Citations

Abstract Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a chronic, irreversible condition that is challenging to diagnose due to subtle symptoms and limitations of conventional tools. Noninvasive lung sound analysis using phonopulmography offers a promising alternative. This study evaluated the feasibility of a deep learning model for distinguishing normal and pathological lung sounds in ILD. Lung sound recordings were collected from 12 subjects (6 healthy, 6 ILD) and segmented beat-to-beat using simultaneously acquired ECG and phonopulmography, yielding 2,280 segments. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs; 13 per segment) were extracted, and a one-dimensional CNN-based You Only Listen Once (YOLO) model was trained for segment classification. Evaluation used Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation, with patient-level classification by aggregating segment predictions via majority vote. On the test set (190 segments per class), the model achieved an average segment-level accuracy of 0.738 ± 0.087 and mean AUC of 0.850 ± 0.062. Precision, recall, and F1-score were 0.775 ± 0.148, 0.755 ± 0.183, and 0.738 ± 0.089, respectively. These preliminary results suggest that beat-level MFCCs with a 1D CNN-based YOLO model enable accurate segment- and patient-level classification. This feasibility study highlights the potential of AI-assisted auscultation for noninvasive monitoring and clinical decision support in ILD management, pending further validation in larger cohorts.

Abstract Introduction Interstitial lung disease-associated pulmonary hypertension (ILD-PH) is a clinically challenging entity that lies on a pathophysiologic spectrum between pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). We compared the metabolomes of patients with ILD-PH to those with PAH and ILD to characterize the PAH-ILD axis and determine whether ILD-PH patients can be phenotyped based on their metabolomic similarity to PAH. Methods Using untargeted metabolomics profiles from patients with PAH, ILD, and ILD-PH in the large, U.S.-based, NIH-funded, multi-center PVDOMICS cohort, we trained an anchor-based classifier on PAH and ILD metabolomes using supervised PLS-DA with a 75/25 train/test split. Primary and secondary PH or risk-group classifications in PVDOMICS were based on expert adjudication of clinical data including right heart catheterization hemodynamics, pulmonary function testing, chest imaging, and laboratory results. We then applied the trained model to each ILD-PH patient to assign a PAH similarity score. We classified patients as having a PAH-like or ILD-like metabolomic phenotype using an optimal PAH similarity score cutoff of 0.5 then compared PAH metabolomic similarity to expert-adjudicated primary and secondary WSPH classifications in PVDOMICS. We implemented FELLA, a network-based metabolomics enrichment method, to holistically characterize the biologic underpinnings of PAH, ILD-PH, and ILD metabolomes. Results We analyzed 244 patients with PAH, 54 with ILD, and 47 with ILD-PH. The anchor-based classifier demonstrated high train-test performance with a c-statistic of 0.81 and 78% agreement with expert-adjudicated diagnoses. Among the ILD-PH patients, 23 were classified as PAH-like and 24 as ILD-like (74% agreement with expert adjudication, Cohen’s kappa 0.49, Hedge’s g estimate of 0.86). FELLA enrichment revealed core glycolytic and bioenergetic pathways were enriched in both pure PAH and ILD-PH. Comparison of diffusion Z-scores between groups demonstrated subtle but biologically coherent differences in several reaction-level nodes, including lactate, NADPH oxidoreductase, and phosphofructokinase, which were enriched in ILD-PH. Conclusion Patients with ILD-PH demonstrate clinically relevant metabolomic phenotypes. Examination of the network biology underlying ILD-PH may point to potential therapeutic targets in this vulnerable subgroup with lagging clinical outcomes. This abstract is funded by: Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation PFF Scholars Program

