Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

21 citation(s) found for "Gaffney, G".

Randomized Trial of Hypofractionated Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy in Women With Breast Reconstruction (RT CHARM, Alliance A221505)
Poppe, Matthew M , Le-Rademacher, Jennifer G , Haffty, Bruce G , Hansen, Eric K , Wagner, Jamie L , Kong, Iwa , Whelan, Timothy J , Kour, Odum, Lee, Minji K , Ruddy, Kathryn J , Partridge, Ann H , Carey, Lisa A , Lustberg, Maryam , Chow, Selina , Stecklein, Shane Richard , Gaffney, David K , Khan, Atif J.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | October 12, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco-26-00474 | PMID 42863096 Get It

PURPOSE Patients with breast cancer requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) often desire breast reconstruction. Reconstructions can be adversely affected by PMRT, and fear of reconstruction complications has discouraged adoption of short-course radiation therapy used after lumpectomy. To fill the evidence gap, we conducted a noninferiority trial of hypofractionated versus conventional PMRT in patients undergoing breast reconstruction. The primary outcome was reconstruction complication rate, a composite of wound healing, readmission, capsular contracture, unplanned reoperation, and reconstruction failure. METHODS Women with unilateral invasive breast cancer with planned immediate or delayed reconstruction and PMRT were randomly assigned (1:1) to 50 Gy (25 fractions/5 weeks) or 42.56 Gy (16 fractions/3 weeks). This study was designed with a noninferiority margin of 10%, assuming a 2-year reconstruction complication rate of 25% with conventional PMRT. Randomization was stratified by immediate versus delayed and autologous versus implant-only reconstruction. RESULTS Between 2018 and 2021, 898 patients enrolled with a median follow-up of 3.9 years; 825 patients were evaluable for the primary end point. The 24-month reconstruction complication rates were 12.3% (52/422) with hypofractionated PMRT and 10.2% (41/403) with conventional PMRT, corresponding to an estimated difference of -2.1% (95% CI, -6.5 to 2.2). The complication rate was higher (regardless of arm) with implant-only versus autologous reconstruction (odds ratio = 1.65). There was no statistically significant difference in 36-month locoregional recurrence rates: 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7 to 3.2) with hypofractionated and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.3) with conventional PMRT. Acute and late toxicity rates were not statistically different. CONCLUSION A 16-fraction course of hypofractionated PMRT is safe and noninferior to conventional PMRT in women undergoing breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Vaginal Cancer, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R, Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha R. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin, Brooks, Rebecca , Chon, Hye Sook, Crispens, Marta Ann, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Mutch, David, Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa, Nwachukwu, Chika, Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Nwachukwu, Chika , Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Arend, Rebecca C. , Bradley, Kristin , Chino, Junzo , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Glaser, Gretchen , Landrum, Lisa M. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | February 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 101-126

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0011 | PMID 41825134 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Vaginal Cancer outline the recommended diagnostic workup, staging considerations, and treatment options for this rare malignancy. Because vaginal cancer is uncommon and shares many biologic and clinical characteristics with cervical cancer, several management recommendations, particularly systemic therapy, are extrapolated from evidence and practices established for cervical cancer. This guideline excerpt summarizes key components of management, including diagnostic evaluation and workup, principles of staging, pathology considerations, radiation therapy principles, and primary treatment recommendations for both early-stage and advanced disease. It also details approaches to manage relapses, including locoregional recurrence and distant metastases, and provides an in-depth overview of systemic therapy recommendations for vaginal cancer.
Cervical Cancer, Version 2.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha, Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Landrum, Lisa M. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nieto, Karina , Nwachukwu, Chika , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Arend, Rebecca C. , Chino, Junzo , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 17, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 549-573

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0057 | PMID 41671440 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cervical Cancer provide diagnostic workup, staging, and various treatment recommendations for cervical cancer based on clinical and surgical staging. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for cervical cancer specifically focuses on diagnosis and workup, principles of staging and surgery, and primary treatment recommendations for early-stage and advanced disease and provides a detailed overview of systemic therapy recommendations for cervical cancer.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Uterine Neoplasms, Version 3.2025
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Campos, Susana M. , Amarnath, Sudha, Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Landrum, Lisa M. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nieto, Karina , Nwachukwu, Chika , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Schuetze, Scott M. , Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel, Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Arend, Rebecca C. , Crispens, Marta Ann , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Sambandam, Vaishnavi

