Dunne, Fidelma

Abstract Background Pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with increased risks of adverse perinatal outcomes, and with long-term metabolic and cardiovascular consequences for both mother and child. The original EMERGE randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluated the effectiveness of early metformin in addition to usual care in women with GDM on glycaemic control and perinatal outcomes. The EMERGE Mothers and Kids study is a longitudinal follow-up of the EMERGE trial participants, designed to investigate the long-term metabolic, cardiovascular, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in mothers and their offspring. Methods This is a prospective, observational cohort study of participants and their children from the EMERGE trial (NCT06327191). A single follow-up visit will be conducted up to 6 years after the index pregnancy. Maternal assessments include anthropometric data, glucose tolerance, and metabolic parameters. Child assessments include growth metrics, adiposity measured via skinfold thickness, and neurodevelopmental status assessed through validated questionnaires. Additional data on quality of life, mental health, breastfeeding, and health economics will also be collected. Discussion This study aims to provide insights into the long-term safety and efficacy of metformin use during pregnancy and its potential impact on the long term maternal and child health outcomes, contributing to evidence-based management of GDM. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT06327191

Abstract Aims To investigate the cost‐effectiveness of early initiation of metformin and usual care for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Methods Economic evaluation from a healthcare perspective, based on the EMERGE randomised controlled trial. In total, 535 women with GDM were randomised to placebo in addition to usual care or metformin in addition to usual care. Economic outcomes included incremental healthcare costs and quality adjusted life years ( QALYs ) and expected cost‐effectiveness at cost‐effectiveness threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained. Uncertainty was explored using parametric, non‐parametric, deterministic and probabilistic methods and heterogeneity using subgroup analysis. Results On average, relative to the placebo arm, the early metformin arm was associated with non‐statistically significant mean increases of €193.07 (95% CI : −€789.88, €1176.01; p = 0.700) and 0.002 QALYs (95% CI : −0.009, 0.013; p = 0.771). In terms of expected cost‐effectiveness at threshold values of €20,000, €45,000 and €100,000 per QALY gained, the probability of the early metformin arm being more cost‐effective was estimated at 0.423, 0.452 and 0.524. Exploratory subgroup analyses provided more favourable but not definitive evidence in favour of the early metformin arm for cohorts with previous GDM and previous caesarean section. Conclusions We do not find definitive evidence that early initiation of metformin in addition to usual care for GDM was more cost‐effective than usual care alone. The clinical and economic evidence may be considered equivocal, but worthy of further examination.

Abstract Metformin is well‐established as a treatment for type 2 diabetes in non‐pregnant individuals. The low cost, acceptability and broad tolerability of metformin have also made it an attractive option for research into the treatment of other conditions associated with insulin resistance. Despite almost 50 years of clinical experience with the use of metformin to treat diabetes in pregnancy, many questions remain regarding its precise effectiveness in different maternal subgroups, as well as potential short‐term and long‐term effects on the offspring. In this narrative review, we present the current evidence for the use of metformin during pregnancy in various maternal subgroups, including women living with overweight and obesity, women at risk of gestational diabetes, women diagnosed with gestational diabetes and women with pregestational diabetes, including type 2 diabetes. Our specific focus is on the impact of metformin on short‐term maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes. We also consider the evidence for other emerging indications for metformin in pregnancy, such as the prevention and management of pre‐eclampsia. Plain Language Summary This article looks at research on how metformin use in pregnancy affects mothers and newborns in the short term. Doctors have prescribed metformin since the 1970s for the treatment of diabetes in pregnancy. Despite years of use, there are still questions about how safe and effective metformin is for mothers and their children. Metformin taken during pregnancy moves through the placenta into the foetus's bloodstream. The short‐term and long‐term effects of metformin on offspring need careful attention. The studies that have looked at the link between metformin use and birth defects have not found any strong link between taking metformin in pregnancy and birth defects, however close attention will continue to be paid in this area. Some large studies have examined the use of metformin in pregnant women who do not have diabetes, but who do live with overweight or obesity. The studies are difficult to compare. Some, but not all, of these studies have shown less weight gain for the mother if metformin is taken by these women during pregnancy. Other large studies have looked at whether metformin can prevent gestational diabetes. The results are mostly disappointing. They suggest that metformin does not stop gestational diabetes from developing. However, the participants in these studies were mostly from white backgrounds and metformin may help prevent gestational diabetes in women of different ethnic backgrounds. However, more research is needed. Metformin has been widely studied as an alternative to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. Because different countries diagnose and treat GDM differently, this makes comparing study results difficult. Women with gestational diabetes seem to gain less weight during pregnancy if they use metformin rather than insulin. Using metformin instead of insulin may result in lower average birth weights for babies from these pregnancies. Also, the use of metformin may lead to fewer babies being born abnormally large. Similarly, large trials have examined the use of metformin in pregnant women who are living with type 2 diabetes. These studies show that metformin can lower a mother's insulin needs. It can also help control weight gain and reduce the risk of having a large baby. One study found that metformin use in women living with Type 2 diabetes might increase the risk of having smaller babies. This was especially true if the mother had high blood pressure or kidney disease. This finding requires further investigation. Metformin might help prevent pre‐eclampsia, but this is still unclear. Research is ongoing into a potential role for metformin in the treatment of pre‐eclampsia. In conclusion, metformin has been studied in many groups of pregnant women. Women with gestational diabetes or type 2 diabetes may see benefits like less weight gain and better blood sugar/glucose control. Current evidence suggests that metformin shouldn't be used if there are foetal growth issues. It is also not recommended for mothers with high blood pressure or kidney disease. Future studies might find specific groups of pregnant women who would benefit the most from metformin.

