neuropsychiatric, and motor dysfunction, white matter lesions on brain imaging, and white matter demyelination, swollen axons, and pigmented glial cells on pathology. Limited data regarding clinical, biofluid or radiological biomarkers of disease severity are available, and no clinical trial endpoints have yet been validated. The objectives of this first-of-its-kind, prospective, observational natural history study were to characterize the clinical trajectory of CSF1R-ALSP and to identify and evaluate key biomarkers and clinical endpoints indicative of disease severity and progression. ILLUMINATE (NCT05020743) was a multicentre, noninterventional natural history study of adults with CSF1R-ALSP and prodromal carriers of CSF1R variants. Participants were followed for up to 36 months, with clinical assessments, fluid biomarkers and volumetric MRI assessments of brain atrophy collected at screening and every 6 months. This study was terminated early (4 June 2025). The analyses reported here include data collected through 19 February 2025. Of 53 participants, 19 were prodromal and 34 were symptomatic (11 of whom had a history of haematopoietic stem cell transplant and 23 who did not). Mean participant age was 47.8 (standard deviation, 4.5) years, and 36.4% were female. Prodromal participants remained relatively stable over 36 months, with little change in neurological function, neurodegeneration biomarkers or radiological disease burden. Impaired neurological function, MRI characteristics of CSF1R-ALSP, and elevated NfL (neurofilament light chain; neurodegeneration biomarker) and GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein; astrogliosis biomarker) levels were more pronounced at baseline and often showed progression over time among symptomatic participants who had not previously received haematopoietic stem cell transplant compared with participants who had previously received haematopoietic stem cell transplant. Significant correlations were observed at baseline and longitudinally between MRI measures of brain atrophy and clinical outcome measures. Based on the fluid biomarkers, MRI measures, and clinical outcome assessments evaluated here, active neurodegeneration, widespread changes visualized on brain MRI, and impaired cognitive and motor function were observed in symptomatic patients with CSF1R-ALSP. The neurological impairment can be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Cortical Basal ganglia Functional Scale. Our data suggest that quantification of brain atrophy using MRI volumetry is a potential biomarker of disease severity and progression in CSF1R-ALSP. It is hoped that this report will contribute to the understanding of disease progression in CSF1R-ALSP and inform future drug development.

Abstract Objective . Penile vibro-elastography (PVE) is complicated by reverberant shear wavefields from the cylindrical geometry of the corpus cavernosum (CC), which bias shear wave speed (SWS) estimates. This study evaluated local phase velocity imaging with wavefield-based filtering (LPVI-WBF) for CC stiffness assessment in post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction (ED), compared against phase gradient (PG) and time-of-flight (TOF) methods. Approach . Six patients with post-prostatectomy ED underwent PVE at four longitudinal visits (902 acquisitions). SWS was estimated in flaccid and erect states at 100, 150, and 200 Hz using LPVI-WBF, PG, and TOF. Wavefield composition was quantified via the standing wave index. Simulations evaluated accuracy and frequency stability under clean and reverberant conditions. Main results . Reverberant components dominated penile acquisitions, with traveling wave energy absent in 59% of acquisitions and mean standing wave fraction of 57 ± 17%. LPVI-WBF was the only method producing physiologically consistent estimates, with erect SWS exceeding flaccid (3.59 ± 0.48 vs 3.25 ± 0.58 m s −1 , p < 0.0001). PG and TOF yielded reversed results ( E < F, p < 0.0001). The dispersion exponent was near-zero for LPVI-WBF ( α = 0.048, p = 0.21), consistent with weakly viscoelastic tissue, while PG ( α = 0.184) and TOF ( α = 0.321) showed significant frequency dependence from reverberant contamination. Simulations confirm PG accuracy in clean wavefields but collapse under reverberant ones. Significance . LPVI-WBF produced SWS estimates consistent with expected CC biomechanics across all patients and frequencies, a criterion PG and TOF failed to satisfy. Phantom validation and multi-directional wavefield simulation are needed to establish accuracy.

