Bajwa, A

Abstract Rationale Pulmonary hypertension (PH) develops in up to 50% of patients with advanced interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and impaired quality of life. Early recognition is essential, as available therapy for ILD-PH has been shown to improve outcomes. Identifying physiologic markers of PH may facilitate earlier referral for right heart catheterization (RHC) and initiation of targeted treatment. Thus, this study aimed to (1) compare functional parameters between ILD patients with and without RHC-confirmed PH, and (2) assess the applicability of previously proposed ILD-PH screening criteria. Methods We retrospectively analyzed ILD transplant candidates with available pre-transplant pulmonary function tests (FVC%, DLCO%), echocardiographic right-ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), six-minute walk distance (6MWD) with oxygen requirement, and RHC data. PH was defined according to the 2022 ESC/ERS criteria. Functional parameters were compared between patients with and without PH. Among those without a prior PH diagnosis, screening thresholds derived from previously published tools were applied (RVSP ≥ 35 mmHg, DLCO < 40%, FVC/DLCO > 1.6, 6MWD < 350 m, or oxygen use during 6MWD). Results Of 107 ILD patients evaluated, 90 had complete RHC data (48 ILD-PH, 42 ILD without PH). Group comparisons are summarized in Table 1. Patients with PH had lower DLCO% (median 18.5 [11.5-26.7] vs 26.5 [20.0-34.7], p = 0.08), higher FVC/DLCO ratios (2.68 [2.1-3.4] vs 1.7 [1.4-2.6], p = 0.08), and higher RVSP (55 [39.7-63.2] vs 39.5 [29-48] mmHg, p = 0.002). Oxygen requirement during 6MWD was more frequent in ILD-PH (79.2% vs 61.9%, p = 0.08). Among patients with PH, 38 (79.16%) had no formal diagnosis prior to pre-transplant RHC. Of these cases, all (100%) met ≥3 screening criteria, most commonly DLCO < 40% (n = 38, 100%), FVC/DLCO > 1.6 (n = 37, 97.3%), and 6MWD < 350 m (n = 33, 86.8%). Additionally, 32 patients (84.21%) met ≥4 criteria and 8 (21.05%) met all five criteria. Conclusion In ILD transplant candidates, patients with PH had worse functional profiles when compared to those without PH, and nearly 80% of PH cases were previously undiagnosed. Systematic application of validated PH screening tools in ILD populations may facilitate earlier recognition, potentially improving patient outcomes. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract Rationale Endobronchial valve (EBV) placement is an established bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) therapy for advanced emphysema. Although randomized trials have shown improvements in lung function, real-world data on predictors of response and complications remain limited. This study evaluated physiological and clinical outcomes after EBV placement and explored predictors of treatment response and adverse events. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients who underwent EBV placement for severe emphysema at Mayo Clinic Florida between 2018 and 2023. Demographics, comorbidities, pulmonary function test and complications data were collected before and after procedure. Responders were defined as those achieving a ≥ 15% relative increase in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), ≥10% reduction in residual volume (RV), ≥25-meter increase in six-minute walk distance (6MWD), or ≥ 1-point decrease in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea score. Results The mean age was 70.4 ± 7.1 years, 59% were female, and the mean Body Mass Index was 25.6 ± 4.9 kg/m². Most patients were non-Hispanic White (96%) and ever-smokers (97%, median 40 pack-years). Following EBV placement, FEV1 increased by + 0.10 L (p < 0.001), forced vital capacity by + 0.17 L (p = 0.001), RV decreased by -0.69 L (p < 0.001), while total lung capacity decreased by -0.35 L (p < 0.001). Diffusing capacity, 6MWD, and mMRC did not significantly change. Responder analysis showed FEV1 improvement in 52% (34/65), RV reduction in 65% (42/65), 6MWD gain in 33% (18/55), and mMRC improvement in 33% (21/63). Complete lobar atelectasis occurred in 59% (44/75) and was significantly associated with FEV1 improvement (p < 0.01). 30-day follow up complications included pneumothorax (26.7%), COPD exacerbation (21%), and pneumonia (20%). 15% pneumothoraces were managed conservatively, 55% required chest tube, 30% needed valve removal due to persistent air leak. Valve migration and replacement occurred in 2.6% each, and valve removal in 26.6% patients. Median hospital stay was longer in patients with complications (5 vs 4 days, p = 0.003). In-hospital mortality was 5.3% but no procedure-related deaths were identified. Conclusions EBV placement is a safe and effective BLVR approach yielding significant improvements in FEV1 and reductions in hyperinflation. Pneumothorax and valve-related events were the most frequent complications. Complete lobar atelectasis strongly correlated with functional improvement, suggesting that early reassessment should be considered when collapse is not achieved to prevent complications and unnecessary valve retention. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract Rationale Treatment of hematologic malignancies has been revolutionized by Chimeric antigen receptor T -cell (CAR-T) therapy. Pulmonary complications are increasingly being reported, however, there are no standardized timelines for pulmonary function test (PFTs) assessment before or after the infusion. We aimed to evaluate changes in lung function (TLC, RV, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC) pre- and post-CAR-T therapy and examine whether these parameters correlate with the development of specific pulmonary complications. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients above the age of 18 with any malignancy who received CAR-T therapy between June 12, 2018, and December 26, 2023. Pre-CAR-T PFTs were obtained closest to the infusion date, and post-CAR-T PFTs were recorded at the earliest available time following infusion. Pre- and post-CART pulmonary function tests were compared using non-parametric paired tests. In addition, we examined the relationship between baseline PFTs and the subsequent occurrence of pulmonary complications after CAR-T infusion. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to assess both the magnitude and direction of change while Sign test was used to evaluate only the direction to confirm the consistency of results. These tests were chosen due to small sample size and non-normal distribution of data. Results Among the 68 patients in our cohort, paired pre- and post- CAR-T measurements of pulmonary function were available for 18 patients. FEV1 declined significantly post-infusion (2.70 ± 0.81 L vs 2.28 ± 0.74 L; Z= -2.55, p = 0.011), the FEV1/FVC ratio remained stable (77.8 ± 8.0 vs 80.9 ± 12.2, p = 0.53). Mean TLC and RV remained stable (TLC 5.70 ± 1.18 L vs 4.66 ± 1.02 L, p = 0.17 and 2.13 ± 0.62 L vs 2.00 ± 0.70 L, p = 0.58). There was no significant correlation between the baseline lung function and the development of pulmonary complications. Conclusion Only the pattern of FEV1 decline following CAR-T therapy infusion demonstrates a significant decline, whereas other PFTs, although reduced, did not show significance. While these findings may suggest a restrictive ventilatory pattern, additional data on lung volumes are required to accurately characterize the underlying type of pulmonary function impairment. Although limited by small sample size and non-uniform timing of PFT assessments, this highlights the need for a routine pre-CAR-T pulmonary function evaluation to inform patient selection and baseline risk stratification. This abstract is funded by: None

Abstract RATIONALE There are limited studies evaluating the association between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy and interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA). Our study aims to investigate this potential relationship to better understand pulmonary complications following CAR-T therapy. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients aged 18 or older with any malignancy who received CAR-T therapy between June 12, 2018, and December 26, 2023. Chest imaging, including PET or CT scans, was reviewed for each patient; the closest scan before CAR-T therapy and the most recent scan afterward. We identified ILA based on findings that included ground-glass opacities, reticular abnormalities, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, or non-emphysematous cysts involving more than 5% of lung zones. We excluded dependent atelectasis, paraspinal fibrosis, aspiration-related changes, mild focal or unilateral abnormalities, and smoking-related centrilobular nodularity without other findings. Results A total of 66 patients had adequate imaging data both before and after CAR-T infusion. Before therapy, 17 patients (25.8%) demonstrated ILA, while 49 (74.2%) did not. Following CAR-T therapy, the overall prevalence of ILA increased to 31 patients (47.0%). Among those who did not have ILA before CAR-T, 16 of 49 (32.7%) developed new ILA following therapy. Conversely, among those with pre-existing ILA, 14 of 17 (82.4%) showed persistent or progressive ILA post-CAR-T. This distribution demonstrated a statistically significant association between pre- and post-CAR-T ILA status (χ² = 10.8, p = 0.001), indicating that pre-CAR-T ILA status strongly predicted post-CAR-T ILA persistence or worsening. When evaluating post-CAR-T ILA in relation to clinical outcomes, among those with pre-CAR-T ILA, 52.9% (n = 9) were deceased at follow-up, compared to 55.1% (n = 27) among patients without ILA. The difference in mortality between the groups was not statistically significant (χ² = 2.34, p = 0.31). 19 of 31 patients (61.3%) with post-CAR-T ILA were deceased at last follow-up, compared with 17 of 37 (45.9%) in those without ILA. Although mortality was numerically higher among patients with post-CAR-T ILA, this difference did not reach statistical significance (χ² = 1.04, p = 0.308). Conclusion Our study demonstrates a statistically significant association between pre- and post-CAR-T interstitial lung abnormalities, suggesting that CAR-T therapy may contribute to the progression or development of ILAs. These findings highlight the need for closer pulmonary monitoring during CAR-T treatment. This abstract is funded by: None