Abstract Aim Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) display adverse lifetime cardiometabolic health. We examined whether early metformin in GDM could impact cardiometabolic risk factors postpartum. Methods EMERGE, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, randomized pregnancies 1:1 to placebo or metformin at GDM diagnosis and followed participants from randomization until 12 ± 4 weeks postpartum. In total, 478 pregnancies were available for postpartum maternal assessment, 237 and 241 assigned to metformin and placebo respectively. Weight (kg), body mass index (BMI) (kg/m2), waist circumference (cm), and blood pressure (mmHg) were measured, infant feeding method documented, and blood specimens drawn for a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, fasting insulin, C-peptide, and lipid analysis. Results Despite similar weight and BMI at trial randomization, participants receiving metformin had significantly lower weight (79.5 ± 15.9 vs 82.6 ± 16.9 kg; P = .04) and BMI (29.3 [5.6] vs 30.5 [5.4]; P = .018) at the postpartum visit. However, no difference in weight change from randomization to 12 weeks postpartum was observed between metformin and placebo groups. Overall, 29% (n = 139) of the cohort met criteria for prediabetes or diabetes, with no positive impact with metformin. There were also no differences in measurements of insulin resistance, blood pressure, or lipids between groups. Conclusion Early metformin use in GDM did not impact important cardiometabolic parameters in the early postpartum period despite significant benefits in weight gain and insulin use in pregnancy.

Importance Gestational diabetes is a common complication of pregnancy and the optimal management is uncertain. Objective To test whether early initiation of metformin reduces insulin initiation or improves fasting hyperglycemia at gestation weeks 32 or 38. Design, Setting, and Participants Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in 2 centers in Ireland (one tertiary hospital and one smaller regional hospital). Participants were enrolled from June 2017 through September 2022 and followed up until 12 weeks’ postpartum. Participants comprised 510 individuals (535 pregnancies) diagnosed with gestational diabetes based on World Health Organization 2013 criteria. Interventions Randomized 1:1 to either placebo or metformin (maximum dose, 2500 mg) in addition to usual care. Main Outcomes And Measures The primary outcome was a composite of insulin initiation or a fasting glucose level of 5.1 mmol/L or greater at gestation weeks 32 or 38. Results Among 510 participants (mean age, 34.3 years), 535 pregnancies were randomized. The primary composite outcome was not significantly different between groups and occurred in 150 pregnancies (56.8%) in the metformin group and 167 pregnancies (63.7%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, −6.9% [95% CI, −15.1% to 1.4%]; relative risk, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.02]; P = .13). Of 6 prespecified secondary maternal outcomes, 3 favored the metformin group, including time to insulin initiation, self-reported capillary glycemic control, and gestational weight gain. Secondary neonatal outcomes differed by group, with smaller neonates (lower mean birth weights, a lower proportion weighing >4 kg, a lower proportion in the >90% percentile, and smaller crown-heel length) in the metformin group without differences in neonatal intensive care needs, respiratory distress requiring respiratory support, jaundice requiring phototherapy, major congenital anomalies, neonatal hypoglycemia, or proportion with 5-minute Apgar scores less than 7. Conclusion and relevance Early treatment with metformin was not superior to placebo for the composite primary outcome. Prespecified secondary outcome data support further investigation of metformin in larger clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02980276 ; EudraCT: 2016-001644-19

AbstractIntroductionType 1 diabetes mellitus occurs in one in every 275 pregnancies and can result in increased morbidity and mortality for both mother and baby. Several pregnancy complications can be reduced or prevented by attendance at pre‐pregnancy care (PPC). Despite this, less than 40% of pregnant women with pre‐gestational diabetes receive formal PPC. The aim of this scoping review is to identify the barriers to PPC attendance among women with type 1 diabetes.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review by searching five databases (Ebsco, Embase, Ovid and PubMed for literature and the ProQuest for any grey/unpublished literature) for studies in English between 2000 and 2022. Studies that evaluated attendance at PPC for women with type 1 diabetes were included.ResultsThere are multiple barriers to PPC attendance, and many of these barriers have been unchanged since the 1990s. Identified barriers can be grouped under patient‐centered and clinician‐centered headings. Patient factors include knowledge and awareness, unplanned pregnancies, negative perceptions of healthcare and communication issues, unclear attendance pathways and logistical issues including time off work and childcare. Clinician factors include physician knowledge, time constraints and lack of comfort discussing pregnancy/contraception.ConclusionThis review highlights the ongoing problem of poor attendance at PPC and identifies key barriers to be addressed when developing and implementing PPC programs for women with type 1 diabetes.