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 5, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 284-291

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0038 | PMID 40763788 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Uterine Neoplasms provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical staging, and treatment options for patients with endometrial cancer and uterine sarcoma. The NCCN Cervical Uterine Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions; examine relevant new data from publications, abstracts, and recent FDA approvals; and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s deliberations on the new FIGO 2023 staging system and updates on the new systemic therapy recommendations for the management of endometrial cancer.
Mental Health Diagnoses in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Potential Impact on Oncologic Outcomes
Howell, Jackson Neal , Mark, Bayarmaa , Wada, David A., Bowling, Marianne, Wei, Mei , Lloyd, Shane , Gaffney, David K. , Maity, Amit , LaRiviere, Michael J. , Rule, William G., Grant, Jonathan D., Deshmukh, Vikrant , Date, Ankita , Hashibe, Mia, Howell, Jackson N , Lloyd, Shane L , Tao, Randa , Newman, Michael

Cancer Medicine | March 11, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cam4.70577 | PMID 40052836 Get It

ABSTRACTBackgroundWe investigated mental health diagnoses (MHDs) in mycosis fungoides (MF) patients compared to the general population, evaluated risk factors, and studied survival outcomes in a large population database.MethodsMF patients from the Utah Cancer Registry diagnosed from 2001 to 2014 were matched with up to five general population individuals from the Utah Population Database. MHDs were retrospectively tracked in both populations (median follow‐up = 6.67 years). Risk factors for new MHDs among MF patients were studied using the Cox proportional hazards model. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐specific survival (DSS) were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsThe incidence of anxiety disorders (HR = 1.99, 95% CI [1.16, 3.42]) and delirium/dementia disorders (HR = 2.43, 95% CI [1.05, 5.63]) was higher among MF patients than the matched general population. Among MF patients, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 2 and BMI < 18 kg/m2 were risk factors for new anxiety disorders. Radiation therapy, CCI ≥ 2, and female gender were risk factors for new delirium/dementia disorders. The 15‐year OS was worse for MF patients with versus without an MHD (36% vs. 81%, HR 2.62, 95%CI [1.24, 5.65]). The 15‐year DSS also worsened for MF patients with versus without an MHD (63% vs. 97%, HR 6.55, 95%CI [1.64, 26.2]).ConclusionsMF patients developed anxiety and delirium/dementia disorders at rates above the general population, and MHDs correlated with worse DSS and OS. Careful mental health monitoring may be an actionable step towards improving health‐related quality of life in this population.
Clinical spectrum of indolent mycosis fungoides with a gamma‐delta (γδ) phenotype: a single institution review including therapy and outcomes
Ufkes, Nicole , Miles, Rodney R., Cipriano, Sarah D. , Bowling, Morgan , Florell, Scott R. , Gaffney, David K. , Wada, D., Tao, Randa , Halwani, Ahmad , Bowling, M.

JEADV Clinical Practice | October 29, 2024 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 203-206