Abstract Introduction The EROS (Erectile Restoration Outcomes and Satisfaction) registry provides prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up after IPP, established in 2020. Objective We sought to assess general trends in the open-ended responses portion of the questionnaire. Methods Data were collected from 2020 to 2025, with a total of 568 responses. The survey included six open-ended questions pertaining to lifestyle change since IPP, reasons not to repeat the procedure, impediments to use, dissatisfaction, what patients wish they had known more about the procedure, and other recommendations. Evaluable data included 6-month responses from Rochester, Jacksonville, and Phoenix. Results Open-ended feedback was given by 66% of patients on what they wished they had known, 54% gave other recommendations, 38% gave lifestyle feedback, 7% elaborated upon reasons not to use, 3% on reasons for dissatisfaction, and 2% on reasons they would not repeat IPP. There was an overall very positive response (“Significant Improvement”, n=74.3%) from those who underwent the IPP placement, with some patients reporting that it was far more convenient than other forms of treatment, and even increased spontaneity in their sexual lives, leading to improved relationships. Among the reported responses are increased confidence (n=39.4%), increased sexual activity (n=13.3%), and improved health and exercise levels (n=6.6%). When questioning patients about why they would not repeat the procedure and what their sources of dissatisfaction were, among those who responded to each question (n=12, n=16), the most frequently reported complaint was the exaggeration of pre-existing curves (n=41.7%, n=25.0%), particularly due to Peyronie’s disease. When questioned about what prevents use, the main responses were partner-related or due to personal problems (n=45.2%). The patients did not have many recommendations, but hoped for a better way to deflate and inflate the device (n=20.4%) and reported adequate pre-operative education and use of the pump. The table below outlines the categories of responses and the percentage of each keyword reported per question type. Conclusions In addition to standard pre-operative IPP counseling, providers should also focus on potential difficulties with device inflation/deflation, length loss (IPP not in the glans), pain/ recovery expectations, the potential for new or worsened curve (erect or flaccid), and potential changes in sensation. IPP satisfaction is high, as only 2% of patients gave responses on why they would not repeat the IPP, with many men expressing an increased level of overall confidence. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) has gained popularity as an irrigant and dip for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Prior in vitro data is conflicting on the impact of CHG use with hydrophilic coated devices. Objective We sought to identify possible associations between CHG use and hydrophilic IPP infection rate. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,933 patients undergoing IPP implantation across 14 referral centers. Data collection spanned from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2024. Each surgeon contributed patients who underwent IPP implantation with CHG used as an irrigant and/or dip as well as an equal number of consecutive control patients without CHG use. The primary outcome was IPP explant for postoperative infection. Univariable analysis was used to compare patient demographics, and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with infection. Results Hydrophilic devices were implanted in 2,150 patients. Median follow-up for non-CHG patients was 13 months (IQR 18) and four months (IQR 9) for CHG patients. The incidence of infection with intraoperative CHG use was significantly higher compared to those without CHG use (4.6%, 46/1,001 vs. 2.1%, 24/1,148, p&lt;0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, intraoperative CHG use was associated with infection (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.47, p=0.01). Additional variables associated with infection included immunosuppression, prior IPP infection, prior priapism, and revision surgery (p&lt;0.01, Table). On subgroup analyses, the increased infection risk of CHG was most clear when CHG was used as both irrigation and dip (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p=0.01) and when CHG was used during revision surgery (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.15-9.82, p=0.03). Conclusions In a large multi-institutional cohort, intraoperative CHG use was associated with an elevated incidence of hydrophilic IPP infection. Providers may take these findings into consideration when performing IPP surgery with hydrophilic devices, especially during revision surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Intuitive Surgical, Fidelis, Urofill, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Cynosure, Antares Pharma, Clarus Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharma; Endo Pharma

Abstract Background To date, no scoring system has adequately defined clinical efficacy of erectile dysfunction (ED) therapies when evaluating differences between cohorts or in meta-analytic studies. Aim To outline the minimal criteria required for any therapy to be considered clinically effective in the treatment of ED. Methods An analytic review was performed of standardized ED questionnaires, with a particular emphasis placed on the International Index of Erectile Function, Erectile Function Domain (IIEF-EFD), and the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) concept. The data were used to create a societal position statement and recommendations on best practices within clinical trials to determine treatment efficacy. Outcomes The SMSNA provided 6 key statements and recommendations to suggest best practices and define minimal thresholds for improvements required for an ED therapy to be considered clinically effective. Results The IIEF-EFD currently represents the preferred standardized questionnaire to evaluate for changes in erectile function post-treatment and is the only questionnaire adequate to assess primary outcomes. To claim efficacy, investigational treatments must demonstrate MCID between cohorts (eg, 2-, 5-, or 7-point median improvements between groups among mild, moderate, or severe ED cohorts) in prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, and adequately powered studies. In studies employing mixed-severity ED populations, a method of calculating an adjusted MCID was proposed based on statistical weighting principles. Similarly, a novel method for analyzing differences between cohorts in meta-analytic studies was presented to incorporate the concept of MCID. Based on these principles, the SMSNA would not support efficacy of a therapy based on statistical significance in a meta-analytic study alone. Similarly, studies claiming efficacy utilizing responder approaches (ie, statistically higher percentage of men achieving MCID between cohorts) would not be acceptable unless the median difference between groups on the IIEF-EFD achieved MCID. Clinical Implications The current position statement provides important, evidence-based data and scientific principles to help define what may be considered as an effective therapy in the treatment of ED. This framework provides a basis that decision-makers, clinicians, and patients may use to help differentiate clinically effective therapies. Strengths & Limitations The published literature is limited by a lack of validated instruments and data defining MCID for ED therapies between cohorts and with meta-analytic studies. The current position statement provides important guidance on these areas of ambiguity pending further, definitive data. Conclusion The current position statement provides detailed guidance on key criteria required to conclude efficacy of therapies used to treat ED.