Citations

ABSTRACT Objective To identify and compare how patient perceptions contribute to Type 1 Delays, defined as delays in deciding to seek care, among individuals with head and neck cancer (HNC) in high‐income countries (HICs) and low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Methods We conducted a scoping review and systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception through November 20, 2023. Eligible studies included patients with HNC in HICs or LMICs who reported patient perceptions contributing to Type 1 Delays. Data extraction was performed in duplicate, and barriers were categorized thematically. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the frequency of reported barriers between HIC and LMIC studies. Results Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria, of which 64.7% ( n = 11) were conducted in HICs and 35.3% ( n = 6) in LMICs, representing 9 countries and 1410 participants. The most frequently cited perceptions contributing to delay were symptom unawareness, misinterpretation, and minimization. Additional barriers included fear of diagnosis, stigma, alternative medicine use, financial challenges, and geographic barriers. Transport/geographic barriers showed a trend toward being more common in LMIC studies ( p = 0.05). Descriptive patterns suggested LMIC patients more often reported structural and sociocultural barriers, whereas HIC patients more commonly cited psychosocial or perceptual barriers. Conclusion Type 1 Delays in HNC are common across both HICs and LMICs, with overlapping and region‐specific contributors. Tailored interventions, such as patient education, stigma reduction, and improved access to diagnostic services, may promote earlier detection and improve global HNC outcomes. Level of Evidence 3.

Background: Access to high-quality airway equipment is critical for effective otolaryngological and emergency care. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), challenges in the procurement infrastructure may hinder equipment availability, impacting patient outcomes. Given the paucity of literature investigating equipment procurement in SSA, this study aims to map out the multilevel barriers to procurement of airway equipment in SSA to inform opportunities for improvement. Methods: A qualitative study design was employed using semi-structured interviews and open-ended survey responses. Participants included otolaryngologists in SSA, manufacturing company representatives and international policymakers, selected through purposive sampling to ensure representation of various roles in the procurement process. Six interviews, one focus group and six survey responses with regional healthcare providers (n = 13), manufacturing representatives (n = 3) and international policymakers (n = 2) explored supply chain dynamics, regulatory challenges, manufacturing capabilities, financial constraints and policy frameworks. Data were analysed using thematic analysis to identify recurrent themes and interrelationships. Results: Systemic barriers exist in the procurement process, including fragmented supply chains, inconsistent regulatory enforcement, limited local manufacturing capacity and insufficient funding mechanisms. Otolaryngologists emphasised frequent delays in equipment availability, while manufacturers reported logistical challenges and regulatory hurdles. Policymakers noted gaps in infrastructure and regional coordination. Emerging themes suggest opportunities for streamlining procurement processes, fostering local production and enhancing collaboration to improve supply chain efficiency. Conclusion: This study underscores the multifaceted challenges in airway equipment procurement in SSA and highlights the need for integrated approaches involving stakeholders across the supply chain. Contribution: Findings provide actionable insights to inform policy development and capacity-building initiatives with the goal of enhancing access to life-saving airway equipment and improving healthcare outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background Preoperative vascular embolization (PVE) is commonly used in managing juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma (JNA) to improve outcomes. However, few studies have evaluated how embolization patterns and vascular features affect prognosis. Methods A 15‐year retrospective review was performed on 44 patients with JNA undergoing surgery at one institution. Data included demographics, vascular supply, embolization techniques, surgical outcomes, and recurrence. Results Forty‐three patients underwent PVE. Most tumors were embolized transarterially (93.0%) using polyvinyl alcohol‐based agents (79.1%). The internal maxillary artery was most commonly embolized (93.0%). Internal carotid artery supply was present in 34.9%, and more than two vessels were embolized in 23.3%. Postembolization tumor blush occurred in 60.5%, with a median of 5% of the pre‐embolization blush remaining after embolization. Neither internal carotid involvement, number of vessels embolized, nor residual blush significantly impacted operative time, surgical outcomes, or recurrence. Conclusion With effective embolization, vascular complexity might not affect JNA resection outcomes. Multicenter studies are required to confirm those findings.