10.1002/jvc2.562 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPrimary cutaneous γδ T‐cell lymphoma (CGD‐CTL) is a rare malignancy that classically exhibits an aggressive clinical phenotype.ObjectivesReview cases of mycosis fungoides with a γδ phenotype that demonstrated an indolent clinical course.MethodsRetrospective review of patients diagnosed with MF with a γδ phenotype and an indolent clinical course between 2018 and 2022 treated at the University of Utah.ResultsFive patients ages 4‐81 years old were identified. All presented with clinically persistent patch or plaque‐stage disease, and histopathology showed primarily epidermotropic infiltrates positive for TCR delta via immunostaining. None of these patients have required aggressive treatment with multiagent chemotherapy.ConclusionsThere exists a subset of indolent CGD‐TCL patients who are clinicopathologically distinct from classic CGD‐CTL and clinically resembling indolent MF. Therefore, we prefer the term “MF with γδ phenotype” for these rare cases.
A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols
Nydahl, Peter , Liu, Keibun , Bellelli, Giuseppe , Calle, Gabi Heras-La, Hoffmann, Magdalena , Jeitziner, Marie‐Madlen , Krewulak, Karla D. , Paulino, Maria Carolina , Haken, Rebecca von , Group, the WDAD Study, Abdalgany, Ahmed Gaber Ahmed, Aburaas, Amjad, Albakosh, Bashir Abobaker, Alhamdan, Hamza Ismail Ahmad, Aljbali, Akram Waled Rajab M, Al-Kandari, Fareeda, Anders, Daniel, Anderson, Marsali, Ashkenazy, Shelly , Avelino, Thiago, Bail, Kasia , Bakri, Ashraf , Baroum, Alaa Mohamed Ali , Brendt-Müller, Jennifer, Brobeil, Angelika, Byrnes, Tru , Cahill, Maria, Canelas, Maria Ana , Carroll, Ida, Conley, Amy, Cotton, Shannon A. , Couser, Mandy, Salgado, A., Cusworth, Elizabeth, Cvoro, Vera , Deosaran, Jordanna, Diebels, Merel, Docherty, Elaine A, Dossow, Vera von , Drennan, Megan, Egdeer, Akram Amin, Eichelsheim, Patrick, Elagili, Aissha Ali Saleh, Elsahl, Saifaleslam Jamal, Elshaikh, Hajer Alsadeg Mohammed, Fathi, Azza , Feige, Melanie, Fiest, Kirsten M. , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Fuchita, Mikita , Gaffney, Carol, Vich, Carola Giménez-Esparza, Feldmann, Nicole , Fitzpatrick, Neasa , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Goldberg, María Adela , Golüke, Nienke M.S. , Graaf, Marinette van der , Groenewald, Engelina , Gross, Renate , Segers, Camilla Grube, Hadi, Renate, Hamdan, Qusai Ahmad Hasan, Hamida, Bahaeddin Ben, Hamza, Monalyce, Hopkins, Jane , Hopkins, John , Jeyaseelan, Arveen , Kadhim, Ali Jawad, Kohler, S., Kooken, Rens , Khutwah, Ayman Salim Abu, Lange, Puck, Liefrink, Sharon, Lin, Yu‐Min , Loo, Shi Pei , Rodrigues, Sara Beatriz Lopes, MacDonald, Allan S., Madders, G, Massaro, Claudia, Maya, Kerri, Manioudaki, Sofia, Stewart, McKenna, Coimbra, Isabel , Miranda, Teresa, Mohamed, Mohamed A. , Mohammed, Mushin Mohammed Elhadi Agbna, Naeem, Fariha , Nam, Mi-Ryeo, Newman, Elaine, Nicol, Renae, Noonan, Claire, Lopes, Maria Inês, Otmani, Zina , O’Reilly, Susan, Ozorio, Valerie, Palakashappa, Jessica, Pandya, Tej , Papadea, Panagiota, Papanikolaou, Metaxia, Pinardi, Elena , Pereira, Inês Filipa Pinto, Premathilaka, Chirantha , Pop‐Purceleanu, Monica , Puchegger, Marlene, Qalhoud, Nouralddeen Mohammed, Raasing, Maike, Ragheb, Dalia Talaat, Ramadan, Nuri, Rubel, Mushabbir Hossain, Sainsbury, Kate, Schimböck, Florian , Schmädig, Roman , Schoon, Yvonne , Sethia, Deepak , Sextl, Edith, Shah, Bhagyesh , Shaout, Dua’a, Sharabi, Alaa Fouad, Shields, Lynn, Smith, Kendall A. , Dam, Linda Smulders-van, Soiza, Roy L. , Spiegler, Andrea, Stocks, Lucy, Sumerauer, Stefan, Tam, Stephanie , Tan, Aik Haw, Tohsche, Peter, Torres, Raquel Gouveia, Toth, Chantal, Tousgaard, Iben, Vogt, Birgit, Walsh, Erica M., Ward‐Stockham, Kristel , Mart, Melinda Webb‐St, Wijnen-Meijer, Mariajne Elisabeth, Zastrow, Inke , Nydahl, Peter , Jeitziner, Marie-Madlen , Krewulak, Karla D , Benbenishty, Julie Sarah , Boogaard, Mark van den , Caplan, Gideon A. , Chung, Chi Ryang , Elhadi, Muhammed , Gurjar, Mohan , Mailhot, Tanya , Morandi, Alessandro , Nawa, Ricardo Kenji , Oh, Esther S , Collet, Marie Oxenbøll , Lindroth, Heidi , Group, the WDAD Study, Abdelmohsen, Sarah Magdy , Aggar, Christina , Alkandari, Farah, Alkaseek, Akram Mohammed , Anders, Daniel, Anderson, Marsali, Blackwood, Bronagh , Brendt-Müller, Jennifer , Burke, Richard, Cacciatore, Stefano , Cahill, Maria, Conley, Amy, Costello, Maria , Diebels, Merel, Elshaikh, Hajer Alsadeg Mohammed, Emme, Christina , Exl, Matthias Thomas , Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Gaffney, Carol, Fitzgerald, Rachel, Fong, Marleta Irene Joy, Graaf, Mirjam, Segers, Camilla Grube, Hadi, Renate, Hamdan, Qusai, Hetland, Breanna , Hopkins, Jane Adele, Ibrahim, Said A. , Imbrìaco, Guglielmo , Inoue, Shigeaki , Kadhim, Ali Jawad, Kohler, Sabrina, Korompeli, Anna , Krüger, Lars , Lange, Puck, Rodrigues, Sara Beatriz Lopes, MacDonald, Allan, McAndrew, Natalie S. , Mohamed, Mohamed Anwar Abdelsalam, Mohammed, Mushin Mohammed Elhadi Agbna, Mulkey, Malissa , Nakamura, Kensuke , Nam, Mi-Ryeo, Newman, Elaine, Nicol, Renae, Olotu, Cynthia , Ornago, Alice Margherita , O’Reilly, Susan, Penfold, Rose , Pereira, Inês Filipa Pinto, Quinn, Terence J , Raasing, Maike Wm, Rajhans, Prasad Anant , Ramadan, Nuri, Rubel, Mushabbir Hossain, Sainsbury, Kate, Salis, Francesco , Sharabi, Alaa Fouad, Smith, Kendall, Tam, Stephanie, Timmons, Suzanne , Torres, Raquel Gouveia, Tsolaki, Vasiliki , Castro, Roberta Esteves Vieira de , Vogt, Birgit, Walsh, Erica, Wefer, Franziska , Wøien, Hilde , Zazzara, Maria Beatrice