Introduction Diabetes mellitus is the most common metabolic complication of pregnancy and its prevalence worldwide is rising. The number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) being conducted in people with diabetes is also increasing. Many studies preferentially publish findings on clinical endpoints and do not report patient-reported outcomes (PROs). In studies that do include PROs, PRO reporting is often of poor quality. Methods We will conduct this systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Using a combination of medical subject headings and keywords (combined using Boolean operators), we will search web-based databases (PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE) for RCTs published in English between 2013 and 2021. Two reviewers will review titles and abstracts. We will review the full texts of any relevant abstracts and extract the following data: date of publication or recruitment period, journal of publication, country of study, multicentre or single centre, population and number of participants, type of intervention, frequency of PRO assessment and type of PRO (or PRO measurement) used. We will also record if the PRO was a primary, secondary or exploratory outcome. We will exclude reviews, observational studies, unpublished data for example, conference abstracts and trial protocols. Any published RCT that includes data on a PRO as a primary or secondary outcome will then be compared against the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials—Patient-Reported Outcome extension checklist, a structured and approved framework for the publication of results of PROs. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval to conduct this study was obtained from the ethics committee at Galway University Hospitals on 24 March 2021 (CA 2592). We aim to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our findings at national and international conferences. Systematic review registration This systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). Registration number CRD42021234917.

BackgroundPregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM) is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Studies assessing interventions to improve maternal and infant outcomes have increased exponentially over recent years. Several outcomes in this field of maternal diabetes are rare, making it difficult to synthesise evidence.ObjectivesTo collect outcomes reported in studies assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM.Search strategyCENTRAL, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until 27 January 2020.Selection criteriaAny randomised controlled trial assessing treatment interventions in pregnant women with PGDM reported in English.Data collection and analysisTwo independent reviewers assessed the suitability of articles and retrieved the data. Outcomes extracted from the literature were broadly categorised into maternal, fetal/infant or other outcomes by the study advisory group.Main resultsSixty‐seven of the 1475 studies identified fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median number of outcomes reported per study was 15 (range 1–46). The majority of studies were from North America and Europe. Insulin and metformin were the most commonly investigated pharmacological interventions. Glucose monitoring was the most assessed technological intervention. In all, 131 unique outcomes were extracted: maternal (n = 69), fetal/infant (n = 61) and other (n = 1).ConclusionsOutcome reporting in treatment interventions trials of pregnant women with PGDM is varied, making it difficult to synthesise evidence, especially for rare outcomes. Systems are needed to standardise outcome reporting in future clinical trials and so facilitate evidence synthesis in this area of maternal diabetes.RegistrationThe systematic review was registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database (Registration number CRD42020173549).Tweetable abstractOutcome reporting is heterogeneous in intervention trials of pregnant women with diabetes existing before pregnancy.

Objective To develop a core outcome set (COS) for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). Design A consensus developmental study. Setting International. Population Two hundred and five stakeholders completed the first round. Methods The study consisted of three components. (1) A systematic review of the literature to produce a list of outcomes reported in RCTs assessing the effectiveness of interventions for the treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. (2) A three‐round, online eDelphi survey to prioritise these outcomes by international stakeholders (including healthcare professionals, researchers and women with PGDM). (3) A consensus meeting where stakeholders from each group decided on the final COS. Main outcome measures All outcomes were extracted from the literature. Results We extracted 131 unique outcomes from 67 records meeting the full inclusion criteria. Of the 205 stakeholders who completed the first round, 174/205 (85%) and 165/174 (95%) completed rounds 2 and 3, respectively. Participants at the subsequent consensus meeting chose 19 outcomes for inclusion into the COS: trimester‐specific haemoglobin A1c, maternal weight gain during pregnancy, severe maternal hypoglycaemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, miscarriage, pregnancy‐induced hypertension, pre‐eclampsia, maternal death, birthweight, large for gestational age, small for gestational age, gestational age at birth, preterm birth, mode of birth, shoulder dystocia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, congenital malformations, stillbirth and neonatal death. Conclusions This COS will enable better comparison between RCTs to produce robust evidence synthesis, improve trial reporting and optimise research efficiency in studies assessing treatment of pregnant women with PGDM. Tweetable abstract 165 key stakeholders have developed #Treatment #CoreOutcomes in pregnant women with #diabetes existing before pregnancy.