Citations

Background and Aims: Disruption of the epigenome is a hallmark of human disease, including liver cirrhosis and HCC. While genetic heterogeneity is an established effector of pathologic phenotypes, epigenetic heterogeneity is less well understood. Environmental exposures alter the liver-specific DNA methylation landscape and influence the onset of liver cancer. Given that currently available treatments are unable to target frequently mutated genes in HCC, there is an unmet need for novel therapeutics to prevent or reverse liver damage leading to hepatic tumorigenesis, which the epigenome may provide. Approach and Results: We performed genome-wide profiling of DNA methylation, copy number, and gene expression from multiple liver regions from 31 patients with liver disease to examine their crosstalk and define the individual and combinatorial contributions of these processes to liver disease progression. We identified epigenetic heterogeneity hotspots that are conserved across patients. Elevated epigenetic heterogeneity is associated with increased gene expression heterogeneity. Cirrhotic regions comprise 2 distinct cohorts—one exclusively epigenetic, and the other where epigenetic and copy number variations collaborate. Epigenetic heterogeneity hotspots are enriched for genes central to liver function (eg, HNF1A) and known tumor suppressors (eg, RASSF1A). These hotspots encompass genes including ACSL1, ACSL5, MAT1A, and ELFN1, which have phenotypic effects in functional screens, supporting their relevance to hepatocarcinogenesis. Moreover, epigenetic heterogeneity hotspots are linked to clinical measures of outcome. Conclusions: Substantial epigenetic heterogeneity arises early in liver disease development, targeting key pathways in the progression and initiation of both cirrhosis and HCC. Integration of epigenetic and transcriptional heterogeneity unveils putative epigenetic regulators of hepatocarcinogenesis.

Abstract The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for all cancer sites, including gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP‐NETs), is meant to be dynamic, requiring periodic updates to optimize AJCC staging definitions. This entails the collaboration of experts charged with evaluating new evidence that supports changes to each staging system. GEP‐NETs are the second most prevalent neoplasm of gastrointestinal origin after colorectal cancer. Since publication of the AJCC eighth edition, the World Health Organization has updated the classification and separates grade 3 GEP‐NETs from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. In addition, because of major advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic technologies for GEP‐NETs, AJCC version 9 advocates against the use of serum chromogranin A for the diagnosis and monitoring of GEP‐NETs. Furthermore, AJCC version 9 recognizes the increasing role of endoscopy and endoscopic resection in the diagnosis and management of NETs, particularly in the stomach, duodenum, and colorectum. Finally, T1NXM0 has been added to stage I in these disease sites as well as in the appendix.

Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P-value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score (P<0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score (P<0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.

Hepatic adenomas occur most commonly in women between the ages of 20 and 40 years, but rarely they occur in older aged persons, including those 60 years of age or older. This group of adenomas, however, has not been systemically examined. Twenty-six hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older were studied, along with a control group of 50 hepatic adenomas in persons aged 30 to 39. Hepatic adenomas in persons 60 or more years of age were found in 21 women and 5 men, while the control group had 44 women and 6 men. Subtyping the adenomas in persons 60 years or older showed the following results: 18 HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (69%), 4 inflammatory adenomas (15%), and 4 unclassified adenomas (15%). In contrast, the control group showed a significantly different pattern (P=0.003), with a greater percentage of inflammatory adenomas (28, 56%), fewer HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (8, 16%), and more unclassified adenomas (14, 28%). Atypia and malignant transformation within the hepatic adenomas was studied next. Of the hepatic adenomas in persons age 60 or greater, 3 (12%) showed atypical histologic features, and 6 (23%) had a malignant transformation. In contrast, for hepatic adenomas in the control group, only 4 (8%) adenomas showed atypical histologic features, and 3 (6%) had undergone malignant transformation. In addition, the hepatic adenomas that were atypical or showed early malignant transformation were less likely to have beta-catenin activation in patients over 60 (2/9 cases) compared with those between 30 and 39 years (5/7 cases). Myxoid change and heavy lipofuscin deposition were also more common in adenomas in older aged persons. In conclusion, hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older are enriched for HNF1A-inactivated adenomas and have a higher frequency of malignant transformation. Malignant transformation, however, is less likely to develop through activation of the beta-catenin pathway.

