Yeh, Matthew M.

Listing and transplanting patients with acute liver failure (ALF) is challenging, requiring rapid assessment of the likelihood of recovery. The availability of a large number of ALF liver explants, along with their clinical data, afforded an opportunity to retrospectively evaluate liver transplantation (LT) decision-making. We hypothesized that, with the benefit of hindsight, a small number of patients might have recovered without LT. Three hundred liver explants from ALF patients of varying etiologies who had undergone LT over 22 years in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group registry were reviewed for histopathological features and degree of necrosis by a committee of 8 hepatopathologists. A second committee of 8 experienced transplant hepatologists independently reviewed clinical data on these same 300 patients and retrospectively scored the likelihood that each patient required transplantation. Only 3 (1%) of those reviewed by the Clinical Committee were considered to “Definitely” not require liver grafting, while an additional 10 (3.3%) were deemed to “Possibly” not require transplantation (Not Likely Group, N=13). There was no difference in the degree of necrosis in explants in these groups, when compared to the remaining Likely Group, N=287 (95.6%), except in acetaminophen (APAP)-associated ALF, where the degree of necrosis was more uniformly graded as severe, correlating with the need for transplantation. Virtually every patient undergoing LT for ALF retrospectively appeared to need their transplant, based on expert clinical consensus review. Overall, there was poor correlation between clinical severity and apparent degree of necrosis seen in the 300 liver explants, except perhaps for APAP subjects.

Subtyping hepatic adenomas is important for patient management due to differing complication risks. Immunohistochemical staining with C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid-A (SAA) is widely accepted as a surrogate for molecular classification to identify inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas. Limited data, however, has been published on how these 2 stains compare for sensitivity. We conducted a large, multicenter, retrospective study to examine the sensitivity and staining characteristics of CRP and SAA in inflammatory hepatic adenomas, with focal nodular hyperplasia (FNHs) as a control group. Inflammatory adenomas were identified in 133 patients (average age 37 years, 109 were female). In all, 69.9% of cases were resection specimens and 90.2% of all cases showed positive staining for both CRP and SAA; 10 (7.5%) were positive for CRP only and 3 (2.3%) were positive for SAA only. CRP was more sensitive than SAA (97.74% vs. 92.48%, P-value = 0.0961) and showed more extensive and intense staining, with a significantly higher modified H-score (P<0.001). Focal nodular hyperplasia can also show positive CRP and SAA staining but with a lower modified H-score (P<0.0001). Based on beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase staining, 26 of inflammatory adenomas also had beta-catenin activation (19.5%). All 3 cases with positive SAA and negative CRP staining were beta-catenin activated. In contrast, the proportion of cases that were CRP positive and SAA negative was similar regardless of beta-catenin activation. The data affirms the strategy of using both CRP and SAA immunostains for hepatic adenoma subtyping and raises the awareness of the highly variable nature of SAA staining characteristics.

Hepatic adenomas occur most commonly in women between the ages of 20 and 40 years, but rarely they occur in older aged persons, including those 60 years of age or older. This group of adenomas, however, has not been systemically examined. Twenty-six hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older were studied, along with a control group of 50 hepatic adenomas in persons aged 30 to 39. Hepatic adenomas in persons 60 or more years of age were found in 21 women and 5 men, while the control group had 44 women and 6 men. Subtyping the adenomas in persons 60 years or older showed the following results: 18 HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (69%), 4 inflammatory adenomas (15%), and 4 unclassified adenomas (15%). In contrast, the control group showed a significantly different pattern (P=0.003), with a greater percentage of inflammatory adenomas (28, 56%), fewer HNF1A-inactivated adenomas (8, 16%), and more unclassified adenomas (14, 28%). Atypia and malignant transformation within the hepatic adenomas was studied next. Of the hepatic adenomas in persons age 60 or greater, 3 (12%) showed atypical histologic features, and 6 (23%) had a malignant transformation. In contrast, for hepatic adenomas in the control group, only 4 (8%) adenomas showed atypical histologic features, and 3 (6%) had undergone malignant transformation. In addition, the hepatic adenomas that were atypical or showed early malignant transformation were less likely to have beta-catenin activation in patients over 60 (2/9 cases) compared with those between 30 and 39 years (5/7 cases). Myxoid change and heavy lipofuscin deposition were also more common in adenomas in older aged persons. In conclusion, hepatic adenomas in persons 60 years of age or older are enriched for HNF1A-inactivated adenomas and have a higher frequency of malignant transformation. Malignant transformation, however, is less likely to develop through activation of the beta-catenin pathway.