Age and Ageing | June 12, 2024 | Volume: 53 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ageing/afae129 | PMID 38952186 Get It

Abstract Background Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Objective To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. Design Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. Setting Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. Methods Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. Results Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289–9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. Conclusion Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.
Vulvar Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Howitt, Brooke E. , Kendra, Kari , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , Zanotti, Kristine , McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Arend, Rebecca C. , Crispens, Marta Ann , Holmes, Jordan A. , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Lee, Nita Karnik , Mutch, David G. , Wethington, Stephanie L.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 18, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 117-135

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0013 | PMID 38503056 Get It

Vulvar cancer is annually diagnosed in an estimated 6,470 individuals and the vast majority are histologically squamous cell carcinomas. Vulvar cancer accounts for 5% to 8% of gynecologic malignancies. Known risk factors for vulvar cancer include increasing age, infection with human papillomavirus, cigarette smoking, inflammatory conditions affecting the vulva, and immunodeficiency. Most vulvar neoplasias are diagnosed at early stages. Rarer histologies exist and include melanoma, extramammary Paget’s disease, Bartholin gland adenocarcinoma, verrucous carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. This manuscript discusses recommendations outlined in the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for treatments, surveillance, systemic therapy options, and gynecologic survivorship.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024
Abu‐Rustum, Nadeem R. , Yashar, Catheryn M. , Arend, Rebecca C. , Barber, Emma L. , Bradley, Kristin , Brooks, Rebecca , Campos, Susana M. , Chino, Junzo , Chon, Hye Sook, Damast, Shari , Fisher, Christine M. , Frederick, Peter J., Gaffney, David K. , Gaillard, Stéphanie , Giuntoli, Robert , Glaser, Scott , Holmes, Jordan A. , Howitt, Brooke E. , Mantia-Smaldone, Gina , Mariani, Andrea , Nagel, Christa , Nekhlyudov, Larissa , Podoll, Mirna, Rodabaugh, Kerry J. , Salani, Ritu , Schorge, John O., Siedel, Jean , Sisodia, Rachel , Soliman, Pamela T. , Ueda, Stefanie , Urban, Renata R. , Wyse, Emily , McMillian, Nicole R., Aggarwal, Shaili, Espinosa, Sara, Gaillard, Stéphanie , Crispens, Marta Ann , Lea, Jayanthi Sivasothy , Mutch, David G.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | December 11, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1224-1233

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0062 | PMID 38081139 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cervical Cancer provide recommendations for all aspects of management for cervical cancer, including the diagnostic workup, staging, pathology, and treatment. The guidelines also include details on histopathologic classification of cervical cancer regarding diagnostic features, molecular profiles, and clinical outcomes. The treatment landscape of advanced cervical cancer is evolving constantly. These NCCN Guidelines Insights provide a summary of recent updates regarding the systemic therapy recommendations for recurrent or metastatic disease.
Early Metformin in Gestational Diabetes
Dunne, Fidelma , Newman, Christine , Alvarez‐Iglesias, Alberto , Smyth, Andrew , Browne, Marie, O’Shea, Paula , Gillespie, Paddy , Finn, Yvonne , Gaffney, G, Khattak, Aftab, O’Keeffe, Derek T. , O’Donnell, Martin , Egan, Aoife, O'Shea, Paula M , Gillespie, Paddy , Dunne, Fidelma P , Ferguson, John P. , Devane, Declan , Bogdanet, Delia , Kgosidialwa, Oratile , Egan, Aoife M. , Liew, Aaron

JAMA | October 3, 2023 | Volume: 330 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 1547

10.1001/jama.2023.19869 | PMID 37786390 Get It

Importance Gestational diabetes is a common complication of pregnancy and the optimal management is uncertain. Objective To test whether early initiation of metformin reduces insulin initiation or improves fasting hyperglycemia at gestation weeks 32 or 38. Design, Setting, and Participants Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 2 centers in Ireland (one tertiary hospital and one smaller regional hospital). Participants were enrolled from June 2017 through September 2022 and followed up until 12 weeks’ postpartum. Participants comprised 510 individuals (535 pregnancies) diagnosed with gestational diabetes based on World Health Organization 2013 criteria. Interventions Randomized 1:1 to either placebo or metformin (maximum dose, 2500 mg) in addition to usual care. Main Outcomes And Measures The primary outcome was a composite of insulin initiation or a fasting glucose level of 5.1 mmol/L or greater at gestation weeks 32 or 38. Results Among 510 participants (mean age, 34.3 years), 535 pregnancies were randomized. The primary composite outcome was not significantly different between groups and occurred in 150 pregnancies (56.8%) in the metformin group and 167 pregnancies (63.7%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, −6.9% [95% CI, −15.1% to 1.4%]; relative risk, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.02]; P = .13). Of 6 prespecified secondary maternal outcomes, 3 favored the metformin group, including time to insulin initiation, self-reported capillary glycemic control, and gestational weight gain. Secondary neonatal outcomes differed by group, with smaller neonates (lower mean birth weights, a lower proportion weighing &amp;gt;4 kg, a lower proportion in the &amp;gt;90% percentile, and smaller crown-heel length) in the metformin group without differences in neonatal intensive care needs, respiratory distress requiring respiratory support, jaundice requiring phototherapy, major congenital anomalies, neonatal hypoglycemia, or proportion with 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7. Conclusion and relevance Early treatment with metformin was not superior to placebo for the composite primary outcome. Prespecified secondary outcome data support further investigation of metformin in larger clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980276 ; EudraCT: 2016-001644-19