Hepatocellular adenomas are rare in children. A large study focused on pediatric patients has not been undertaken. A natural language search was performed at 5 institutions for hepatocellular adenomas in patients younger than 21 years old. Clinical characteristics as well as immunohistochemical staining profile was reviewed and adenomas subtyped per standard classification. Patients were divided into prepubescent and postpubescent age group. Thirty-one patients were included. Eleven (35%) were male and 10 (32%) were prepubescent. Fifteen (54%) of 28 patients with known clinical histories had adenomas associated with a syndrome. The percentage of the different adenoma subtypes was: 16% β-catenin activated, 10% combined inflammatory and β-catenin activated, 29% HFN1α-inactivated, 35% inflammatory, and 10% unclassified subtype by immunohistochemical staining. Interestingly 53% of patients with syndromes were male, while 85% of patients in the nonsyndromic group were female. The total number of β-catenin activated tumors was greater in the syndromic group (5/15, 33%) and prepubescent group (5/10, 50%) than in the nonsyndromic group (2/13, 16%) and postpubescent group (3/21, 14%), P=0.4 and 0.07, respectively. Inflammatory type adenoma was more frequent in the postpubescent (10/21, 48%) than in the prepubescent group (1/10, 10%), P=0.06, trending toward significance. Pediatric patients with hepatocellular adenomas frequently have syndromes, especially in the prepubescent group. In patients with syndromes a greater percentage of adenomas were β-catenin activated. In patients without a known syndrome the distribution of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes appears similar to adults.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common malignancy arising in the liver. It carries a poor prognosis, in part because its pathogenesis is not well understood. The type 3 inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate receptor (ITPR3) is the principal intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) release channel in cholangiocytes, and its increased expression has been related to the pathogenesis of malignancies in other types of tissues, so we investigated its role in CCA. ITPR3 expression was increased in both hilar and intrahepatic CCA samples as well as in CCA cell lines. Deletion of ITPR3 from CCA cells impaired proliferation and cell migration. A bioinformatic analysis suggested that overexpression of ITPR3 in CCA would have a mitochondrial phenotype, so this was also examined. ITPR3 normally is concentrated in a subapical region of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in cholangiocytes, but both immunogold electron microscopy and super‐resolution microscopy showed that ITPR3 in CCA cells was also in regions of ER in close association with mitochondria. Deletion of ITPR3 from these cells impaired mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling and led to cell death. Conclusion: ITPR3 expression in cholangiocytes becomes enhanced in CCA. This contributes to malignant features, including cell proliferation and migration and enhanced mitochondrial Ca2+ signaling.

Context Several immunohistochemical markers are available to establish the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Judicious selection is essential to achieve a reliable diagnosis in limited tissue provided by liver biopsy. Objective To compare the efficacy of 5 hepatocellular markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma across various levels of differentiations. Design Immunohistochemistry for hepatocyte paraffin antigen 1 (Hep Par 1), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-3, arginase-1, and bile salt export pump transporter was performed in 79 hepatocellular carcinomas, yielding 93 observations (13 well-differentiated [14%], 41 moderately differentiated [44%], and 39 poorly differentiated [42%] tumors). Results Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1 had the highest sensitivity for well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas arginase-1 and glypican-3 had the highest sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. When staining of more than 50% of the tumor was considered a positive result, arginase-1 remained the most sensitive marker for all differentiations, whereas sensitivity for Hep Par 1 in poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma dropped to 30% and that of glypican-3 in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma was 15%. The addition of Hep Par 1 and/or polyclonal CEA to arginase-1 did not lead to an increase in sensitivity for any differentiation. The combined use of arginase-1 and glypican-3 yielded 100% sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion Arginase-1 was the most sensitive marker in all differentiations of hepatocellular carcinoma. Glypican-3 had high sensitivity for poorly differentiated cases and its combined use with arginase-1 enabled identification of nearly all cases of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Although bile salt export pump transporter has good overall sensitivity, it has a limited role in establishing hepatocellular differentiation when added to a panel of arginase-1 with either glypican-3 or Hep Par 1.