Hepatocellular adenomas are rare in children. A large study focused on pediatric patients has not been undertaken. A natural language search was performed at 5 institutions for hepatocellular adenomas in patients younger than 21 years old. Clinical characteristics as well as immunohistochemical staining profile was reviewed and adenomas subtyped per standard classification. Patients were divided into prepubescent and postpubescent age group. Thirty-one patients were included. Eleven (35%) were male and 10 (32%) were prepubescent. Fifteen (54%) of 28 patients with known clinical histories had adenomas associated with a syndrome. The percentage of the different adenoma subtypes was: 16% β-catenin activated, 10% combined inflammatory and β-catenin activated, 29% HFN1α-inactivated, 35% inflammatory, and 10% unclassified subtype by immunohistochemical staining. Interestingly 53% of patients with syndromes were male, while 85% of patients in the nonsyndromic group were female. The total number of β-catenin activated tumors was greater in the syndromic group (5/15, 33%) and prepubescent group (5/10, 50%) than in the nonsyndromic group (2/13, 16%) and postpubescent group (3/21, 14%), P=0.4 and 0.07, respectively. Inflammatory type adenoma was more frequent in the postpubescent (10/21, 48%) than in the prepubescent group (1/10, 10%), P=0.06, trending toward significance. Pediatric patients with hepatocellular adenomas frequently have syndromes, especially in the prepubescent group. In patients with syndromes a greater percentage of adenomas were β-catenin activated. In patients without a known syndrome the distribution of hepatocellular adenoma subtypes appears similar to adults.

Steatohepatitis-like change has not been described in focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). Steatohepatitis-like change in FNH may show overlapping features with steatohepatitic variant of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This problem can be compounded if seen in FNH with widened cell plates or hepatocyte rosettes, other features that can also be seen in HCC. This study examined steatotic FNHs for the frequency of steatohepatitis-like change, especially in the setting of FNH with rosettes and/or widened cell plates. Thirty-three resection specimens of steatotic FNH from 3 institutions were evaluated for degree of steatosis, background liver steatosis, ductular reaction, and lymphocytic infiltrate, as well as presence of thick fibrous bands, thick-walled vessels, ballooned hepatocytes, Mallory-Denk bodies, dilated sinusoids, hepatocyte rosettes, and thick hepatic plates. Steatosis was distributed along fibrous septa as well as diffusely throughout the FNH. Steatohepatitis-like changes were focally present in 54% (18 cases). Thick plates>3 cells were focally found in 14 cases (42%); rosettes were common (70%). All cases showed at least 2 of the histologic features highly suggestive for the diagnosis of FNH such as thick bands of fibrosis, thick-walled vessels and/or ductular reaction and the typical map-like pattern of glutamine synthetase immunostaining. More than half of fatty FNH examined for this study had features of at least focal steatohepatitis-like changes. This finding should not be confused with steatohepatitic variant of HCC. Common typical features of FNH including thick-walled vessels, ductular reaction and thick fibrous bands are helpful for discrimination of FNH from HCC.

Context Several immunohistochemical markers are available to establish the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Judicious selection is essential to achieve a reliable diagnosis in limited tissue provided by liver biopsy. Objective To compare the efficacy of 5 hepatocellular markers for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma across various levels of differentiations. Design Immunohistochemistry for hepatocyte paraffin antigen 1 (Hep Par 1), polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), glypican-3, arginase-1, and bile salt export pump transporter was performed in 79 hepatocellular carcinomas, yielding 93 observations (13 well-differentiated [14%], 41 moderately differentiated [44%], and 39 poorly differentiated [42%] tumors). Results Arginase-1 and Hep Par 1 had the highest sensitivity for well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma, whereas arginase-1 and glypican-3 had the highest sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. When staining of more than 50% of the tumor was considered a positive result, arginase-1 remained the most sensitive marker for all differentiations, whereas sensitivity for Hep Par 1 in poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma dropped to 30% and that of glypican-3 in well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma was 15%. The addition of Hep Par 1 and/or polyclonal CEA to arginase-1 did not lead to an increase in sensitivity for any differentiation. The combined use of arginase-1 and glypican-3 yielded 100% sensitivity for poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusion Arginase-1 was the most sensitive marker in all differentiations of hepatocellular carcinoma. Glypican-3 had high sensitivity for poorly differentiated cases and its combined use with arginase-1 enabled identification of nearly all cases of poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. Although bile salt export pump transporter has good overall sensitivity, it has a limited role in establishing hepatocellular differentiation when added to a panel of arginase-1 with either glypican-3 or Hep Par 1.