Importance Adverse events in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) are inconsistently reported. The Clavien-Dindo Classification has been modified and validated in several surgical subspecialties but has yet to be validated in OHNS. Objective To create and validate a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification for OHNS that reflects the severity and duration of harm for complications experienced by patients undergoing OHNS. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a multicenter survey study of subject matter experts (SMEs) from OHNS subspecialties from academic institutions within the US. A literature review identified publications reporting surgical complications in OHNS in the English language between January 2019 and April 2020. Complications were summarized and used to inform a modified Clavien-Dindo Classification. Feedback from internal SMEs was incorporated. Thirty-five clinical vignettes were created, and an electronic survey was sent to SMEs at outside institutions. Each SME was randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups to evaluate 8 to 9 vignettes. The survey was conducted in September 2023, and data were analyzed from February to May 2024. Exposure Participation in the electronic survey. Main Outcomes and Measures Vignette scores were assessed and the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) calculator was used to assess cumulative morbidity. The scale is based on the grading by the Clavien-Dindo Classification and reflects overall morbidity on a scale from 0 (no complication) to 100 (death). Variability of the CCIs between reviewers, the primary outcome, was summarized with the SD. The percentage of reviewers with a high (≥26.2) or low (<26.2) CCI within a vignette was reported. Reliability was summarized using Krippendorff α. Results Of 106 SMEs, 43 (response rate, 40.6%) completed at least 1 vignette. Eighteen of 35 vignettes (51.4%; 95% CI, 34.9%-68.0%) had unanimous high CCI, and 8 of 35 vignettes (22.9%; 95% CI, 8.9%-36.8%) had unanimous low CCI (overall categorical agreement, 74.3%; 95% CI, 59.8%-88.8%). On average, the Krippendorff α was 0.74, indicating moderate reliability. A total of 21 850 OHNS complications were reviewed and categorized as surgical or medical with 12 including subcategorization for specificity. Each category was then assigned a modified OHNS Clavien Dindo classification grade. Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study of OHNS experts, a modified OHNS Clavien-Dindo Classification was developed and validated using case vignettes. The modified Clavien-Dindo Classification provided a granular subcategorization for each complication category and grade, duration of harm, and an overall summary complication score (CCI). Results suggest the modified OHNS Clavien-Dindo Classification reliably differentiated between high-grade and low-grade OHNS complications and could be utilized for assessing surgical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Introduction Laryngotracheoesophageal clefts (LTEC) are aspiration‐related lesions often assessed using swallow studies and symptoms like respiratory or feeding difficulties. However, these indicators are unreliable predictors of disease severity. Lung inflammation and injury, though significant concerns, are rarely and inconsistently evaluated or reported. As a result, the correlation between swallow study findings and actual pulmonary disease remains unclear. Methods A retrospective cohort of children with LTEC seen in our Aerodigestive Program between October 1, 2012, and September 30, 2023, who underwent videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) or flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) were included. Data collected included clinical history, risk factors, BAL, chest CT, impedance probe, VFSS/FEES findings, and FOIS‐P/I scores at baseline and follow‐up. Results Eight‐two subjects identified. Lung inflammation and bronchiectasis were common and correlated. Clinical factors, impedance probe, and the presence/severity of swallowing abnormalities on VFSS/FEES were not predictive of lung disease. Fifty‐seven patients underwent LTEC repair for a range of indications, only 49% based on CT and/or BAL findings. Of 57 children who had LTEC repair, only 49% were based on CT or BAL findings. LTEC repair was associated with modest improvement feeding and swallowing. Discussion Children with LTEC have a high prevalence of inflammatory lung disease and injury and undergo repair for a variety of reasons. Swallow studies detect functional swallowing issues but do not reliably identify lung disease. Despite this limitation, LTEC repair is linked to improved feeding and swallowing in some patients, though not all benefit.

Importance Bilateral vocal cord paralysis is a challenging problem to manage in adults, and a known complication of thyroid surgery which is more common in resource-limited settings. Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction is a management option that has not been studied in this population or setting. Objective To report the surgical outcomes of posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction for bilateral vocal cord paralysis in a resource-limited setting, and to evaluate the efficacy of a hybrid system for teaching this technique in Kenya. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Tertiary public referral hospital, Eldoret, Kenya Participants Adults >18 years with tracheostomy dependence secondary to bilateral vocal cord paralysis after thyroid surgery or other iatrogenesis. The hybrid training program included Kenyan surgeons and surgical trainees. Intervention or Exposures Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction and hybrid training system included didactic lectures, simulation-based training, case discussion and planning, and live cases. Main Outcomes Measures One-year airway outcomes measured by achievement of tracheostomy decannulation, and self-reported surgeon knowledge and skill acquisition. Results Ten patients met criteria and were included in the analysis, with mean age 42 years (range 30-62 years) and had been tracheostomy dependent for an average of 6 years (range 1-12 years). Seven (70%) had open reconstruction, and 3 (30%) had endoscopic reconstruction. All were decannulated and remained tracheostomy-free at 1 year. Three surgeons and 7 trainees participated in the hybrid teaching methods. All reported increased comfort in laryngotracheal reconstruction, with all 3 surgeons reporting comfort performing the surgeries independently. Conclusion Posterior graft laryngotracheal reconstruction shows promise as a potential method of treating bilateral vocal cord paralysis and achieving decannulation in a resource-limited setting. Relevance The methods reported in this study lend themselves to replication and expansion to other similar settings. The authors plan to replicate this work in other centers in East Africa.