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) develops in up to 50% of patients with advanced interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and impaired quality of life. Early recognition is essential, as available therapy for ILD-PH has been shown to improve outcomes. Identifying physiologic markers of PH may facilitate earlier referral for right heart catheterization (RHC) and initiation of targeted treatment. Thus, this study aimed to (1) compare functional parameters between ILD patients with and without RHC-confirmed PH, and (2) assess the applicability of previously proposed ILD-PH screening criteria. Methods We retrospectively analyzed ILD transplant candidates with available pre-transplant pulmonary function tests (FVC%, DLCO%), echocardiographic right-ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), six-minute walk distance (6MWD) with oxygen requirement, and RHC data. PH was defined according to the 2022 ESC/ERS criteria. Functional parameters were compared between patients with and without PH. Among those without a prior PH diagnosis, screening thresholds derived from previously published tools were applied (RVSP ≥ 35 mmHg, DLCO < 40%, FVC/DLCO > 1.6, 6MWD < 350 m, or oxygen use during 6MWD). Results Of 107 ILD patients evaluated, 90 had complete RHC data (48 ILD-PH, 42 ILD without PH). Group comparisons are summarized in Table 1. Patients with PH had lower DLCO% (median 18.5 [11.5-26.7] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.7], p = 0.08), higher FVC/DLCO ratios (2.68 [2.1-3.4] vs 1.7 [1.4-2.6], p = 0.08), and higher RVSP (55 [39.7-63.2] vs 39.5 [29-48] mmHg, p = 0.002). Oxygen requirement during 6MWD was more frequent in ILD-PH (79.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.08). Among patients with PH, 38 (79.16%) had no formal diagnosis prior to pre-transplant RHC. Of these cases, all (100%) met ≥3 screening criteria, most commonly DLCO < 40% (n = 38, 100%), FVC/DLCO > 1.6 (n = 37, 97.3%), and 6MWD < 350 m (n = 33, 86.8%). Additionally, 32 patients (84.21%) met ≥4 criteria and 8 (21.05%) met all five criteria. Conclusion In ILD transplant candidates, patients with PH had worse functional profiles when compared to those without PH, and nearly 80% of PH cases were previously undiagnosed. Systematic application of validated PH screening tools in ILD populations may facilitate earlier recognition, potentially improving patient outcomes. This abstract is funded by: None

ABSTRACT Pulmonary hypertension due to interstitial lung disease (PH‐ILD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Real‐world patients initiating inhaled treprostinil are not well‐characterized. This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate healthcare resource utilization in patients with PH‐ILD who initiated treatment with inhaled treprostinil vs patients who remained untreated. Adult patients diagnosed with PH‐ILD were indexed on initiation of inhaled treprostinil and patients who remained untreated were indexed on first observed PH diagnosis (31 March 2021–30 September 2024). Patients were excluded if they were ever treated with any pulmonary arterial hypertension therapy. Inhaled treprostinil patients were matched to up to four untreated patients. All‐cause per‐patient per‐month (PPPM) hospitalizations and ICU‐related hospitalizations were the primary outcomes of interest. 294 patients treated with inhaled treprostinil and 736 untreated patients were identified. Mean all‐cause PPPM hospitalizations remained unchanged in the pre‐index vs post‐index periods in the inhaled treprostinil cohort (0.11 vs 0.12; p = 0.42) but significantly increased in untreated patients (0.12 vs 0.23; p < 0.01). ICU utilization also remained unchanged in the pre‐index vs post‐index periods for the inhaled treprostinil cohort (0.06 vs 0.07; p = 0.11) compared to the untreated cohort (0.06 vs 0.13; p < 0.01). Untreated patients had significantly higher post‐index PPPM hospitalizations ( p < 0.01) and ICU utilization ( p < 0.01) compared to inhaled treprostinil patients. Patients who initiated inhaled treprostinil had a 30% decreased risk of hospitalization compared to untreated patients (relative risk: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.59–0.83; p < 0.01). Among real‐world patients with PH‐ILD, treatment with inhaled treprostinil is associated with fewer all‐cause hospitalizations and ICU‐related hospitalizations compared to untreated patients with PH‐ILD.

