Jain, Dhanpat

Hepatic adenomas occur most commonly in women between the ages of 20 and 40 years, but rarely they occur in older aged persons, including those 60 years of age or older. This group of adenomas, however, has not been systemically examined. Twenty-six hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older were studied, along with a control group of 50 hepatic adenomas in persons aged 30 to 39. Hepatic adenomas in persons 60 or more years of age were found in 21 women and 5 men, while the control group had 44 women and 6 men. Subtyping the adenomas in persons 60 years or older showed the following results: 18 HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (69%), 4 inflammatory adenomas (15%), and 4 unclassified adenomas (15%). In contrast, the control group showed a significantly different pattern (P=0.003), with a greater percentage of inflammatory adenomas (28, 56%), fewer HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (8, 16%), and more unclassified adenomas (14, 28%). Atypia and malignant transformation within the hepatic adenomas was studied next. Of the hepatic adenomas in persons age 60 or greater, 3 (12%) showed atypical histologic features, and 6 (23%) had a malignant transformation. In contrast, for hepatic adenomas in the control group, only 4 (8%) adenomas showed atypical histologic features, and 3 (6%) had undergone malignant transformation. In addition, the hepatic adenomas that were atypical or showed early malignant transformation were less likely to have beta-catenin activation in patients over 60 (2/9 cases) compared with those between 30 and 39 years (5/7 cases). Myxoid change and heavy lipofuscin deposition were also more common in adenomas in older aged persons. In conclusion, hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older are enriched for HNF1A-inactivated adenomas and have a higher frequency of malignant transformation. Malignant transformation, however, is less likely to develop through activation of the beta-catenin pathway.

Context Several immunohistochemical markers are available to establish the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Judicious selection is essential to achieve a reliable diagnosis in limited tissue provided by liver biopsy. Objective To compare the efficacy of 5 hepatocellular markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma across various levels of differentiations. Design Immunohistochemistry for hepatocyte paraffin antigen 1 (Hep Par 1), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-3, arginase-1, and bile salt export pump transporter was performed in 79 hepatocellular carcinomas, yielding 93 observations (13 well-differentiated [14%], 41 moderately differentiated [44%], and 39 poorly differentiated [42%] tumors). Results Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1 had the highest sensitivity for well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas arginase-1 and glypican-3 had the highest sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. When staining of more than 50% of the tumor was considered a positive result, arginase-1 remained the most sensitive marker for all differentiations, whereas sensitivity for Hep Par 1 in poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma dropped to 30% and that of glypican-3 in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma was 15%. The addition of Hep Par 1 and/or polyclonal CEA to arginase-1 did not lead to an increase in sensitivity for any differentiation. The combined use of arginase-1 and glypican-3 yielded 100% sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion Arginase-1 was the most sensitive marker in all differentiations of hepatocellular carcinoma. Glypican-3 had high sensitivity for poorly differentiated cases and its combined use with arginase-1 enabled identification of nearly all cases of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Although bile salt export pump transporter has good overall sensitivity, it has a limited role in establishing hepatocellular differentiation when added to a panel of arginase-1 with either glypican-3 or Hep Par 1.