ImportanceUnderstanding the global barriers to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery (OHNS) care is crucial in addressing disparities in access to care, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs).ObjectiveTo characterize barriers to comprehensive otolaryngology care across World Bank income groups.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing an online cross-sectional survey that was administered by the Global OHNS Initiative via international and national professional societies, personal contacts, and social media, this study captured the perceptions of otolaryngologists regarding barriers to OHNS care at the levels of the country, health sector, clinician, and patient. Participants included otolaryngologists from the 194 World Health Organization member states and Taiwan. Eligibility criteria included a medical degree and specialized training in managing conditions of the ear, nose, and throat. The nonresponse rate was not recorded. The data collection period spanned from October 2022 to June 2023.ExposuresExposures included World Bank income group classification.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcomes were Likert scale responses regarding frequency of barriers to OHNS care. The a priori hypothesis was that LMICs would report more frequent barriers to OHNS care.ResultsThe study involved 146 otolaryngologists (47 female individuals [32%]), with 69 (47%) from high-income countries and 77 (53%) from LMICs. Male individuals represented 45 high-income country respondents (65%) and 54 LMIC respondents (70%). Barriers were reported across income groups at all levels of the health system, with a higher frequency in LMICs. Several barriers were reported to be more substantial in LMICs, such as the national volume and distribution of otolaryngologists, financial compensation for clinicians, and patient stigma, and others were common across income settings, such as the availability of operating rooms and inflexible working hours. Common concerns included national and health sector barriers: OHNS workforce, referral networks, government support; clinician barriers: excessive clinician workloads, understaffing, poor administration support; patient barriers: distance to health care facilities, financial burdens such as medical costs and foregone wages, stigma, and health literacy.Conclusions and RelevanceThe results of this cross-sectional study suggest that there are barriers to otolaryngology care globally that affected all levels of the health care system. This work may inform prioritization of otolaryngology within research and policy, and it emphasizes the need for effective strategies to expand access to otolaryngology care, particularly in lower-income settings.

Background: Surgical registries have been widely adopted in high-income countries to improve patient outcomes. However, similar data-driven initiatives are still scarce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Aims: This study aimed to address the challenges of implementing a perioperative registry for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) in Mekelle, Ethiopia, and to assess strategies for ensuring its long-term sustainability. Methods: The registry was developed using REDCap, through a collaborative effort between otolaryngologists in the United States and Ethiopia, ensuring its relevance to the local context. On-site training sessions were conducted for 13 OHNS residents and four senior surgeons to facilitate their use of the registry. A Wi-Fi router was installed in the operating room to enable real-time data entry. Continuous support was provided through remote communication between the local team and the U.S. research team. Sustainability strategies focused on fostering local ownership, integrating the registry into existing workflows, and maintaining continuous data monitoring. Results: Despite facing challenges like intermittent internet connectivity and issues with workflow integration, the local team successfully integrated the registry into routine clinical and surgical practices. Key strategies included providing dedicated Wi-Fi routers, modifying registry fields for improved efficiency, and emphasizing the registry’s value to the institution. Ongoing collaboration between the local team and the U.S. team enabled continuous optimization and data collection. Conclusion: The successful implementation of this perioperative registry underscores the importance of engaging local stakeholders and integrating sustainable workflows. This initiative serves as a model for other LMICs seeking to establish surgical registries that enhance data-driven decision-making at both the patient and institutional levels.

ABSTRACTObjective(s)We aim to identify the diversity of barriers to care for otolaryngology‐head and neck surgery patients in Harare, Zimbabwe.MethodsInterviews were conducted at four general otolaryngology clinics in Harare in October 2022.The patient population included children and adults presenting to either government or private clinics. Via interpreter, six standardized questions were discussed with each patient. Survey responses were used to categorize patients into one or more of three types of delays: (1) deciding to seek care, (2) reaching the appropriate healthcare facility, and (3) receiving adequate care after reaching that facility.ResultsForty‐six patients participated in this survey. The average time from problem presentation to treatment in this population was 16.3 months. Twenty‐six percent of patients experienced more than one type of delay. The most common type of delay was Type 3 (67%). Many of these patients reached appropriate facilities but could not receive timely treatment due to lengthy wait times. Type 1 delays affected 35% of patients. Notable causes were fear of doctors, preference for traditional healing, or ignorance to a treatable problem. Type 2 delays were also reported in 37%, commonly due to long distance and time to travel and insufficient finances for these journeys.ConclusionsENT patients in Zimbabwe experience a myriad of delays to receiving appropriate care. Systemic issues, including backlogged surgical lists, convoluted referral patterns, and poor transportation infrastructure, are significant contributors to patient delays. The 3‐delay model is useful for identifying barriers to care for future efforts to improve patient access to safe and affordable surgical care.Level of EvidenceLevel VI.