Helo, S

Abstract Introduction The EROS (Erectile Restoration Outcomes and Satisfaction) registry provides prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up after IPP, established in 2020. Objective We sought to assess general trends in the open-ended responses portion of the questionnaire. Methods Data were collected from 2020 to 2025, with a total of 568 responses. The survey included six open-ended questions pertaining to lifestyle change since IPP, reasons not to repeat the procedure, impediments to use, dissatisfaction, what patients wish they had known more about the procedure, and other recommendations. Evaluable data included 6-month responses from Rochester, Jacksonville, and Phoenix. Results Open-ended feedback was given by 66% of patients on what they wished they had known, 54% gave other recommendations, 38% gave lifestyle feedback, 7% elaborated upon reasons not to use, 3% on reasons for dissatisfaction, and 2% on reasons they would not repeat IPP. There was an overall very positive response (“Significant Improvement”, n=74.3%) from those who underwent the IPP placement, with some patients reporting that it was far more convenient than other forms of treatment, and even increased spontaneity in their sexual lives, leading to improved relationships. Among the reported responses are increased confidence (n=39.4%), increased sexual activity (n=13.3%), and improved health and exercise levels (n=6.6%). When questioning patients about why they would not repeat the procedure and what their sources of dissatisfaction were, among those who responded to each question (n=12, n=16), the most frequently reported complaint was the exaggeration of pre-existing curves (n=41.7%, n=25.0%), particularly due to Peyronie’s disease. When questioned about what prevents use, the main responses were partner-related or due to personal problems (n=45.2%). The patients did not have many recommendations, but hoped for a better way to deflate and inflate the device (n=20.4%) and reported adequate pre-operative education and use of the pump. The table below outlines the categories of responses and the percentage of each keyword reported per question type. Conclusions In addition to standard pre-operative IPP counseling, providers should also focus on potential difficulties with device inflation/deflation, length loss (IPP not in the glans), pain/ recovery expectations, the potential for new or worsened curve (erect or flaccid), and potential changes in sensation. IPP satisfaction is high, as only 2% of patients gave responses on why they would not repeat the IPP, with many men expressing an increased level of overall confidence. Disclosure No

Abstract Introduction Penile implant (PI) surgery is a well-recognized strategy for erectile dysfunction (ED) with excellent functional/satisfaction outcomes. To date, little attention has been paid to the attitudes and satisfaction outcomes of female partners of such patients. Objective To qualitatively assess how female partners feel about PI surgery to inform the development of a female partner specific questionnaire. Methods Female partners of men who had undergone PI surgery (3-piece inflatable) underwent concept elicitation interviews. Prior to this, a panel of experts in female sexual health and PI surgery was convened to define potential domains of interest. Women were interviewed by one of two female sexual medicine clinicians to elicit concepts. As part of the spontaneous item generation phase, participants were asked about their attitudes, hopes and concerns prior to PI surgery, as well as changes in partner post-surgery. Participants were then asked whether they identified domains raised by the expert panel that were not mentioned during the spontaneous phase. Additional open-ended questions were asked about experiences before and after PI surgery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim for subsequent qualitative analysis by 2 trained members of the study team. Results 12 women have been interviewed. Mean partner age = 60 years, relationship duration = 20years. Interviews were held <12 months post-PI for 17% of partners, 12-24 months for 25%,>24 months for 58%. Partner communication and involvement in decision to get the implant were uniquely raised as pre-surgical concerns, whereas PI attributes were uniquely mentioned as post-surgical concerns. How the PI has impacted the man’s self-esteem, whether impacts to self-esteem have affected the partner, and overall satisfaction with sex were most common concepts raised across pre- and post-surgery Conclusions Using rigorous qualitative methodology, we have identified concepts that are unique to pre-surgery, post-surgery, and common across the surgical experience among partners of men who have undergone penile implant surgery. These data will facilitate development of a tool to assess female partner attitudes, beliefs and satisfaction prior to and after PI surgery. Disclosure Yes, this is sponsored by industry/sponsor: Coloplast Clarification: Industry funding only - investigator initiated and executed study

Abstract Introduction 0.05% Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) has gained popularity as an irrigant and dip for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) surgery. Prior in vitro data is conflicting on the impact of CHG use with hydrophilic coated devices. Objective We sought to identify possible associations between CHG use and hydrophilic IPP infection rate. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,933 patients undergoing IPP implantation across 14 referral centers. Data collection spanned from January 1, 2017 to March 1, 2024. Each surgeon contributed patients who underwent IPP implantation with CHG used as an irrigant and/or dip as well as an equal number of consecutive control patients without CHG use. The primary outcome was IPP explant for postoperative infection. Univariable analysis was used to compare patient demographics, and logistic regression analysis was performed to assess factors associated with infection. Results Hydrophilic devices were implanted in 2,150 patients. Median follow-up for non-CHG patients was 13 months (IQR 18) and four months (IQR 9) for CHG patients. The incidence of infection with intraoperative CHG use was significantly higher compared to those without CHG use (4.6%, 46/1,001 vs. 2.1%, 24/1,148, p<0.001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, intraoperative CHG use was associated with infection (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.24-3.47, p=0.01). Additional variables associated with infection included immunosuppression, prior IPP infection, prior priapism, and revision surgery (p<0.01, Table). On subgroup analyses, the increased infection risk of CHG was most clear when CHG was used as both irrigation and dip (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.19-3.46, p=0.01) and when CHG was used during revision surgery (OR 3.36, 95% CI 1.15-9.82, p=0.03). Conclusions In a large multi-institutional cohort, intraoperative CHG use was associated with an elevated incidence of hydrophilic IPP infection. Providers may take these findings into consideration when performing IPP surgery with hydrophilic devices, especially during revision surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Intuitive Surgical, Fidelis, Urofill, Boston Scientific, Coloplast, Cynosure, Antares Pharma, Clarus Pharmaceuticals, Acerus Pharma; Endo Pharma