Abstract Introduction: Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) is a known adverse event associated with Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs), causing fibrosis of the lung. In the DESTINY-Breast 04, TROPICS-02, and ASCENT trials the rate of ILD/Pneumonitis was 12.1%, 0.4%, and 0% respectively. In these studies, the time to first cross-sectional imaging after initiation of ADC was 6 weeks. However, prior treatment with a topoisomerase-1 inhibitor ADC was not permitted in these studies, so the influence of sequential ADC treatments remains unknown. Here, we aimed to characterize the frequency and management of ILD in sequential use of ADCs in a multi-institution retrospective analysis. Methods: We identified patients (pts) with HR+/HER2-low and HR-/HER2-low MBC who had received both Trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-DXd) and Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) monotherapy (in either order, with or without intervening therapies) who were treated at five academic centers between 2020-2023. Patients had received treatment with the ADC in either routine clinical treatment or as a prior participant on a clinical trial with ADC monotherapy. Information regarding ILD diagnosis, imaging, timing of onset, peak and resolution along with management information was collected and analyzed. Retrospective assessment of ILD toxicity was graded using CTCAE v5.0, based on available clinical and radiographic reports. Results: 10/60 pts who received ADC therapy in this multi-institutional cohort were diagnosed with ILD (all grades). No differences in age or BMI were observed in those who developed ILD versus those who did not, and 9/10 pts were White, 1 was Asian, with a median age of 59 years (47-79 years). Pertinent history in these pts included 3/10 had a prior smoking history, 8/10 had a prior cardiac or pulmonary comorbidity (including sleep apnea, lung cancer, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, thrombosis, or stroke). Prior to receiving their first ADC, 7/10 patients had metastatic disease to the lung. All 10 patients were diagnosed with ILD during treatment with T-DXd. 4 pts initially received T-DXd, then developed ILD and then upon recovery, subsequently received SG. The remaining 6 pts initially received SG (with no reports of ILD), and then received T-DXd and subsequently developed ILD. In the entire cohort, the median time from ADC initiation to first CT scan was 8 weeks (range 1-22 weeks). Within the cohort that developed ILD, the median time from initiation of T-DXd to first CT scan was also 8 weeks (range 6-13 weeks). The median time to diagnoses of ILD was 3 months after initiation of T-DXd (range 0.4-14.5 months). Dyspnea was the most common presenting symptom in 9/10 pts and at diagnosis of ILD, dyspnea was graded as III in 6/10 pts, II in 3/10 pts, and I in 1/10 pts. Diagnostic evaluation included CT chest (9/10), pulmonary consultation (8/10), pulmonary function testing (2/10), and bronchoscopy (1/10). 4/10 patients presented at their highest-grade toxicity at diagnosis. All patients stopped T-DXd treatment, 7 were hospitalized, 7 required supplemental oxygen, and 8 were prescribed steroids for treatment. Of those receiving steroids, the most common starting dose was prednisone 1 mg/kg and doses ranged from 0.5 mg/kg to 9mg/kg prednisone equivalents. No patient received a secondary immunosuppressive agent. The steroid treatment duration ranged from 1-4 months. None of the 10 pts underwent re-challenge with T-DXd and 3/10 developed grade V ILD (death). Conclusion: We observed a 16.6% incidence of all grade ILD (5% grade V ILD) with T-DXd and 0% with SG. In this small cohort study, we did not observe a clear increased risk for ILD with sequential treatment of ADCs. Practice patterns were consistent with recommended diagnostic evaluation and steroid management. Additional strategies are needed to characterize pts most at risk for developing ILD and to identify situations where re-challenge may be safe. Citation Format: Sarah Premji, Laura Huppert, Reshma Mahtani, Samantha Fisch, Naomi Dempsey, Angelina Raimonde-Taylor, Saya Jacob, Laura Quintal, Jo Chien, Michelle Melisko, Ana Sandoval-Leon, Lauren Carcas, Manmeet Ahluwalia, Natasha Harpalani, Jenna Hoppenworth, Dame Idossa, Ruta Rao, Hope Rugo, Karthik Giridhar. Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) in Sequential Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) use in patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC): A Multi-Institutional experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO4-12-06.